Is Tulsi Gabbard for Real?
America Is Ready for a Genuine Peace Candidate
The
lineup of Democrats who have already declared themselves as candidates
for their party’s presidential nomination in 2020 is remarkable, if only
for the fact that so many wannabes have thrown their hats in the ring
so early in the process. In terms of electability, however, one might
well
call the seekers after the highest office in the land the nine
dwarfs. Four of the would-be candidates – Marianne Williamson a writer,
Andrew Yang an entrepreneur, Julian Castro a former Obama official,
Senator Amy Klobuchar and Congressman John Delaney – have no national
profiles at all and few among the Democratic Party rank-and-file would
be able to detail who they are, where they come from and what their
positions on key issues might be.
Senator
Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts has a national following but she also
has considerable baggage. The recent revelation that she falsely described herself
as “American Indian” back in 1986 for purposes of career advancement,
which comes on top of similar reports of more of the same as well as
other resume-enhancements that surfaced when she first became involved
in national politics, prompted Donald Trump to refer to her as
“Pocahontas.” Warren, who is largely progressive on social and domestic
issues, has been confronted numerous times regarding her views on
Israel/Palestine and beyond declaring that she favors a “two state
solution” has been somewhat reticent. She should be described as
pro-Israel for the usual reasons and is not reliably anti-war. She comes
across as a rather more liberal version of Hillary Clinton.
And
then there is New Jersey Senator Cory Booker, being touted as the “new
Obama,” presumably because he is both black and progressive. His record
as Mayor of Newark New Jersey, which launched his career on the national
stage, has both high and low points and it has to be questioned if
America is ready for another smooth-talking black politician whose
actual record of accomplishments is on the thin side. One unfortunately
recalls the devious Obama’s totally bogus Nobel Peace Prize and his
Tuesday morning meetings with John Brennan to work on the list of
Americans who were to be assassinated.
Booker
has carefully cultivated the Jewish community in his political career,
to include a close relationship with the stomach-churning “America’s
Rabbi” Shmuley Boteach, but has recently become more independent of
those ties, supporting the Obama deal with Iran and voting against
anti-Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) legislation in the Senate.
On the negative side, the New York Times likes Booker, which means that
he will turn most other Americans off. He is also 49 years old and
unmarried, which apparently bothers some in the punditry.
California
Senator Kamala Harris is a formidable entrant into the crowded field
due to her resume, nominally progressive on most issues, but with a work
history that has attracted critics concerned by her hard-line
law-and-order enforcement policies when she was District Attorney
General for San Francisco and Attorney General for California. She has
also spoken at AIPAC,
is anti-BDS, and is considered to be reliably pro-Israel, which would
rule her out for some, though she might be appealing to middle of the
road Democrats like the Clintons and Nancy Pelosi who have increasingly
become war advocates. She will have a tough time convincing the antiwar
crowd that she is worth supporting and there are reports that she will
likely split the black women’s vote even though she is black herself,
perhaps linked to her affair with California powerbroker Willie Brown
when she was 29 and Brown was 61. Brown was married, though separated,
to a black woman at the time. Harris is taking heat because she clearly
used the relationship to advance her career while also acquiring several patronage sinecures on state commissions that netted her hundreds of thousands of dollars.
The
most interesting candidate is undoubtedly Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard,
who is a fourth term Congresswoman from Hawaii, where she was born and
raised. She is also the real deal on national security, having
been-there and done-it through service as an officer with the Hawaiian
National Guard on a combat deployment in Iraq. Though in Congress full
time, she still performs her Guard duty.
Tulsi’s own military experience notwithstanding, she gives every indication of being honestly anti-war. In the speech
announcing her candidacy she pledged “focus on the issue of war and
peace” to “end the regime-change wars that have taken far too many lives
and undermined our security by strengthening terrorist groups like
Al-Qaeda.” She referred to the danger posed by blundering into a
possible nuclear war and indicated her dismay over what appears to be a
re-emergence of the Cold War.
Not afraid of challenging establishment politics, she called for
an end to the “illegal war to overthrow the Syrian government,” also
observing that “the war to overthrow Assad is counter-productive because
it actually helps ISIS and other Islamic extremists achieve their goal
of overthrowing the Syrian government of Assad and taking control of all
of Syria – which will simply increase human suffering in the region,
exacerbate the refugee crisis, and pose a greater threat to the world.”
She then backed up her words with action by secretly arranging for a
personal trip to Damascus in 2017 to meet with President Bashar
al-Assad, saying it was important to meet adversaries “if you are
serious about pursuing peace.” She made her own assessment of the
situation in Syria and now favors pulling US troops out of the country
as well as ending American interventions for “regime change” in the
region.
In
2015, Gabbard supported President Barack Obama’s nuclear agreement with
Iran and more recently has criticized President Donald Trump’s
withdrawal from the deal. Last May, she criticized Israel for shooting
“unarmed protesters” in Gaza, but one presumes that, like nearly all
American politicians, she also has to make sure that she does not have
the Israel Lobby on her back. Gabbard has spoken at a conference of
Christians United for Israel, which has defended Israel’s settlement
enterprise; has backed legislation that slashes funding to the
Palestinians; and has cultivated ties with Boteach as well as with major
GOP donor casino magnate Sheldon Adelson. She also attended the
controversial address to Congress by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu in March 2015, which many progressive Democrats boycotted.
Nevertheless,
Tulsi supported Bernie Sanders’ antiwar candidacy in 2016 and appears
to be completely onboard and fearless in promoting her antiwar
sentiments. Yes, Americans have heard much of the same before, but Tulsi
Gabbard could well be the only genuine antiwar candidate that might
truly be electable in the past fifty years.
What
Tulsi Gabbard is accomplishing might be measured by the enemies that
are already gathering and are out to get her. Glenn Greenwald at The Intercept describes how NBC news published a widely distributed story on February 1st,
claiming that “experts who track websites and social media linked to
Russia have seen stirrings of a possible campaign of support for Hawaii
Democrat Tulsi Gabbard.”
But the expert cited by NBC turned out to be a firm New Knowledge, which was exposed by no less than The New York Times
for falsifying Russian troll accounts for the Democratic Party in the
Alabama Senate race to suggest that the Kremlin was interfering in that
election. According to Greenwald, the group ultimately behind this attack on Gabbard is The Alliance for Securing Democracy (ASD), which sponsors a tool called Hamilton 68, a news “intelligence net checker” that claims to track Russian efforts to disseminate disinformation. The ASD website advises that “Securing Democracy is a Global Necessity.”
ASD was set up in 2017 by the usual neocon crowd with funding from The Atlanticist and anti-Russian German Marshall Fund. It is loaded with
a full complement of Zionists and interventionists/globalists, to
include Michael Chertoff, Michael McFaul, Michael Morell, Kori Schake
and Bill Kristol. It claims, innocently, to be a bipartisan
transatlantic national security advocacy group that seeks to identify
and counter efforts by Russia to undermine democracies in the United
States and Europe but it is actually itself a major source of
disinformation.
For
the moment, Tulsi Gabbard seems to be the “real thing,” a genuine
anti-war candidate who is determined to run on that platform. It might
just resonate with the majority of American who have grown tired of
perpetual warfare to “spread democracy” and other related frauds
perpetrated by the band of oligarchs and traitors that run the United
States. We the people can always hope.
(Republished from Strategic Culture Foundation by permission of author or representative)
No comments:
Post a Comment