Forget Jussie Smollet, Here Are the Real False Flags
Kevin Barrett • February 24, 2019 • from The Unz Review
The
world slipped closer to nuclear war. Big false flags—actual, suspected,
and anticipated—were a key factor. But hardly anybody noticed. Everyone
was riveted by the story of actor Jussie Smollet, who supposedly paid a
couple of Nigerian-American bodybuilders for a staged racist-homophobic
near-lynching. The ostensible motive: Add a zero to Smollet’s pathetic
little million-a-year salary.
The Jussie Smollet hoax was story number 29 of the 31 we covered on this week’s False Flag Weekly News.
In a
world filled with false flags, this one just wasn’t all that important.
Conspiracy theories that Obama was somehow involved are not supported by
logic and evidence. If you really need a conspiracy theory (beyond
Smollet conspiring with Nigerians) try this: The whole thing was staged
to distract us, to get us talking about stupid celebrities and divisive,
emotionally-galvanizing issues unrelated to the real dirty business
conducted by our psychopathic rulers.
The week’s biggest suspected false flag was the bombing in Pulwama, Kashmir. This one may start a nuclear war. Over 40 Indian soldiers were killed in an attack attributed to an angry young Kashmiri suicide bomber supposedly backed by Pakistani intelligence.
More likely it was an Indo-Zionist false flag designed to demonize
Pakistan and rally Indians behind Pakistan-hating Modi, who is about to
launch his re-election campaign.
The
first clue is the timing: Pakistan has nothing to gain by heightening
tensions now. Recently elected pro-9/11-truth Prime Minister Imran Khan
is desperately seeking money to revitalize his country’s crumbling
economy. The Pulwama attack is terrible PR for Pakistan as it proffers
its global begging bowl. But it’s perfect PR for Modi’s campaign launch.
And as Sabtain Ahmed Dar
writes: “Modi’s framing of Pakistan as a terrorist state on the visit
of Saudi crown prince Muhammad Bin Salman cunningly and subliminally
(seeks) an advantage in its foreign policy with Iran by checkmating and
framing both the Saudis and Pakistanis at the same time.”
Another
sign of a likely false flag is a bigger bang and more casualties than
would be expected, giving the event a huge media footprint. The alleged
Pulwama attacker supposedly managed to kill more than forty occupation
soldiers. While not impossible, such hugely successful operations often
owe their success to inside help. Classic examples include:
- The 1995 Oklahoma City bombing, which Brigade Gen. Ben Partin proved (and all kinds of evidence including news footage shows) was far too destructive to be attributed to a fertilizer truck bomb.
- 9/11, in which relatively minor office fires, kindled by what amounts to a negligible amount of kerosene, supposedly caused three high rises and all other WTC-prefixed buildings to blow themselves to kingdom come.
- The 2002 Bali bombing, attributed to a patsy’s car bomb, which left a crater (among other evidence) more consistent with the detonation of a mini-nuke.
- The 7/7/2005 London bombings, foretold by Mossad, obviously caused by military explosives planted beneath the floors of the trains and busses, admitted to be part of a “drill” by the drill’s organizer, but absurdly attributed to homemade drugstore explosives in backpacks.
In
analyzing suspected false flags, the first rule of thumb is: If the
event is big and bloody enough to make a huge media splash, whoever
gains from that splash is the likely perpetrator. It takes skill and
resources to create big, bloody attacks. Nobody will invest the
necessary resources in planning and carrying out such an event unless
they anticipate big gains.[1]
Another major suspected false flag this week was the “desecration of Jewish graves”
near Strasbourg, France. Like Jussie Smollet fake attack, this one
reinforced mainstream politically correct narratives about the supposed
persecution of minorities. But unlike the Smollet affair, this one had
huge political implications: It seemed perfectly timed to save Macron by
demonizing the Yellow Vest uprising as “anti-Semitic.” In an orchestrated response reminiscent of the “spontaneous” Charlie Hebdo marches, “Thousands Marched Against Anti-Semitism in France.” Apparently everyone has forgotten the long history of fake anti-Semitic incidents,
may of them as ludicrously amateur as Jussie Smollet’s. The difference
is that the media will never let us forget that Smollet’s attack was
fake—while it will never let us remember that the “anti-Semitic” ones
were.
Sometimes
the most important false flags are the ones looming on the horizon.
This week there were two: An imminent one targeting Venezuela, and a
bigger, nastier, further-off one targeting Iran.
The
supposed Western aid convoy seeking to enter Venezuela from Columbia was
obviously a set-up for false flags designed to trigger an escalation of
Trump’s war on Maduro’s democratically-elected,
constitutionally-legitimate government. Not long after Russia warned that it was coming,
the predicable “Maduro attack on the aid convoy” broke out. As in
Ukraine, Syria, and other targets of US-Israeli destabilization,
mysterious masked gunmen fired at both sides, igniting bloodshed that
could be blamed on the targeted government. After an aid truck was
burned by mysterious arsonists , the Venezuelan government fingered “false flag expert” Pompeo’s “agents.”
After
they are done with Venezuela, Trump’s neocon wrecking crew may head for
Iran. Last week, Mnuchin’s Zionist-run Treasury Department sanctioned
the biggest US-Iran friendship organization, the New Horizon NGO, which
has brought hundreds of Western authors, scholars, activists, and media
personalities to conferences in Tehran and Mashhad. The transparently
bogus excuse for shutting down New Horizon was a minor spy scandal that hand nothing to do with the New Horizon organization.
Yesterday Veterans Today Senior Editor Gordon Duff suggested that
recent anti-Iran moves are greasing the skids for another disastrous war
of aggression for the benefit of Israel. In his article Trump, Kushner Bolton Weighing False Flag Scenarios for April-May War with Iran
Duff cites insider sources warning of “a dirty bombing in the US or a
massive explosion, to be blamed on a mine in the Straits of Hormuz, that
cripples one of America’s defective aircraft carriers.”
If
the US invades Venezuela, and especially if it attacks Iran, a global
war involving Russia and perhaps China is a real possibility. Trump’s
shredding the INF treaty, which will put US and Russian forces on hair
trigger alerts with very little time to respond to attack warnings, make
such apocalyptic scenarios even more likely. Those of us who promote
false flag awareness should remember that war-trigger deceptions like
the destruction of the Maine, the Lusitania, and the Pearl Harbor
fleet—not to mention the World Trade Center—are far more important than
pathetic little scams by the likes of Jussie Smollet.
Notes
[1] As Robert Pape explains in Dying to Win,
indigenous forces resisting occupations—as in Kashmir, Palestine,
Afghanistan, and elsewhere—often do target occupying forces in suicide
terror attacks. These are strategic military acts designed to raise the
cost of occupation and eventually convince the occupier to cut his
losses and go home. Such “real” (non-false-flag) attacks are usually of
modest scale and are designed to “bleed” the occupier, not inflame the
occupier’s citizens into demanding an intensified occupation. This
strategic use of “terrorism” is exemplified by the death of a thousand
cuts the US is suffering in Afghanistan.
No comments:
Post a Comment