Monday, February 11, 2019
1565-1568: For All The State Jural Assemblies - 26 The National Jurisdiction: Soil from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
In our discussion of the American
Government that we are heir to, we identified three "unions" of various
kinds of "states" that existed long prior to the creation of the Federal
Government.
They were and are:
The United States -- a union of soil
jurisdiction "landed (e)states" formed by the former colonies via
Unanimous Declaration issued July 1, 1776, published July 4, 1776. This
is our "national jurisdiction". Each state has defined geographical
boundaries.
The United States of America - a
federation of Land Jurisdiction States formed September 9, 1776 for the
purpose of joint operations in international jurisdiction, including the
international land and sea jurisdictions. This is our international
jurisdiction. Each State has defined geographical boundaries.
The States of America -- a
confederation of inchoate "States of States" formed under The Articles
of Confederation, March 1, 1781, for the purpose of conducting the
business of the States in global commercial jurisdiction. These
"Federal States of States" have no defined geographical boundaries and
exist only on paper. (These are the "Missing" Federal States of
States.)
Please note --- all this is our
American Government, which existed prior to and which created the
Federal Government as an "instrumentality" to provide services to the
States and People of this country.
Let's look briefly at our "national jurisdiction" --- the soil jurisdiction of each state in The United States.
Imagine the familiar outline of your State of the Union. Got it?
Now pretend you are slicing it like a
layer cake horizontally, taking the top six inches of the soil off. It
has the same outline and shape, but not much depth.
This is your state's national soil jurisdiction.
We call all the rest underneath the
soil "the land". The land is also shaped exactly like the outline of
your State of the Union, but it is a much thicker layer, miles deep, and
it forms your State's international land jurisdiction.
Together we call this "the land and
soil" of your State of the Union. The two jurisdictions -- the national
soil jurisdiction state and the international Land Jurisdiction State
-- are both geographically defined and both work together hand in glove.
So, what does the "national" soil jurisdiction of your State do and how does it operate?
The first thing it does is guarantee local control.
This is the level of the "state republics" and "republican states" guaranteed by the constitutional contracts.
The soil level states are seldom
referenced in print, but when they are, they appear in all small
letters: maine, virginia, florida, etc. These are the member states of
The United States.
When we are born we all enter the
world via the soil jurisdiction of our state, and are in the political
status of a "man of the soil" known as "jus soli" or a "state
national".
This determines our basic
nationality. We are, for example, "virginians" and because we are
"virginians" we are also considered "Virginians". This in turn
identifies us as "Americans" for international purposes.
When we are born, we are not "citizens" of anything.
Being a "citizen" implies an
obligation to serve a government. It is patently ridiculous to claim
that a newborn baby has an obligation to serve any government,
nonetheless, certain disreputable governmental services corporations
have made exactly such claims against babies born in America for several
generations. This is part of what we need to address.
It is the "jus soli" status of the
baby that leads to the political status at the State level of State
National. Neither one have any obligation to serve any government at
all; they are required to obey the Public Law and keep the peace and
other than that, they are free as birds.
The basic dictum of the national soil jurisdiction is, "Harm none and be harmed none."
Likewise, the republic states and
their state republics are seldom referenced in print and even more
seldom are they officially populated and used to conduct business ---
but they can be. This results in a quorum of state nationals opting to
act as state citizens, and invoking the national soil jurisdiction of
their State of the Union to conduct national-level business.
For these purposes, Texas is a nation. Pennsylvania is a nation.
The soil jurisdiction also includes
surface water, so each state republic also has a republic of state
attached to it, and for business purposes, you have "The Texas
Republic" operating the soil jurisdiction of Texas and "The Republic of
Texas" operating the surface water jurisdiction of Texas.
All of these entities are unincorporated and operate as unincorporated businesses.
They are owned and operated by the people who are native to Texas and those who have been "naturalized".
Naturalization at the State level is
a process of having a home inside the borders of the State for at least
a year and a day, without committing any felonies or taking public
assistance, and firmly declaring on the public record your desire and
intention (after meeting the basic requirements) to make that State your
permanent home.
In the old days this was done by
taking out three small ads in the local papers over a period of 90 days,
and there is still no obstruction to doing this now. In this way, a
guy from Florida can adopt Texas as his home, for example, or a "U.S.
Citizen" born in Croatia or Washington, DC, can become a Minnesotan.
Obviously, the soil is like the skin
on a body. By owning and controlling the skin, the local people retain
the vast majority of the power of government if they act in their
proper capacity and organize to do so. Everyone is standing on the
soil, so the power of arrest basically belongs to the soil jurisdiction
and the republican state authorities and their county/County Sheriffs.
However, operating the Soil and Land jurisdictions of our States of the Union requires us to forswear and expatriate from any other citizenship, including any federal citizenship.
Most Americans do not realize that
they have been kidnapped on paper into a foreign jurisdiction and
misidentified as either "United States Citizens" or "Citizens of the
United States" or "US CITIZENS" almost from birth, a circumstance that
keeps us from actually owning land and controlling our own assets.
In fact, most States of the Union
became severely de-populated prior to this current effort, simply
because people didn't realize that they were the victims of
unconscionable contracting activities by their own employees.
Coming home to the "land and soil"
of your State means that you are eligible to inherit all that you have
been deprived of, that you come under the Public Law, instead of any
private "Statutory Law", that you can exercise local control of your
land and surface water resources, and that you can operate your
"republican states" ---that is, the national soil jurisdiction of your
State of the Union, again.
So long as you see the advantage of
doing so and educate yourselves and declare your birthright political
status--- and work with others of like-mind to restore the "land and
soil" jurisdiction government owed to this country--- there isn't a
power on Earth than can stop you from inheriting and controlling what is
rightfully yours.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
By Their Works
By Anna Von Reitz
I have always preferred to think of
myself as a "Christian", a member of the Universal Church, and have
always regarded doctrinal and denominational differences as big question
marks.
There may indeed be only one correct
doctrine in the end, but just as easily there might be no correct
doctrine ever created by man. The same goes for denominations. So far
as I know, God did not come down to Earth and declare a schism between
Catholics and Methodists and Baptists and Mennonites and Baptists
and.... men and their differing opinions did all that.
Judging from the number of times the
Disciples had to be directly corrected, and even with the help of the
Holy Spirit ---accounting for our egos, bad hearing, temptations, and
other faults--- I don't put my faith in doctrines promulgated by men.
This is why I have an inclusive and
broad view of religion. So long as people are trying to live honorable
and peaceful lives, taking care of each other and their families and
communities, I tend to call that "good". Live and let live.
We will all get our corrections when the time comes.
But when "Christians" harbor organized crime within their Church and benefit from it....
When they act as Trustees in Gross Breach of Trust with respect to entire countries and billions of people suffer....
When they take crimes and sins like pedophilia and make them into sacraments....
When there is no end to this relativism and wishy-washy spineless lack of basic ethics and honesty....
When they twist any reasonable plausible recognizable definition of "Christianity" into something else....
Then I protest -- because they are
not just giving themselves a bad name, they are disgracing all those who
answer to the name "Christian".
And they are disgracing Christ.
If a Christian will not stand up for the memory of Yeshuah and his Teaching and his Living Spirit, who will?
I have been polite. I have been patient. I have been supportive of Church reform all across the board.
I have often stood in the gap and
defended people who are trying to do the right thing though their sins
be as scarlet and also defended the millions of completely innocent
Christians who are being disgraced and misrepresented.
Yes, I have called forth the Loyal
Angels of the Living God and I am not ever going to be wishy-washy
about that. Nor will I apologize.
Being a Christian is not a "relative
thing" subject to "interpretation" via some kind of "fluid definition"
that suddenly includes cannibalism and the rape of little children. No.
That's not "Christianity" you feckless, shameless Liars.
That's Satanism, and by your works you shall be known.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
For All The State Jural Assemblies - 25 State Electors, State Nationals, and State Citizens
By Anna Von Reitz
Okay, let's try it again:
State Nationals = everyone born
within the physical geographical borders of a State. A National has no
particular duty to serve the State other than to obey the Public Law
(Non-Statutory Law) and keep the peace.
State Citizens = those State
Nationals who additionally choose to serve the State Government in some
capacity, such as Jurors, Militia Members, elected officials, or hired
officers.
State Electors = those State
Nationals who own land in the State and meet other requirements such as
legal age, etc., to participate in State Elections.
You can be either: (1) a State National or (2) a State Citizen.
Being a State National or a State
Citizen does not necessarily mean that you qualify to be a State
Elector. You can be part of the State Jural Assembly and serve as a
Juror without being a State Elector. You can be elected to a Public
Office, such as Sheriff, without being able to vote for yourself.
This is because of the pesky issue
of letting non-landowners vote on questions that only affect landowners,
and therefore the requirement that State Electors be landowners.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
Answers to Common Questions and Misconceptions for the Jural Assemblies
By Anna Von Reitz
1. Misconception Number One: that colored people and women are not welcome to join State Jural Assemblies.
This idea derives from the fact that
to be on safe ground legally and lawfully, the State Jural Assemblies
need to go back and pick up where at least some of them left off -- in
1860. They need to re-establish a Quorum of Jurors qualified by 1860
standards, and that Quorum then needs to update the membership rules to
officially include people of color and women.
Please note that in the days of
slavery there were both white and colored slaves in this country, and
"indentured servants" too --- none of whom could act as State Electors.
The real qualifier was land
ownership and neither slaves nor indentured servants could own land,
hence, could not act as Electors.
However, both black men and Native
men who were Free and who owned land in a State, could act as State
Jural Assembly Members and still can.
The important idea behind all this
was that nobody not tied to the State by commitment to the Land of that
State should have a voice in the affairs of that State.
If you think about this, it is a
reasonable requirement: otherwise, people passing through the State
could cast votes with no skin in the game. They could, with a large
enough population of transients (known as "residents"), dictate to and
obligate those people who are actually committed to living in and
building their businesses in that State.
We see some attempt at this with the
current Border Crisis, where people foreign to the State and with no
actual material commitment to say, California, are influencing public
policy and helping themselves to public assistance and dictating
elections --- all with no substantial actual and material commitment to
California.
This is why our States all require
Electors to hold only one citizenship --- State Citizenship. They also
require State Citizens to be landowners. Color requirements as such,
don't actually exist in the American States and never did, except in
limited portions of the Deep South.
The more potent issue in 1860 and today is the capacity in which we are acting.
The affect of having the Territorial
Congress arbitrarily "confer" citizenships on people and then claiming
that they are acting as "persons" via a process of undisclosed
enfranchisement, has established a situation in which average Americans
are now almost uniformly "presumed" to be in the condition of either
indentured servitude to the Queen, or slaves owned by the Municipal
United States Government, or both.
It isn't until we take action to
Expatriate from any such presumed federal citizenship that we can
actually own land in fact, and therefore qualify as State Citizens and
as State Electors.
The question of the landownership
requirement continues to be contentious. It has been argued in some
States that our bodies are made of "dust" and "to dust returneth", and
therefore all men and women are "landowners". This may serve the
esoteric point, but doesn't answer the actual dilemma posed by
non-landowners voting on issues that don't impact them, but which do
impose increased tax burdens on landowners.
Women in Europe and America were
able to own land and had been able to own land for centuries prior to
1860, so landownership was not the crux of the matter for women. It was
more the prevailing idea that women were gentle and needed at home,
ill-suited to the hurly-burly of politics and demands of public office,
that kept them from being included in Jural Assemblies.
Now that two World Wars and the
Civil War itself have convinced us otherwise, women have claimed (and
earned) equal rights, and merely updating the old State Jural Assembly
rules suffices.
It's a small burden to find 30
free men above the age of 21 who are claiming their birthright political
status and who are land owners, to hold the first quorum meeting for
each State Jural Assembly, but it is one that assures that the further
actions of the Assemblies going forward are properly sanctioned and
brought up to date.
And in no case does any of this
prevent anyone at any time from: (1) expatriating from federal
citizenship status, (2) participating in the State Jural Assembly
organizational activities and meetings, (3) making sure that their
Assembly is fully staffed, fully informed, and on firm ground going
forward.
2. Misconception Number 2: that
people have to give up things like Social Security payments or medical
coverage owed to them by Federal Government agencies, if they reclaim
their birthright political status.
Most Americans never knowingly left
their birthright political status. This was merely a self-interested
legal presumption being misapplied to millions of people based on
equally self-interested falsification of registration documents and
improper demands that we "apply" for Social Security, "register" to vote
in what appeared to be public elections, and so on.
Having to take action to rebut this
legal presumption is anti-intuitive to most people and the resulting
confusion is paralyzing, especially when they assume that they will lose
pension dividends and health care and other things of value that they
are owed.
Fortunately, the only thing we lose
is the ability to vote in private elections hosted by foreign
corporations, which is quickly made up for, as we hold our own public
elections, instead.
Once we return our Given Names (also
known as Trade Names) to the land and soil jurisdiction of our States
of the Union, we are no longer in La-La-Land, and we can no longer be
"presumed" to be in the Queen's service or the Pope's.
All the franchises they have
"gifted" us with are similarly under new ownership--- American
ownership, not "U.S. Citizen" ownership.
The only impact this has is that
both the Queen and the Pope and all their employees are now obligated to
obey the Constitutions and the Public Law of this country again, with
respect to you and your assets.
The magic words are: "I accept all gifts and waive all benefits."
"Benefits" are gifts that come with
strings attached-- unseen, unstipulated, undisclosed contracts and
conditions that you are "presumed" to know and accept when you accept
"benefits".
Thus, when they mischaracterize
Social Security Earned Dividends that you and your employers paid for as
"benefits" they are claiming that you are acting in the capacity of a
"U.S. Citizen" or "Citizen of the United States" --- and moreover, that
you are a Federal Citizen in receipt of welfare.
Now, there are many people receiving
"benefits" from the Social Security Administration as public assistance
that they never earned. Some never contributed a dime and are receiving
thousands of dollars in medical care and support payments every
month.
Those of us who unknowingly signed
up for Social Security and vested in this program meant for Federal
Employees are not in receipt of "benefits". Anything we get back is an
"earned dividend". The import difference is that "benefits" can be
discontinued at whim, whereas "earned dividends" owed to former
employees have to be paid.
The situation is analogous to going
to work for a foreign corporation in a foreign country. While you are
in that foreign country, you obey its laws. You also obey the internal
"laws" of the corporation you work for.
When you quit or retire and return home -- what happens?
You are no longer living under the
laws of that foreign country, and are back living under the laws of your
own country. That's for starters.
The corporation you worked for still owes you every bit of your pension plan.
That includes medical services (not benefits) and monthly dividend payments (not benefits).
It's the same way with Social
Security and Medicare. They still owe you every jot, and they owe it to
you as "earned dividends and services", not as "benefits".
Similarly, the franchises and
ACCOUNTS held in YOUR NAME and created "for" you have been
mischaracterized as belonging to "U.S. Citizens" and/or "Citizens of the
United States".
These franchises and ACCOUNTS are
toxic to you until you return home to the land and soil of your State of
the Union via expatriation from any Federal Citizenship, and claim
ownership of them as an American State National or American State
Citizen.
It's the difference between "benefits" and "earned dividends" again.
As a "U.S. Citizen" or "Citizen of
the United States" you are obligated to pay all the bills related to
these franchises and ACCOUNTS created in YOUR NAME, but as an American
State National or an American State Citizen, you are the inheritor of
the assets and credits owed to these accounts.
Suffice it to say that as long as
you cling to your identity as a "U.S. Citizen" or "Citizen of the United
States", you are a Pauper by definition, obligated to function under
foreign law, obligated to obey foreign corporation policies, obligated
to pay for every whim of the British Territorial Congress--- but when
you reclaim your birthright political status, you are owed the return of
everything that is rightfully yours.
Your Trustees, the British Monarch
and the Pope, have to act as your Trustees again ---and return your
"borrowed" property, plus interest, leases, fees, etc.
So, you lose absolutely nothing of
any importance when you return to your birthright political status, and
you regain all that was stolen and commandeered, including your
Constitutional guarantees.
As you will be conducting your own
elections and dealing with your own issues and taking control of your
own purse strings, you will not need to overly concern yourself with the
circus in Washington, DC, and you will have no reason or desire to
participate in their political parties.
The world will come back into focus
and the tail will stop wagging the dog once enough people understand the
circumstance and take the necessary action -- (1) reclaim your
birthright political status; (2) join your State Jural Assembly and boot
it up.
----------------------------
See this article and over 1500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal button on this website.
No comments:
Post a Comment