The Empire Keeps Proving Julian Assange Right About Everything from The Anti Media
(CJ Opinion) — WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has been charged under seal by
the Trump administration. This has been revealed by a purportedly
accidental copy-paste error in an unrelated court document which used
Assange’s name, interestingly not long after it was reported
to the Wall
Street Journal that federal prosecutors “have considered publicly indicting Mr. Assange to try to trigger his removal from the embassy because a detailed explanation of the evidence could give Ecuadorean authorities reason to turn Assange over.”
Street Journal that federal prosecutors “have considered publicly indicting Mr. Assange to try to trigger his removal from the embassy because a detailed explanation of the evidence could give Ecuadorean authorities reason to turn Assange over.”
Insider sources have reportedly confirmed to the Washington Post that
Assange has been charged. Because those charges are sealed, it’s
impossible to know what they are or how they’re being justified. If you
ask #Resistance Twitter, it’s because it’s #MuellerTime and Assange is
about to be arrested under some mysterious charges involving WikiLeaks’
publication of non-government, non-classified emails in 2016. If you ask
QAnon cultists, it’s because Donald Trump is planning to extradite
Assange so as to rescue him and deal a fatal blow to the Deep State. If
you ask people who actually know what they’re talking about, however,
it’s most likely for WikiLeaks’ Afghanistan and Iraq war logs and/or
last year’s CIA leak publications, and most likely using the Espionage
Act. This would constitute a deadly blow to press freedoms, and arguably a greater leap in the direction of Orwellian dystopia than the Patriot Act.
It also proves once again that Julian Assange was completely right.
I’ve had so, so many arguments with people this year about Assange’s publicly stated rationale for remaining in the Ecuadorian embassy, where he was granted political asylum by Ecuador’s previous government on the basis that the US was seeking his extradition. The refrain that he can “leave whenever he wants” is extremely common,
with Assange’s detractors insisting that he’d never be arrested and
extradited to the United States, and that he is instead hiding from (non-existent)
Swedish rape charges. The narrative that Assange couldn’t possibly be
hiding from the same government which tortured Chelsea Manning has been
aggressively promulgated by mainstream outlets like the The Guardian, as in this article by
James Ball from earlier this year titled “The only barrier to Julian
Assange leaving Ecuador’s embassy is pride”, claiming that “The
WikiLeaks founder is unlikely to face prosecution in the US.”
Ball’s article includes the following galaxy-brained excerpts:
“Visitors, like fish, stink in three days.”“There is no public criminal case against Assange or WikiLeaks in the US, though Assange frequently says there is evidence of sealed indictments against him and his associates, and there have been publicly disclosed surveillance warrants against WikiLeaks staff, as well as FBI interest in Assange and his current and former co-workers (including me, as I worked with WikiLeaks for a few months in 2010 and 2011). There is no real reason to believe anything has changed with Assange’s situation in the US.”“The problem for both sides is that neither wants to lose face: Assange wants to be a symbol of resistance against an overreaching US state, and does not want to admit his asylum was about his personal actions and not those of WikiLeaks. Ecuador does not want to suggest it made a mistake in granting Assange asylum.”
Ball was at best
completely wrong, and at worst knowingly lying about the very real
possibility of secret US charges. We know that the charges are from the
US government, so they’ve got nothing to do with any rape or bail
violation allegations. But the narrative that Assange is a stinky,
stinky weirdo hiding in a cupboard has been so aggressively promulgated
by imperial propagandists like Ball it’s (for me at least) literally
impossible to talk about Assange’s plight on social media without some
stranger coming up and spewing it all over the conversation.
And it’s no mystery
why that is. The alternative to making Assange the creepy rapist hiding
from justice would be to acknowledge the possibility of what we now
know for certain: that a vast, sprawling superpower, with so many
extremely tight alliances that it is effectively the center of a
globe-spanning empire, is working to extradite an Australian journalist
from an Ecuadorian embassy in the United Kingdom so that it can punish
him for publishing facts. Much, much easier to have him be the stinky
cupboard man than the center of an assault on speech with implications
stretching to all future generations and every corner of the globe.
Julian Assange founded
an innovative leak outlet on the premise that corrupt power can be
fought with truth and transparency. Corrupt power responded by
silencing, persecuting and smearing him. In so doing they succeeded in
slowing down the leaks, minimizing the impact of publications, and
nullifying Assange’s ability to defend himself, and in exchange they
have publicly proved that his thesis was, and is, absolutely correct.
There is a power establishment which uses lies and secrecy to manipulate
and deceive us, and it hates having the light of truth shone upon it
more than anything. We know that for certain now. There is no doubt
whatsoever.
Julian Assange was never
hiding from justice. Julian Assange is, and always has been, hiding
from injustice. He has been proven right about his reasons for seeking
political asylum from Ecuador, as he has been proven right about so very
much before.
This article was chosen for
republication based on the interest of our readers. Anti-Media
republishes stories from a number of other independent news sources. The
views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not reflect
Anti-Media editorial policy.
Since you’re here… …We have a small favor to ask. Fewer and fewer people are seeing Anti-Media articles as social media sites crack down on us, and advertising revenues across the board are quickly declining. However, unlike many news organizations, we haven’t put up a paywall because we value open and accessible journalism over profit — but at this point, we’re barely even breaking even. Hopefully, you can see why we need to ask for your help. Anti-Media’s independent journalism and analysis takes substantial time, resources, and effort to produce, but we do it because we believe in our message and hope you do, too.
If everyone who reads our reporting and finds value in it helps fund it, our future can be much more secure. For as little as $1 and a minute of your time, you can support Anti-Media. Thank you. Click here to support us
No comments:
Post a Comment