Here I am printing the abstract of a new study: "Aluminium in
brain tissue in autism." The publication is Journal of Trace Elements
in Medicine and Biology.
The authors of the study are associated with The Birchall
Centre, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK;
Life Sciences, Keele University; Department of Clinical Neuropathology,
Kings College Hospital, London, UK; and the
Department of Clinical Neuropathology, Kings College Hospital, London,
UK.
The findings? Shockingly high levels of aluminum were found
in these brain samples. It's widely acknowledged that aluminum can enter
the brain and disrupt its functions.
Of course, aluminum is present in many vaccines.
Here is the abstract of the study. I've put several statements in caps for emphasis:
"Autism spectrum disorder is a neurodevelopmental disorder of
unknown aetiology. It is suggested to involve both genetic
susceptibility and environmental factors including in the latter
environmental toxins. Human exposure to the environmental toxin
aluminium has been linked, if tentatively, to autism spectrum disorder.
Herein we have used transversely heated graphite furnace atomic
absorption spectrometry to measure, for the first time, the aluminium
content of brain tissue from donors with a diagnosis
of autism. We have also used an aluminium-selective fluor to identify
aluminium in brain tissue using fluorescence microscopy. THE ALUMINIUM
CONTENT OF BRAIN TISSUE IN AUTISM WAS CONSISTENTLY HIGH. The mean
(standard deviation) aluminium content across all
5 individuals for each lobe were 3.82(5.42), 2.30(2.00), 2.79(4.05) and
3.82(5.17) μg/g dry wt. for the occipital, frontal, temporal and
parietal lobes respectively. THESE ARE SOME OF THE HIGHEST VALUES FOR
ALUMINIUM IN HUMAN BRAIN TISSUE YET RECORDED AND
ONE HAS TO QUESTION WHY, FOR EXAMPLE, THE ALUMINIUM CONTENT OF THE
OCCIPITAL LOBE OF A 15 YEAR OLD BOY WOULD BE 8.74 (11.59) μg/g dry wt.?
Aluminium-selective fluorescence microscopy was used to identify
aluminium in brain tissue in 10 donors [10 donors or
5, as mentioned above?]. While aluminium was imaged associated with
neurones it appeared to be present intracellularly in microglia-like
cells and other inflammatory non-neuronal cells in the meninges,
vasculature, grey and white matter. The pre-eminence of
intracellular aluminium associated with non-neuronal cells was a
standout observation in autism brain tissue and may offer clues as to
both the origin of the brain aluminium as well as a putative role in
autism spectrum disorder."
The study authors mention "clues." What about the many aluminum-containing childhood vaccines now on official schedules?
Worldmercuryproject.org writes:
"What does this mean for today's generation of children who
receive 5,000 mcg of aluminum in vaccines by the age of 18 months and up
to 5,250 additional mcg if all recommended boosters, HPV and meningitis
vaccines are administered."
This might well constitute a "clue," pointing to where at
least some of that highly toxic aluminum in autistic brains comes from.
As "the experts" deny this vaccine-aluminum-autism
connection, I would suggest they back up their "science" by stepping
forward themselves and taking ALL the vaccines on the official schedule,
including boosters, in order to catch up with their shots.
They should do this in the limited time recommended by public health
agencies.
After all, if aluminum (and other toxic substances) in vaccines aren't a problem, what do they have to lose?
They're desperate to mandate the full load of vaccines for every man, woman, and child---so they should start with themselves.
Otherwise, they have no standing to make claims.
Neither do "science bloggers" who embrace every official
mainstream study as if it were manna from heaven. To them, I offer the
following quotes from two famous medical-journal editors, who have pored
over more studies than these bloggers have dreamed
of.
Marcia Angell, former editor of The New England Journal of
Medicine, in the NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, "Drug Companies
& Doctors: A Story of Corruption":
"It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the
clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of
trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no
pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly
over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of
Medicine."
Here is Richard Horton (another pro's pro), editor-in-chief,
The Lancet, in The Lancet, 11 April, 2015, Vol 385, "Offline: What is
medicine's 5 sigma?":
"The case against science is straightforward: much of the
scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by
studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory
analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together
with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious
importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness...
"The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is
alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too
often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they
retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors
deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst
behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy
competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of
'significance' pollutes the literature with many a statistical
fairy-tale...Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a
perpetual struggle for money and talent..."
I want to see more on the new study showing shocking levels
of aluminum in autistic people. I want to see funding provided to other
researchers---INDEPENDENT RESEARCHERS with no ties to drug companies or
government agencies---so they can follow up
on the new study and come to their own conclusions.
And I want to see common sense applied to aluminum toxicity.
As in: why would anyone want to inject children with a known neurotoxin?
Would you be willing to spin the roulette wheel on YOUR child's life and future and brain?
Well, would you?
No comments:
Post a Comment