by Jon Rappoport
Occasionally, I reprint this article. I wrote it some years
ago, during research on toxic chemicals pervading the landscape. I used
to send the piece to mainstream reporters, but I eventually gave that up
as a bad bet.
They're dedicated to fake news...and now they're losing
control over public consciousness. Losing badly. Independent media are
in the ascendance, and rightly so.
In 1997, Joel Griffiths and Chris Bryson, two respected
mainstream journalists, peered into an abyss. They found a story about
fluorides that was so chilling it had to be told.
The Christian Science Monitor, who had assigned the story, never published it.
Their ensuing article, "Fluoride, Teeth, and the Atomic
Bomb," has been posted on websites, sometimes with distortions,
deletions, or additions. I spoke with Griffiths, and he told me to be
careful I was reading a correct copy of his piece. (You can find
it---"Fluoride, Teeth, and the Atomic Bomb," at fluoridealert.org.)
Griffiths also told me that researchers who study the effects of
fluorides by homing in on communities with fluoridated drinking water,
versus communities with unfluoridated water, miss a major point:
studying the water is not enough; toxic fluorides are everywhere---they
are used throughout the pharmaceutical industry in the manufacture of
drugs, and also in many other industries (e.g., aluminum, pesticide).
I want to go over some of the major points of the Griffiths-Bryson article.
Griffiths discovered hundreds of documents from the World War 2 era.
These included papers from the Manhattan Project, launched to build the
first A-bomb.
Griffiths/Bryson write: "Fluoride was the key chemical in atomic bomb
production...millions of tons...were essential for the manufacture of
bomb-grade uranium and plutonium for nuclear weapons throughout the Cold
War."
The documents reveal that fluoride was the most significant health
hazard in the US A-bomb program, for workers and for communities around
the manufacturing facilities.
Griffiths/Bryson: "Much of the original proof that fluoride is safe for
humans in low doses was generated by A-bomb program scientists, who had
been secretly ordered to provide 'evidence useful in litigation'
[against persons who had been poisoned by fluoride and would sue for
damages]... The first lawsuits against the US A-bomb program were not
over radiation, but over fluoride damage, the [government] documents
show."
A-bomb scientists were told they had to do studies which would conclude that fluorides were safe.
The most wide-reaching study done was carried out in Newburgh, New York,
between 1945 and 1956. This was a secret op called "Program F." The
researchers obtained blood and tissue samples from people who lived in
Newburgh, through the good offices of the NY State Health Department.
Griffiths/Bryson found the original and secret version of this study.
Comparing it to a different sanitized version, the reporters saw that
evidence of adverse effects from fluorides had been suppressed by the US
Atomic Energy Commission.
Other studies during the same period were conducted at the University of
Rochester. Unwitting hospital patients were given fluorides to test out
the results.
Flash forward. Enter Dr. Phyllis Mullenix, the head of toxicology at
Forsyth Dental Center in Boston. In the 1990s, Mullenix did a series of
animal studies which showed that, as Griffiths/Bryson write:
"...fluoride was a powerful central nervous system (CNS) toxin..."
Mullenix applied for further grant monies from the National Institutes
of Health. She was turned down. She was also told that fluorides do not
have an effect on the CNS.
But Griffiths/Bryson uncovered a 1944 Manhattan Project memo which
states: "Clinical evidence suggests that uranium hexafluoride may have a
rather marked central nervous system effect...it seems most likely that
the F [fluoride] component rather than the [uranium] is the causative
factor."
The 1944 memo was sent to the head of the Manhattan Project Medical
Section, Colonel Stafford Warren. Warren was asked to give his okay to
do animal studies on fluorides' effects on the CNS. He immediately did
give his approval.
But records of the results of this approved project are missing. Most likely classified.
Who was the man who made that 1944 proposal for a rush-program to study
the CNS effects of fluorides? Dr. Harold Hodge, who worked at the
Manhattan Project.
Who was brought in to advise Mullenix 50 years later at the Forsyth
Dental Center in Boston, as she studied the CNS effects of fluorides?
Dr. Harold Hodge.
Who never told Mullenix of his work on fluoride toxicity for the Manhattan Project? Dr. Harold Hodge.
Was Hodge brought in to look over Mullenix's shoulder and
report on her discoveries? It turns out that Hodge, back in the 1940s,
had made suggestions to do effective PR promoting fluoride as a dental
treatment. So his presence by Mullenix's side, all those years later,
was quite possibly as an agent assigned to keep track of her efforts.
Getting the idea here? Build an A-bomb. Forget the toxic fluoride consequences. Bury the fluoride studies. Twist the studies.
More on Hodge. In 1944, "a severe pollution incident" occurred in New
Jersey, near the DuPont plant in Deepwater where the company was trying
to build the first A-bomb. A fluoride incident. Farmers' peach and
tomato crops were destroyed. Horses and cows became crippled. Some cows
had to graze on their bellies. Tomato crops (normally sold to the
Campbell Company for soups) were contaminated with fluorides.
The people of the Manhattan Project were terrified of lawsuits and
ensuing revelations about the toxic nature of their work. A heads-up
memo was written on the subject. Its author? Harold Hodge. Among other
issues, he reported on the huge fluoride content in vegetables growing
in the polluted area.
Also the high fluoride levels in human blood.
The farmers began to bring lawsuits. Big PR problem.
The lawsuits were settled quietly, for pittances.
Harold Hodge wrote another memo. Get this quote: "Would there be any use
in making attempts to counteract the local fear of fluoride on the part
of residents [near the A-bomb facility]...through lectures on F
[fluoride] toxicology and perhaps the usefulness of F in tooth health?"
Griffiths/Bryson write: "Such lectures were indeed given, not only to
New Jersey citizens but to the rest of the nation throughout the Cold
War."
This was a launching pad for fluorides as "successful dental treatments."
Now you know why promoting toxic fluorides as a dental treatment was so important to government officials.
Footnote: In Stanley Kubrick's 1964 film, Dr. Strangelove, Brigadier
General Jack D. Ripper rails about the destruction fluorides are
wreaking on the "pure blood of pure Americans." Of course, General
Ripper is fleshed out as a crazy right-wing fanatic. He's ready and
willing to start a nuclear war. How odd. Apparently unknown to the
Strangelove script writers, fluorides were, in fact, very toxic and were
an integral part of the program that created atomic bombs in the first
place.
No comments:
Post a Comment