Green Beret to cover up fake “Bin Laden killing”? by Kevin Barrett from Veterans Today
Green Beret to cover up fake “Bin Laden killing”?
Official "Bin Laden killing" story is a
joke. Now two Seal Team 6 members being investigated for murdering a
Green Beret who may have learned too much...
By Kevin Barrett, Veterans Today Editor Staff Sgt. Logan J. Melgar
Did Staff Sgt. Logan J. Melgar learn something unusual about the alleged killing of Osama Bin Laden by Seal Team 6?
If he did, he took the secret to his grave. Sgt. Melgar turned up
dead last June 4 in the housing he shared with Seal Team 6 members at
the US Embassy in Bamako, Mali.
Now two Seals from Team 6 are under investigation for murder — and speculation is swirling about the possible motive, including “whether
Sergeant Melgar had stumbled upon some illicit activity the SEALs were
involved in, and they silenced him, according to interviews with troops
and their families.” (NY Times)
One of the most egregious examples of “illegal activity” would be the
supposed killing of Osama Bin Laden on May 2, 2011 in Abbottabad,
Pakistan. According to Seymour Hersh’s sources, the murdered individual
said to have been Bin Laden was never positively identified by anyone,
including the shooter who essentially shot the head and body into bloody
pulp without any other team members having caught so much as a glimpse
of the individual who was shot.
According to Hersh’s sources, the mess that remained of “Bin Laden”
was bagged and dumped from a helicopter over the mountains. A ludicrous
cover story about a supposed “burial at sea according to Muslim custom”
was invented by idiot higher-ups, who perhaps did not realize that no
such Muslim custom exists: Islam insists on land burial where at all
possible.
Hersh’s sources claim that Pakistan’s ISI, which holds
few if any secrets from CIA/NSA who created it, held Bin Laden under
house arrest at the Abbottabad compound from 2006 onward, almost
certainly with the full knowledge and complicity of the US government.
This scenario completely demolishes the official story of 9/11: If
Bin Laden were really involved in 9/11, the US government would have put
Bin Laden on trial and convicted him in a real, civilian court of law
(not the kind of kangaroo court currently being used to lynch Khalid
Sheikh Mohammad and other “9/11 conspirators”). It wouldn’t have
ordered the Pakistanis hold him under house arrest for five years!
Even more obviously, if Bin Laden were really the 9/11 ringleader, he
would have been captured and interrogated, not killed. After all, the
information he could provide could stop attacks and save lives! (The
same is true of all the other patsies who are summarily executed as
“terrorists” — if they were real terrorists, every effort would be made
to take them alive.)
But is Hersh correct in assuming that Bin Laden was really killed in
Abbottabad? Hersh’s account, supposedly corroborated by people who were
there, suggests that not the slightest effort was made to positively
identify Bin Laden either before or after the execution! Instead, a
single gunman blasted “Bin Laden” to smithereens, and nobody else saw
anything but the human hamburger that was left…which was quickly
disposed of.
To call this account suspicious is an understatement. If true, it is
proof positive that Bin Laden was NOT killed that day. Why? Because in
the event of an actual Bin Laden execution, positive identification of
Bin Laden would have been the highest priority. Instead, it appears
(according to Hersh) that AVOIDING positive identification of “Bin
Laden” was the highest priority. Ergo, there was no Bin Laden killing.
Yes, something really happened in Abbottabad that
night…but what it is ain’t exactly clear. Did Sgt. Logan J. Melgar find
out what really happened—perhaps in drunken conversation with Seal Team 6
members—and pay the price?
There is good reason to think Bin Laden died in December, 2001, as
Pakistani and Egyptian newspapers reported. David Ray Griffin’s short
book Osama Bin Laden: Dead or Alive? shows that Bin Laden was
innocent of involvement in 9/11, likely died of kidney failure in late
2001 and was buried in an unmarked grave (according to actual
Salafi-Islamic prescription).
But Griffin’s hypothesis is not a fully-proven slam dunk, just a best
guess. The only thing we know for sure is that the official story of
the “Bin Laden killing,” like the official story of 9/11, is an obvious
load of horse manure, riddled with internal inconsistencies and
impossibilities.
No comments:
Post a Comment