Electromagnetic and Informational Weapons: The Remote Manipulation of the Human Brain
This important article first published by GR in
August 2004 brings to the forefront the role of Psychotronic weapons as
an instrument of modern warfare.
It should be understood, that Electromagnetic and
Informational Weapons are fully operational and could be used by
US-NATO in their wars in different parts of the World.
***
In October 2000, Congressman Denis J. Kucinich
introduced in the House of Representatives a bill, which would oblige
the American president to engage in negotiations aimed at the ban of
space based weapons.
In this bill, the definition of a weapons system included:
“any other unacknowledged or as yet undeveloped means inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)… through the use of land-based, sea- based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations“(15).
As in all legislative acts quoted in this article,
the bill pertains to sound, light or electromagnetic stimulation of the
human brain.
Psychotronic weapons belong, at least for a layman
uninformed of secret military research, in the sphere of science
fiction, since so far none of the published scientific experiments has
been presented in a meaningful way to World public opinion.
That it is feasible to manipulate human behavior with
the use of subliminal, either by sound or visual messages, is now
generally known and acknowledged by the scientific community.
This is why in most countries, the use of such
technologies, without the consent of the individual concerned, is in
theory banned. Needless to say, the use of these technologies is
undertaken covertly, without the knowledge or consent of targeted
individuals.
Devices using light for the stimulation of the brain
constitute another mechanism whereby light flashing under certain
frequencies could be used to manipulate the human psychic.
As for the use of sound, a device transmitting a beam
of sound waves, which can be heard only by persons at whom the beam of
sound waves is targeted, has been reported in several news media. In
this case, the beam is formed by a combination of sound and ultrasound
waves which causes the targeted person to hear the sound inside his
head. Such a procedure could affect the mental balance of the targeted
individual as well as convince him that he is, so to speak, mentally
ill.
This article examines the development of technologies
and knowledge pertaining to the functioning of the human brain and the
way new methods of manipulation of the human mind are being developed.
Electromagnetic energy
One of the main methods of manipulation is through electromagnetic energy.
In the declassified scientific literature only some
30 experiments have been published supporting this assumption (1),(2).
Already in 1974, in the USSR, after successful testing within a military
unit in Novosibirsk, the Radioson (Radiosleep) was registered with the
Government Committee on Matters of Inventions and Discoveries of the
USSR, described as a method of induction of sleep by means of radio waves (3), (4), (5).
In the scientific literature, technical feasibility
of inducing sleep in a human being through the use of radio waves is
confirmed in a book by an British scientist involved in research on the
biological effects of electromagnetism (6). A report by the World Health
Organisation (WHO) on nonionizing radiation published in 1991 confirms
that:
“many of biological effects observed in animals exposed to ELF fields appear to be associated, either directly or indirectly, with the nervous system…” (2).
Among the published experiments, there are those where pulsed microwaveshave
caused the synchronization of isolated neurons with the frequency of
pulsing of microwaves. Ffor example, a neuron firing at a frequency of
0.8 Hz was forced in this way to fire the impulses at a frequency of 1
Hz. Moreover, the pulsed microwaves contributed to changing the
concentration of neurotransmitters in the brain (neurotransmitters are a
part of the mechanism which causes the firing of neurons in the brain)
and reinforcing or attenuating the effects of drugs delivered into the
brain (1).
The experiment where the main brain frequencies
registered by EEG were synchronized with the frequency of microwave
pulsing (1,2) might explain the function of the Russian installation
Radioson. Microwaves pulsed in the sleep frequency would cause the
synchronization of the brain’s activity with the sleep frequency and in
this way produce sleep.
Pulsing of microwaves in frequency predominating in
the brain at an awakened state could, by the same procedure, deny sleep
to a human being.
A report derived from the testing program of the Microwave Research Department at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research states
“Microwave pulses appear to couple to the central nervous system and produce stimulation similar to electric stimulation unrelated to heat”.
In a many times replicated experiment, microwaves
pulsed in an exact frequency caused the efflux of calcium ions from the
nerve cells (1,2). Calcium plays a key role in the firing of neurons and
Ross Adey, member of the first scientific team which published this
experiment, publicly expressed his conviction that this effect of
electromagnetic radiation would interfere with concentration on complex
tasks (7).
Robert Becker, who had share in the discovery of the
effect of pulsed fields at the healing of broken bones, published the
excerpts from the report from Walter Reed Army Institute testing
program. In the first part “prompt debilitation effects” should have
been tested (8). Were not those effects based on the experiment by Ross
Adey and others with calcium efflux?
British scientist John Evans, working in the same
field, wrote that both Ross Adey and Robert Becker lost their positions
and research grants and called them “free-thinking exiles” (6). In 1975,
in the USA, a military experiment was published where pulsed microwaves
produced, in the brain of a human subject, an audio perception of
numbers from 1 to 10 (9). Again the possibility to convince an
individual that it is mentally ill is obvious. The testing program of
American Walter Read Army Institute of Research, where the experiment
took place, counts with “prompt auditory stimulation by means of
auditory effects” and finally aims at “behavior controlled by
stimulation” (8).
Let us assume that the words delivered into the brain
were transcribed into ultrasound frequencies. Would not then the
subject perceive those same words as his own thoughts?
And would this not imply that that his behavior was
being controlled in this way through the transmission of ultrasound
frequencies? In this regard, the American Air Force 1982 “Final Report
On Biotechnology Research Requirements For Aeronautical Systems Through
the Year 2000” states:
“While initial attention should be toward degradation of human performance through thermal loading and electromagnetic field effects, subsequent work should address the possibilities of directing and interrogating mental functioning, using externally applied fields…” (10).
Several scientists have warned that the latest
advances in neurophysiology could be used for the manipulation of the
human brain.
In June 1995, Michael Persinger, who worked on the
American Navy’s project of Non-lethal electromagnetic weapons, published
a scientific article where he states:
“the technical capability to influence directly the major portion of the approximately six billion brains of the human species without mediation through classical sensory modalities by generating neural information within a physical medium within which all members of the species are immersed… is now marginally feasible“ (11).
In 1998, the French National Bioethics Committee
warned that “neuroscience is being increasingly recognized as posing a
potential threat to human rights“ (12). In May 1999 the neuroscientists
conference, sponsored by the UN, took place in Tokyo. Its final
declaration formally acknowledges that :
“Today we have intellectual, physical and financial resources to master the power of the brain itself, and to develop devices to touch the mind and even control or erase consciousness…We wish to profess our hope that such pursuit of knowledge serves peace and welfare” (13).
On the international political scene, in the last few years, the concept of remote control of the human brain has
become a matter of international and intergovernmental negotiation. In
January 1999, the European Parliament passed a resolution where it
called “for an international convention introducing a global ban on all
developments and deployments of weapons which might enable any form of
manipulation of human beings.“ (14)
Already in 1997, nine states of the Commonwealth of
Independent States (CIS) addressed the UN, OBSE and the states of the
Interparliamentary Union with the proposal to place at the agenda of the
General Assembly of the United Nations, the preparation and adoption of
an international convention “On Prevention of Informational Wars and Limitation of Circulation of Informational Weapons” (16), (3).
Informational Weapons
The initiative was originally proposed, in the
Russian State Duma, by Vladimir Lopatin (3). V. Lopatin worked, from
1990 to 1995, in sequence, in the standing committees on Security
respectively of the Russian Federation, Russian State Duma and of the
Interparliamentary Assembly of the Commonwealth of Independent States
(CIS), specializing in informational security.(3). The concept of
informational weapon or informational war is rather unknown to the world
general public. In 1999, V. Lopatin, together with Russian scientist
Vladimir Tsygankov, published a book „Psychotronic Weapon and the
Security of Russia“ (3). There we find the explanation of this
terminology:
“In the report on the research of the American Physical Society for the year 1993 the conclusion is presented that psychophysical weapon systems…can be used… for the construction of a strategic arm of a new type (informational weapon in informational war)…”
Among many references on this subject, we refer to
Materials of the Parliament Hearings “Threats and Challenges in the
Sphere of Informational Security”, Moscow, July 1996, “Informational
Weapon as a Threat to the National Security of the Russian Federation”
(analytical report of the Intelligence Service of the Russian
Federation), Moscow, 1996 and a material “To Whom Will Belong the
Conscientious Weapon in the 21st Century”, Moscow, 1997. (17).
In 2000 V. Lopatin introduced, after two other
authors, the third in order bill on the subject of “Informational and
Psychological Security of the Russian Federation“. Lopotin’s findings
were reviewed by the Russian newspaper Segodnya:
“…Means of informational-psychological influence are capable not only of harming the health of an individual, but, also of causing, according to Lopatin, ‘the blocking of freedom of will of human being on the subliminal level, the loss of the ability of political, cultural and social self identification, the manipulation of societal consciousness, which could lead to the destruction of a sense of collective identify by the Russian people and nation’“ (16).
In the book “Psychotronic Weapons and the Security of
Russia”, the authors propose among the basic principles of the Russian
concept of defense against the remote control of the human psyche not
only the acknowledgement of its existence, but also the fact that the
methods of informational and psychotronic war are fully operational
(“and are being used without a formal declaration of war”) (18). They
also quote the record from the session of the Russian Federation’s
Federal Council where V. Lopatin stated that psychotronic weapon can
“cause the blocking of the freedom of will of a human being on a subliminal level” or “instillation into the consciousness or subconsciousness of a human being of information which will trigger a faulty or erroneous perception of reality” (19).
In that regard, they proposed the preparation of
national legislation as well as the establishment of legal international
norms “aimed at the defense of human psyche against subliminal,
destructive and informational manipulations” (20).
Moreover, they also propose the declassification of
all analytical studies and research on the various technologies. They
warned that, because this research has remained classified and removed
from the public eye, it has allowed the arms race to proceed unabated.
It has thereby contributed to increasing the possibility of psychotronic
war.
Among the possible sources of remote influence on
human psyche, the authors list the “generators of physical fields“ of
“known as well as unknown nature” (21). In 1999 the STOA (Scientific and
Technological Options Assessment), part of the Directorate General for
Research of the European Parliament published the report on Crowd Control Technologies, ordered by them with the OMEGA foundation in Manchester (UK) (22, http://www.europarl.eu.int/
One of four major subjects of the study pertained to the so-called “Second Generation“ or “non lethal” technologies:
“This report evaluates the second generation of ‘non-lethal’ weapons which are emerging from national military and nuclear weapons laboratories in the United States as part of the Clinton Administration’s ‘non-lethal’ warfare doctrine now adopted in turn by NATO. These devices include weapons using… directed energy beam,…radio frequency, laser and acoustic mechanisms to incapacitate human targets” (23) The report states that „the most controversial ‚non-lethal‘ crowd control … technology proposed by the U.S., are so called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behavior… the greatest concern is with systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system“ (24). The report also states that „perhaps the most powerful developments remain shrouded in secrecy“ (25).
The unavailability of official documents confirming
the existence of this technology may be the reason why the OMEGA report
is referencing, with respect to mind control technology, the internet
publication of the author of this article (26 http://www.europarl.eu.int/
Similarly, the internet publication of the director
of the American Human Rights and Anti-mind Control Organization (CAHRA),
Cheryl Welsh, is referenced by the joint initiative of the Quaker
United Nations Office, United Nations Institute for Disarmament
Research, and Programme for Strategic and International Security
Studies, with respect to non-lethal weapons (27).
On September 25th, 2000, the Committee on Security of
the Russian State Duma discussed the addendum to the article 6 of the
Federal law On Weapons. In the resolution we read:
“The achievements of contemporary science… allow
for creation of measured methods of secret, remote influencing on the
psyches and physiology of a person or a group of people“ (28). The
committee recommended that the addendum be approved. The addendum to the
article 6 of the Russian Federation law “On Weapons“ was approved on
July 26, 2001. It states:
“within the territory of the Russian Federation is prohibited the circulation of weapons and other objects… the effects of the operation of which are based on the use of electromagnetic, light, thermal, infra-sonic or ultra-sonic radiations…“ (29).
In this way, the Russian government made a first step to stand up to its dedication to the ban of mind control technology.
In the Doctrine of Informational Security of the
Russian Federation, signed by president Putin in September 2000, among
the dangers threatening the informational security of Russian
Federation, is listed
“the threat to the constitutional rights and freedoms of people and citizens in the sphere of spiritual life… individual, group and societal consciousness“ and “illegal use of special means affecting individual, group and societal consciousness” (30). Among the major directions of the international cooperation toward the guaranteeing of the informational security is listed „the ban of production, dissemination and use of ‘informational weapon‘ “ (31).
The foregoing statement should be interpreted as the
continuing Russian commitment to the international ban of the means of
remote influencing of the activity of the human brain.
Similarly, in the above mentioned report, published
by the STOA, the originally proposed version of the resolution of the
European Parliament calls for:
“an international convention for a global ban on all research and development… which seeks to apply knowledge of the chemical, electrical, sound vibration or other functioning of the human brain to the development of weapons which might enable the manipulation of human beings, including a ban of any actual or possible deployment of such systems.“(32)
Here the term “actual” might easily mean that such weapons are already deployed.
Among the countries with the most advanced military
technologies is the USA which did not present any international
initiative demanding the ban of technologies enabling the remote control
of human mind. (The original version of the bill by Denis J. Kucinich
was changed.)
All the same, according to the study published by
STOA, the US is the major promoter of the use of those weapons. Non
lethal technology was included into NATO military doctrine due to their
effort: “At the initiative of the USA, within the framework of NATO, a
special group was formed, for the perspective use of devices of
non-lethal effects” states the record from the session of the Committee
on Security of the Russian State Duma (28).
The report published by STOA states: “In October 1999
NATO announced a new policy on non-lethal weapons and their place in
allied arsenals” (33). “In 1996 non-lethal tools identified by the U.S.
Army included… directed energy systems” and “radio frequency weapons”
(34) – those weapons, as was suggested in the STOA report as well, are
being associated with the effects on the human nervous system.
According to the Russian government informational
agency FAPSI, in the last 15 years,U.S. expenditures on the development
and acquisition of the means of informational war has increased
fourfold, and at present they occupy the first place among all military
programs (17),(3).
Though there are possible uses of informational war,
which do not imply mind control, the US Administration has been
unwilling to engage in negotiations on the ban on all forms of
manipulation of the human brain. This unwillingness might indeed suggest
that the US administration intends to use mind control technologies
both within the US as well as internationally as an instrument of
warfare.
One clear consequence of the continuation of the
apparent politics of secrecy surrounding technologies enabling remote
control of the human brain is that the governments, who own such
technologies, could use them without having to consult public opinion.
Needless to say, any meaningful democracy in today’s world could be
disrupted, through secret and covert operations. It is not
inconceivable that in the future, entire population groups subjected to
mind control technologies, could be living in a “fake democracy” where
their own government or a foreign power could broadly shape their
political opinions by means of mind control technologies.
Mojmir Babacek is
the founder of the International Movement for the Ban of the
Manipulation of the Human Nervous System by Technical Means, He is the
author of numerous articles on the issue of mind manipulation.
Notes
1)
Handbook of Biological Effects of Electromagnetic Fields, 1996, CRC
Press Inc., 0-8493-0641-8/96, – pg. 117, 119, 474- 485, 542-551, 565 at
the top and third and last paragraph
2) World Health Organization report on non-ionizing radiation from 1991, pg. 143 and 207-208
3)
V. Lopatin, V Cygankov: „Psichotronnoje oružie i bezopasnost Rossii“,
SINTEG, Russian Federation, Moscow, ISBN 5-89638-006-2-A5-2000-30, list
of the publications of the publishing house you will find at the addresshttp://www.sinteg.ru/
4)
G. Gurtovoj, I. Vinokurov: „Psychotronnaja vojna, ot mytov k realijam“,
Russsian Federation, Moscow, „Mysteries“, 1993, ISBN 5-86422-098-1
5)
With greatest likelihood as well the Russian daily TRUD, which has
organized the search for the documents, Moscow, between August 1991 and
end of 1992 6) John Evans: Mind, Body and Electromagnetism, the
Burlington Press, Cambridge, 1992, ISBN 1874498008, str.139
7)
Robert Becker: “Body Electric: Electromagnetism and the Foundation of
Life”, William Morrow and comp., New York, 1985, pg. 287
8)
Robert Becker: “Cross Currents, teh Startling Effects of
Electromagnetic Radiation on your Health”, 1991, Bloomsburry Publishing,
London, Great Brittain, ISBN 0- 7475-0761-9, pg. 304, Robert Becker
refers to Bioelectromagnetics Society Newsletter, January and February
1989
9) Don R. Justesen, 1975, Microwaves and Behavior, American Psychologist, March 1975, pg. 391 – 401
10)
Dr. Nick Begich and Jeane Maning: “Angels Don’t Play This HAARP,
Advances in Tesla Technology”, Earthpulse Press, 1995, ISBN
0-9648812–0-9, pg. 169
11)
M. A. Persinger: „On the Possibility of Directly Lacessing Every Human
Brain by Electromagnetic Induction of Fundamental Algorythms“,
Perception and Motor Skills, June1995,, sv. 80, str. 791-799
12) Nature, vol.391, 22.1.1998,str.316, „Advances in Neurosciences May Threaten Human Rights“
13)
Internet reference at the site of the United Nations University and
Institute of Advanced Studies in Tokyo does not work any more, to verify
the information it is necessary to find the document from the 1999 UN
sponsored conference of neuroscientists in Tokyo, you may inquire at the
address unuias@ias.unu.edu 14)http://www.europarl.eu.int/
15) http://thomas.loc.gov./ and search for Space Preservation Act then click at H.R.2977
16)
Russian daily Segodnya, 11. February, 2000, Andrei Soldatov: „Vsadniki
psychotronitscheskovo apokalypsa” (Riders of Psychotronic Apokalypse)
17) See ref. 3), pg. 107
18) See ref. 3) pg. 97
19) See ref. 3), pg. 107
20) See ref. 3), pg. 108
21) See ref. 3) pg. 13
23) see ref. 22 pg. XIX or 25
24) see ref. 22 pg. LIII or 69
25) see ref. 22 pg. XLVII or 63, aswell pg. VII-VIII or 7-8, pg. XIX or 25, pg. XLV or 61
26) see ref. 22) pg. LIII or 69, note 354
27) http://www.unog.ch/unidir/
28)
Document sent by Moscow Committee of Ecology of Dwellings. Telephone:
Russian Federation, Zelenograd, 531-6411, Emilia Tschirkova, directrice
29) Search www.rambler.ru ,
there “poisk” (search) and search for “gosudarstvennaja duma” (State
Duma) (it is necessary to type in Russian alphabet), at the page which
appears choose “informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy”
(Informational Channel of the Russian State Duma), there “federalnyje
zakony podpisanyje prezidentom RF” (Federal laws signed by president of
the Russian Federation), choose year 2001 and search 26 ijulja, è. N
103-F3 (July 26, 2001, number N 103- F3) , “O vnesenii dopolnenija v
statju 6 federalnogo zakona ob oružii” (addendum to the article 6 of the
Federal law on weapons)
30) Search www.rambler.ru and
then (type in Russian alphabet) “gosudarstvennaja duma”, next
“informacionnyj kanal gosudarstvennoj dumy” (informational channel of
the State Duma), next search by use of “poisk” (search) Doktrina
informacionnoj bezopasnosti Rossii” “Doctrine of the Informational
Security of the Russian Federation) there see pg. 3 “Vidy
informacionnych ugroz bezopasnosti Rossijskkoj federacii” (Types of
Threats to the Informational Security of the Russian Federation)
31)
See ref. 30, pg. 19, “Mìždunarodnoje sotrudnièestvo Rossijskoj
Federacii v oblasti obespeèenija informacionnoj bezopasnoti”
(International Cooperation of the Russian Federation in Assuring the
Informational Security”
32) See ref.22, pg. XVII or 33
33) See ref.22, pg. XLV or 61
34) See ref.22 pg. XLVI or 62
The original source of this article is Global Research
Copyright © Mojmir Babacek, Global Research, 2018
Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page
Become a Member of Global Research
No comments:
Post a Comment