9/11 Through the Eyes of an American Skeptic
Chapter I
9-11 Through the Eyes of an American Skeptic
As a journalist with an independent weekly newspaper based in Washington, D.C.,
I became caught up in the events of 9-11 from the minute it happened
and was able to write freely about the terror attacks that were
exploited to start the pre-planned War on Terror.
From
my position as a skeptic of the unproven official version, I have
examined the facts and evidence since the day it happened and have
concluded that the U.S.
government and controlled media have engaged in a conspiracy to deceive
the world about what really happened on that terrible day.
The Dream
The early morning hours of September 11, 2001 found me with my family driving through New York City en route to Washington, D.C. after a weekend trip to Stowe, Vermont. We had visited the Trapp family lodge and gotten a late start from Stowe on Monday afternoon. By the time we reached New York City, our two small children were fast asleep in the back seat of our rented Buick.
Because
the hotels were all full or outrageously expensive, I was left with no
choice but to continue driving down the highway when I should have been
sleeping. To keep me awake as I drove through New York City, my wife Helje told me about a vivid dream she had had a week earlier, the night before we had left our home near Chicago.
I
had heard parts of Helje's strange dream when she had first told it to
our children in the backseat of the car as we set out across Indiana for Washington, D.C. Now, to help keep me awake on the busy highways of New York City, she told me her dream from the week before.
In
the dream we were driving toward a city with a skyline of densely
packed skyscrapers when a large airplane flew right at our car and dove
into the road about 50 meters in front of us. She turned and saw the
plane emerge from the ground behind us and another plane coming at us
from another angle. This was a strange dream in which she felt that our
family had been under attack.
Helje's dream turned out to be an eerie and uncanny premonition of what was to happen in the skies of New York City less than eight hours later.
It was about 3 a.m. on September 11 when we finally found an affordable hotel room just inside the state of Maryland on Interstate 95. The kids woke up and jumped on the beds and then we all fell asleep about a half-hour later.
I
woke up about 8:30 a.m. and went down to the lobby for a cup of
coffee. The television was on in the breakfast area reporting that a
plane had struck the North Tower of the World Trade Center in Manhattan. I grabbed some pastries and coffee and hurried back to the room and turned the television to the news channel.
The children and I went to get more donuts and coffee and were on our way back to the room when the second plane hit the South Tower. Helje had seen it happen live on television. We were shocked by the events and realized that America was under attack. I immediately called my office in Washington, D.C. and told my boss that kamikaze airplanes had hit the World Trade Center.
He thought I was joking. I said I wouldn't joke about such a thing
and told him to turn on the radio. I called the office again after the
Pentagon was hit and said we would not be coming to Washington but were heading home to Chicago. Having no idea what would happen next, I thought it would be best to take the country roads and stay away from big cities.
We drove through rural Lancaster County
past Amish farmers harvesting a very tall corn crop. I stopped and
walked into the fields to ask some of the German-speaking farmers if
they knew what had happened in New York City. They said they had not heard anything about it and carried on working with their horse-drawn harvester.
Our route from Pennsylvania to Chicago
took us near the site in Shanksville where Flight 93 supposedly
crashed, but I had no desire to go to the scene of the disaster. We
stopped for lunch in a small town. The
diner was full of people but nobody was talking. The people sat
quietly, as if mesmerized, listening to the news on the radio.
Indications of Israeli Involvement
We listened to the radio as we drove across Pennsylvania.
It was a beautiful sunny day with a bright blue sky. About noon I
heard a news report that five "Middle Eastern" men had been seen in New Jersey videotaping and celebrating the destruction of the World Trade Center.
"They're
probably Israelis," I told Helje. For millions of Americans who
automatically associate "Middle Eastern" with Arab, this news report
planted the idea in their minds that Arabs from the Middle East were
behind the terror attacks on New York and Washington.
This
line of thinking quickly became the media's only acceptable version of
events and although it has still not been proven, it has become the
official version of 9-11.
The first indication that the attack on the World Trade Center was an elaborate "false flag" operation came with the arrest of the five men on the New Jersey side of the Hudson River. These
men, described as "Middle Eastern" in the first media reports, were
later identified as Israelis. A false flag operation is a crime which
is designed and carried out so that another party or nation is blamed.
That
the five jubilant Middle Eastern men, who had photographed themselves
smiling and celebrating with the burning World Trade Center in the
background, were indeed Israelis (namely Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Oded
Ellner, Omer Marmari, and Yaron Schmuel) and that two of them were known
to U.S. law enforcement and intelligence agencies as agents of Israeli
intelligence, was ignored by the mass media.
The men had been observed taking video or photos of themselves with the World Trade Center
burning in the background. Sivan Kurzberg told the police that the men
had been driving in their van in the immediate vicinity of the towers
that morning. He was photographed flicking a lighter with the burning
towers behind him.
A
woman who had observed the jubilant Israelis said she was struck by the
expressions on the men's faces. "They were like happy, you know," she
said. "They didn't look shocked to me. I thought it was very strange."
When
they were arrested, Sivan, the driver of the van, told the police, "We
are Israeli. We are not your problem. Your problems are our problems.
The Palestinians are the problem."
The story of the five men celebrating the destruction of the Twin Towers
was dropped from the national news when it became known that they were
not Arabs or Muslims from the Middle East, but Jews from Israel.
The
noteworthy fact that these men, who clearly had prior knowledge of the
attacks, were in fact Israelis, and that they had been arrested at
gunpoint with box cutter knives, multiple passports, and thousands of
dollars in cash in a van that tested positive for explosives was only
reported by Paolo Lima in a local New Jersey newspaper, the Bergen Record, the following day.
This important and timely information, however, was completely ignored by the New York Times and the other national mass media outlets based across the river in New York City.
I discussed the pertinent details with Lima
by phone, and this important and suppressed story became the subject of
my first article about 9-11. I realized then, during the first week
after 9-11, that the mainstream news media was ignoring and covering up
important information and evidence about the terrorist attacks.
There
would be, for example, no reporting in the mainstream media of Israeli
involvement or prior knowledge of the attacks. And this was just the
beginning of the censorship the controlled media was to impose on the
events of 9-11.
The
possibility that these men could be Israeli intelligence agents
involved in a spectacular "false flag" terror attack was discussed in my
article that went to print in the American Free Press on September 20, 2001. It was the only newspaper in the United States where such thoughts could openly be expressed.
Months later, Forward,
a well known New York-based Jewish newspaper, confirmed that Urban
Moving Systems, the Weehawken, New Jersey-based "moving" company that
the men worked for, was actually an Israeli intelligence front operation
and that at least two of the men, evidently the Kurzberg brothers, were
known agents of Mossad, Israel's military intelligence agency.
Dominic
Suter, the Israeli "owner" of the company and a prime suspect, was
somehow allowed to flee to Israel after the Federal Bureau of
Investigation had initially interviewed him, but before they could
interrogate him a second time. He has not been extradited to the United States since.
After being held for 10 weeks, the five Israelis were sent back to Israel
on visa violations. Ellner, Marmari, and Schmuel appeared on an
Israeli television show, without the Kurzberg brothers, in November
2001.
Three of the Israeli agents arrested on 9-11 appeared on Israeli television in November 2001 and admitted that their mission had been to document the 9-11 attacks. "The fact of the matter is that we come from a country that experiences terror daily," Oded Ellner (center) said. "Our purpose was to document the event."
One
would think that such a revealing public admission by a suspect,
claiming prior knowledge of the terror attack and saying that his
purpose "was to document the event" would be extremely newsworthy
information in the United States.
Sadly,
this was not the case. Rather than discuss the evidence, the
mainstream media has constructed and defended an unproven version of
events in which the blame is assigned to nineteen Arabs with ties to
Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaida.
Indications
of Israeli involvement in 9-11 were conspicuous from the beginning.
Benjamin Netanyahu, the former Israeli prime minister and leader of the
right wing Likud Party, actually said that he viewed 9-11 as a positive
development. On the day of the attacks, Netanyahu was interviewed by
James Bennet of the New York Times:
Asked tonight what the attack meant for relations between the United States and Israel,
Benjamin Netanyahu, the former prime minister, replied, "It's very
good." Then he edited himself: "Well, it's not good, but it will
generate immediate sympathy."
Benjamin Netanyahu (right) and Ehud Olmert are Israeli politicians from the extreme right-wing Likud party, which grew out of the Zionist terror organization, the Irgun. Olmert, then mayor of Jerusalem, made a secret visit to New York City the day before the terror attacks. Asked what the attacks meant for U.S.-Israeli relations, Netanyahu said, "It's very good."
Netanyahu
predicted that the attack would "strengthen the bond between our two
peoples, because we've experienced terror of so many decades, but the United States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror."
Prior knowledge of the 9-11 attacks clearly indicates complicity in the murder of some 3,000 people.
Journalists,
like myself, who challenge the official version with evidence and facts
are marginalized as "conspiracy nuts." I have been portrayed as an
anti-Semitic writer by the leading media networks simply because I dare
to investigate the evidence of Israeli involvement in the terror
attacks.
The
level of the personal attacks against me increased dramatically in
August 2006, when a police assault by three unidentified heavily-armed
men resulted in my right elbow being fractured and my being
unjustifiably shocked with 50,000 volts from a police device known as a
TASER. This outrageous and illegal assault occurred at my home in front
of my wife and eight-year-old daughter.
I
was taken to jail and subsequently charged by the police with resisting
arrest and aggravated assault, both misdemeanor charges. In the Chicago
system nearly everyone in such a situation is forced to plead guilty
and accept the sentence meted out by the judge. I refused to plead
guilty, however, and spent nearly one year trying to defend myself
against the baseless charges and malicious prosecution. In early June
2007, I was found guilty of both misdemeanors after a seriously flawed
four-day trial in which the police were allowed to destroy the video
evidence and then openly lied on the stand. My expert witness and
evidence were not allowed to be presented by the Cook County
judge, Hyman Riebman, a Zionist Jew. Having seen that there was no way
to obtain justice in the corrupt court system, I was compelled to leave
Chicago
with my family before the date of sentencing. It would have been
irresponsible for me to allow this criminal system to cause more harm to
me and my family than it already had.
Odigo Warnings
In
the first days and weeks after 9-11, I paid very close attention to the
large number of Israeli terror suspects arrested, which was more than
two hundred by November 2001, and investigated the published reports
that an Israeli instant text message service had been used to warn
Israelis of the attacks in New York - hours
before they occurred. Many Israelis were evidently forewarned of the
attacks through an Israeli instant messaging service called Odigo. This
story, which presents the clearest evidence of Israeli prior knowledge
of the attacks, was reported only very briefly in the U.S. media – and then forgotten.
According
to the published reports, Israel-based employees of Odigo reported
having received warnings of an imminent attack at the World Trade Center hours before the first plane hit the north tower. Odigo, an Israeli-owned company, had its U.S. headquarters two blocks from the World Trade Center, but the forewarned Odigo employees did not pass the terror warning on to the authorities in New York, an act that would have saved thousands of lives.
Two
weeks after 9-11, Alex Diamandis, Odigo's vice president, said, "The
messages said something big was going to happen in a certain amount of
time, and it did – almost to the minute." "It was possible that the
attack warning was broadcast to other Odigo members, but the company has
not received reports of other recipients of the message," Diamandis
said. Four thousand Israelis were expected to have been working at the World Trade Center
on 9-11, yet only one was reported to have died at the complex. Based
on the Israeli government figure that 4,000 Israelis were expected to
have been at the World Trade Center at the time of the attacks, it seems evident that many Israeli Odigo users got the message of warning.
Odigo,
which offers real-time messaging, has a feature called "People Finder"
which allows a user to send an instant message to a large group based on
a common characteristic, such as Israeli nationality. "People Finder"
allows Odigo users to search for online "buddies," with filters like
Israeli nationality, while maintaining user privacy at all times. The
message was probably sent in Hebrew. The Internet address of the sender
of the warning was allegedly given to the FBI. Two months later it was
reported that the FBI was still investigating the matter. Since then
there have been no further media reports about the Odigo warning of
9/11.
These
two news stories about the fake Israeli "movers" and the Odigo
messages, which clearly indicated that some Israelis had very specific
prior knowledge of the attacks, were published in American and Israeli
newspapers shortly after 9-11. Had the recipients of these Odigo
instant messages contacted the New York police department, thousands of lives could have been saved. The question that has not been asked is, why didn't they?
Cui Bono?
There
were several early indicators that Israelis were involved in 9-11 and
that it was a spectacular "false flag" terror attack designed to serve
as a casus belli to drag the United States
into the "War on Terror." Apart from the previously mentioned evidence
of Israeli prior knowledge, there were also the amazingly insensitive
comments of Netanyahu about 9-11 being "very good" in his view.
Netanyahu,
it should be noted, is the author of several books which call for the
western nations to engage in a global "War on Terror." Since 1986,
Netanyahu has urged the United States and western democracies to take up arms against the enemies of Israel
in the name of "fighting terrorism," which is the title of one of his
books. The "terrorists" that Netanyahu wants the West to wage war on,
however, all happen to be the people and states opposed to Israel's illegal occupation of Palestinian land.
I approached the 9-11 investigation with a twenty-five year history of living in and following the events of the Middle East. After many years of traveling in Europe and the Middle East, I obtained a degree in History from the University of California at Santa Cruz in 1992. My academic emphasis was on Palestine and Israel.
After the first U.S. war against Iraq, which I was actively opposed to,
I spent my final year of university researching the Soviet occupation
of the newly liberated Baltic republics and completing my courses at the
University of Bergen in Norway.
Fate brought me into the proximity of another mass disaster on the morning of September 28, 1994, when I arrived by ship in Sweden and learned that the Baltic ferry named Estonia
had sunk during the night with 852 victims lost at sea. My wife's
first husband, a famous Estonian singer named Urmas Alender, was among
the missing. While it was abundantly clear that something much more
explosive than a "monster wave" had sunk the ferry, the Swedish
government and media pretended that natural forces had caused the
catastrophe. In the process of investigating what happened in the ferry
disaster, I came to realize that a modern "democratic" state, like Sweden, could actually be complicit in the cover-up of the mass murder of hundreds of its own citizens.
When in the year 2000, I began working as a journalist for the Washington-based Spotlight, later to become the American Free Press, I turned my attention to the mysterious 1996 crash of TWA Flight 800 off the coast of New York.
I attended the final sessions of the government agency (NTSB) involved
in investigating the "crash" of Flight 800 and was appalled at the
obvious cover-up of the facts. I watched how three Jewish members of
the board completely dominated the NTSB final sessions and how the
testimonies of more than 100 eyewitnesses, who had testified to having
seen a streaking object hitting the aircraft in flight, were
categorically dismissed because, according to a young Jewish member of
the board, based on the time of the observations, all of the witnesses
must have been drunk and hallucinating. After the two-day presentation
of the NTSB findings there was no press conference or session allowing
for questions from the media or public. This was clearly another
cover-up.
I had also studied the Israeli attack on the USS Liberty and seen how the U.S. government and military had covered up the truth of the Israeli military attack on the unarmed Navy vessel off the coast of Egypt
in 1967. With this background I approached the events of 9-11. Well
aware of the history of false-flag terror, the overwhelming Zionist
influence in government and media, and dishonest official investigations
into recent mass disasters, I was a natural skeptic from the start.
Evidence of Explosions Ignored
The administration of George W. Bush rushed the nation and its allies into war in Afghanistan
within one month of the 9-11 attacks using the unsolved crime as the
casus belli for an overt act of aggression that had been planned long
before. The war against the government of Afghanistan, called Operation Enduring Freedom by the government and military, began on Oct. 7, 2001.
The week before the war began I wrote an article about the immense oil and gas reserves of the Caspian Basin
and the new "Great Game" to gain control of these valuable energy
resources. I also wrote several articles about the long-standing
business and personal ties between George W. Bush and the Bin Laden
family. One month after 9-11, I wrote about how the mass media was
ignoring the large number of eyewitness accounts describing explosions
at the World Trade Center before the collapse of the Twin Towers and Building 7.
"Despite
reports from numerous eyewitnesses and experts, including news
reporters on the scene, who heard or saw explosions immediately before
the collapse of the World Trade Center,
there has been a virtual silence in the mainstream media," I wrote in
the article titled "Some Survivors Say 'Bombs Exploded Inside WTC.'"
"After the airplanes hit the World Trade Center
there were some explosive devices inside the buildings that caused the
towers to collapse," Van Romero, an explosives expert and former
director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center at New Mexico Tech, told the Albuquerque Journal
minutes after the collapses. The collapse of the structures resembled
controlled implosions used to demolish old structures and was "too
methodical to be a chance result of airplanes colliding with the
structures," Romero said. Coming from a man who is an expert in the
effects of explosives on structures, Romero's comments carried a lot of
weight in my opinion.
"It
would be difficult for something from the plane to trigger an event
like that," Romero said. If explosions did cause the towers to collapse,
"It could have been a relatively small amount of explosives placed in
strategic points."
"One
of the things terrorist events are noted for is a diversionary attack
and secondary device," he said. Then suddenly, ten days after the
attack, without any explanation, Romero did a complete about-face in his
analysis of the collapse. "Certainly the fire is what caused the
building to fail," he told the Albuquerque Journal on September 21.
A friend of mine from Brooklyn told me that he had been standing among a crowd of people on Church Street, about two blocks from the South Tower
(WTC 2), when he saw "a number of brief light sources being emitted
from inside the building between floors 10 and 15." He saw about six of
these brief flashes, accompanied by "a crackling sound" immediately
before the tower collapsed.
Even a veteran 51-year-old fire fighter, Louie Cacchioli, told People magazine that he had witnessed explosions in the South Tower:
"I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to get
in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went off. We
think there were bombs set in the building."
What
is most peculiar about the eyewitness reports of explosions was that
they were completely ignored by the mainstream news media, even when the
reports came from their own reporters on the scene. Stephen Evans of
the BBC, for example, was in the South Tower
where he witnessed "a series of explosions" and felt a "big explosion,
from much, much lower." Yet the BBC, like the rest of the mainstream
media failed to investigate or even discuss the evidence of explosions
in the towers.
How did the editors of the mass media networks in the United States and Britain
make the decision not to discuss the evidence of explosions even when
the information came from their own reporters on the scene? Eyewitness
reports and images of explosions were broadcast only once and then swept
under the carpet. It soon became quite clear that the mass media was
censoring any discussion of the evidence of explosions in the World Trade Center.
Within
a few weeks I realized that the media and government were working
together to deceive the public about what really had happened on 9-11
and that there was a conspiracy to promote a false version of events in
order to gain public support for a previously planned war policy in the Middle East.
The mass media engaged in a comprehensive propaganda campaign to
instill fear in the public. My family and I decided that it would be
safer and more sane to live in Europe, so at the end of November, after
the Thanksgiving holiday, we flew to Germany.
Destruction of Evidence
In Germany, I had the opportunity to interview Andreas von Bülow near Köln. Von Bülow, an author and former member of the Bundestag
(the German parliament) served on the parliamentary commission which
oversees the three branches of the German secret service. Von Bülow
said he thought Israel's
intelligence service, Mossad, was behind the 9-11 attacks. These
attacks, he said, were carried out to turn public opinion against the
Arabs and boost military and security spending.
"You
don't get the higher echelons," von Bülow said, referring to the
"architectural structure" which masterminds such terror attacks. At this
level, he said, the organization doing the planning, such as Mossad, is
primarily interested in affecting public opinion. The terrorists who
actually commit the crimes are what von Bülow calls "the working level,"
such as the nineteen Arabs who allegedly hijacked the planes on
September 11. "The working level is part of the deception," he said.
"Ninety-five
percent of the work of the intelligence agencies around the world is
deception and disinformation," he said, which is widely propagated in
the mainstream media creating an accepted version of events.
"Journalists don't even raise the simplest questions," he said. "Those
who differ are labeled as crazy."
Eckehardt Werthebach, the former president of the Verfassungsschutz
(a branch of German intelligence), told me that "the deathly precision"
and "the magnitude of planning" behind the attacks would have needed
"years of planning." Such a sophisticated operation, Werthebach said,
required the "fixed frame" of a state intelligence organization,
something not found in a "loose group" of terrorists. Both Werthebach
and von Bülow said the lack of a complete "blue ribbon" investigation,
with congressional hearings, into the events of September 11 was
incomprehensible. These men made more sense to me than anyone in the U.S. government or media.
As
incomprehensible as it might seem, the Bush administration delayed and
avoided an official investigation for as long as possible – at least
until all of the evidence was destroyed. The steel from the World Trade Center was quickly shipped to Asia
where it was melted down. The evidence from the crime scene was being
destroyed as quickly as possible. This was clearly criminal, yet the
highest authorities in the U.S. government and the Department of Justice were allowing it to happen.
Molten Metal
I
consider 9-11 to be an unsolved crime and have done what I can to
investigate the crime using the available evidence. In the summer of
2002, for example, I wrote an article about the seismic data that showed
unexplained spikes occurring at the beginning of each collapse.
In
my research into the removal of the rubble, I learned from one of the
contractors and a demolition expert that molten metal had been
discovered at the bottom of the rubble pile in the lower basement
levels. This molten metal was described to me as "molten steel" by
Peter Tully, president of Tully Construction of Flushing, New York, and
Mark Loizeaux, president of Controlled Demolition, Inc. (CDI) of Phoenix, Maryland.
The
molten steel was found "three, four, and five weeks later, when the
rubble was being removed," Loizeaux said. He said molten steel was also
found at WTC 7, the 47-story building owned by Larry Silverstein, which
collapsed mysteriously in the late afternoon. Loizeaux said, "If I were
to bring the towers down, I would put explosives in the basement to get
the weight of the building to help collapse the structure."
The
molten metal found beneath the rubble was clearly important evidence
that could explain how the towers were brought down. Because each tower
was held up by 47 huge box core columns, there had to be an explanation
for what caused these columns to fall. The official explanation that
fires had caused the floor trusses to give way failed to explain what
happened to the core columns. To explain the extremely quick collapse
of the core columns, the seismic spikes and molten metal seemed to be
very important clues.
Steven E. Jones, a professor of physics at Brigham Young University (BYU) in Utah, contacted me in the summer of 2005 and asked me what I had learned about the discovery of molten metal at the World Trade Center. I told Jones exactly what Peter Tully and Mark Loizeaux had said about the discovery of molten iron in the basements of the Twin Towers
and Building 7. After studying the reports and photographs of molten
metal, Jones had been able to obtain some fragments of the metal. He
concluded that the fragments were primarily iron and possible evidence
that Thermite had been used to demolish the buildings.
The author and Professor Steven E. Jones discuss the evidence of thermite in May 2006.
Encouraged by his research, I visited Professor Jones on the campus of Brigham Young University in the spring of 2006. From Provo, Utah, I then traveled by train to the University of California at Davis
where I met with Professor Thomas A. Cahill, an expert on airborne
particles. Dr. Cahill had conducted a study of the particles contained
in the thin bluish smoke that rose from the rubble for nearly four
months after 9-11. Cahill's air sampling began on October 2 and
continued until late December 2001, when the last fires were finally
extinguished.
Asked
why it took so long to begin a scientific evaluation of the air
contamination that accompanied the destruction of the World Trade
Center, Dr. Cahill said he had assumed that there were scores of
agencies and scientists monitoring the air quality in New York City
after 9-11. "I assumed it was happening. I could not believe it was
not," Cahill said. "The EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] did
nothing."
Cahill's
work revealed the presence of extremely small metallic aerosols in
unprecedented amounts in the plumes coming from the burning WTC rubble.
Most of the particles in these plumes were in the categories of
ultra-fine and nano-particles: from 0.26 to 0.09 microns. The
extraordinarily high level of ultra-fine aerosols was one of the most
unusual aspects of the data, Cahill said. "Ultra-fine particles require
extremely high temperatures," he said, "namely the boiling point of the
metal."
Since
the scientific data supports the theory that some form of Thermite was
used to destroy the towers, the question is how it got onto the 81st
floor of the south tower, where large amounts of molten metal were seen
falling before the collapse?
Molten iron pours out of South Tower about one minute before the tower disintegrated.
So,
what really was on the 81st floor of the South Tower? What was in
these heavy "battery-looking things?" Were they batteries, or were they
Thermite? And is it more than a coincidence that both planes flew
directly into secure computer rooms in both towers and that both
spectacular explosions showed evidence of Thermite-produced white smoke?
The Cover-up Continues
Despite
the legal difficulties, slander, criticism, and other setbacks, I have
continued to examine the evidence from 9-11 and ask the questions that
demand to be answered. The wasted lives of the thousands of victims
from the terror attacks and the illegal wars that have been waged in the
name of 9-11 deserve to be honored with the truth, not a pack of lies
pushed by the controlled media onto a gullible public.
It
would be naïve and foolish for us to expect the truth from a government
that has been shown to have repeatedly lied to the media and
international community in order to accomplish its dubious goals. The
truth of 9-11 will certainly not be given to us on a silver platter. It
is something we will have to fight for.
Finis
This chapter was originally written in February 2007 for ZeitenSchrift, a Swiss magazine.
Benjamin Netanyahu quote from "Spilled Blood is Seen as Bond That Draws 2 Nations Closer," by James Bennet, New York Times, 12 September 2001
Original - February 2007
Latest Edit - June 15, 2011
No comments:
Post a Comment