|
Why has the Deep State gone to war against Donald Trump? |
|
(To read about Jon's mega-collection, The Matrix Revealed, click here.)
|
|
Some people say Trump is nothing more than another Globalist puppet. Is that the whole story?
Is Trump worse than his supporters want him to be, and better than his enemies claim he is?
By Jon Rappoport
Trump is unpredictable. He shoots his mouth off.
No one is sure what he might do next.
That is not the Deep State's version of what a president is supposed to be.
Bill Clinton, George W Bush, Barack Obama---they were good
boys. Globalists. The intelligence establishment and the military
industrial complex knew "the situation" was well in hand. Trump is the
strange intruder. The "crazy one."
If his swaggering indifference to the Deep State's agenda is
merely a pose---a formidable acting job---then why is he subjected to
withering attacks every day, even from his own Party? After all, he has
surrounded himself with Goldman Sachs big shots---can't they be relied
on to keep him in check? What's the problem?
Well, one huge problem is he keeps attacking mainstream
media. He lashes out and calls them Fake News. He takes every
opportunity to accuse them of lying. No president in modern history has
dared to work that angle. Understand that the intelligence
establishment---a major component of the Deep State---uses major media
to shape public perception on an ongoing basis. Gunslinger Trump is
upsetting that applecart, at a time when public trust in mainstream news
is, all on its own, eroding. He isn't supposed to be piling on.
If Trump's attacks on The News are a carefully crafted
theatrical ploy, somehow designed to serve the Deep State, where is the
payoff?
I keep bringing up Trump vs. the Media, because, for the past
35 years, working as a reporter, I've seen the media damage and the
mind control, the brainwashing and the corruption, the collusion between
The News and the Deep State, and the resulting destruction of human
life. Just to name two areas of major crimes: viciously lying war press
coverage, and viciously lying medical coverage. Anyone---especially a
president---who wades in and disrupts the seamless hypnotic flow of
mainstream news, whatever his motives, deserves praise.
For the record, I believe Trump is, and will be, a complete
and utter disaster for the environment, as regards corporate pollution. I
see no evidence he will lessen medical crimes. He is out to lunch, when
it comes to appointing people to forward his agendas and support his
presidency. Who on his team ISN'T talking out of school? Who isn't
betraying him? Why did he extend the utterly failed war in Afghanistan?
Some of his most ardent supporters saw, in him, a foreign policy man
with the guts and intelligence of Ron Paul. They certainly aren't happy.
The big lynchpin issue is immigration. It always was.
Ideologues from the Left, and the Deep State, are outraged, because they
want open borders. Forever. Their masters, who are far more cynical and
calculating, are forcing the unending migrant flood as a method for
erasing separate nations---a prime plank in the Globalist platform. Any
fool should be able to see this. It has nothing to do with "humane"
motives. The heaping of financial burdens on states and nations, as an
outcome of the migrant flood, is also intentional. So is the resultant
crime. These are not illusions. How serious Trump is about stemming the
flood---that is up for grabs. But the fact that he has spoken out, time
and time again, even if you assume he is lying about what he intends to
do, has galvanized people all over the world. They are waking up to the
resurrection of sovereign nations, as opposed to a one world-nation,
under the ministrations of Globalist utopian tyrants. If Trump's stance
on the immigration issue is merely a con, it has certainly had a massive
blowback effect against the new world order. For those who claim that
top-down control of the planet is a given, with no exceptions, why
didn't the controllers make sure someone other than Trump was elected in
2016? If these controller-gods are so powerful, why didn't they dump
the flaccid useless Hillary Clinton and nominate a dynamic Democrat who
would have taken Trump to the cleaners? Why didn't they launch a really
convincing Trump dossier and cut him off at the knees before the
election?
For all the "Hegelian dialectic" people, who insist that
Trump was put into office to whipsaw the public to the other side, after
the socialist Obama had done his assigned job: consider the fact that
any corporatist Republican candidate could have served that
function---instead of a fast-talking, shooting-from-the-hip, swaggering
narcissist cowboy Crazy, who suddenly began spouting anti-Globalist
pro-nationalist rhetoric to a worldwide audience.
"Well, you see, they needed a really strong America-first
nationalist guy, Trump, so they could take him down and snuff out the
flames of separate nations, once and for all. They also wanted to
exacerbate the divide-and-conquer strategy for America---causing the
deepest conflicts to come to the surface and rip America apart at the
seams"---
I'm not rejecting those arguments completely; but I am saying
elite controllers would be taking quite a gamble with that strategy,
because the Trump effect vis-à-vis nationalism is formidable, and elite
Globalists aren't in the habit of encouraging all the points that defeat
their own stance. They aren't in the habit of pushing a man into the
spotlight (and the Oval Office) who talks those points endlessly and
puts dangerous ideas into millions of minds. Whether fake or real, Trump
is that man, he talks that talk, and he does it relentlessly. There was
no way to stage the 2016 election without spawning all this
anti-Globalist rhetoric?
Trump has also attacked the intelligence establishment and
the FBI. Not just once, but many times. Yes, you could say his
appointments to headline jobs in those agencies belie his words---but
why allow such a president to exist in the first place? Trump is
actually mirroring a few of the major charges the political Left has
leveled at the intel establishment for decades. And people out in the
real world are agreeing with his harsh criticisms. When Trump first
started this drumbeat, Senator Chuck Schumer said it was big mistake,
because the intelligence community has six ways of getting back at you.
Schumer didn't say Trump was wrong. He just said Trump was crazy.
And that may be a clue. Trump just doesn't care. He grew up
hustling in the real estate field. He rubbed elbows with the Mob. He
made deals however they could be made, with whoever showed up with
money. He survived, went broke, survived again. He developed a giant
ego. He promoted himself ceaselessly, once he'd achieved a bit of fame.
In his world, bureaucrats are the lowest form of human life. He's a hard
charging asshole, and after a few drinks, he might gleefully admit it.
This is not a character the Deep State wants around, and
especially not in the White House. "I'm the president and you just
handed me this CIA assessment? It reads like sheer bullshit. Why don't
you fill me in on the real facts, if you know what they are, or is your
problem stemming from the fact you're ignorant?" Even on that level, the
intel community doesn't want Trump around. Face it, Washington is full
of bullshitters on every conceivable platform. These people have never
done a thing to justify their existence, much less their jobs. They
skate all day, every day, and they expect to skate all the way into
their pensions. Now along comes this bull in the china shop. No one
really knows when he's telling the truth and when he's lying, but he
does seem to have a nose for spotting fakers---maybe because he's faked
it for so long himself. And done it well. Done it better than most.
Certainly done it better than jive analysts at the CIA, who really have
faint knowledge about what's going on in hots spots across the globe,
but try to talk a good game.
Don't kid a kidder.
On this level alone, Trump has not endeared himself to denizens of the Deep State.
Continuing with the theme of "Trump just doesn't care," it's
possible he's willing to be drummed out of office. He's daring the press
and his other enemies to try it, and his position is: "If you can carry
it off, go ahead. See what trouble and disaster you bring down on your
own heads, if you win." He's willing to fly away from the White House,
as Nixon did, and go back to Trump Tower in New York and pick up from
where he left off. That's a strong position. He's always been a
go-for-broke character, and if this president thing doesn't work out,
there are other worlds to conquer. Such a stance would make his enemies
nervous. He's quite able to call their bluff.
Meanwhile, as long as he's in office, he's a proponent of
President Calvin Coolidge's famous "the business of America is
business." This is, at once, a gift to, and a theft from, Globalists.
It's a gift, because Trump intends to give mega-corporations, which are
the action arms of Globalism, free reign to dominate the marketplace,
horribly pollute to their hearts' content, cooperate with government
allies in stepping up surveillance of the citizenry, and pay less taxes,
as long as some of these companies, or a few of them, bring jobs back
to America. It's a theft, because Trump isn't structuring these
corporations as part of the infamous Globalist trade treaties, like the
TPP. (Unless he goes back on that promise, too.) He's prone to making
separate trade deals with separate nations. At least on the surface, he
appears to want to prove that this tactic can succeed. And it can build
up the US economy. Even, worst case, if he's lying about opposing trade
treaties, once again he's planted an idea in many minds: you don't need
Globalist trade deals to make trade work. This is not a Deep State idea.
Far from it. It's corrosive to the Deep State.
Look at how many counties and states turned red in the 2016
election. Territorially, it was overwhelming. What were all those people
on all that land thinking? It was a mixed bag. On the one hand (without
mentioning it), they wanted the government benefits they were accruing,
as a matter of course, to remain in place. At the same time, they
wanted freedom, the right to be left alone, the right to reject
political correctness, the right to celebrate America as an independent
and sovereign nation, the right to feel proud of their country, the
right to be able to work and find a job, the right to own guns, the
right to shut down open borders, the right to uphold the traditional
family, the right to reject major media as a bunch of liars and crooks
(and ditto for the Washington swamp).
The Globalists deviously put a man in the White House who was stimulating that whole range of sentiment and conviction? Really?
Then we come to the Clintons. Major league bullshitters in
their own right---and on a level Trump could hardly aspire to. The Deep
State, with some reservations, had accepted the idea that one of their
own, Hillary Clinton, with all her personal and family and political
baggage, was going to be the next president of the United States. She
and Bill seemed to be made of Teflon, or some similar substance that
swallowed scandals whole and made them disappear. The press had played a
central role there. (The press that Trump was violently attacking.)
Forget the Clinton Foundation. Forget Hillary's decades-long shameful
defense of her husband's sexual predations. Forget Mena and the cocaine
trafficking and Bill's arrangements with the CIA. Right out in the open,
Hillary, with her sidekick, Barack Obama, had destroyed a whole
country. Libya. They had reduced an entire nation to bloody chaos. If
she could get away with that, she could get away with anything. So, for
the Deep State, she still held promise. She could work a hustle beyond
any hustle Trump could dream of. Good. She would do a good Globalist job
as the next American president. The press would keep things reasonably
quiet. She and Bill would continue their deep and long relationship with
the CIA and all the CIA stands for.
But there was one major issue. Apparently, once again, the
all-knowing and all-seeing and all-controlling controllers of the Deep
State, who manage society flawlessly, as Hegelians par excellence, had
screwed up royally. They hadn't talked with Hillary's doctors. These
gods, who can execute the synthesis of opposites on a grand scale, who
know the future decades in advance, had failed to notice Hillary was
sick. Quite sick. Sick enough so that if she won the election, she might
have to hide from the public for the better part of her term, and even
that (absurd) tactic might not work.
So perhaps midway through the 2016 election campaign, the
Globalist gods of the Deep State decided to back off and let Trump win.
Not because they favored him, not because they knew they could manage
his every move, and not because they had turned him into one of their
own, but because they had messed up and had to scramble and make the
best of an unpleasant situation. Because on a gross physical level,
Hillary was toast.
But they would attack President Donald mercilessly and do
whatever they could to drive him out of office and take him down. They
would sink their claws into Vice President Mike Pence and reassemble
however much of his brain they needed to adjust, for the moment when he
would step into the presidency.
The press and sleazebag Robert Mueller would head up phase
one of the raid on Trump. Violations of financial laws, sexual
misdemeanors and felonies, cooperating with the enemy
(Russia)---whatever could be cobbled together, true or false---was fair
game. Operation Oust the President was seriously underway.
Some people believe I'm a Trump supporter. As I've been
saying all along, I praise him on three counts: he helped keep Hillary
Clinton from the Oval Office; he has relentlessly attacked major media;
and he has mouthed strong anti-Globalist ideas. Everything else is up
for grabs.
There has never been a doubt in my mind that he is a liar.
But why is that news? Pardon me for noticing that every president is a
liar. Obama, Bush, and Clinton run a close race for the recent winner on
that score. My personal choice is Obama, only because he did the best
work of the three in pretending he was honorable.
Bottom line for now: the Deep State has to hate Trump,
because at the very least, he is a symbol and a lightning rod for
anti-Globalism and pro-Nationalism.
Apparently, he has calculated (and made) a number of deals
(that's what he does) in order to (hopefully) stay in office. Deals with
Goldman Sachs, deals with the military, deals with the military
industrial complex, etc. These arrangements, of necessity, mean he has
to walk back and discard some of his campaign promises. This is old hat
for him. It's business.
At the risk of repeating myself, most people don't fully
grasp the pernicious influence of mainstream news. Not just that
influence now, not just in the past few years, but forever. The ability
of the press, in concert with versions of the Deep State, to twist and
deform and undermine and reverse and fragment public perception, on
every major story and issue, is basically substituting death for life.
If the population is, on a daily basis, under the influence of such mind
control, then what kind of breakthrough is possible? No breakthrough.
None. The game is over. Fortunately, through the Internet, that
brainwashing is being shattered by independent media, piece by piece.
And then---along came Trump. From a position of devil-may-care, extreme
visibility, rudely, crudely, relentlessly, impulsively, he has attacked
the press. He's "crazy" that way. Like some wild Salvador Dali, he's
turned the tables on consensus reality. I don't care why he's doing it. I
don't care how he's doing it. He's doing it. This is an opening. This
is an accelerated opportunity for all sorts of independent voices who,
for their own reasons, oppose the Deep State. This opportunity must be
taken.
There are certainly risks, when it comes to Donald Trump. But taking apart major media is not one of them.
Coda 1: The biggest risk is war. With North Korea. This is
where cooler heads must prevail. This is where even arch Globalists must
weigh in. They want control of a viable planet, not one in smoking
ruins. If the business of America is business, an atmosphere in which
sellers and buyers can operate is an obvious requirement. Not a nuclear
atmosphere. But this isn't just a Trump problem. It would have been a
Hillary problem, if she had won the White House. Presented with a
(completely insane) Pentagon "strategy" for defeating North Korea,
either president would become "interested." Given Hillary's track record
in Libya, she might be more eager than Trump...
Coda 2: Hollywood, in its own fanciful way, is marshalling
its troops for yet another round of attacks on Trump, in the form of a
movie, "The [Washington] Post," which details the release of the
Pentagon Papers, in 1971, as an act of defiance against corrupt
government. Viewers are supposed to get the idea that the press is the
hero, and their war now against Trump is a holy crusade, for which we
should all be grateful. Hail to the press! We love you. We need you.
There is also a report that George Clooney will produce a mini-series on
the Watergate scandal for Netflix. Yet another Watergate re-run. I
wonder how many lies this one will push. The theme, again, will
certainly include the press exposure of the Nixon-team crimes. By
extension, we are supposed to imagine the press is now the champion of
truth in its anti-Trump campaign. Both these projects are oblique
efforts to repair the press' tattered image. They are Real and True. The
independent media are Fake and False. Good luck with that one.
Sorry for the length of this article. It was far too short. I had to leave a lot on the cutting room floor...
|
 |
|
|
Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections.
|
|
|
Jon Rappoport
The
author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM
THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US
Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a
consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the
expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he
has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles
on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin
Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and
Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics,
health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world.
|
|
|
You can find this article and more at NoMoreFakeNews.com.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment