Chapter 11 Twisted Minds by Jim Fetzer Ph.D. & Kelley Watt from Nobody Died at Sandy Hook

Jim Fetzer Ph.D. & Kelley Watt 



Stephen Sedensky does not establish a causal nexus between the shooter, 
his victims and the weapons he is alleged to have used. It suffers from the 
shortcomings of concluding that there were no fingerprints on the .22 rifle that 
was allegedly used to shoot his mother and, even more surprisingly, that of the 
large number of shots that were fired from the 5.56 calibre Bushmaster (close 
to 1 50 rounds), none of the bullet fragments coidd be matched to the weapon: 



5 * "No positive identification could be made to any of the bullet evidence submissions noted in 5.56 mm 

caliber. The physical condition of the bullet jacket surfaces were severely damaged and corroded. They all lacked 
individual striated marks of sufficient agreement for the identification process. The test fires also exhibited a lack of 
individual striated marks on the bullet surface for comparison purposes. This condition can be caused by fouling in 
the barrel of the rifle and the ammunition itself. The Bushmaster rifle cannot be eliminated as having fired the S.56 
caliber bullet evidence examined," quoting from the 6/19/13 Forensic Science Laboratory report. 



Under these circumstances, it would have been impossible for the alleged 
shooter, Adam Lanza, to have been convicted in a properly conducted court 
of law for his alleged offense, because no causal nexus has been established 
between the purported shooter, his weapons and the 20 children and seven 
adults he is supposed to have killed , which one might have naively supposed 
was the point of the investigation. But if that was its goal, then its objective 
was not achieved. If there has ever been such an abysmal failure in the annals 
of forensic investigation, I would love to hear about it. This is absurd! 

The staged photos for the fake event 

We have published several studies of the celebrated Shannon Hicks’ 
“iconic photograph”, which seems to show children being evacuated from 
Sandy Hook. But now we have additional proof it was staged, where the 
children were rearranged into a different sequence to create the “best shot” 
to convey the false impression that a real emergency was taking place. Here 
is addition proof that this was a hoax: 




And a new video study offers further proof that this was only a drill, 
where the author is very patient and circumspect in arriving at the conclusion 
that it was a hoax and no children died. But, of course, if he is correct-and 
the evidence is over-whlemingly on his side-than Lenny Pozner has no case 



178 



Are Sandy Hook skeptics delusional with “twisted minds ”? 



and we should not be concerned about the “parents of the victims” at Sandy 
Hook, because there were none. 



One of his best observations concerns what a real evacuation would have 
looked like, which would have been something a lot like this: 




When you combine the missing 469 children being evacuated from the 
school, the absence of EMTs hurrying into the school to rush those little 
bodies off to hospitals were doctors could pronounce them “dead or alive”, 
the denial of access to the bodies by their parents, the lack of urgency about 
what was taking place— including rearranging the children to take a staged 
photograph- there really is no room for doubt that this was a drill, which even 
Obama Department of Education officials have confirmed. 

Lenny Pozner’s vicious attack 

Lenny entitled his commentary, “Our Grief Denied: The Twisted Cruelty 
of Sandy Hook Hoaxers ”, and begins with this image and two paragraphs 
that follow here, which commit fallacies that I spent 35 years teaching 
undergraduates to avoid. After all, if none of those children actually died 
on 14 December 2012, then they are not “committing lies” or “spreading 
misinformation” as the author of this assault claims. 

The most obvious is that of begging the question by taking for granted 
the issue under consideration, namely, whether or not 20 students and 6 
adults were murdered by Adam Lanzan at Sandy Hook Elementary School 
on 14 December 2012: 

More than a year and a half after Adam Lanza brutally murdered 26 
women and children at the Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, 



179 




Jim Fetzer Ph.D. & Kelley Watt 




Photos of Sandy Hook Elementary School victims sit at a small memorial near the school on Jan. 

14, 2013, In Newtown, a month after the horrific massacre that claimed 20 children and six women at 
the school. (Getty Images / January 15, 2013) 

parents and relatives of the victims still relive the terror of that fateful day 
along with the daily anguish and torment they suffer over the loss of their 
loved ones. 

Worse, they have to suffer the onslaught of delusional conspiracy 
theorists, commonly called hoaxers, who claim Sandy Hook was a “false 
flag” event concocted by the government as a pretext to gun confiscation. 

As a parent of one of the murdered students, Noah Pozner, I have worked 
to debunk and stop the cruel and hateful hoaxers who use the Internet to 
spread their lies. Recently, some hoaxers have stepped up the intensity of 
their twisted campaign in an effort to draw more people into this destructive 
tale of misinformation and continue to disrupt the lives of victims ’families. 

Equally important, however, is the appeal to pity, which, in this case, 
entails the alleged grief that the victim’s parents have had to endure, where 
what the “Sandy Hook hoaxers” is only cruel if those 26 children actually 
died that day. 

We can only feel their grief if their children actually died, where none of 
their reactions were remotely like the genuine grief expressed by the parents 
of dead children in Gaza. 

We have no responses remotely comparable from the alleged “parents” 
of dead children at Sandy Hook. Just as you can search in vain for the 



180 



Are Sandy Hook skeptics delusional with “twisted minds ”? 



missing children, you can 
search in vain for reactions 
from them to the alleged 
deaths of their children. 

Try Robbie Parker, father 
of Emilie, meeting the 
press, for example; or 
try Anderson Cooper 
interviewing the parents of 
Grace McDonnell. Search 
for any parent displaying 
real grief. It’s not there. 

Noah Pozner’s “death certificate” 

Upon first consideration, Lenny’s “death certificate” for Noah Pozner 
looks authentic, where questions only arise when you take a closer look. For 
it to have been published by his father, Lenny, is a significant development, 
since it is the first concrete proof we have that any child actually died at 
Sandy Hook. As I have emphasized, there have been extraordinary efforts 
to suppress information about these 20 deaths: 




Children killed in Gaza playground shelling 




m . I-, . < t.— -» as m < » 




181 





Jim Fetzer Ph.D. & Kelley Watt 



As Dennis Cimino has observed, why would they need to use different 
typewriter ribbons on that certificate for different fields of it? and why is 
the certificate clearly with shaded areas that are not uniform like authentic 
death certificates are? You can clearly see that the typewriter clarity is blurry > 
in some fields and clear and crisp in the others, meaning that, while the 
blurry ones may have been done with a typewriter, the clear sections were 
photoshopped into the document. His observations have been reinforced by 
those sent to me by Bob Sims: 

(1) I am rather surprised, according to the copy you posted, that any 
branch of government was still using typewriters at all, when computers 
can do it so much better. However, the use of a typewriter in this case 
makes it much easier to spot fraud. 

(2) For starters, can you see any reason for the government typist to 
change the ball back and forth on the IBM machine I must assume was 
being used, because I cannot think of a reason to go to the extra trouble, 
and what for? 

(3) For example, look at the very > top in Box 3, where the date is posted. 
Why is that type clearly smaller than the rest of the page? You would have 
to change the ball for this, but for what reason? 

(4) Now look at the capital ‘‘A ” in Box 12 for Residence (Alpine). It is 
identical to the capital “ A ” in Box 22 for Mailing Address (Alpine). It 
is also identical to the capital “A” in Box 33 for Funeral Home. This is 
totally as expected, is it not? Read on. 

(5) Note that the capital “ A ” in question above in three different boxes has 
a small flag at its pinnacle. Compare that to the capital ‘‘A ”, without the 
small flag in Box 4, Time of Death, Box 26, City > or Town, Box 27, County 
of Death, and Box 39, Time Pronounced, and in Box 46, Time of Injury. 

(6) Compare Box 1, ‘‘Noah, ” with Box 7, ‘‘November, ” and you will 
clearly see that the spacing between the “N” and the “o ” is quite different. 

(7) Compare Box 1, the “N” in “Noah,” with Box 26, the “N” in 
‘‘SANDY. ” They are clearly different. 

(8) Compare Box 1, ‘‘Samuel, ” with Box 11, ‘‘Sandy, ” and again, the 
spacing between the ‘‘S” and the ‘‘a ” is clearly not the same. 

(9) In fact, the entire spacing in Box 1 is unlike any other in the forged 
document. 



182 




Are Sandy Hook skeptics delusional with “twisted minds ”? 



(10) Compare the name “Pozner” in Box 1 with “Pozner” in Box 20, 

clearly not the same. 

Noah Pozner’s death certificate is a fake, which we have proven on a 
dozen or more different grounds. But if Sandy Hook had been real, there 
would have been no reason to fake it. QED 

Moreover, Noah Pozner’s “death certificate” states that “No autopsy 
was performed”, while the “official report” states, “All the victims were 
given autopsies ”. We know they cannot both be true. It would be tempting 
to presume that one of them is accurate and the other a mistake. But insofar 
as they are both predicated on the presupposition Noah Pozner and 19 other 
children actually died at Sandy Hook, they both appear to be false. We have 
no authentic proof that any of those children, including Noah Pozner, actually 
died. None-for the obvious reason that none of them died! 

Is “Lenny Pozner” Noah’s father? 

One of the more intriguing developments related to the Pozner case is 
that the man who calls himself “Lenny” and poses as Noah’s father initiated 
contact with one of the members of the Sandy Hook research group, with 
whom 1 have collaborated in publishing several articles, including “Top Ten 
Reasons: Sandy Hook was an elaborate hoax I interviewed her and Kate 
Slate together on “ The Real Deal”, (radiofetzer.blogspot.com)'. 24 March 
2014. Here is what “Kelly from Tulsa”, as honest as the day is long, wrote 
me about her “conversations with Lenny”: 

I received an email message several months ago from Google+ stating 
Lenny Pozner was following (cyber stalking) me, so I hit the reply button and 
said to Mr. Pozner, ” Why are you following me on Google+, is it because 1 
don ’t believe anything about the official story’? ” Mr. Pozner wrote me back 
stating he had indeed lost his son and the death certificates were available 
to prove it for $19 from the Newtown Clerk’s office and I told him that the 
death certificated were not available and that the town had them sealed and 
I didn ’t believe it was really Noah s father otherwise he would have known 
that and Iwasn ’t going to waste my time talking through emails to someone 
posing to be Noah s father 

To make a long story short we emailed back and forth until late in the 
evening when he stated he was tired of using the keyboard and could we talk 
on the phone. 1 gave him my cell number and we talked until 3:00 am and 
proceeded to talk everyday for the next 5 weeks, often multiple times on the 
same day. 



183 




Jim Fetzer Ph.D. & Kelley Watt 



1 would say we 
spent 100 or more 
hours on the phone 
back and Roth over a 
5-week time period. 
We laughed, we 
shared photos and 
I got the impression 
he was a soft spoken 
likable guy, at the 
same time, I never 
got the impression 
he lost his son nor 
was he able to 



Noah Samuel Pozner 

Obituary 



Guest Book 




'Hi Sweet Angel, l think of you 
*o wry qffro o»i 
- Mil Davie 



View 



Sign 



| POZNER. NOAH SAMUa 
I Noah Samuel Pozner, on December 
14. 2012. a vetim of the of the tragic 
events of last Fnday at Sandy Hook 
Elementary School Noah was bom in 
Danbury. CT. son of Lenny and 
| Veron-que Po/ner, How do you capture 
I the essence of a sa year old m just a 
1 *ew words ? Noah was an impish, 
larger than life little boy. Everything he 
did conveyed acton and energy through love He was the 
ighi of our family, a little soul devoid of spite and 
meanness. He wi be forever missed by his mother, father, 
siblings Danielle Michael. Sophia and twin AneUe his 
grandparents Mane. Dirk, Ivan. DeannB and Lena, uncles 
and aunts, Arthur, Stephan. Alexi Patricia and Victoria May 
you fly to that peaceful valley and wait for us there Funeral 
services wit take place on Monday December 17. 2012 
(TODAY) at 1 DO PM from The Abraham L. Green and Son Funeral Home 88 Beach Road In 
Fairfield, with interment foDowing at B'nai Israel Cemetery on Moose Hi Road in Monroe. 
Memorial contributions may be directed to the planting of trees In Israel. 



Moro Photos 




convince me even 
though he tried 
somewhat hard. 



ABRAHAM L GRILN. >$V 
MSI) SON ***** 
m »AOI IK*A» fsmntiA ct 



The first time we spoke until the wee hours of the morning: I asked him to 
produce the following items (by the way, this call began on Friday night and 
went until Saturday morning) a death certificate for his son, his son s birth 
certificate showing he had been born, a photo of his wife in the hospital with 
Noah and Noah s twin sister as well as Sandy Hook report card. 

The following Monday he sent me an email telling me to check my inbox 
and sure enough, much to my surprise, he had posted all the things I asked 
for on his lenpoz.com website. However, the photo was not of his wife in the 
hospital, nonetheless, he did post a photo ofVeronique with the two newborns 
in her arms. The death certificate I believe stated he was “never married” 
which I thought odd. 

Speaking of his wife I asked him about Veronique working for the State 
Department in some capacity to disarm the country of Switzerland and 
he told me she never worked for the State Department but was a nurse, to 
which I asked for her nursing certificate (which he sent). Since Veronique s 
mother worked for the UN, I decided to call the office in the US Embassy and 
disguised myself as a foreigner to ask for Mrs. Veronique Haller. I was told 
that “she had left her post in 2013 ” (after she had been discovered working 
there for gun control in Switzerland). 

On Noah s birth certificate, it states that Veronique was born in 
Switzerland, but Lenny told me it was a different “Veronique Haller". I told 
him I felt he was lying to me and I believed it was his wife. I told Lenny that 
the name “Veronique Haller” was unusual and for it not to be the same 



184 



Are Sandy Hook skeptics delusional with “twisted minds ”? 



person stretched the imagination but he said “Veronique ” was a very common 
name overseas. Whatever! 



st ati or oomuncvT 



CffTmc vri of uv» uni 

hum tAMUl ranu 
Ml AM 



£ > 

l “ 

W- 

5 

a 

8 

- > 

\\ 



JMU tuns arum 

'■-*1 MW 



. i ovnci 

^ imnei 



i« vr» Tr>vrN Bo* m. oa.mi.it, conmi mrt i m 



3 3 



Like I said, we talked for around 5 weeks and I felt we had developed 
a friendship of sorts. We laughed many times as he had a very good sense 
of humor, but my overall impression from my gut told me he was not being 
truthful and over and over my mantra was, “Your son did not die and on 
top of that you are much too old to have children that young. ” He asked me 
how old I guessed him to be and I said I was “ around 61 ” and he said he 
was 47 which 1 did not believe. So I asked him for a driver s license, which 
he immediately sent before I could practically finish my sentence; but it had 
expired in 2009 and the photo did not looklike the Lenny I had seen on lenpoz. 
com. In fact, we laughed, because I told him he looked like a Columbian 
Drug Lord— and he agreed. 



Our friendship came to an end rather abruptly because I told Lenny that I 
was going to make a donation to his Noah ’sArk website (to which he sent me 
the correct address) since there were several official and unofficial donation 
websites set up on his son s behalf. I explained that, since I did not believe his 
son nor any others died at the school as the result of any shooting, there 



185 



Jim Fetzer Ph.D. & Kelley Watt 



would probably be a class 
action lawsuit claiming fraud 
and that, unless I had made a 
donation, I could not expect 
to be a part of that suit. I also 
told Lenny that a friend of 
mine agreed with me and had 
just made a donation. The next 
day he returned her money 
because if a lawsuit does 
ensue, he did not want her to 
be a beneficiary. 

He wrote me one last email after that, which said, "Fuck You Bitch ”, and 
that was the last I heard of my friend, Lenny Pozner. I found it rather strange 
that, every day— even numerous times a day— I would let it be kirown that I 
thought he was lying, yet he never once got upset or mad. When I brought 
up the money issue was when he ended our friendship. Sad! Go figure! 
Meanwhile, Noah ’s mother has claimed that she has released a photograph 
of his body. But no one I know can find it. So where is it? 

For those who base their conclusions upon logic and evidence, there is 
no doubt that, as Paul Preston was told by his contacts in the Department of 
Education of the Obama administration, it was a drill and no children died, 
which was done to promote an anti-gun agenda. Yet the charade continues. 
Not only were stories and photos published predating “the massacre”, but 
even NPR is running stories about the traumatic effects for the Sandy Hook 
first responders. No children died-not even Noah Pozner, it would appear-yet 
the charade continues without end. 

This chapter originally appeared as “Are Sandy Hook critics delusional with 
‘twisted minds’?” (6 August 2014), veteranstoday.com. 

[Editor s note: Although Appendix C, The Sandy Hook Timeline, includes 
reports from the media, contemporaneous at the time, that copies of the death 
certificates had been released under pressure from the press to The New York 
Post, none of us has been able to obtain copies— nor do we know of anyone 
else who has succeeded. Professor James Tracy, for example, wrote to The 
Post asking for copies and received no response. This appears to have been 
yet another false report like that from the Hartford Courant, which claimed 
that it had receive the FBI Report on Sandy Hook. But there appears to 
have been no FBI investigation of Sandy Hook, where that, too, appears to 
have been just one more in an endless stream of lies, deceit and deception 
surrounding Sandy Hook.] 




186 



Anologies with the London 7/7 Subway Bombings 

12 



Every grain of Sandy Hook: 
Snopes.com & 
Plausible Deniability 

by Sterling Harwood, J.D., Ph.D. 

In the time of my confession, in the hour of my deepest need 
When the pool of tears beneath my feet flood every newborn seed 
There s a dying voice within me reaching out somewhere 
Toiling in the danger and in the morals of despair. 

Don i have the inclination to look back on any mistake 
Like Cain, I now behold this chain of events that I must break 
In the fury of the moment I can see the master s hand 
In every leaf that trembles, in every grain of sand. 

*** 

I gaze into the door-way of temptation s angry flame 
And every time I pass that way I always hear my name 
Then onward in my journey I come to understand 
That every hair is numbered like every grain of sand. 

*** 

In the violence of a summer s dream, in the chill of a wintry light 
In the bitter dance of loneliness fading into space 
In the broken mirror of innocence on each forgotten face. 

*** 

Sometimes I turn, there s someone there, other times it s only me 
lam hanging in the balance of the reality of man 
Like every sparrow falling, like every grain of sand. 



~ Bob Dylan, “Every Grain of Sand,” from the album Shot of Love (1981) 



187