Wall St. and the Rise of Hitler by
Antony C. Sutton from reformation.org
CHAPTER FIVE
I.T.T. Works Both Sides of the War
Thus while I.T.T. Focke-Wolfe planes were bombing Allied ships, and I. T. T. lines were passing information to German submarines, I.T.T. direction .finders were saving other ships from torpedoes. (Anthony Sampson, The Sovereign State of I.T.T., New York: Stein & Day, 1973, p. 40.)
The multi-national giant International Telephone and Telegraph (I.T.T.)1 was founded in 1920 by Virgin Islands-born entrepreneur Sosthenes Behn. During his lifetime Behn was the epitome of the politicized businessman, earning his profits and building the I.T.T. empire through political maneuverings rather than in the competitive market place. In 1923, through political adroitness, Behn acquired the Spanish telephone monopoly, Compania Telefonica de Espana. In 1924 I.T.T., now backed by the J.P. Morgan firm, bought what later became the International Standard Electric group of manufacturing plants around the world.
The parent
board of I.T.T. reflected the J.P. Morgan interests, with Morgan partners
Arthur M. Anderson and Russell Leffingwell. The Establishment law firm of
Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed was represented by the two junior
partners, Gardiner & Reed.
DIRECTORS
OF I.T.T. IN 1933:
|
|
Directors
|
Affiliation
with other
Wall Street firms: |
Arthur M. ANDERSON
|
Partner, J.P. MORGAN and New York Trust
Company
|
Hernand BEHN
|
Bank of America
|
Sosthenes BEHN
|
NATIONAL CITY BANK
|
F. Wilder BELLAMY
|
Partner in Dominick & Dominicik
|
John W. CUTLER
|
GRACE NATIONAL BANK, Lee Higginson
|
George H. GARDINER
|
Partner in Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner
& Reed
|
Allen G. HOYT
|
NATIONAL CITY BANK
|
Russell C. LEFFINGWELL
|
Partner J.P. MORGAN and CARNEGIE CORP.
|
Bradley W. PALMER
|
Chairman, Executive Committee, UNITED FRUIT
|
Lansing P. REED
|
Partner in Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner
& Reed
|
The National
City Bank (NCB) in the Morgan group was represented by two directors, Sosthenes
Behn and Allen G. Hoyt. In brief, I.T.T. was a Morgan-controlled company; and
we have previously noted the interest of Morgan-controlled companies in war and
revolution abroad and political maneuvering in the United States.2
In 1930 Behn
acquired the German holding company of Standard Elekrizitäts A.G., controlled
by I.T.T. (62.0 percent of the voting stock), A.E.G. (81.1 percent of the
voting stock) and Felton & Guilleaume (six percent of the voting stock). In
this deal Standard acquired two German manufacturing plants and a majority
stock interest in Telefonfabrik Berliner A.G.I.T.T. also obtained the Standard
subsidiaries in Germany, Ferdinand Schuchardt Berliner Fernsprech-und
Telegraphenwerk A,G., as well as Mix & Genest in Berlin, and Suddeutsche
Apparate Fabrik G,m.b.H. in Nuremberg.
It is
interesting to note in passing that while Sosthenes Behn's I.T.T. controlled
telephone companies and manufacturing plants in Germany, the cable traffic
between the U.S. and Germany was under the control of Deutsch-Atlantische
Telegraphengesellschaft (the German Atlantic Cable Company). This firm,
together with the Commercial Cable Company and Western Union Telegraph Company,
had a monopoly in transatlantic U.S.-German cable communications. W.A. Harriman
& Company took over a block of 625,000 shares in Deutsch-Atlantische in
1925, and the firm's board of directors included an unusual array of
characters, many of whom we have met elsewhere. It included, for example, H. F.
Albert, the German espionage agent in the United States in World War I;
Franklin D. Roosevelt's former business associate yon Berenberg-Gossler; and
Dr. Cuno, a former German chancellor of the 1923 inflationary era. I.T.T. in
the United States was represented on the board by yon Guilleaume and Max
Warburg of the Warburg banking family
There is no
record that I.T.T. made direct payments to Hitler before the Nazi grab for
power in 1933. On the other hand, numerous payments were made to Heinrich
Himmler in the late 1930s and in World War II itself through I.T.T. German
subsidiaries. The first meeting between Hitler and I.T.T. officials — so far as
we know — was reported in August 1933,3 when Sosthenes
Behn and I.T.T. German representative Henry Manne met with Hitler in
Berchesgaden. Subsequently, Behn made contact with the Keppler circle (see
Chapter Nine) and, through Keppler's influence, Nazi Baron Kurt von Schröder
became the guardian of I.T.T. interests in Germany. Schröder acted as the
conduit for I.T.T. money funneled to Heinrich Himmler's S.S. organization in
1944, while World War II was in progress,
and the United states was at war with Germany.4
Through Kurt
Schröder, Behn and his I.T.T. gained access to the profitable German armaments
industry and bought substantial interest in German armaments firms, including
Focke-Wolfe aircraft. These armaments operations made handsome profits, which
could have been repatriated to the United States parent company. But they were
reinvested in German rearmament. This reinvestment of profits in German armament
firms suggests that Wall Street claims it was innocent of wrongdoing in German
rearmament — and indeed did not even know of Hitler's intentions — are
fraudulent. Specifically, I.T.T. purchase of a substantial interest in
Focke-Wolfe meant, as Anthony Sampson has pointed out, that I.T.T. was
producing German planes used to kill Americans and their allies — and it made
excellent profits out of the enterprise.
In Kurt von
Schröder, I.T.T. had access to the very heart of the Nazi power elite. Who was
Schröder? Baron Kurt von Schröder was born in Hamburg in 1889 into an old,
established German banking family. An earlier member of the Schröder family
moved to London, changed his name to Schroder (without the dierisis) and
organized the banking firm of J. Henry Schroder in London and J. Henry Schroder
Banking Corporation in New York. Kurt von Schröder also became a partner in the
private Cologne Bankhaus, J. H. Stein & Company, founded in the late
eighteenth century. Both Schröder and Stein had been promoters, in company with
French financiers, of the 1919 German separatist movement which attempted to
split the rich Rhineland away from Germany and its troubles. In this escapade
prominent Rhineland industrialists met at J. H. Stein's house on January 7,
1919 and a few months later organized a meeting, with Stein as chairman, to
develop public support for the separatist movement. The 1919 action failed. The
group tried again in 1923 and spearheaded another movement to break the
Rhineland away from Germany to come under the protection of France. This
attempt also failed. Kurt von Schroder then linked up with Hitler and the early
Nazis, and as in the 1919 and 1923 Rhineland separatist movements, Schröder
represented and worked for German industrialists and armaments manufacturers.
In exchange for
financial and industrial support arranged by von Schroder, he later gained
political prestige. Immediately after the Nazis gained power in 1933 Schroder
became the German representative at the Bank for International Settlements, which
Quigley calls the apex of the international control system, as well as head of
the private bankers group advising the German Reichsbank. Heinrich Himmler
appointed Sehroder an S.S. Senior Group Leader, and in turn Himmler became a
prominent member of Keppler's Circle. (See Chapter Nine.)
In 1938 the
Schroder Bank in London became the German financial agent in Great Britain,
represented at financial meetings by its Managing Director (and a director of
the Bank of England), F.C. Tiarks. By World War II Baron Schrader had in this
manner acquired an impressive list of political and banking connections
reflecting a widespread influence; it was even reported to the U.S. Kilgore
Committee that Schrader was influential enough in 1940 to bring Pierre Laval to
power in France. As listed by the Kilgore Committee, Sehroder's political
acquisitions in the early 1940s were as follows:
SS Senior Group Leader. Iron Cross of First
and Second Class.
|
|
Trade Group for Wholesale and Foreign Trade –
Manager.
|
Swedish Consul General.
|
|
Akademie fur Deutsches Recht (Academy
of Germany Law) – Member
|
International Chamber of Commerce – Member of
administrative committee.
|
|
City of Cologne – Councilor.
|
Council of Reich Post Office – Member of
advisory board.
|
|
University of Cologne – Member of board of
trustees.
|
German Industrial and Commerce Assembly –
Presiding member.
|
|
Kaiser Wilhelm Foundation – Senator.
|
Reich Board of Economic Affairs Member.
|
|
Advisory Council of German-Albanians.
|
Deutsche Reichsbahn – President of administrative
board.
|
|
Goods Clearing Bureau – Member.
|
|
|
Working Committee of Reich Group for
Industry and Commerce – Deputy chairman.5
|
Schröder's
banking connections were equally impressive and his business connections (not
listed here) would take up two pages:
Bank for International Settlement – Member of
the directorate.
|
|
Deutsche Verkehrs-Kredit-Bank, A.G.,
Berlin (Controlled by Deutsche Reichsbank) – Chairman of board of directors.
|
J.H. Stein & Co, Cologne – Partner
(Banque Worms was French correspondent).
|
|
Deutsche Ueberseeische Bank (Controlled by
Deutsche Bank, Berlin) – Director.6
|
Deutsche Reichsbank, Berlin. Adviser to board
of directors.
|
|
|
Wirtschaftsgruppe Private Bankegewerbe –
Leader.
|
|
|
This was the
Schröder who, after 1933, represented Sosthenes Behn of I.T.T. and I.T.T.
interests in Nazi Germany. Precisely because Schröder had these excellent
political connections with Hitler and the Nazi State, Behn appointed Schröder
to the boards of all the I.T.T. German companies: Standard Electrizitatswerke
A.G. in Berlin, C. Lorenz A.G. of Berlin, and Mix & Genest A.G. (in which
Standard had a 94-percent participation).
In the
mid-1930s another link was forged between Wall Street and Schröder, this time
through the Rockefellers. In 1936 the underwriting and general securities
business handled by J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation in New York was
merged into a new investment banking firm — Schroder, Rockefeller &
Company, Inc. at 48 Wall Street. Carlton P. Fuller of Schroder Banking
Corporation became president and Avery Rockefeller, son of Percy Rockefeller
(brother of John D. Rockefeller) became vice president and director of the new
firm. Previously, Avery Rockefeller had been associated behind the scenes with
J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation; the new firm brought him out into the
open.7
I.T.T. had yet
another conduit to Nazi Germany, through German attorney Dr. Gerhard Westrick.
Westrick was one of a select group of Germans who had conducted espionage in
the United States during World War I. The group included not only Kurt von
Schröder and Westrick but also Franz von Papen — whom we shall meet in company
with James Paul Warburg of the Bank of Manhattan in Chapter Ten — and Dr.
Heinrich Albert. Albert, supposedly German commercial attache in the U.S. in
World War I, was actually in charge of financing yon Papen's espionage program.
After World War I Westrick and Albert formed the law firm of Albert &
Westrick which specialized in, and profited heavily from, the Wall Street
reparations loans. The Albert & Westrick firm handled the German end of the
J Henry Schroder Banking loans, while the John Foster Dulles firm of Sullivan
and Cromwell in New York handled the U.S. end of the Schroder loans.
Just prior to
World War II the Albert-Papen-Westrick espionage operation in the United States
began to repeat itself, only this time around the American authorities were
more alert. Westrick came to the U.S. in 1940, supposedly as a commercial
attache but in fact as Ribbentrop's personal representative. A stream of
visitors to the influential Westrick in-eluded prominent directors of U.S.
petroleum and industrial firms, and this brought Westrick to the attention of
the FBI.
Westrick at
this time became a director of all I.T.T. operations in Germany, in order to
protect I.T.T. interests during the expected U.S. involvement in the European
war.8
Among his other enterprises Westrick attempted to persuade Henry Ford to cut
off supplies to Britain, and the favored treatment given by the Nazis to Ford
interests in France suggests that Westrick was partially successful in
neutralizing U.S. aid to Britain.
Although
Westrick's most important wartime business connection in the United States was
with International Telephone and Telegraph, he also represented other U.S.
firms, including Underwood Elliott Fisher, owner of the German company Mercedes
Buromaschinen A.G.; Eastman Kodak, which had a Kodak subsidiary in Germany; and
the International Milk Corporation, with a Hamburg subsidiary. Among Westrick's
deals (and the one which received the most publicity) was a contract for Texaco
to supply oil to the German Navy, which he arranged with Torkild Rieber,
chairman of the board of Texaco Company.
In 1940 Rieber
discussed an oil deal with Hermann Goering, and Westrick in the United States
worked for Texas Oil Company. His automobile was bought with Texaco funds, and
Westrick's driver's license application gave Texaco as his business address.
These activities were publicized on August 12, 1940. Rieber subsequently
resigned from Texaco and Westrick returned to Germany. Two years later Rieber
was chairman of South Carolina Shipbuilding and Dry Docks, supervising
construction of more than $10 million of U.S. Navy ships, and a director of the
Guggenheim family's Barber Asphalt Corporation and Seaboard Oil Company of
Ohio.9
In 1939 I.T.T.
in the United States controlled Standard Elektrizitats in Germany, and in turn
Standard Elektrizitats controlled 94 percent of Mix & Genest. On the board
of Standard Elektrizitats was Baron Kurt von Schroder, a Nazi banker at the
core of Nazism, and Emil Heinrich Meyer, brother-in-law of Secretary of State
Keppler (founder of the Keppler Circle) and a director of German General
Electric. Schroder and Meyer were also directors of Mix & Genest and the
other I.T.T. subsidiary, C. Lorenz Company; both of these I.T.T. subsidiaries
were monetary contributors to Himmler's Circle of Friends — i.e., the Nazi S.S. slush fund. As late
as 1944, Mix & Genest contributed 5,000 RM to Himmler and Lorenz
contributed 20,000 RM. In short, during World War II International Telephone
and Telegraph was making cash payments to S.S. leader Heinrich Himmler.10 These
payments enabled I.T.T. to protect its investment in Focke-Wolfe, an aircraft
manufacturing firm producing fighter aircraft used against the United States.
The interrogation
of Kurt von Schröder on November 19, 1945 points up the deliberate nature of
the close and profitable relationship between Colonel Sosthenes Behn of I.T.T.,
Westrick, Schröder, and the Nazi war machine during World War II, and that this
was a deliberate and knowledgeable relationship:
Q. You have
[told] us in your earlier testimony, a number of companies in Germany in which
the International Telephone and Telegraph Company or the Standard Electric
Company had a participation. Did either International Telephone and Telegraph
Company or the Standard Electric Company have a participation in any other
company in Germany?
A. Yes. The
Lorenz Company, shortly before the war, took a participation of about 25
percent in Focke-Wolfe A.G. in Bremen. Focke-Wolfe was making airplanes for the
German Air Ministry. I believe that later as Focke-Wolfe expanded and took in
more capital that the interest of Lorenz Company dropped a little below this 25
percent.
Q. So this
participation in Focke-Wolfe by Lorenz Company began after Lorenz Company was
nearly 100-percent owned and controlled by Colonel Behn through the
International Telephone and Telegraph Company?
A. Yes.
Q. Did Colonel
Behen [sic] approve of this
investment by the Lorenz Company in Focke-Wolfe?
A. I am confident
that Colonel Behn approved before his representatives who were in close touch
with him formally approved the transaction.
Q. What year
was it that the Lorenz Company made the investment which gave it this 25
percent participation in Foeke-Wolfe?
A. I remember
it was shortly before the outbreak of war, that is, shortly before the invasion
of Poland. [Ed: 1939]
Q Would
Westrick know all about the details of the participation of Lorenz Company in
Foeke-Wolfe, A.G. of Bremen?
A. Yes. Better
than I would.
Q. What was the
size of the investment that Lorenz Company made in the Focke-Wolfe A.G., of
Bremen, which gave them the initial 25 percent participation?
A. 250,000
thousand RM initially, and this was substantially increased, but I don't recall
the extent of the additional investments that Lorenz Company made to this
Focke-Wolfe A.G. of Bremen.
Q. From 1055,
until the outbreak of the European War, was Colonel Behn in a position to
transfer the profits from investments of his companies in Germany to his companies
in the United States?
A. Yes. While
it would have required that his companies take a little less than the full
dividends because of the difficulty of securing foreign exchange, the great
bulk of the profits could have been transferred to the company of Colonel Behn
in the United States. However, Colonel Behn did not elect to do this and at no
time did he ask me if I could accomplish this for him. Instead, he appeared to
be perfectly content to have all the profits of the companies in Germany, which
he and his interests controlled, reinvesting these profits in new buildings and
machinery and any other enterprises engaged in producing armaments.
Another one of
these enterprises, Huth and Company, G.m.b.H., of Berlin, which made radio and
radar parts, many of which were used in equipment going to the German Armed
Forces. The Lorenz Company as I recall it [had] a 50-percent participation in
Huth and Company. The Lorenz Company also had a small subsidiary which acted as
a sales agency for the Lorenz Company to private customers.
Q. You were a
member of the board of Lorenz Company's board of director, from about 1935 up
to the present time. During this time, Lorenz Company and some of the other
companies, such as Foeke-Wolfe with which it had large participation, were
engaged in the manufacture of equipment for armaments and war production. Did
you know or did you hear of any protest made by Colonel Behn or his
representatives against these companies engaged in these activities preparing
Germany for war?
A. No.
Q. Are you
positive that there was no other occasion in which you were asked by either
Westrick, Mann [sic], Colonel Behn or any other person connected with the
International Telephone and Telegraphic Company interests in Germany, to
intervene on behalf of the company with the German authorities.
A. Yes. I don't
remember any request for my intervention in any matter of importance to the
Lorenz Company or any other International Telephone and Telegraph interests in
Germany.
I have read the record of this interrogation and I
swear that the answers I have given to the question of Messrs. Adams and Pajus
are true to the best of knowledge and belief. s. /Kurt von Schröder
It was this story of I.T.T.-Nazi cooperation during
World War II and I.T.T. association with Nazi Kurt von Schröder that I.T.T.
wanted to conceal — and almost was successful in concealing. James Stewart
Martin recounts how during the planning meetings of the Finance Division of the
Control Commission he was assigned to work with Captain Norbert A. Bogdan, who
out of uniform was vice president of the J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation
of New York. Martin relates that "Captain Bogdan had argued vigorously
against investigation of the Stein Bank on the grounds that it was 'small
potatoes.'"11
Shortly after blocking this maneuver, two permanent members of Bogdan's staff
applied for permission to investigate the Stein Bank — although Cologne had not
yet fallen to U.S. forces. Martin recalls that "The Intelligence Division
blocked that one," and so some information on the Stein-Schröder
Bank-I.T.T. operation survived.
Footnotes:
1For an
excellent review of I.T.T.'s worldwide activities, see Anthony Sampson, The
Sovereign State of I.T.T., (New York: Stein & Day, 1973).
2See also
Sutton, Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution, op. cit.
3New York
Times, August 4, 1933.
4See also
Chapter Nine for documentary proof of these I.T.T. payments to the S.S.
5Elimination
of German Resources, p. 871.
6Ibid.
7New York
Times, July 20, 1936.
8Anthony
Sampson reports a meeting between I.T.T. vice president Kenneth Stockton and
Westrick in which the preservation of I.T.T. properties was planned. See
Anthony Sampson, op. cit., p. 39.
9There is no substance
to reports that Rieber received $20,000 from the Nazis. These reports were
investigated by the F.B.I. with no proof forthcoming. See United States Senate,
Subcommittee to Investigate the Administration of the. Internal Security Act,
Committee on the Judiciary, Morgenthau Diary (Germany), Volume I, 90th
Congress, 1st Session, November 20, 1967, (Washington: U.S. Government Printing
Office, 1967), pp. 316-8. On Rieber see also Appendix to the Congressional
Record, August 20, 1942, p, A 1501-2, Remarks of Hon. John M. Coffee.
10See
pp. 128-130 for further details.
11James
Stewart Martin, op. cit., p. 52.
No comments:
Post a Comment