Templeton Times: Chapter 10: CT Crime Data confirms FBI Report from Nobody Died at Sandy Hook

Chapter 10 CT Crime Data
confirms FBI Report

by Dr. Eowyn, Ph.D. & Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.

“According to the Connecticut State Crime Report for 2012, there were
27 deaths in Connecticut that did not occur in any community’ or jurisdiction
in Connecticut. But if no one died in Newtown, no one died at Sandy Hook"-
Jim Fetzer

Brasscheck TV claims SatlCty HOOk FBI HOaX

that the victims of the Sandy

Hook massacre really are in VitSl nOHSGnSG

the FBI’s Consolidated Crime Report, if you know how to read it.

He (the author) claims that those who believe this is “the smoking gun”
of Sandy Hook have committed a mistake, because the numbers are there
under a special “State Police” designation.

He even suggests that Wolfgang Halbig and Alex Jones have been
taken in, which is especially surprising since the one he refers to as “W” is a
former state trooper himself. Someone has blundered, but that would not be
Wolfgang. Sandy Hook is a subdivision of Newtown. Murders in Newtown
should be reported under
“Newtown”, not under a
“State Police” designation.

Search for Brasscheck
TV: “Sandy Hook FBI
Hoax: Viral Nonsense”

169

Dr. Eowyn Ph.D. & Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.

Murders are offenses under the law and should be reported for the
community or jurisdiction that has the legal authority to investigate and
prosecute them, even if the investigation were conducted by the CT State
Police. Otherwise, how would any community know what crimes were
committed there?

The Connecticut State Police are an organization, not a community or a
jurisdiction. Like everything else about this event, there is nothing normal
or consistent or coherent about it. And it therefore comes as no surprise that
the FBI report has been confirmed by the state’s crime statistics for 2012:

Crime in Connecticut 2012

Arrest Statistics for Year 2012 Anencv: Connecticut Total

•n

1
to
y

Aggravated Assault

1
S'

</>

■n

| Stolen Property]

Weapons Charges

1
i

<10

10-12

218

13-14

364

790

127

362

666

435

705

119

165

586

733

109

293l 311

495l 1828

130l 42

31371 16l 42 1 lOl 59 1 49Gl 160l 1

1 4-4

Go to “Crime in Connecticut COMPLETE for 2012" and on page 26, you
will find the data that I am publishing here. At the intersection of “Murder”
with “<10” (below 10 years of age) for 2012, you will find the number “0"!
But that does not quite settle the matter, because the number “27" appears
under the heading, “State Police Misc.” buried on page 415:

Crime In Connecticut 2012 Offense end Arrest Dete

Offense Statistics for Veaf 701?

Agency
or Are©

-..It. tan. •

J. 067. 466

1 nrtr » Of fenvr

Offenses

Number

Rat-'

Clearances
Number Pet

Value Stolen

Total Avrragr

Hurdo’

100 OS

R**

0 1

00%

Robbery

0.1

50 0%

$215

$54

Aggravated As&feA

t-7

76 9%

—

Hue**,

17.5%

$17,669

$797

larceny

703

70 7%

*445.601

*7.197

Motor VcNOc The«

2.4

45 9%

$707,519

S9.4-H

Arson

0-0%

$1 >45.01 7

$47,000

Crime Irwftea Total 1

370

12 3

146

38.6%

>1,161,304

>3.072

1 Aran not nluki!

•IrckjJnJ to suer Mk* lotto

Value Recovered

>243 497

* Aj rates per 100,000 panom. osne nm of rape per 100,000 Nwtota a 0-1

1 lrrti)M 12 Xttm rf Nwnttwn aw Itadtnf

If you put the data on page 415 together with the data on page 26, then
according to the Connecticut State Crime Report for 2012, there were 27
deaths in Connecticut that did not occur in any community or jurisdiction

170

CT Crime Data confirms FBI Report

in Connecticut. But if no one died in Newtown, then no one died at Sandy
Hook, because Sandy Hook is in Newtown.

Twenty-seven people cannot have died in Connecticut and also not have
died anywhere in Connecticut in 2012. The Connecticut State Police, who
orchestrated this event, have been caught and are looking for a way out. The
FBI is playing along, because Eric Holder, the US Attorney General, was a
crucial player in the hoax.

A more interesting analysis

A far more sophisticated discussion of The FBI’s Consolidated Uniform
Crime Report for Connecticut may be found in Global Research, “The Sandy
School Massacre and FBI Data Anomalies” (27 September 2014), by Jason
Kissner. Jason cites an article by Adan Salazar that appeared on infowars.
com to critique it and explain why its author got it wrong. He even notes that
Connecticut reports zero murders for children below the age of 10 in its own
report on crime in 2012:

FBI SAYS NO ONE KILLED AT SANDY HOOK

Agency publishes crime report showing "0" murders occurred in Newtown in

Image Credits: Wiki Commons

Kissner identifies himself as a “criminologist”, who would appear to
be in an appropriate position to explain why “the data entry identified by
Salazar in no way whatsoever supports the claim that the FBI says no one
was killed at Sandy Hook. ” But of course it does. Since the FBI’s data is
confirmed by Connecticut’s data, but no location for those deaths appears in
the state report, it supports the inference no one died, since if they died they
had to have died somewhere.

171

Dr. Eowyn Ph.D. & Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.

Kissner says, “There could conceivably be real issues as to why the Sandy
Hook murders weren ’t scored in the Newtown 'Agency or Area ’even if it
is true that the Connecticut State Police managed the ‘investigation. ’”
Because the Newtown event was scored under the “State Police Misc. ”
heading and the FBI received the data from Connecticut, it placed a “0”
in the Newtown row. Which means the claim that the FBI says nobody
was killed at Newtown is not supported by the FBI’s data point. But
does Kissner really think people can die in Connecticut without dying
somewhere in Connecticut?

After all, murders are reported in the communities or jurisdictions in
which they have occurred, not on the basis of the agency or organization
that investigates them. Since these “murders” allegedly took place in Sandy
Hook and Sandy Hook is a subdivision of Newtown, they should have been
reported under “Newtown”, not under “State Police Misc.” The only reason
to cite any murders under “State Police Misc.” is to obfuscate that no one
died in Newtown in 2012.

Did the CT State police retract data?

When Kissner turns to an article in USA TODAY, however, he comes up
with some striking information, which is that the data originally submitted
by Colorado on the Aurora “Batman” shooting as well as the data originally
submitted by Connecticut about Sandy Hook were both retracted at the request
of local authorities, which were in the case of Sandy Hook, the Connecticut
State Police:

'The records are voluntary subnvfled by police agencies, and FBI oWc-ats say the Connecticut
State Police and Aurora police departments initially provided I ho information on the year's two
largest killing ocdontt - only to request mat it be deleted

In Aurora. Sgt Chris Am&ler says his department provides data to the Colorado Bureau ol
Investigations monthly The FBI database contains information on 18 other homicides in Aurora in
201 £

■Wo checked our records and found that al data related to the theater shooting was
submitted.* he said, adding that investigators were still trying to fgure out why the
incident was later deleted from FBI records. Connecticut's homicide count is correct,
but the FBI'6 dotailod supplementary material includes ont y the shooting ot Adam
Larua's mother at her home in December 2012, |uat before Larue went to the
elementary school U Paul Vance soya tvs department submitted a ibt-paga report on
the Newtown school victims to the FBI but later identified a ms taka. Updated data was
provdod too late to bo rotloctod in the database. Vonco says, but the information
should be added soon.*

As Kissner observes, what sort of “mistake” could possibly have justified
the CTSP to request the retraction of data on homicides? The “supplemental
homicide report” (which is the “supplementary materials” mentioned here)
is as simple as it gets, but the mention of the suspect ’s mother, Nancy Lanza,
suggests that information about her may have been in error— which given the

172

CT Crime Data confirms FBI Report

latest research about the alleged victims, could very’ well have justified the
retraction-along with the data on every other purported victim. The school
was closed by 2008 and no one died there in 2012.

Sandy Hook “smoking guns”

This report is not “the smoking gun” of Sandy Hook, because the word
“the” implies there is one and only one. There are many “smoking guns” for
Sandy Hook, including that the school had been closed by 2008, that there
were no 469 children being evacuated, that the Shannon Hicks’ “iconic”
photograph was staged, that the “official report” by Danbury State’s Attorney
does not connect the suspect to his alleged victims or the weapons he is
supposed to have used and that Wolfgang has exposed the “script”. The FBI
report is important because it encapsulates the problems with Sandy Hook:

The FBI crime report is making an impact with the public, no doubt,
because it represents the federal government and the authority’ of the state
(not just of Connecticut, but of the United States). We tend to confound
authority with truth, when truth is the authority-and where “authorities ”
lie to the American people all the time: about Lee Oswald, the Gulf of
Tonkin, Iraqi soldiers dumping babies out of incubators in Kuwait, about
19 Arab hijackers, about Osama bin Laden, about Saddam Hussein, about
Sandy Hook and about the Boston bombing— the authorities are lying to
us all the time!

What is incredible is that we still tend to believe in our government, no
doubt because the very’ idea that it would kill 3, 000 of our fellow citizens
to promote a political agenda is beyond our comprehension. They have
experts on mind control and the dissemination of false information to
instill fear into us and manipulate us for political purposes. The young
Kuwati girl who testified before Congress is an appropriate illustration,
since it was an emotional appeal like the emotional appeal of 20 first-
graders being massacred at school.

The statistical records for crimes in states should be straightforward
and unambiguous, as Jason Kissner observes: it’s a simple spread-sheet
with the intersection of kinds of crimes and locations where crimes of that
kind could have been committed. Had there been a murder of 20 children
and seven adults— including Nancy Lanza as the twenty-seventh-then those
numbers would have appeared in their proper place. It is a federal crime to
report false statistics to the FBI, so the CTSP tacked on a new category of
“State Police Misc.” as though that solved the problem. But perhaps Nancy
Lanza also poses special problems, which have caused them some concern.

173

Dr Eowyn Ph.D. & Jim Fetzer, Ph.D.

What about Nancy Lanza?

Another line of proof concerns the woman alleged to be Adam Lanza’s
mother, Nancy. There is more than one theory regarding her identity. One,
which identifies her with Annie Haddad, has been featured in “A sampler
of Sandy Hook videos”, where I explained that studies about her tend to
disappear from the internet as rapidly as they are posted. In this instance, you
can find this one by clicking on this link. Both “Nancy Lanza” and “Annie
Haddad” as appearing to be the person also known under the last name
“Champion”.

This theme is developed further in a new book by Dennis and Sabrina
Phillips, Making a Killing: The Unofficial Story of the Sandy Hook
Massacre (2014). According to the Tampa Bay Times, when Nancy Lanza’s
mother, “Dorothy Hanson”, was reached for comment after the shooting,
she was “Too distraught to talk.” During some initial research, they came
across an obituary from the St. Petersburg Times back in the year 2000. It was
for an “Eleanore Champion” and it’s the one of the only obituaries connecting
Nancy Lanza to the Champion name.

Create Acmunt I Log tr | T ■

Ho w lacant ttama Dtannali hrumi

Note this site hat updated
10. N«ncy tmo-incT and dropped the old

Nancy E Lanza Sandy Hook address.

Nancy J Lanza

Nancy A Lohneiss

For more, search YouTube for “Nancy Lanza: Her life today — The
Undead of Sandy Hook”.

LiveHIES

174

CT Crime Data confirms FBI Report

An alternative account can be found here: In the horror story > of Sandy
Hook, Nancy Lanza, Adam s mother, has been somewhat of a mystery > and
met a rather awful end, according to the official tale. It would appear that
perhaps Nancy never died. The real “Undead” of this false flag. Another part
of this farce known as the Sandy Hook Massacre. The absurd photographs
from INSIDE the Lanza house would be enough to show normal people
that her death was faked. However, here we will provide several additional
layers of proof that she obviously is still living her life today. In fact, it appears
that Nancy and Peter are back together again... sans “Adam", of course. (For
more, see Chapter 7.)

The situation with regard to Sandy Hook boggles the mind. The
Connecticut State Police submit information to the FBI that asserts 27 people
died in Connecticut, but at the same time denies that they died anywhere in
Connecticut. That is absurd and revealing. The objective of disinformation
is to create enough uncertainty that everything is believable and nothing is
knowable. But we have a mountain ofproofthat the school was closed by 2008
and that no one died there in 2012. Even Obama officials in the Department
of Education have confirmed it. And Dr. Eowyn offers more proof that no
one died in her brilliant study of the Social Security Death Index (Chapter
9), which has apparently been shut down so students and scholars cannot
compare the data it provides with the claims being made by local, state and
federal authorities.

This chapter is an expanded and revised version of an article originally
published as “Sandy Hook: CT crime data confirms FBI report” (28
September 2014), veteranstoday.com.

175

Dr Eowyn Ph.D. & Jim Fetzei; Ph.D.

176

Are Sandy Hook skeptics delusional with “twisted minds ”?

Are Sandy Hook skeptics
delusional with “twisted minds”?

by Jim Fetzer Ph.D., & Kelley Watt

“Noah Pozner s death certificate is a fake. But if Sandy Hook had been
real, there would have been no reason to fake it. QED "-Jim Fetzer

Someone calling himself “Lenny Pozner”, who purports to be the father
of the alleged Sandy Hook victim, Noah Pozner, has launched a vicious attack
upon those who are skeptical of the “official story” of the Sandy Hook event.

A response has been published by Able Child, observing that the problem
has arisen because the “official report” from Connecticut authorities,
especially the Sandy Hook Final Report authored by Danbury State’s Attorney
Stephen Sedensky, was a shoddy piece of work that raised more questions
than it answers. This exchange deserves serious consideration, not least of
all because Noah Pozner appears to be the only alleged “child victim” for
whom their birth and death certificates have been released by their “parents”.
There is no stronger case.

That makes the Noah Pozner case of special significance as an acid test: if
Noah really died, that defeats the critics ’ claim that “no children died at
Sandy Hook but if Noah did not die, especially if Lenny s “proof of death ”
turns out to be fake, then this effort to defeat the critics will have backfired
badly. And it is very straightforward to demonstrate that AbleChild is right
about the “official report”.

The “official report” on Sandy Hook

At this point in time, it is relatively trivial to demonstrate that the “official
report” on Sandy Hook that was authored by Danbury State’s Attorney

177

Templeton Times

Fluoride Information

Monday, November 27, 2017

Chapter 10: CT Crime Data confirms FBI Report from Nobody Died at Sandy Hook

No comments:

Post a Comment