Wall St. and the Rise of Hitler by
Antony C. Sutton from reformation.org
CHAPTER SIX
Henry Ford and the Nazis
I would like to
outline the importance attached by high [Nazi] officials to respect the desire
and maintain the good will of "Ford," and by "Ford" I mean
your father, yourself, and the
Ford Motor Company, Dearborn. (Josiah E. Dubois,
Jr, Generals in Grey Suits, London:
The Bodley Head, 1953, p. 250.)Henry Ford is often seen to be something of an enigma among the Wall Street elite. For many years in the 20s and 30s Ford was popularly known as an enemy of the financial establishment. Ford accused Morgan and others of using war and revolution as a road to profit and their influence in social systems as a means of personal advancement. By 1938 Henry Ford, in his public statements, had divided financiers into two classes: those who profited from war and used their influence to bring about war for profit, and the "constructive" financiers. Among the latter group he now included the House of Morgan. During a 1938 New York Times interview1 Ford averred that:
Somebody once
said that sixty families have directed the destinies of the nation. It might
well be said that if somebody would focus the spotlight on twenty-five persons
who handle the nation's finances, the world's real war makers would be brought
into bold relief.
The Times reporter asked Ford how he equated
this assessment with his long-standing criticism of the House of Morgan, to which
Ford replied:
There is a
constructive and a destructive Wall Street. The House of Morgan represents the
constructive. I have known Mr. Morgan for many years. He backed and supported
Thomas Edison, who was also my good friend ....
After
expounding on the evils of limited agricultural production — allegedly brought
about by Wall Street — Ford continued,
... if these
financiers had their way we'd be in a war now. They want war because they make
money out of such conflict — out of the human misery that wars bring.
On the other
hand, when we probe behind these public statements we find that Henry Ford and
son Edsel Ford have been in the forefront of American businessmen who try to
walk both sides of every ideological fence in search of profit. Using Ford's own
criteria, the Fords are among the "destructive" elements.
It was Henry
Ford who in the 1930s built the Soviet Union's first modern automobile plant
(located at Gorki) and which in the 50s and 60s produced the trucks used by the
North Vietnamese to carry weapons and munitions for use against Americans.2 At about the
same time, Henry Ford was also the most famous of Hitler's foreign backers, and
he was rewarded in the 1930s for this long-lasting support with the highest
Nazi decoration for foreigners.
This Nazi favor
aroused a storm of controversy in the United States and ultimately degenerated
into an exchange of diplomatic notes between the German Government and the
State Department. While Ford publicly protested that he did not like
totalitarian governments, we find in practice that Ford knowingly profited from
both sides of World War II — from French and German plants producing vehicles
at a profit for the Wehrmacht, and from U.S. plants building vehicles at a
profit for the U.S. Army. Henry Ford's protestations of innocence suggest, as
we shall see in this chapter, that he did not approve of Jewish financiers
profiting from war (as some have), but if anti-Semitic Morgan3 and Ford
profited from war that was acceptable, moral and "constructive."
On December 20,
1922 the New York Times reported4 that
automobile manufacturer Henry Ford was financing Adolph Hitler's nationalist
and anti-Semitic movements in Munich. Simultaneously, the Berlin newspaper Berliner Tageblatt appealed to the
American Ambassador in Berlin to investigate and halt Henry Ford's intervention
into German domestic affairs. It was reported that Hitler's foreign backers had
furnished a "spacious headquarters" with a "host of highly paid
lieutenants and officials." Henry Ford's portrait was prominently
displayed on the walls of Hitler's personal office:
The wall behind
his desk in Hitler's private office is decorated with a large picture of Henry
Ford. In the antechamber there is a large table covered with books, nearly all
of which are a translation of a book written and published by Henry Ford.5
The same New York Times report commented that the
previous Sunday Hitler had reviewed,
The so-called
Storming Battalion.., 1,000 young men in brand new uniforms and armed with
revolvers and blackjacks, while Hitler and his henchmen drove around in two
powerful brand-new autos.
The Times made a clear distinction between
the German monarchist parties and Hitler's anti-Semitic fascist party. Henry
Ford, it was noted, ignored the Hohenzollern monarchists and put his money into
the Hitlerite revolutionary movement.
These Ford
funds were used by Hitler to foment the Bavarian rebellion. The rebellion
failed, and Hitler was captured and subsequently brought to trial. In February
1923 at the trial, vice president Auer of the Bavarian Diet testified:
The Bavarian
Diet has long had the information that the Hitler movement was partly financed
by an American anti-Semitic chief, who is Henry Ford. Mr. Ford's interest in
the Bavarian anti-Semitic movement began a year ago when one of Mr. Ford's
agents, seeking to sell tractors, came in contact with Diedrich Eichart, the
notorious Pan-German. Shortly after, Herr Eichart asked Mr. Ford's agent for
financial aid. The agent returned to America and immediately Mr. Ford's money
began coming to Munich.
Herr Hitler
openly boasts of Mr. Ford's support and praises Mr. Ford as a great
individualist and a great anti-Semite. A photograph of Mr. Ford hangs in Herr
Hitler's quarters, which is the center of monarchist movement.6
Hitler received
a mild and comfortable prison sentence for his Bavarian revolutionary
activities. The rest from more active pursuits enabled him to write Mein Kampf. Henry Ford's book, The International Jew, earlier
circulated by the Nazis, was translated by them into a dozen languages, and
Hitler utilized sections of the book verbatim in writing Mein Kampf.7
We shall see
later that Hitler's backing in the late 20s and early 30s came from the
chemical, steel, and electrical industry cartels, rather than directly from
individual industrialists. In 1928 Henry Ford merged his German assets with
those of the I.G. Farben chemical cartel. A substantial holding, 40 percent of
Ford Motor A.G. of Germany, was transferred to I.G. Farben; Carl Bosch of I.G.
Farben became head of Ford A.G. Motor in Germany. Simultaneously, in the United
States Edsel Ford joined the board of American I.G. Farben. (See Chapter Two.)
A decade later,
in August 1938 — after Hitler had achieved power with the aid of the cartels —
Henry Ford received the Grand Cross of the German Eagle, a Nazi decoration for
distinguished foreigners. The New York
Times reported it was the first time the Grand Cross had been awarded in
the United States and was to celebrate Henry Ford's 75th birthday.8
The decoration
raised a storm of criticism within Zionist circles in the U.S. Ford backed off
to the extent of publicly meeting with Rabbi Leo Franklin of Detroit to express
his sympathy for the plight of German Jews:
My acceptance of
a medal from the German people [said Ford] does not, as some people seem to
think, involve any sympathy on my part with nazism. Those who have known me for
many years realize that anything that breeds hate is repulsive to me.9
The Nazi medal
issue was picked up in a Cleveland speech by Secretary of Interior Harold
Ickes. Ickes criticized both Henry Ford and Colonel Charles A. Lindbergh for
accepting Nazi medals. The curious part of the Ickes speech, made at a
Cleveland Zionist Society banquet, was his criticism of "wealthy
Jews" and their acquisition and
use of wealth:
A mistake made
by a non-Jewish millionaire reflects upon him alone, but a false step made by a
Jewish man of wealth reflects upon his whole race. This is harsh and unjust,
but it is a fact that must be faced.10
Perhaps Ickes
was tangentially referring to the roles of the Warburgs in the I.G. Farben
cartel: Warburgs were on the board of I.G. Farben in the U.S. and Germany. In
1938 the Warburgs were being ejected by the Nazis from Germany. Other German
Jews, such as the Oppenheim bankers, made their peace with the Nazis and were
granted "honorary Aryan status."
A post-war
Congressional subcommittee investigating American support for the Nazi military
effort described the manner in which the Nazis succeeded in obtaining U.S.
technical and financial assistance as "quite fantastic.11 Among other
evidence the Committee was shown a memorandum prepared in the offices of
Ford-Werke A.G. on November 25, 1941, written by Dr. H. F. Albert to R. H.
Schmidt, then president of the board of Ford-Werke A.G. The memo cited the
advantages of having a majority of the German firm held by Ford Motor Company
in Detroit. German Ford had been able to exchange Ford parts for rubber and
critical war materials needed in 1938 and 1939 "and they would not have
been able to do that if Ford had not been owned by the United States."
Further, with a majority American interest German Ford would "more easily
be able to step in and dominate the Ford holdings throughout Europe." It
was even reported to the Committee that two top German Ford officials had been
in a bitter personal feud about who was to control Ford of England, such
"that one of them finally got up and left the room in disgust."
According to
evidence presented to the Committee, Ford-Werke A.G. was technically
transformed in the late 1930s into a German company. All vehicles and their
parts were produced in Germany, by German workers using German materials under
German direction and exported to European and overseas territories of the
United States and Great Britain. Any needed foreign raw materials, rubber and
nonferrous metals, were obtained through the American Ford Company. American
influence had been more or less converted into a supporting position (Hilfsstellung) for the German Ford
plants.
At the outbreak
of the war Ford-Werke placed itself at the disposal of the Wehrmacht for
armament production. It was assumed by the Nazis that as long as Ford-Werke
A.G. had an American majority, it would be possible to bring the remaining
European Ford companies under German influence — i.e., that of Ford-Werke A.G.
— and so execute Nazi "Greater European" policies in the Ford plants
in Amsterdam, Antwerp, Paris, Budapest, Bucharest, and Copenhagen:
A majority,
even if only a small one, of Americans is essential for the transmittal of the
newest American models, as well as American production and sales methods. With
the abolition of the American majority, this advantage, as well as the
intervention of the Ford Motor Company to obtain raw materials and exports,
would be lost, and the German plant would practically only be worth its machine
capacity.12
And, of course,
this kind of strict neutrality, taking an international rather than a national
viewpoint, had earlier paid off for Ford Motor Company in the Soviet Union,
where Ford was held in high regard as the ultimate of technical and economic
efficiency to be achieved by the Stak-hanovites.
In July 1942
word filtered back to Washington from Ford of France about Ford's activities on
behalf of the German war effort in Europe. The incriminating information was
promptly buried and even today only part of the known documentation can be
traced in Washington.
We do know,
however, that the U.S. Consul General in Algeria had possession of a letter
from Maurice Dollfuss of French Ford — who claimed to be the first Frenchman to
go to Berlin after the fall of France — to Edsel Ford about a plan by which
Ford Motor could contribute to the Nazi war effort. French Ford was able to
produce 20 trucks a day for the Wehrmacht, which [wrote Dollfuss] is better
than,
... our less
fortunate French competitors are doing. The reason is that our trucks are in
very large demand by the German authorities and I believe that as long as the
war goes on and at least for some period of time, all that we shall produce
will be taken by the German authorities .... I will satisfy myself by telling
you that... the attitude you have taken, together with your father, of strict
neutrality, has been an invaluable asset for the production of your companies
in Europe.13
Dollfuss
disclosed that profits from this German business were already 1.6 million
francs, and net profits for 1941 were no less than 58,000,000 francs — because
the Germans paid promptly for Ford's output. On receipt of this news Edsel Ford
cabled:
Delighted to hear you are making progress. Your
letters most interesting. Fully realize great handicap you are working under.
Hope you and family well. Regards.
s/ Edsel
Ford14
Although there
is evidence that European plants owned by Wall Street interests were not bombed
by the U.S. Air Force in World War II, this restriction apparently did not
reach the British Bombing Command. In March 1942 the Royal Air Force bombed the
Ford plant at Poissy, France. A subsequent letter from Edsel Ford to Ford
General Manager Sorenson about this RAF raid commented, "Photographs of the plant on fire were published in American
newspapers but fortunately no reference was made to the Ford Motor Company.15 In any
event, the Vichy government paid Ford Motor Company 38 million francs as
compensation for damage done to the Poissy plant. This was not reported in the
U.S. press and would hardly be appreciated by those Americans at war with
Nazism. Dubois asserts that these private
messages from Ford in Europe were passed to Edsel Ford by Assistant
Secretary of State Breckenridge Long. This was the same Secretary Long who one
year later suppressed private messages
through the State Department concerning the extermination of Jews in Europe. 16
Disclosure of those messages conceivably could have been used to assist those
desperate people.
A U.S. Air
Force bombing intelligence report written in 1943 noted that,
Principal
wartime activities [of the Ford plant] are probably manufacture of light trucks
and of spare parts for all the Ford trucks and cars in service in Axis Europe
(including captured Russian Molotovs).16
The Russian
Molotovs were of course manufactured by the Ford-built works at Gorki, Russia.
In France during the war, passenger automobile production was entirely replaced
by military vehicles and for this purpose three large additional buildings were
added to the Poissy factory. The main building contained about 500 machine
tools, "all imported from the United States and including a fair
sprinkling of the more complex types, such as Gleason gear cutters, Bullard
automatics and Ingersoll borers.17
Ford also
extended its wartime activities into North Africa. In December 1941 a new Ford
Company, Ford-Afrique, was registered in France and granted all the rights of
the former Ford Motor Company, Ltd. of England in Algeria, Tunisia, French Morocco,
French Equatorial, and French West Africa. North Africa was not accessible to
British Ford so this new Ford Company — registered in German-occupied France —
was organized to fill the gap. The directors were pro-Nazi and included Maurice
Dollfuss (Edsel Ford's correspondent) and Roger Messis (described by the U.S.
Algiers Consul General as "known to this office by repute as unscrupulous,
is stated to be a 100 percent pro-German")18
The U.S. Consul
General also reported that propaganda was common in Algiers about
... the
collaboration of French-German-American capital and the questionable sincerity
of the American war effort, [there] is already pointing an accusing finger at a
transaction which has been for long a subject of discussion in commercial
circles.19
In brief, there
is documentary evidence that Ford Motor Company worked on both sides of World
War II. If the Nazi industrialists brought to trial at Nuremberg were guilty of
crimes against mankind, then so must be their fellow collaborators in the Ford
family, Henry and Edsel Ford. However, the Ford story was concealed by
Washington — apparently like almost everything else that could touch upon the
name and sustenance of the Wall Street financial elite.
Footnotes:
1June 4, 1938,
2:2.
2A list of these
Gorki vehicles and their model numbers is in Antony G. Sutton, National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet
Union, (New York: Arlington House Publishers, 1973), Table 7-2, p. 125.
3The House of
Morgan was known for its anti-Semitic views.
4Page 2, Column 8.
5Ibid.
6Jonathan Leonard,
The Tragedy of Henry Ford, (New York:
G.P. Putnam's Sons, 1932), p. 208. Also see U.S. State Department Decimal File,
National Archives Microcopy M 336, Roll 80, Document 862.00S/6, "Money
sources of Hitler," a report from the U.S. Embassy in Berlin.
7On this see Keith
Sward, The Legend of Henry Ford, (New
York: Rinehart & Co, 1948), p. 139.
9Ibid., December
1, 1938, 12:2.
10Ibid., December
19, 1938, 5:3.
13Josiah E.
Dubois, Jr., Generals in Grey Suits, (London:
The Bodley Head, 1958), p. 248.
14Ibid., p. 249.
15Ibid., p. 251.
16Ibid.
17U.S. Army Air
Force, Aiming point report No I.E.2, May
29, 1943.
18U.S. State
Department Decimal File, 800/61o.1.
19Ibid.
No comments:
Post a Comment