Unless you've been living in a cave, you're aware that a film,
Vaxxed, has been showing in theaters across America---and audiences are stunned by its revelations.
Vaxxed exposes a huge scandal at the CDC, where a long-time
researcher, William Thompson, confessed (2014) that he and colleagues
committed gross fraud in a study of the MMR vaccine.
Thompson admitted that evidence showed the vaccine led to higher risk of
autism in children---but that finding was intentionally buried, and the
vaccine was given a free pass.
Of course, mainstream reporters have been mercilessly attacking
Vaxxed, and a segment of the population finds it impossible to believe that the CDC would ever commit this kind of fraud.
So, as a mind-changer, let me take you back to the late summer of 2009,
and the Swine Flu epidemic, which was hyped to the sky by the CDC. The
Agency was calling for all Americans to take the Swine Flu vaccine.
Remember?
The problem was, the CDC was concealing another scandal.
At the time, star CBS investigative reporter, Sharyl Attkisson, was
working on a Swine Flu story. She discovered that the CDC had secretly
stopped counting cases of the illness---while, of course, continuing to
warn Americans about its unchecked spread.
Understand that the CDC's main job is counting cases and reporting the numbers.
What was the Agency up to?
Here is an excerpt from my 2014 interview with Sharyl Attkisson:
Rappoport: In 2009, you spearheaded coverage of the
so-called Swine Flu pandemic. You discovered that, in the summer of
2009, the Centers for Disease Control, ignoring their federal mandate,
[secretly] stopped counting Swine Flu cases in America. Yet they
continued to stir up fear about the "pandemic," without having any real
measure of its impact. Wasn't that another investigation of yours that
was shut down? Wasn't there more to find out?
Attkisson: The implications of the story were even
worse than that. We discovered through our FOI efforts that before the
CDC mysteriously stopped counting Swine Flu cases, they had learned that
almost none of the cases they had counted as Swine Flu was, in fact,
Swine Flu or any sort of flu at all! The interest in the story from one
[CBS] executive was very enthusiastic. He said it was "the most original
story" he'd seen on the whole Swine Flu epidemic. But others pushed to
stop it and, in the end, no broadcast wanted to touch it. We aired
numerous stories pumping up the idea of an epidemic, but not the one
that would shed original, new light on all the hype. It was fair,
accurate, legally approved and a heck of a story. With the CDC keeping
the true Swine Flu stats secret, it meant that many in the public took
and gave their children an experimental vaccine that may not have been
necessary.
---end of interview excerpt---
I'll add a few details. It was routine for doctors all over America to
send blood samples from patients they'd diagnosed with Swine Flu, or the
"most likely" Swine Flu patients, to labs for testing. And
overwhelmingly, those samples were coming back with the result: not
Swine Flu, not any kind of flu.
That was the big secret. That's what the CDC was hiding. That's why
they stopped reporting Swine Flu case numbers. That's what Attkisson
had discovered. That's why she was shut down.
But it gets even worse.
Because about three weeks after Attkisson's findings were published on
the CBS News website, the CDC, obviously in a panic, decided to double
down. If one lie is exposed, tell an even bigger one. A much bigger
one.
Here, from a November 12, 2009, WebMD article is the CDC's response:
"Shockingly,
14 million to 34 million U.S. residents - the CDC's best guess is 22
million - came down with H1N1 swine flu by Oct. 17 [2009]." (
"22 million cases of Swine Flu in US," by Daniel J. DeNoon).
Are your eyeballs popping? They should be.
No comments:
Post a Comment