Behind The CIA Desperate Turkey Coup Attempt. Huge Geopolitical Shift
Behind the coup attempt is a far more dramatic story of the huge geopolitical shift that the often unpredictable political survivor, President (still) Recep Erdogan, was in the midst of making when Gülen’s loyalists made their desperate, now apparently failed coup attempt. What follows is a series of Q&A remarks to the background of the dramatic events unfolding in a pivotal part of the geopolitical order.
Q: How would you comment on the events of
Friday to Saturday evening, when the army carried out a coup? Were
these events predictable?
WE: The coup was a reaction to
the recent dramatic geopolitical shift of Erdogan. It was instigated by
networks in Turkey loyal to the CIA. It clearly was a desperate move,
ill-prepared.
Q: What do you think are the real reasons for such a move of the army?
WE: This was a network of
officers inside the Army loyal to the Fetullah Gülen Movement. Gülen is a
100% CIA controlled asset. He even lives since years in exile in
Saylorsburg, Pennsylvania having gotten safe passage and a green card by
former top CIA people like Graham Fuller and the former US Ambassador
to Ankara.
Gülen has been a decades-long mad
project of the CIA to weaponize political Islam as an instrument of
regime change. Recall that in 2013 there were mass protests against
Erdogan in Istanbul and elsewhere. That was when Gülen, who previously
had made a deal with Erdogan’s AK Party, broke and criticized Erdogan as
a tyrant in the Gülen-controlled media such as Zaman. Since then
Erdogan has been moving to root out his internal most dangerous
adversary, Gülen and friends, including raids on Zaman and other
Gülen-controlled media. This is not about a battle between the White
Knight and Evil Knievel. It is about power pure in Turkish politics. If
you are interested in the details of the Gülen CIA project I urge
readers to look in my book, The Lost Hegemon (German: Amerikas Heilige
Krieg).
Q: Do you think these events in Turkey could lead to civil war, as interpreted by some commentators?
WE: I doubt that. The Gülen
Movement in the past two years has been severely reduced in influence by
Erdogan and his head of intelligence—purges etc. The traditional
so-called Ataturk Army as State Guardian is long gone …since the 1980s.
What is interesting to watch now
will be the foreign policy of Erdogan: Rapprochement with Russia,
reopening talks on the Russia Turkish Stream gas pipeline to the Greek
border. The simultaneous Erdogan rapprochement with Netanyahu. And most
critical, Erdogan’s apparent agreement, part of Putin’s demands for
resumption of ties, that Turkey cease efforts to topple Assad by
covertly backing DAESH or other terrorists in Syria and training them in
Turkey, selling their oil on the black market. This is a huge
geopolitical defeat for Obama, probably the most incompetent President
in American history (even though he has some serious competition for the
title from George W. Bush and Clinton).
Q: Do you believe that in this way Erdogan indeed be overthrown?
WE: Not likely as it now looks.
Even in the early hours when Erdogan was able to tell media that it was a
Gülen coup try, I was convinced Gülen would fail. Today, July 16, it
seems he has failed. The CIA has egg on its face and Obama and NATO try
to cover it up by their “warm embrace of the democratically elected
Erdogan (sic!).” They cared not that in Ukraine when the CIA ran the
Maidan Square coup in February 2014, that Viktor Yanukovic was the
“democratically elected president of Ukraine.” Look at the mess
Washington made there in their effort to provoke a split between Russia
and the EU.
Q: How should we interpret the
information alleged that Erdogan sought asylum in Germany, and do you
think that Germany would not approve?
WE: There are many wild rumors. I have no information on that.
Q: How do you put the United States and Russia in relation to recent events?
WE: It should be clear from what I
have said that Washington was behind the coup as their impotent
reaction to the major Erdogan geopolitical shift since June, when he
fired Davotoglu as Prime Minister and named loyalist Binali Yıldırım. At
that point Erdogan simultaneously turned away from the Washington
anti-Assad strategy in Syria and towards Israel (who is in a sharp
geopolitical conflict with Washington these days), towards Russia and
now, even towards Assad in Syria.
Q: What impact on developments has the fact that Turkey is a member of NATO?
WE: This is difficult to assess.
Washington desperately needs Turkey in NATO for its global strategy,
especially in controlling oil flows of the Middle East, and now its
natural gas. This is why the moment it was clear the coup would fail,
Obama and company “embraced” their “friend” Erdogan. It’s called damage
control in intelligence parlance.
Q: Do you believe that it is good for
Turkey that Erdogan and the current government is removed in this way,
rather than in the elections?
WE: By the time I am writing this, it appears he is firmly still in power, perhaps more than before.
Q: How do you think the events in Turkey may affect the European Union?
WE: The EU is in the process of
dissolving as a project. It was always a monstrous idea, encouraged in
the 1950s by Churchill, by the early CIA and their European friends like
Monnet, in order for the US better to control Europe. That was obvious
when President Obama made his brazen intervention into British politics
to tell the British not to exit the EU. The European Union is a
monstrous top-down faceless bureaucracy, unelected, unanswerable to the
people, sitting in Brussels next to NATO headquarters.
Brexit started the dissolution.
It will now go rather fast now is my feeling. Perhaps Hungary will be
next if the CIA is not able to do a color revolution against Orban
before their October referendum on “Huexit.” France? Marie Le Pen’s
supporters and millions of French are fed up with dictates from
Brussels. Look at the recent criminal decision, despite huge scientific
evidence that glyphosate, the widest-used weed killer in the EU, is
carcinogenic, to ignore all health and safety evidence even of EU
governments, and arbitrarily re-approve it for 18 more months of
poisoning of the food and the population. This is not what the people of
Europe or anywhere deserve from their civil servants.
Q: How do you think the events in Turkey
may affect the migrant crisis, and do you expect the reopening of
so-called Balkan route for refugees?
WE: It’s too early to say. If
Erdogan and Assad, brokered by Putin and Russia, and perhaps some
cooperation from Israel, manage to make true peace in Syria, the refugee
flow from the war could cease. People want to return home, rebuild
their lives in their own country.
F. William Engdahl is strategic risk consultant
and lecturer, he holds a degree in politics from Princeton University
and is a best-selling author on oil and geopolitics, exclusively for the
online magazine “New Eastern Outlook”
The original source of this article is New Eastern Outlook
Copyright © F. William Engdahl, New Eastern Outlook, 2016
Comment on Global Research Articles on our Facebook page
Become a Member of Global Research
No comments:
Post a Comment