Chapter 2
The "Society of Jesus" the Engine of Destruction
The Society of Jesus the members of which are
referred to as the Jesuits, has absorbed the Papacy. This Society was
founded by a fanatic, one Ignatius Loyola, in 1541; its object being to
combat the Protestant Reformation of Martin Luther of 1517.
Loyola was the son of a prominent Spanish family who had distinguished
himself as a soldier, and by the immoral excesses of his private life,
but who, owing to an accident which maimed him, was supposed to have
become "converted," and during the illness which followed, the Society
of Jesus was conceived in his brain, fertile with deviltry.
The Society of Jesus is under the strictest military discipline, due to
the military training and psychology of its founder. It is absolutely
commanded by the "General" its head, also known as the "Black" Pope.
The garb is always a plain black cassock. But here permit me to present
the definition of one of its eminent "Generals" of the seventeenth
century and which aptly describes it today:
"The members of the Society are dispersed in every corner of the world,
and divided into as many nations and kingdoms as the earth has limits;
divisions, however, marked only by distance of places, not of
sentiment; by the differences of languages, not of affections; by the
dissemblance of faces, not of manners. In that family the Latin thinks
as the Greek, the Portuguese as the Brazilian, the Hibernian as the
Sumatran, the Spanish as the French, the English as the Flemish; and
amongst so many different geniuses, no controversy, no contention,
nothing which gives you a hint, to perceive that they have more than
one …. Their birthplace offers them no motive of personal interest. The
same aim, same conduct, same VOW, which like a conjugal knot, has tied
them together. At the least sign one man, the General, turns and
returns the entire society and shapes the revolution of so large a body.
"It is easy to move, but difficult to shape." (Imago Primsaeculi
Societas Jesu," published by the authorization of Mutto Vittelschi,
General in 1640.)
With the above authentic illumination you will be able to somewhat
grasp the reason that the execution of the mandate of the Holy Alliance
and secret treaty of Verona was entrusted to the members of the Society
of Jesus. God save the mark!
THE JESUIT OATH
As a further item of interest we quote the following excerpts of this
oath-bound organization. It is the oath taken now by practically all
priests of the Church of Rome, and has been charged as the one taken by
the members of the Fourth Degree in the Knights of Columbus. (See
Congressional Record, House Bill 1523, Contested election case of
Eugene C. Bonniwell, against Thos. S. Butler, Feb. 15, 1913, pages
3215-16.)
"I ................, now in the presence of Almighty God, the Blessed
Virgin Mary, the Blessed Michael the Archangel, the Blessed St. John
the Baptist, the Holy Apostles, Peter and Paul, and all the Saints,
sacred hosts of Heaven, and to you, my ghostly Father, the Superior
General of the Society of Jesus, founded by St. Ignatius Loyola, in the
Pontification of Paul the Third, and continued to the present, do by
the womb of the virgin, the matrix of God, and the rod of Jesus Christ,
declare and swear that his holiness, the Pope, is Christ's Vice-regent,
and is the true and only head of the Catholic or Universal Church
throughout the earth; and that by the virtue of the keys of binding and
loosing, given to his Holiness by my Savior, Jesus Christ, he hath
power to depose heretical kings, princes, states, commonwealths and
governments, all being illegal without his sacred confirmation, and
that they may be safely destroyed.
"Therefore, to the utmost of my power, I shall and will defend this
doctrine and his Holiness' right and customs against all usurpers of
the heretical or Protestant authority, whatever especially the Lutheran
Church of Germany, Holland, Denmark, Sweden and Norway, and the now
pretended authority of the Church of England and Scotland, the branches
of the same, now established in Ireland, and on the continent of
America and elsewhere . . . . . . . I do now renounce and disown any
allegiance as due to any heretical king, prince or state named
Protestant or Liberals, or obedience to any of their laws, magistrates
or officers.
"I do further declare, that I will help and assist and advise all or
any of his Holiness' agents in any place wherever I shall be, and do my
utmost to extirpate the heretical Protestant or Liberal doctrines and
to destroy all their pretended powers, legal or otherwise.
"I do further promise and declare, that notwithstanding I am dispensed
with to assume any religion heretical, for the propagating of the
Mother Church's interest, to keep secret and private all her agents'
counsels, from time to time as they may instruct me, and not to divulge
directly or indirectly, by word, writing, or circumstances whatever;
but to execute all that shall be proposed, given in charge or
discovered unto me, by you, my ghostly father ....
"I do further promise and declare, that I will have no opinion or will
of my own, or any mental reservation whatever, even as a corpse or
cadaver (perinde ac cadaver)
but unhesitatingly obey each and every command that I may receive from
my superiors in the Militia of the Pope and Jesus Christ.
"That I will go to any part of the world, whatsoever, without murmuring
and will be submissive in all things whatsoever communicated to me . .
. . I do further promise and declare, that I will, when opportunity
presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly or openly, against all
heretics, Protestants and Liberals, as I am directed to do to extirpate
and exterminate them from the face of the whole earth, and that I will
spare neither sex, age nor condition, and that I will hang, waste,
boil, flay, strangle and bury alive these infamous heretics; rip up the
stomachs and wombs of their women and crush their infants' heads
against the wall, in order to annihilate forever their execrable race.
"That when the same cannot be done openly, I will secretly use the
POISON CUP, THE STRANGULATION CORD, THE STEEL OF THE POINARD, OR THE
LEADEN BULLET, REGARDLESS OF THE HONOR, RANK, DIGNITY OR AUTHORITY OF
THE PERSON OR PERSONS WHATSOEVER MAY BE THEIR CONDITION IN LIFE, EITHER
PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, AS I AT ANY TIME MAY BE DIRECTED SO TO DO BY ANY
AGENT OF THE POPE OR SUPERIOR OF THE BROTHERHOOD OF THE HOLY FAITH OF
THE SOCIETY OF JESUS."
The late Edwin A. Sherman, a 33rd Degree Mason of Oakland, California,
in his book entitled. "The Engineer Corps of Hell," quotes Chas.
Sauvestre, whose work he translated from the Spanish, which says in
part:
"Such are the Jesuits. Always expelled, forever returning, and little
by little, clandestinely, and in the darkness, throwing out its
vigorous roots. Its wealth may be confiscated, its losses cannot be
detained for they are covered . . . Confessors, negotiators, brokers,
lenders, peddlers of pious gew gaws, inventors of new devotions to make
merchandise. At times, mixing in politics, agitating states, and making
princes tremble upon their thrones, for they are terrible in their
hate. WOE UNTO HIM WHEN THEY TURN UPON HIM AS AN ENEMY! . . . . . Its
society grows and increases in riches and influence by all sorts of
means; and no one can attack them, for everywhere we find men prompt to
serve them, to obtain from them some advantage of position for pride .
. . . . For themselves, they are nothing, not having pompous titles, no
crosiers, no mitres, no capes of the prebendaries, but pertain to that
one ORDER, everywhere governing and directing . . . . In whatever place
of the Catholic world a Jesuit is insulted or resisted, no matter how
insignificant he may be, he is sure to be avenged,—and this we know.
"The General is always surrounded by counselors, professors, novices
and graduates." says Michelet . . . "prescribing friendship in the
seminaries and being prohibited to walk two by two, it is necessary to
be alone, or three together, but not less, for it is well known that
the Jesuits never establish any intimacy before a third, for the third
is a spy; for when there are three, which is indispensable, there
cannot be found a traitor."
THE JESUIT OATH TAKEN BY THE FIRST
ARCHBISHOP OF BALTIMORE (1769)
LEAVES ITS IMPRESS
The papal church when expedient, follows the rule of pagan Rome to hold
a conquered country in leash, and make it yield its pound of flesh, by
placing over it native rulers, which is the easy way to approach the
people on their blind side.
In 1753 an American-born boy of eighteen, one John Carroll, from Upper
Marlborough, Maryland, entered the College of the Society of Jesuits at
Watteau, Flanders, to study for the Romish priesthood in that Order.
The time required ordinarily for the training in that Society, is
fourteen years, and, as John Carroll was not ordained until he had
served sixteen years in preparation, it is safe to conclude that this
American-born youth was an especially well grounded Cadaver
upon his return to the Colonies in 1769, and that his Society was
justified in feeling that its interests would be competently
administered.
John Carroll had taken the oath from which we quoted some pages back,
to "When opportunity presents, make and wage relentless war, secretly
or openly, against all heretics, Protestants and Liberals."
It is interesting to note that John Carroll was a first cousin to
Charles Carroll of Carrollton, the only Romanist who signed the
Declaration of Independence.
The officials of Maryland Colony sent a committee, of which Benjamin
Franklin was a member, to visit French Canada to see if help could be
had from that source in the interest of the Colonies in the coming
conflict with England.
It was recommended by Congress that Charles Carroll ask his cousin,
John Carroll, the Jesuit priest, to accompany them, hoping that he
would use his influence in securing the assistance of the French
priests in the Cause of the Colonies, an act which showed the lack of
understanding of the fundamentals and discipline of the Jesuit Society,
by the Colonists.
Of course, the expedition utterly failed, owing to the influence of the
French priests and the people of French Canada, over whom "Father" John
Carroll was supposed to have had the power of persuasion. Though
England was an heretical
country, the exceedingly liberal and the independent spirit of defiance
in the American Colonies, was far more menacing, in the eyes of the
priests, to the interests of the church and the divine-righters, and
Priest Carroll's Jesuit Oath precluded the possibility of his having
any interest in his native country, consequently he had to think in the
same channel as his French compatriots in religion. That he, a few
years later, merited the distinction from his church to be made the
first Archbishop of Baltimore, and was permitted to live to the ripe
old age of four score years, is proof positive that he served his
church faithfully by strictly adhering to his Jesuit Oath. The first
Archbishop of Baltimore left his indelible stamp on that diocese as was
clearly demonstrated during the Civil War, for every plot to
assassinate President Lincoln, and there were many, were hatched in
Baltimore—in fact, Baltimore is the Vienna of America.
The fact also must not be overlooked, that there were less than 30,000
Romanists and 25 priests in the Colonies at the breaking out of the
Revolution. This, of course, was a handicap to the Reverend Carroll.
The first Archbishop of Baltimore must have been, however, thoroughly
conversant with the rumblings of the Revolution in Europe, for his
Society was having some "rough sledding" during the early eighteenth
century when he arrived in Flanders, and its members were being driven
out of first one country and then another.
The great battle for political freedom was being bitterly waged between
the Jesuits on one hand and Freemasonry on the other, just as in the
final analysis of the present irrepressible conflict in the United
States today, these two forces are lining up, a fact which is becoming
more obvious as time goes on.
They stand today as they have always stood, these Jesuits, against
every principle upon which Freemasonry is founded—upon which
Americanism is based.
A group of French cyclopedists, led by Jean Jacques Rousseau, had
embodied a new concept of government, in which the central postulate
was, that the only authority to govern should come from the consent of
the governed. This was whipped into shape and published early in the
eighteenth century and boldly proclaimed to the world by Rousseau in
his "Social Contract"—contract of society. Eleven years after, Thomas
Jefferson, Thomas Paine and other framers of our Declaration of
Independence, incorporated it in that great chart of liberty, and when
the silver tones of our old Liberty Bell in Philadelphia rang it out on
July 4th, 1776, it reverberated around the world and stirred the red
blood of every divine-right hater to its depths:
"Gravely plain the good pen lined it,
And the fifty-six all signed it;
Pledged their lives to seal and bind it, True and well!
Then sudden from the steeple,
Clanged the tocsin of the people,
Spoke the sum of history's pages,
Pealed the thoughts of saints and sages,
Rang the keynote of the ages,—in the Bell."
("The Liberty Bell" by Howard S. Taylor.)
And the fifty-six all signed it;
Pledged their lives to seal and bind it, True and well!
Then sudden from the steeple,
Clanged the tocsin of the people,
Spoke the sum of history's pages,
Pealed the thoughts of saints and sages,
Rang the keynote of the ages,—in the Bell."
("The Liberty Bell" by Howard S. Taylor.)
It is difficult now for us to realize the boldness and courage required of that little group of Colonial Rebels
who gathered around the table in Independence Hall in Philadelphia, to
sign that document. It was a grim joke, indeed, that Benjamin Franklin
sprung when he took up the pen to write in his name, and said:
"Gentlemen, we must now all hang together, for if we don't, we will
hang separately."
The success of the Revolution in the American Colonies gave the
stimulation to the French to revolt in 1789. The triumphant conclusion
of John Wilkes' battle for a free press in England, the rumblings of
revolt in the Papal States where the pope was king, all these held the
cradle of Popular Government in this country in security until the
infant had dropped its swaddling clothes, and got a fair start to grow.
John Carroll was studying in the Jesuit College in Flanders when
Rousseau's Social Contract set Europe ablaze with its message to the
downtrodden masses. The sensation precipitated by that revolutionary
proclamation can be but faintly imagined now. Certain it is that the
pope of Rome with the rest of the crown heads of Europe saw the
handwriting on the wall, if the New Idea of government were permitted
to take root.
Four years later John Carroll was a full-fledged Jesuit priest, and was
returned to his native land where he had an opportunity to get a close-up of the working out of the first Popular Government where the people were the only source of authority.
In 1808 this Jesuit priest was created the first Archbishop of Baltimore, by his Lord-God
the pope. In receiving the pallium he took a more disloyal oath of
allegiance than that as a priest, to direct the work of his Order and
his church.
Verily, "The ways of God are wondrous strange." Who would have thought
that a few months later an infant son would be born to a pioneer couple
in the backwoods of Kentucky, in a rude log hut, who was destined to,
fifty years later, with one blow, defeat the cautiously laid plans of
the Vatican, its Jesuits, the Romanofs of Russia, the Hapsburgs of
Austria and the King of Prussia!
I have often pictured the baby Lincoln playing about the humble log
cabin in the Kentucky woods, whose life was no different from the
infant life of other children of the pioneers, except in the greater
degree of poverty, and wondered if by chance in her day dreams, Nancy
Hanks Lincoln could have glimpsed the perspective in which her baby boy
was destined to become the savior of this Popular Government; if, when
she gathered him to her proud motherly heart, quieting him to sleep
with a crooning lullaby, which all mothers sing, the noble but
storm-tossed future of the child she snuggled might by chance, like
summer lightning, have flashed over her vision? And, in my mind's eye,
I pictured the meeting on the other side of the Great Divide of this
mother and son on the morning of April 15th, 1865, and the happy look
of triumph in her glistening eyes as she beheld him in the immortal
garb of martyrdom which his enemies had inadvertently placed upon him.
Next: Chapter 3 |
Table of Contents
No comments:
Post a Comment