Don’t Vaccinate to Protect My Cancer Kid
from The Thinking Moms' Revolution
Posted on February 10, 2015 by Thinking Moms' Revolution
~ Jean Ghantous
I read with great interest the recent ‘measles
epidemic’ articles that addressed the vaccine debate from the point of
view of a cancer parent. My interest is the result of being a cancer
parent myself – my little girl has been battling leukemia on and off for
the past 10 years. I read these articles, and I became angry. Very,
very angry. Once again, the government and drug companies are exploiting
the plight of children stricken by cancer to achieve a profit-driven
end without actually helping them. In fact, this profitable end could
cause great harm, even increasing the rates of pediatric leukemia, if
their obvious goal of a federally mandated vaccination protocol is
achieved. I am a seasoned Momcologist, a term the research-driven cancer
parents call themselves. We are the cancer equivalent of Thinking
Moms, critical thinkers. I have done extensive reading on the etiology
of leukemia, its connection to autoimmune disease, and how vaccines and
natural disease may influence these sorts of childhood illnesses. Come
connect the dots with me.
Clearly, I empathize with the raw fear
the parents in these articles have that their immunocompromised children
may contract an illness that could be devastating. I have walked for
years in their shoes. I get it. However, the parents in these articles
are either grossly misinformed, or their comments have been edited with
bias. Let’s get some facts straight about cancer treatment and
infection. One of the first things we were warned about after my
daughter’s diagnosis was live-virus vaccination. No one in the family
was to receive a live-virus vaccine while my daughter was on
treatment
because these viruses can and do shed (1, 2, 3, 4), some for as much as
four weeks (5), potentially infecting the immunocompromised patient with
disastrous results. That includes the measles vaccine (MMR II and
ProQuad), the intranasal flu vaccine, and the chicken pox shot. In fact,
my other children were able to get medical waivers not to receive
vaccines because of my daughter’s illness. I know my child is much more
likely to encounter a peer at school who has been recently vaccinated
with a live-virus vaccine than she is to encounter natural disease from
an unvaccinated child.
If my child were at a stage of treatment in which she was very
immunocompromised, she would not be in school. My daughter missed most
of fourth grade and a good portion of fifth, not because she was so
sick, but because others were sick. Despite a nearly 100% vaccine
compliance rate at our school, there were regular outbreaks of shingles,
occurring after chicken pox vaccine boosters, influenza and other
illnesses. Please note that, even in areas in which vaccine
compliance is extremely high, there are still outbreaks of disease that
are not caused by the unvaccinated (6).
The most deadly threats for a child during
intensive cancer treatment lie right within his or her own body.
Immunocompromised pediatric cancer patients are far more likely to die
from opportunistic infections that originate from overgrowths of fungi,
mold and bacteria(7) than they are from vaccine-related viral
infections. When I searched to find the last recorded incidence of a
child dying of measles (because that is the hated disease du jour) while
undergoing cancer treatment, well, I couldn’t find one. I did,
however, find at least one death in the immunocompromised from the
measles vaccine (8), with no indication of when it or they occurred.
There hasn’t been a recorded death in the U.S. from measles in the past
10 years. (9) In fact, measles infection may actually be curative of
some blood cancers (10, 11), presumably by initiating normal immune
system defenses. The measles virus as an actual treatment has also been
explored in other malignancies (12, 13).
There is evidence that the “hygiene theory” of the immune system may have some relevance to to vaccines. It
has been found that more “hygienic” populations, i.e. kids who have had
fewer exposures to everyday germs, are at higher risk for some
illnesses. The idea being that the immune system needs to “learn”
how to respond appropriately by coming in contact with common bugs in
order to develop properly. Industrialized countries that have a
decrease in infectious burden over less developed nations nevertheless
show an increase in allergies and autoimmune disease. “The leading idea
is that some infectious agents — notably those that co-evolved with us —
are able to protect us against a large spectrum of immune-related
disorders.” (14) Are we trading benign, transient illnesses that were
once considered normal childhood rites of passage, illnesses that appear
to be protective for more serious disease, for a lifetime of chronic
illness, even death?
A discussion of the peculiarities of
leukemia is in order, its relationship to the immune system, and the
idea that vaccines can act as a possible trigger for the cancer itself.
Leukemia begins with the development of immature white blood cells in
the bone marrow, when one of these baby white blood cells mutates into
an abnormal, leukemic cell. The more actively the body produces white
blood cells (which are infection-fighting cells), therefore, the higher
the risk of mutation. This is the explanation given for increases in
the incidence of leukemia after a flu virus passes through an area (15),
and why children who exhibit hyper-stimulated immune responses in the
form of asthma and eczema also have increased risk for leukemia (16). It
may seem contradictory to discuss infection as a preventative for
leukemia when applying the hygiene hypothesis, while also pointing to
infection as a cause. It’s apparently all about the maturity and status
of the immune system. “Timing is critical, as early infections are
likely to positively modulate the immune system thereby reducing risk of
leukemia, whereas later infections in children whose immune system was
less well modulated may increase such risk.” (17)
Time to stop and connect more dots. What are American children exposed to that deliberately hyper-stimulate the immune system? Vaccines.
Our children are subjected to an incredibly aggressive vaccine
schedule, the likes of which no other country sees, from the day they
are born (and we have the highest first-day infant death rate of any
first-world country, by the way) (18). Could we actually be triggering
leukemia, the most common form of childhood cancer, with these vaccines?
Particularly when we give them to children who already show signs of
abnormal immune response?
Vaccines are not calibrated by weight
or age or health-risk factors; potency levels of vaccines are
standardized (19), which may cause hyper-stimulation for a child with a
highly sensitive immune system. Isn’t it interesting that less
industrial countries have lower rates of autoimmune disease, yet when
those kids come to industrialized countries, in one generation they
match our rates? (20) Could this possibly be related to the fact that
these immigrants are required to submit to more aggressive vaccine
schedules?
Acute lymphocytic leukemia is also less common in
third-world countries, despite their children’s otherwise more
debilitated state. Children in industrialized nations experience a
sharp rise in leukemia between two and six years of the age, the vaccine
years, which does not occur in less developed nations. (21)
It
is so very obvious that this potential connection requires exploration,
yet the only studies to be found merely compare leukemia in more
vaccinated to less vaccinated kids. The data from children who are
completely unvaccinated is critical in uncovering the true reality of
overall pediatric health. We may very well find many interesting
discoveries. Read this study from Germany (22), for example, which shows
less acute and serious chronic illness overall for unvaccinated
children, though they did not include childhood cancer. Why are we
merely chasing a cure when a likely cause is sitting right under our
noses?
One word: Profit. As of 1988, vaccine makers and the
doctors who administer vaccines bear no liability for vaccine injury
(23). They cannot be held accountable by law for adverse events from
vaccination. In fact, the entire adverse event reporting system (VAERS)
is voluntary! This means that the more aggressive our vaccine schedule,
the more profitable it is for vaccine makers. But what about the Centers
for Disease Control, don’t they direct the vaccines our children really
need? Please note that the CDC uses worldwide disease data to formulate
our policies, which makes no sense at all. How could one possibly
compare a malnourished child living in unsanitary conditions and
subsequently exposed to illness to a child exposed to that same illness
in a first-world country? I invite parents to take a look at the resumes
of some of the heads of pharmaceutical companies and members of the CDC
like this one (24). One can very clearly see those in charge of vaccine
policy have a dangerous conflict of interest with those who profit from
that policy. Remember, pharmaceutical companies contributed $34 million dollars in campaign funds in 2014 (25). It would behoove anyone attempting office these days to err on the side of ‘big pharma.’
I must add additional comment about parental trust in the government as
it concerns our cancer kids. Once parents recover from a cancer
diagnosis, they have a strong desire to help their children – to
participate in activism in some way. It is then they discover a
disturbing reality about the state of pediatric cancer research and
funding: In a united front, the major cancer fundraising organizations,
our government, and the pharmaceutical industry ignore pediatric cancer.
Why? First, kids don’t vote. Second, kids don’t get cancer in rates
high enough to warrant good profit returns. There has not been a novel
drug developed for the treatment of acute lymphocytic leukemia, the most
common childhood cancer, in 20 years (26). Oncologists are forced to
use the same horridly harmful chemotherapy and radiation; the only
variability in protocols is in the combinations, dosages and timing of
the same archaic drugs. And while ‘cure’ rates have increased, childhood
cancer incidence is still on the rise (27). Over and over again,
however, these organizations will exploit the pitiful stories and
pictures of our kids to tug heartstrings and solicit funding. The
National Cancer Institute directs a pittance (4%) at pediatric cancer
research versus other, more common and profitable, cancers (28). When
will health research be directed by the needs of the people rather than
the greed of corporations?
If any parent wants their child to be
safe from preventable illness, it is a cancer parent. Yet I also stand
with scores of cancer parents who have seen their children become
stricken with leukemia shortly after vaccination. My little girl? She
was diagnosed with leukemia shortly after her pediatrician “caught her
up” on her shots almost 10 years ago. That “catch up” schedule matches
the regular schedule for a toddler today. Unfortunately, it is nearly
impossible to untangle true childhood cancer statistics or ‘cure’ (as in
survival) rates (29). The SEER database includes only five states and
ten cities in the U.S., and one cannot readily backtrack to the time
before the mad rush of vaccines. (30)
It is time to ask the hard
questions for the sake of our children. Are we actually causing
leukemia and other childhood illnesses with these vaccines? Could we
even prevent leukemia by allowing natural disease? The current measles
“scare” is clearly a push for a federally mandated vaccine program.
Measles is highly contagious, yes, but benign (even potentially helpful)
for the vast majority in a first-world country. If the current vaccine
schedule could be harming our children, what will happen when
pharmaceutical companies are given carte blanche? Do we really want to
relinquish our parental rights to a government that has shown itself to
be both corrupt and callous in their treatment of our cancer kids? What
data is critical to either prove, or disprove, the hypothesis that
vaccines can lead to increased chronic disease, particularly those
related to the immune system like leukemia? An independent study of the
overall health of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children must be
undertaken. It is past time to finish connecting the dots to reveal the
true picture of vaccines and childhood cancer. Though it is too late
for my vaccine-injured daughter, this Momcologist stands against vaccine
mandates, for the health of future children.
~ Jean Ghantous
About
the author: Jean Ghantous is a wife and mother of three with a
background in science, who formerly held a position with a
pharmaceutical company as a research specialist. She has been a
Momcologist for the past 10 years, since her daughter was diagnosed with
high-risk pre-B cell acute lymphocytic leukemia as a toddler. After
three years of treatment, the family enjoyed years of remission until
her daughter was again diagnosed with a very late relapse at nine years
old. She is currently in remission and doing well.
Jean’s
penchant for research led to the important discovery that transfusional
iron overload had been a long-overlooked high-risk factor for adverse
late effects in cancer children. “Oncologists are so focused on
treatment protocols that preventative care has been neglected,
universally,” said Jean. “I realized within the first 10 minutes of
researching iron overload that not only did my daughter have a very
grave problem, but many kids, over many years, were at risk as well. I
was horrified to read the list of side effects of iron toxicity; it was
eerily similar to the late effects one is told to expect from
chemotherapy.” Jean pushed for treatment and preventative care. She said
“No one addressed iron overload because, well, no one had NOTICED it.
For decades of cancer treatment.” This led to her hospital implementing
a computerized tracking program for transfusional iron deposition and
its involvement in a nationwide strategy for reducing risk from iron
toxicity in children with cancer.
While Jean had always been
suspicious that vaccines could play a role in the development of
leukemia, she was told her daughter’s diagnosis after aggressive
vaccination was “coincidence.” After her third child also sustained a
vaccine injury, Jean took on the additional descriptor of Thinking Mom
and became more actively involved in advocating for vaccine safety. “It
is abundantly clear to any parent who takes the time to do the research
that there is a very real causative connection between immune system disorders, chronic disease and vaccines,” warns
Jean. “American kids are sick, really sick. EpiPens, inhalers,
glucometers, special diets and special-needs teachers have become
normalized in our schools. Four children in my neighborhood have been
granted Make-A-Wish trips for life-threatening illness. One-third of my
son’s class is in need of special-needs educational support. This is NOT normal. We MUST stop this insane, profit-driven push for federal vaccine mandates. Clearly, our families’ futures depend on it.”
References
1) “Detection of Measles Virus RNA in Urine Specimens from Vaccine Recipients,” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC228449/
2) “ Vaccine Oka Varicella-Zoster Virus Genotypes Are Monomorphic in
Single Vesicles and Polymorphic in Respiratory Tract Secretions,” http://jid.oxfordjournals.org/content/193/7/927.full
3)
MMR II vaccine insert: “Excretion of small amounts of the live
attenuated rubella virus from the nose or throat has occurred in the
majority of susceptible individuals 7 to 28 days after vaccination.” http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf
4) “Chickenpox Attributable to a Vaccine Virus Contracted From a Vaccine With Zoster,” http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/106/2/e28.full
5) FluMist vaccine insert: “FluMist contains live attenuated
influenza viruses that must infect and replicate in cells lining the
nasopharynx of the recipient to induce immunity. Vaccine viruses capable
of infection and replication can be cultured from nasal secretions
obtained from vaccine recipients (shedding).” Study showed shedding up
to 28 days post vaccination: http://www.medimmune.com/docs/default-source/pdfs/flumist_pi.pdf
6) “Influenza Outbreak in a Vaccinated Population — USS Ardent, February 2014,” http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6342a3.htm?mobile=nocontent
7) “Infections in the Neutropenic Patient— New Views of an Old Problem:,” http://asheducationbook.hematologylibrary.org/content/2001/1/113.full
8) MMR II vaccine insert: “Measles inclusion body encephalitis{44}
(MIBE), pneumonitis{45} and death as a direct consequence of
disseminated measles vaccine virus infection have been reported in
immunocompromised individuals inadvertently vaccinated with
measles-containing vaccine.” http://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/m/mmr_ii/mmr_ii_pi.pdf
9)
“There has been no measles deaths reported in the U.S. since 2003,” Dr.
Anne Schuchat, the director of CDC’s National Center for Immunization
and Respiratory Diseases. (Apparently, the veracity of this statement is
in question, as CDC data for 2009 and 2010 both list two measles
deaths, leading one to wonder why does the director of CDC’s National
Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases not seem to know about
them? Don’t you think given the current hoopla about an outbreak with
no associated deaths that they would be screaming about them? Could it
be that they were in immunocompromised people who got the disease either
from the vaccine or from recently vaccinated people?) http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/zero-u-s-measles-deaths-in-10-years-but-over-100-measles-vaccine-deaths-reported/
10)
Bluming A, Ziegler J. “Regression of Burkitt’s lymphoma in association
with measles infection.” The Lancet. 1971 Jul 10;:105–106.
11) “Remission of Disseminated Cancer after Systemic Oncolytic Virotherapy,” http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(14)00332-2/fulltext
12) “Measles Virus for Cancer Therapy,” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3926122/
13)
Liu TC, Galanis E, Kirn D. “Clinical Trial Results with Oncolytic
Virotherapy: A Century of Promise, a Decade of Progress.” Nat Clin Pract
Oncol. 2007;4(2):101–117. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17259931
14)
Hygiene hypothesis: “In countries where good health standards do not
exist, people are chronically infected by those various pathogens. In
those countries, the prevalence of allergic diseases remains low.
Interestingly, several countries that have eradicated those common
infections see the emergence of allergic and autoimmune diseases.”
“The ‘Hygiene Hypothesis’ for Autoimmune and Allergic Diseases: An Update,” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841828/
15) “Childhood Leukemia Incidence in Britain, 1974–2000: Time Trends and Possible Relation to Influenza Epidemics,” http://jnci.oxfordjournals.org/content/98/6/417.full.pdf+html?sid=b366f430-37bb-49a4-b9b0-794149a1d2da
16) “Allergic Conditions and Risk of Hematological Malignancies in Adults: A Cohort Study,” http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/4/51
17)
“Timing is critical, as early infections are likely to positively
modulate the immune system thereby reducing risk of leukemia, whereas
later infections in children whose immune system was less well modulated
may increase such risk.”
“Infection and Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia,” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2834409/
18)
U.S. highest first-day infant mortality of industrialized nations: “6
Articles You Should Read about Infant Mortality in the U.S” http://america.aljazeera.com/watch/shows/fault-lines/FaultLinesBlog/2013/9/19/america-s-infantmortalitycrisisbackgroundreading.html
19) “Potency Tests of Combination Vaccines,” http://cid.oxfordjournals.org/content/33/Supplement_4/S362.full
20) “The ‘Hygiene Hypothesis’ for Autoimmune and Allergic Diseases: An Update,” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2841828/
21)
“An Infectious Aetiology for Childhood Acute Leukaemia: A Review of the
Evidence.” http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15491284. Sharp peak in
ALL diagnoses in developed countries between 2 and 6 years; early
infection could be protective.
22) German study on the health of vaccinated versus unvaccinated children: http://healthimpactnews.com/2011/new-study-vaccinated-children-have-2-to-5-times-more-diseases-and-disorders-than-unvaccinated-children/
23) Vaccine Liability removed: http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/March-2011/No-Pharma-Liability–No-Vaccine-Mandates-.aspx#a1
24)
Julie Gerberding: “Merck Announces Appointment of Dr. Julie Gerberding
as Executive Vice President for Strategic Communications, Global Public
Policy and Population Health,” http://www.mercknewsroom.com/news-release/corporatenews/merck-announces-appointment-dr-julie-gerberding-executive-vice-president
25) Pharmaceutical campaign contributions 2014: “Pharmaceuticals/Health Products: Long-Term Contribution Trends,” http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/totals.php?cycle=2014&ind=H04
26) “Little Patients, Losing Patience: Pediatric Cancer Drug Development,” http://mct.aacrjournals.org/content/5/8/1905.full
27) Childhood and Adolescent Cancer Statistics, 2014: http://acco.org/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=gAi0ji8IFPU%3d&tabid=670
28) National Cancer Institute gives 4% to pediatric cancer research: http://acco.org/Information/AboutChildhoodCancer/ChildhoodCancerStatistics.aspx
29) “Because Statistics Don’t Tell the Whole Story: A Call for Comprehensive Care for Children With Cancer,” http://acco.org/LinClick.aspx?fileticket=9egsDtJw3fw%3d&tabid=670
30) SEER database: http://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2011/results_merged/sect_29_childhood_cancer_iccc.pdf
No comments:
Post a Comment