Putin set to drop “truth bomb” on USA
Posted by Kevin Barrett on
February 12, 2015
Will Russia blow 9/11 wide open?
As
Gordon Duff reported here
Tuesday – and as discussed on today’s
False Flag Weekly News (posted above – click here for story links) –
Russian President Vladimir Putin is preparing the release of Russian satellite
photos and other evidence showing that 9/11 was a false-flag operation by
treasonous elements of the American national security community.
The original story
reporting Putin’s threat was published by Pravda on February 7th.
According to Duff, that story has been confirmed by a reliable source who has
actually seen some of the photos during a visit to Moscow. VT sources insist
that this is NOT merely a shot across the bow of the US government. Putin,
these sources say, is genuinely planning to release the 9/11 material.
These historic photos are expected to
show:
* That none of the
passenger airliners allegedly used as weapons on 9/11 actually crashed where we
were told they did; and:
* That the World Trade Center
demolitions were conducted using extremely high-energy weapons.
“The sh*t has hit the fan!” exclaimed
one highly knowledgable VT source.
Russia’s classified 9/11 dossier has
been held in reserve against the day the Russians feel a vital national
interest – such as their survival as a free and independent nation – is at
stake. That day, it appears, has either finally come, or is approaching so fast
that the impending launch of the “truth bomb” is being prepared.
Russia’s satellite photos and other
evidence are currently serving a strategic role analogous to that of
nuclear weapons. They are primarily a deterrent – a last-ditch ace-in-the-hole
whose main role is to deter and dissuade the enemy from going too far.
But unlike nuclear weapons, the “truth
bomb” will not kill anyone; and its use against the US would first and
foremost harm the 9/11-complicit faction of the American power structure,
while helping the non-complicit faction regain control and adjust the course of
the ship of state away from the icebergs. While risky (the 9/11 bomb could
indirectly lead to Israel contemplating or even exercising its Samson Option)
and therefore anathema to risk-averse elites, Putin has apparently decided that
the benefits outweigh the potential drawbacks.
If and when the Russians finally
release their 9/11 dossier, the cataclysm that ensues will stand as a
milestone in the march of one of the signal trends in modern warfare and
geostrategy: the weaponization of truth. While lies have been weaponized since
time immemorial, in the form of propaganda, disinformation, false signals, and
so on, truth has rarely been in a position to fight back.
Today, the weaponized big lies of the
Zio-American Empire – like the empire itself – are over-extended and
vulnerable. The stage is being set for a David’s slingshot of truth to bring
down a Goliath of lies. To understand how 9/11 has backfired, let’s review the
past few decades of history.
During the 1990s, the neoconservatives
(and even some realists like Zbigniew Brzezinski, who has since repented of the
way his views were used to justify 9/11) believed a New Pearl Harbor
would bring invaluable benefits to American geo-strategy. According
to their analysis, famously expressed in Brzezinski’s The Grand Chessboard (1997) the US was “too democratic at home
to be autocratic abroad.” In The Grand
Chessboard, Brzezinski stated that the US would increasingly find it
“difficult to fashion a consensus on foreign policy issues, except in the
circumstances of a truly massive and widely perceived direct external threat.”
He ominously noted: “The public supported America’s engagement in World
War II largely because of the shock effect of the Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbor.”
The obvious solution: A New Pearl Harbor
that would convince the American people they were under massive external
threat. The neoconservatives, with their Israeli friends, were glad to oblige.
The result was 9/11: The event that was supposed to enable a “New American
Century.”
But the New Pearl Harbor backfired, for
several reasons.
First, the “direct external threat,”
alleged Arab and Muslim extremism, was bogus. The Arab and Muslim world, with
its vast energy reserves and economic growth potential, should have been a US
ally, not an enemy. And the religious element in Arab-Muslim civilization was
especially conducive to friendship with the US, since the US and the Islamic
nations are the last monotheistic cultures on earth. It would have been in
the US strategic interest to be a strong ally of the Muslim world against
European secularism, Russian and Chinese post-communism, and Hindu extremism.
The deal should go something like this: America protects the genuine
independence, including the religious values, dignity and autonomy, of its
fellow monotheists; and in return gets a say (though not total control) in oil pricing and policy.
But thanks to a false flag that
turned the US against Islam and Muslims, America chose precisely the wrong
enemy. While Israel has benefitted mightily from the US war on Islam,
America has been digging its own grave by wasting its substance, even its
sanity, on a fight against a phantom.
Secondly, rather than uniting Americans
behind their leaders in a “good fight” against the nation’s enemies, 9/11 has
greatly exacerbated the fractiousness and mistrust of leadership that
makes it hard for the US to conduct foreign policy. Polls show that 36%
of Americans (over 100 million people) think 9/11 was an inside job, while a whopping 84% or so don’t believe they
are getting the full truth about 9/11 from their government. Confidence in
government is at
record lows, and the sickening feeling of having been lied to is largely
responsible for the US military’s inability to win wars – and for the rash of
troop and veteran suicides that are far more lethal than any enemy army.
So 9/11, the neoconservative New Pearl
Harbor, has hollowed out America, not strengthened it. The false-flag attack on
New York and Washington has left the US morally and financially bankrupted,
without a functioning Constitution, fragmented in every conceivable way,
lacking domestic and international legitimacy, and no longer in a position to
be even a first among equals, much less a self-styled sole superpower.
The neoconservatives, whose top
priority has always been Israel, are in a panic. Their only hope is to flee
forward into ever-bigger wars. That is why Netanyahu is so desperately lobbying
for a war on Iran that would set the Middle East, and perhaps the whole world,
on fire. And that is why such neoconservatives as Victoria
Nuland are pushing for a war with Russia that would in all likelihood go
nuclear.
World War III is the last desperate
hope for the neoconservatives and their Likudnik allies. Such a war would usher
in martial law, enable the suppression (or at least continued obfuscation) of
the truth about 9/11, and save the neocons from treason trials, and Israel from
dismantlement.
Though Putin doesn’t want to play his
ace in the hole, the 9/11 truth card, until he absolutely has to, the moment of
truth may have finally arrived. As soon as it becomes absolutely clear
that the US is never going to back off from its attempt to turn Ukraine
into a hostile NATO base; that the economic war on Russia has reached a
point of no return; that the neoconservative “flight forward” into World War
III is inevitable…
…at that point, no sooner and no later,
Putin will slap his 9/11 truth card down on the table and let the chips fall
where they may.
If he plays it too soon, he is taking
unnecessary risks.
But if he waits too long, the move will
lose its impact. (Once World War III is underway, 9/11 truth from the Russian
government will be dismissed as propaganda, and censorship under martial law
will turn the truth bomb into a dud.)
I believe the moment of truth is at
hand. Strategically, Putin needs to play his 9/11 truth card now.
The Pravda story, confirmed by VT’s
inside sources, suggests that the card is about to be played.
Dr. Kevin
Barrett, a Ph.D. Arabist-Islamologist, is one of America’s best-known critics
of the War on Terror.
Dr. Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.
Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.
Dr. Barrett has appeared many times on Fox, CNN, PBS and other broadcast outlets, and has inspired feature stories and op-eds in the New York Times, the Christian Science Monitor, the Chicago Tribune, and other leading publications.
Dr. Barrett has taught at colleges and universities in San Francisco, Paris, and Wisconsin, where he ran for Congress in 2008. He currently works as a nonprofit organizer, author, and talk radio host.
Related Posts:
- ‘Islamic State’ head-choppers: The best enemy money can buy
- Canada: The Jonathan Kay “War on Truth”
- US war on terror is war on Israel’s enemies
- ‘US legitimacy waning over 9/11 hoax’
- Save Sheikh al-Nimr – expose 9/11
The
views expressed herein are the views of the author exclusively and not
necessarily the views of VT or any other VT authors, affiliates, advertisers,
sponsors or partners and technicians. Notices
Posted by Kevin Barrett on
February 12, 2015, With 26710 Reads, Filed under 9/11.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0.
You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.
No comments:
Post a Comment