Chemtrails: The Exotic Weapon
Climate Change to Fear Most
NASA Documents Reveal “Climate Change” Caused By Covert Weather Weapons 11
Little Known NASA Documents Reveal Mission of Military and Federal Agencies to Modify the Climate
__________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
It’s unacceptable that the UN/IPCC continue to push CO2 as the cause for climate change but refuse to acknowledge the military has been actively engaged in Climate Warming Weapons Technologies for more than 20 years.
____________________________________________________
TITLE: “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification”
This set of
documents from 1966 reveals a network of government agencies in
perpetual and secret collaboration with each other and the military to
Modify the Global climate. Created by the elitist National Academy of
Sciences – decades of an inter-agency culture of secrecy explains why
the issue of covert aerosol Geoengineering is a taboo topic to be
degraded to the status of “conspiracy theory” by a matrix of complicit
bureaucrats at every opportunity. This is why your local TV
“meteorologist” will rarely make a helpful comment about an unusual sky
filled with persistent jet trails.
TITLE: “The Evolution of a Weather Modification R&D program Into a Military Weapons System”. A 1986 Critique of the 1966 initiative.
This
document appears as an anonymous draft intended as a critique of the US
Weather Modification Program that the author characterizes as hijacked
into a military weapons system.
____________________________________________________
____________________________________________________
Jules Verne
wrote about geoengineering the earth’s climate in 1889 in a sequel to
“From the Earth to the Moon” called “The Purchase Of The North Pole”. Verne writes that the Baltimore Gun Club purchased large tracts of the Arctic then used the famous canon from the earth-to-the-moon
to tilt the Earth’s axis. The goal was to establish a tropical paradise
as a profitable tourist attraction at the North Pole while “improving”
the entire global climate.
If Verne
correctly predicted that man would travel from the earth to the moon, it
should be no surprise that he also predicted that a small group of
influential men would consider warming the climate for profit.
Verne could
have been inspired by Harvard geologist Nathaniel Shaler who proposed
diverting warm Atlantic water into the Arctic back in 1877 – a dozen
years before Verne’s “fantastic”story was published.
____________________________________________________
Warming the Arctic with large-scale Geoengineering projects has been the vision of industrialists for 100 years – and still is
___________________________________________________
Remember when People Thought Arctic Warming was a Good Idea?
VILLAGE VOICE: “ Hey, remember when climate change was a swell idea? Coconuts were in the offing.”
“Imaginations
ran wild, and The Washington Post envisioned Manhattan becoming a
tropical paradise” … “People would be gathering oranges off the trees in
Central Park, or picking cocoanuts from palms along the Battery, [and]
hunting crocodiles off the Statue of Liberty.”
The
prospect sounded so splendid to New Yorkers that Senator William Calder
(1917-1923) tried to get $100,000 appropriated for a study of the idea. Village Voice
Remember when Scientists Thought Arctic Warming was a Good Idea?
1962 Harry
Wexler (March 15, 1911- 1962) was an MIT graduate and PhD in
meteorology. Wexler had been researching the link connecting chlorine
and bromine compounds to the destruction of the stratospheric ozone layers,
but died of a heart attack while on vacation in Woods Hole, Mass.
Wexler had already accepted an invitation to deliver a lecture entitled “The Climate of Earth and Its Modifications” at the University of Maryland Space Research and Technology Institute. (Source)
Wexler’s was
last in a long line of ambitious proposals to warm the Arctic.
Coincidently, his proposals were made at the same time the National
Academy of Sciences was working to create a national weather modification program – a direction in which the military had already embarked in 1958.
“Global Warming” initiatives proposed by Wexler:
- To increase the global temperature of the Earth by 1.7°C, “by injecting a cloud of ice crystals into the polar atmosphere by detonating 10 H-bombs in the Arctic Ocean – the subject of his 1958 article in Science magazine” (Wexler H., 1958, “Modifying Weather on a Large Scale,” Science, n.s. 128 (Oct. 31, 1958): 1059-1063).
- To diminish the global temperature by 1.2°C could be doable, “by launching a ring of dust particles into equatorial orbit, a modification of an earlier Russian proposal to warm the Arctic”.
- To destroy the ozone layer and hence increase abruptly the surface temperature of the Earth, by spraying “several hundred thousand tons of chlorine or bromine” with a stratospheric airplane. Fleming, 2007(a), pp. 56-57; Fleming, 2007(b), “note n° viii” p. 9 & p. 5 (source)
The decision to reverse direction from warming the arctic to cooling the arctic was announced in 1963 -
the year following Wexler’s death when the National Academy of Sciences
Committee on Atmospheric Sciences recommended appointment of a Panel on
Weather & Climate Modification. pg 2
Prevailing Circumstances following WWII:
- Operation Paperclip (Also called Operation Overcast) succeeded in recruiting scientists from Nazi Germany for employment in the US after WW II and led to the formation of NASA and the ICBM program.
- The National Security Act passed in 1947 made possible the rise of the military industrial complex and creation of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA ) to increase opportunities for scientific experiments to be conducted without public knowledge or Congressional oversight.
- Post-war advances in science and advanced physics opened up opportunities to develop concepts of advanced thinkers like Nikola Tesla that had been waiting on the shelf for over 50 years.
- In 1958, military application of Tesla’s little known methods of electromagnetic manipulation of earth’s atmosphere was already underway. White House advisor on weather modification to President Eisenhower reported the DoD was studying ways to manipulate electrical charges of the earth and sky in order to manipulate the weather for purposes of national defense.
- The rise of an informed and educated middle class looked down on proposals that employed nuclear detonations that became regarded as dangerous and arrogant. This is not to say that proposals to mediate the arctic climate were totally abandoned.
____________________________________________________
If warming the arctic was regarded as good for commerce for 100 years why would a discovery that found carbon dioxide was already performing the task for free, suddenly be regarded as a catastrophe to prevent?
____________________________________________________
The
BP disaster in the Gulf of Mexico demonstrates how Big Oil exists in a
world of opportunistic pragmatism, no matter the risk to the
environment. With an established record of corporate sociopathy, Big Oil
would have little interest in what event would cause arctic ice to
retreat as long as their long-held dream of new arctic navigation routes
and access to previously ice-locked oil and gas reserves was realized.
It could make marginal difference if the arctic temperatures rise due to
(1) rising CO2 levels or (2) covert arctic climate manipulation.
This
timeline of determined Geoengineering projects suggests the goal of
mediating arctic climate remains a favorite goal of the fossil fuel
industry.
1877 Harvard geologist Nathaniel Shaler
proposed channeling more of the warm Kuroshio Current through the
Bering Strait to raise temperatures in the Polar region by 30 degrees.
1912, New York Engineer and Industrialist, Carroll Livingston Riker proposed building a 200 mile jetty
off Newfoundland to increase the Gulf Stream’s flow into to the Arctic
Basin with the added benefit that it would “shift” the axis of planet
earth. The New York Times characterized the proposal as “amazing”… but not insane.
1929: Hermann Oberth,
German-Hungarian physicist and engineer; Proposed building giant
mirrors on a space station to focus the Sun’s radiation on Earth’s
surface, making the far North habitable and freeing sea lanes to
Siberian harbors.
1945; Julian Huxley,
biologist and Secretary-General of UNESCO 1946-48; Proposed exploding
atomic bombs at an appropriate height above the polar regions to raise
the temperature of the Arctic Ocean and warm the entire climate of the
northern temperate zone.
1946 Village Voice article from 2005 reporting on theMay, 1946 issue of Mechanix Illustrated that featured
several arctic-warming geoengineering proposals. One “brave new idea”
was proposed by Julian Huxley, then the Secretary-General of UNESCO, and
brother of Aldous Huxley, that would detonate atomic bombs to warm the
Arctic.
1958; M. Gorodsky,
Soviet engineer and mathematician, and Valentin Cherenkov, Soviet
meteorologist; Proposed placing a ring of metallic potassium particles
into Earth’s polar orbit to diffuse light reaching Earth and increase
solar radiation to thaw the permanently frozen soil of Russia, Canada,
and Alaska and melt polar ice.
1958; Arkady Markin,
Soviet engineer; Proposed that the United States and Soviet Union build
a gigantic dam across the Bering Strait and use nuclear power–driven
propeller pumps to push the warm Pacific current into the Atlantic by
way of the Arctic Sea. Arctic ice would melt, and the Siberian and North
American frozen areas would become temperate and productive.
1958 Russian Oil engineer, P.M. Borisov’s
proposed melting the Arctic and Greenland icecaps by spreading black
coal dust on the ice, creating cloud-cover across the poles to trap heat
and to divert warm Atlantic waters into the polar regions. This scheme
was taken seriously by Soviet climatologists. Two conferences were held
in Leningrad in the early 1960′s following an initial meeting in Moscow
by the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1959.
1958 Atlantic Richfield geologist L.M. Natland, proposed exploding up to 100 underground nuclear bombs to mine the Alberta Oil Sands.
Heat from the detonations was expected to boil the bitumen deposits,
reducing their viscosity to the point that standard drilling operations
could be used. The plan was encouraged by US efforts to find “peaceful
uses” for atomic energy. The project was approved in 1959 but the
Canadian government reversed their decision in 1962 and declared that
Canada was opposed to all forms of nuclear testing. In 2012 the Canadian
Tar Sands are, again an issue of international concern.
1962 Harry
Wexler (March 15, 1911- 1962) was an MIT graduate and PhD in
meteorology. Wexler had been researching the link connecting chlorine
and bromine compounds to the destruction of the stratospheric ozone layers,
but died of a heart attack while on vacation in Woods Hole, Mass.
Wexler had already accepted an invitation to deliver a lecture entitled “The Climate of Earth and Its Modifications” at the University of Maryland Space Research and Technology Institute. (Source)
____________________________________________________
It remains largely unexplained why decades of optimism for warming the arctic was suddenly replaced with a campaign of fear and doom for the consequences of warming the arctic under the name of “Global Warming”
____________________________________________________
In the 1960’s Geoengineering proposals to warm the Arctic took a largely unexplained U-turn when oceanographer, Roger Revelle’s research
concluded that carbon dioxide was already warming the climate for free
and without the need for expensive and risky geoengineering projects.
This U-Turn
of direction appeared to be a setback with the exception of those
stakeholders in the energy sector who had been invested in arctic
warming projects for decades. Did the CO2 story finally promise to give
Exxon, BP and Shell what they wanted?
If the science of Roger Revelle’s forecast for global warming turned out to be wrong or too slow, the DoD could step in – for reasons of national security – to assist arctic warming as secret component of the military’s classified weather modification and weapons program.
The 1996 Air Force document that forecasts “Owning the Weather in 2025”
would not rule out using Tesla and plasma technologies to increase
arctic temperatures in order to disadvantage a perceived enemy. A
decision not to intervene might betray the military’s primary objective of “Full Spectrum Dominance”. After all, access to Oil and Gas has been a national security priority for decades.
In 1966, Dr. Gordon J. F. MacDonald was Chairman of the ICAS Select Panel on Weather and Climate Modification and wrote:
“Carbon
dioxide placed in the atmosphere since the start of the industrial
revolution has produced an increase in the average temperature of the
lower atmosphere of a few tenths of a degree Fahrenheit.” Gordon
MacDonald “Unless Peace Comes: How to Wreck the Environment. Source
MacDonald was referring to Roger Revelle
and Hans Suess paper that reversed the debate from how to warm the
arctic to how to avoid warming the arctic. Revelle’s ocean research
reported a rise in carbon dioxide in earth’s atmosphere was allegedly a
result of industrial age manufacturing and coal-burning.Source
Revelle
had worked with the Navy in the late 1940’s to determine which projects
gained funding and successfully promoted the idea that the Navy should
invest more in “basic research”. Revelle was deeply involved in the
global growth of oceanography. He was also one of the committee chairmen
in the influential National Academy of Sciences studies of the “Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation” (BEAR),
1954-1964. Revelle’s world influence was significant as president of
the Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research, an international group of
scientists devoted to advising on international projects. Revelle and
other scientists at Scripps Institution of Oceanography helped the U.S.
government to plan nuclear weapons tests so that oceanographers might make use of the data. Source
The conclusions of the BEAR
report were understandably significant for demonstrating the harmful
biological and environmental damage of atomic radiation and could easily
suffice to thwart geoengineering projects that recommended detonating
H-bombs. But the evidence is weak that all intentions to mediate arctic climate was totally abandoned.
If the
fundamental goal to warm the arctic remains an unspoken priority of
national security in the energy sector, the project could be taken out
of public view and committee oversight to become a classified operation
in the development of the military’s weather warfare program – an
initiative that was acknowledged by civilian weather modification
programs formalized by the 1966 NASA and ICAS charter.
____________________________________________________
Since 1958 Congress and the military had already been working on exotic weather warfare systems that involved electromagnetic manipulation of the ionosphere.
____________________________________________________
US
Congress, Senate, Committee on Inter-State and Foreign Commerce, Weather
Modification Research, Hearing, Washington D.C. US Govt. Printing
Offlce, March 18-19, 1958; Lowell Ponte quotes Capt. Orville as
reporting “that the Dept. of Defense was studying ways to manipulate the
charges of earth and sky and so affect the weather by means of an
electronic beams to ionize or de-ionize the atmosphere over a given
area” …. Capt. Orville also discussed ongoing US Air Force experiments with ‘sodium
vapor, ejected from jet planes to intercept solar radiation ‘ over
enemy countries and rain their weather. (The Cooling, op. cit. pp.
168-169 Source P. 42
The
flip-flop from finding ways to warm the arctic to suddenly finding ways
to keep the arctic from warming was announced in 1963 – the year
following the sudden death of Meteorologist, Harry Wexler. Having total
awareness of the military’s 1958 weather weapons program, the National
Academy of Sciences (NAS) recommended the appointment of a “Panel on Weather and Climate Modification”. source This event could serve to consolidate military and civilian weather modification programs for peaceful purposes or – if necessary – as covert weather modification and even climate warming operations secretly carried out by the military under the catch-all justification of “national security”.
FOLLOW THE MONEY:
Lobbyists for Big Oil publicly claim Global Warming is a hoax while
quietly investing billions in new drilling opportunities due to the
reality of receding arctic ice. The energy sector has made huge
investments in ice-breakers and drilling equipment to profit from the
very global warming they are reluctant to acknowledge. The position of
having your cake while eating it is essential. When arctic climate
warming is revealed as a military climate modification operation, big
oil can fall back on “we told you so”. Since governments may come and go
over the next 100 years, they calculate the demand for oil – and the
companies who drill for it – will remain intact.
- “As the polar ice cap retreats, energy companies are looking north for a potentially huge new source of crude” Source
- “Shell is one of six companies planning to extract oil, gas and minerals in the Arctic as global warming melts ice and opens new sea lanes to commerce.” Source
- “Remote and dangerous sources of arctic oil are becoming increasingly attractive as the global need for oil grows and the existing reserves dry up.” Source
____________________________________________________
Documents from 1966 reveal how the military and federal agencies are modifying the global climate.
____________________________________________________
TITLE: “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification”
This set of documents from 1966
reveals a network of government agencies in perpetual and secret
collaboration , working with the military to Geoengineer the climate.
Created as an agenda of the elitist National Academy of Sciences
– decades of an inter-agency culture of secrecy explains why the issue
of covert aerosol Geoengineering is a taboo topic to be degraded to the
status of “conspiracy theory” by every government agency in this web of
complicit bureaucrats at every opportunity. This is why your local TV
“meteorologist” will rarely make a helpful comment about an unusual sky
filled with persistent jet trails.
- 1966, JUN: “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification” Prepared by the ICAS select Panel on Weather Modification
- 1966: NOV: A Recommended National Program in Weather Modification – A Report to the Interdepartmental Committee for Atmospheric Sciences (ICAS) by Homer E. Newell – Associate Administrator for Space Science and Applications, NASA, Washington, D.C.
- 1966: APPENDIX I – Panel on Weather and Climate Modification to Committee on Atmospheric Sciences NAS-NRC – Membership Recommendations
- 1966: APPENDIX II – Special Commission on Weather Modification – National Science Foundation Membership Recommendations.
- 1966: APPENDIX III Report prepared by the ICAS Select Panel on Weather Modification; “Present and Future Plans of Federal Agencies in Weather-Climate Modification,” dated June 20, 1966
- 1966: APPENDIX IV Memorandum for Dr. Homer E. Newel1 from J. Herbert Hollomon, Chairman, ICAS, Subject: National Weather Modification Program, dated June 21, 1966
- 1966: APPENDIX V NASA Panel to Study Weather Modification Activities; Membership, Chronology of Meetings, and a Compilation of Supporting Material used by the Panel
- 1966: APPENDIX VI Budget Recommendations and Trends for a National Weather Modification Program
1966 –
NASA: A Recommended National Program in Weather Modification – A report
to the Independent Committee for Atmospheric Sciences (ICAS) by Homer E.
Newell – Associate administrator for Space Science and Applications,
NASA, Washington, DC.
In 1966, a report from NASA to ICAS (Independent Committee for Atmospheric Sciences of the National Academy of Sciences, NAS)
was the first step in establishing a national Weather modification
program that would ultimately involve multiple federal agencies. The
report focused on four initial agencies: ESSA, NSF, NASA, and the Dept. of Interior’s Bureau of Reclamation.
Under Recommended Principals it
was noted that (a) each agency would be independently funded while
stressing inter-agency cooperation in research. Independent funding of
agencies could make the program less conspicuous and more difficult for
Congress to defund. Also, new agencies could be brought on board without
high profile budget hearings. (b) A designated “central” agency – while
having responsibility for focusing the national program – would not
have any real authority to implement programs, leaving those decisions
to probable unidentified civilian lobbyists and DoD “stakeholders”.
Although the
theme of the ICAS report is in the context of protecting water,
agriculture, forests, lands and natural resources, the knowledge gained
from climate manipulation was of more immediate interest to the military
and their industrial complex.
Thirty years following the creation of the Nation Program in Weather Modification, the US Air Force published a document (“Owning The Weather in 2025” )
establishing that federal agencies involved in the National Weather
Modification program are under tacit authority of the Department of
Defense.
Owning the Weather in 2025 – Opening Statement: Current
technologies that will mature over the next 30 years will offer anyone
who has the necessary resources the ability to modify weather patterns
and their corresponding effects, at least on the local scale. Current
demographic, economic, and environmental trends will create global
stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups
to turn this weather-modification ability into a capability.
In the
United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of
national security policy with both domestic and international
applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its
interests, at various levels. These levels could include unilateral
actions, participation in a security framework such as NATO, membership
in an international organization such as the UN, or participation
in a coalition. Assuming that in 2025 our national security strategy
includes weather-modification, its use in our national military strategy
will naturally follow. Besides the significant benefits an operational
capability would provide, another motivation to pursue
weather-modification is to deter and counter potential adversaries.
In this
paper we show that appropriate application of weather-modification can
provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined. In the
future, such operations will enhance air and space superiority and
provide new options for battlespace shaping and battlespace awareness.1
“The technology is there, waiting for us to pull it all together;”2 in
2025 we can “Own the Weather
_______________________________________________________
Case Study 2
A 1986 Critique of the 1966 National Weather Modification Initiative
The Evolution of a Weather Modification R&D program Into a Military Weapons System
_______________________________________________________
This document appears
as an anonymous draft intended as a critique of the US Weather
Modification Program that the author characterizes as hijacked into a
military weapons system. The final draft is not yet located.
For over 100
years, experts and authors were advocating geoengineering projects warm
the arctic. The public, at large, was entertained by these concepts
even when suggestions to detonate hydrogen bombs over the north pole
were advocated by a nationally recognized weather expert in 1962.
It’s
revealing that initial proposals to solve the newly discovered CO2
“warming” problem had less to do with cutting back on carbon emissions
and more to do with a rush to release toxic atmospheric aerosols without
first, researching the hazards. The specter of polluting the
atmosphere, blocking sunlight and causing the release of huge volumes of
CO2 from the jet aircraft aerosol sorties is an obvious public health
and strategic concern that requires years of research that the
government was unwilling to legislate and fund. Therefore, the
impatience with which these chemical aerosol schemes were promoted
suggests that emergency steps to cool the planet with aerosols was never
the primary mission.
____________________________________________________
In 1962, Geoenginnering efforts to warm the arctic were widely entertained but in 1966 it was top priority to prevent the arctic from warming by even one degree.
____________________________________________________
Trojan Horse?:
Under the military’s vision to Own the Weather Weather in 2025
atmospheric warming with ionospheric and plasma weapons is an
established capability. The numerous agencies inside the National
Weather and Climate Modification program are actively guarding the
military’s aerosol and energy weapons program with stiff denials to the
public and media whenever the issue of “chemtrails” is a story on local
radio or TV stations.
It’s
unacceptable that the UN/IPCC continue to push CO2 as the cause for
climate change but refuse to acknowledge the military has been actively
engaged in climate modification since the mid 1990′s?
An abrupt reversal of policy from promoting arctic climate mediation to preventing Global Warming resulted in ideas that both polluted the atmosphere AND became a source of Global Warming.
Just as the
ICAS/NASA National Weather Modification program is being formalized the
record shows most ideas to cool the planet suddenly involve bazaar
schemes to spray or disburse particles, biology and dust into the
atmosphere and oceans. These are the same people who – just a few months
earlier, were eagerly lining up to hear Wexler talk about ways to warm
the planet with hydrogen bombs, destruction of the OZONE and orbital
particles.
While most
of us realize that many of these proposals from respected experts would
be catastrophic to the environment, not all of these draconian ideas
have been rejected, even as increasing evidence determines that
deploying chemicals into the atmosphere does more harm than good.
Deployment of geoengineering aerosols as observed in practice for two decades is now regarded as a source of global warming – not a fix.:
____________________________________________________
Geoengineering Aerosols Are Warming the Atmosphere and Are a Source of Global Warming
____________________________________________________
In 2007, investigator, Cliff Carnicom calculated the impact of the current unacknowledged aerosol deployment into the atmosphere and concludes:
“It can
be seen from this model that the results of artificial aerosol
introduction into the lower atmosphere can be of a magnitude quite on
par with the extraordinary impacts projected by even modest and
conservative global warming models upon humans in the near future. As
the model presented herein is intended to be reasonably conservative,
the impact of the aerosol operations could be much greater than these
results show. It is advised that the citizens consider the viability and
merit of this model in the examination of the global warming issue, and
that they openly take aggressive action to halt the intentional aerosol
operations.
This
paper is late in its offering, as my availability for continued research
at this level is limited. I am nevertheless hopeful that the
information can be evaluated and assimilated into the many rationales
and arguments that have developed over the last decade to cease the
intentional alteration of the atmosphere of our planet.” – Cliff
Carnicom Complete study
____________________________________________________
Geoengineering Proposals to Warm the Arctic Are Replaced by Fear of Global Warming
____________________________________________________
- 1965; President’s Science Advisory Committee, United States; Proposal: Investigated injecting condensation or freezing nuclei into the atmosphere to counteract the effects of increasing carbon dioxide.
- 1977; Cesare Marchetti, Italian industrial physicist; Coined the term “geoengineering” and proposed sequestering CO2 in the deep ocean.
- 1983; Stanford Penner, A. M. Schneider, and E. M. Kennedy, American physicists; Suggested introducing small particles into the atmosphere to reflect more sunlight back into space.
- 1988; John H. Martin, American oceanographer; Proposed dispersing a relatively small amount of iron into appropriate areas of the ocean to create large algae blooms that could take in enough atmospheric carbon to reverse the greenhouse effect and cool Earth.
- 1989; James T. Early, American climatologist suggested deflecting sunlight by 2 percent with a $1 trillion to $10 trillion “space shade” placed in Earth orbit.
- 1990; John Latham, British cloud physicist; Proposed seeding marine stratocumulus clouds with seawater droplets to increase their reflectivity and longevity.
- 1992; NAS Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy proposed adding more dust to naturally occurring stratospheric dust to increase the net reflection of sunlight.
- 1998: International Space Station (ISS): The first modular component of the International Space Station (ISS) was launched and is the current (in 2012) habitable artificial satellite in low Earth orbit following the Salyut, Almaz, Skylab and Mir. (1998 ISS mission consistent with same year increase in jet aerosol public observations and complaints) The stated function of the SSI is to provide an international space platform for research and experimentation in the fields of biology, human biology, physics, astronomy, meteorology (weather) and other fields.
- 2010: Geoengineer, David Keith (AAAS Meeting) proposal to use jet aircraft to spray Sulfur dioxide and aluminum nano-particles into the atmosphere to reflect sunlight back into space.
In 1968, Gordon J. F. MacDonald authored a chapter in “Unless Peace Comes“
where he correctly predicted that future means of obtaining national
objectives by force hinges on man’s ability to control and manipulate
the environment of planet Earth.
“When
achieved, this power over his environment will provide man with a new
force capable of doing great and indiscriminate damage. Our present
primitive understanding of deliberate environmental change makes it
difficult to imagine a world in which geophysical warfare is practised.
Such a world might be one in which nuclear weapons were effectively
banned and the weapons of mass destruction were those of
environmental catastrophe. As I will argue, these weapons are peculiarly
suited for covert or secret wars.”
“To
consider the consequences of environmental modification in struggles
among nations, we need to consider the present state of the subject and
how postulated developments in the field could lead, ten to fifty years
from now, to weapons systems that would use nature in new and perhaps
unexpected ways. “
More Than Owning the Weather in 2025
The confidence and enthusiasm expressed in the USAF 1996 document: Owning the Weather in 2025 was supported by the advent of scalar weapons technologies during the Reagan Star War years. The document promises: “weather-modification can provide battlespace dominance to a degree never before imagined. The
“never before imagined” comment speaks directly to the HAARP
ionospheric heater facility, the Bernard Eastlund patents and military
strategies for global military dominance. This scenario of weather
control harkens to the predictive warning from Gordon MacDonald in
chapter in the book: Unless Peace Comes: How to Wreck the Environment. Source
Timeline for Owning the Weather: From 1987-1992 ATPI scientists build on Bernard Eastlund’s patents for development of new weapon capabilities
In 1994 ATPI
is bought by E-Systems with a contract to build the biggest ionospheric
heater in the world (HAARP). — In 1995, Raytheon bought E-Systems and
old APTI patents. — In 1996 the Air Force publishes: Owning The Weather in 2025
In his 2011 book, Here on Earth: A Natural History of the Planet, scientist and author, Tim Flannery
reminds us that proposals to melt the Icecaps were advanced after World
War II by reputable figures including the first director-general of
UNESCO (Julian Huxley-1946), by a top official at the U.S. Weather
Bureau, and by a Russian oil engineer Petr Mikhailovich Borisov.
Scientific conferences debated the merits, while mining and energy
corporations contemplated the use of nuclear detonations in the
extraction of coal and oil.
Reputable
figures in the international community saw an opportunity to detonate
nuclear weapons as a novel and constructive way to geoengineer the
Arctic. The prevailing rationale to justify method included: (1) The
arctic is nearly too cold to be habitable by humans (2) The polar ice
cap blocks valuable shipping lanes. (3) The expanses of frigid water up
North contributes to uncomfortably cold winters in many countries. (4)
difficulty of drilling for oil through ice.
The idea was publicly floated as a “peaceful use” of atomic weapons.
Flannery offers this example as evidence of humanity’s seeming propensity for hastening its own extinction.
Here on Earth: A Natural History of the Planet - By Tim Flannery. Book Reviewby Mark Engler
Russian Oil engineer, P.M. Borisov’s Proposed Method of Melting the Arctic Icecap
Borisov’s idea: If
the Arctic ice is once melted much less of the sun’s radiation will be
reflected out into space and therefore the arctic ice cap will not
re-form. An ice-free Arctic Ocean would be a great boon to oceanic
shipping, especially between Europe and East Asia. Much land in northern
Canada and Siberia would be freed of permafrost and made suitable for
agriculture. Borisov believed that an ice-free Arctic Ocean would lead
to increased evaporation of water and hence increased rainfall
worldwide, including the region of Sahara Desert leading to grass
growing there. Borisov considers all of the impacts of the melting of
the Arctic ice cap to be beneficial. He asserts that the melting of the
Greenland ice cap would raise sea levels at a rate of only 1.5 to 2 mm
per year.
This scheme
was taken seriously by Soviet climatologists. Two conferences were held
in Leningrad in the early 1960′s following an initial meeting in Moscow
by the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences in 1959. Borisov’s suggestions to warm the arctic included:
- Covering great areas of the Arctic with black powders such as coal dust (G. Veksler, 1959) (Carbon Black?)
- Dispersing the cloud cover over the central Arctic Basin (D. Fletcher, 1958) (Geoengineering Aerosols?)
- Deepening of the Thomson Sill (V.N. Stepanov, 1963)
- Covering the water surface with a monomolecular film (M. Budyko, 1962)
- Installations to direct warmer Atlantic water into the Kara Sea (V.P. P’yankov, 1965)
- Pumping cold Arctic water into the Pacific to draw warm Atlantic water into the Arctic Basin (P.M. Borisov, c. 1968)
This concept also required construction of a dam across the Bering Strait. Source: P.M. Borisov, “Can we Control the Arctic Climate?”, Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, March, 1969, pp. 43-48.
In a related scheme, a proposal was floated to store nuclear waste in the Antarctic. The plan would allow specially designed canisters of hot radioactive waste to melt down through the ice until it reached the “ice-rock interface” where it would supposedly remain in cold storage for 250,000 years.
The following Timeline is from the book, “Angels Don’t Play This HAARP” Advances in Tesla Technology
by Jeanne Manning and Dr. Nick Begich and contains disturbing facts
about the little known history of our Government’s use of scalar
technologies to modify the weather. Additional events and links were
inserted in 2012 to update the list.
Timeline of public and covert testing and development of energy weapons
- 1886-8: Nikola Tesla invents system of Alternating Current power source and transmission system. As 60-pulse-per-second (hertz) AC power grids spread over the land, Earth’s resonance frequency will eventually dance to a different beat than her usual 7-8 hertz .
- 1900: Tesla applies for patent for a device to transmit Electrical Energy “Through the Natural Mediums”. U.S. Patent #787,412 issued in 1905
- 1924: Confirmation that radio waves bounce off ionosphere (electrically-charged layer starting at altitude of 50 kilometers).
- 1938: Scientist proposes to light up night sky by electron gyrotron heating from a powerful transmitter.
- 1940: Tesla announces “death ray” invention.
- 1945: Atomic bomb tests begin 40,000 electromagnetic pulses to follow.
- 1952: W.O. Schumann identifies 7.83 hertz resonant frequency of the earth.
- 1958: Van Allen radiation belts discovered (zones of charged particles trapped in earth’s magnetic field) 2,000+ miles up. VA Belt violently disrupted with nuclear detonations
- 1958: Project Argus, U.S. Navy explodes 3 nuclear bombs in Van Allen belt.
- 1958: As far back as 1958, the chief White House adviser on weather modification, Captain Howard T. Orville, said the DoD was studying “ways to manipulate the charges of the Earth and sky and so affect the weather by using an electronic beam to ionise or de-ionise the atmosphere over a given area.
- 1960: Series of weather disasters begin.
- 1961 – Project Skywater – Bureau of Reclamation (water) cloud seeding project funded by Congress.
- 1961: Copper needles dumped into ionosphere as “telecommunications shield”.
- 1961: Scientists propose artificial ion cloud experiments. In 1960′s the dumping of chemicals (barium powder etc.) from satellites/rockets began.
- 1961-62: Soviets and USA blast many EMPs in atmosphere, 300 megatons of nuclear devices deplete ozone layer estimated at 4%.
- 1962: Launch of Canadian satellites and start of stimulating plasma resonances by antennas within the space plasma.
- 1966, June, Report to ICAS by ICAS Select Panel – Chair, Gordon JF MacDonald. “Future plans of Federal Agencies in Weather and Climate Modification.”
- 1966, Nov, report from NASA to ICAS (Independent Comm. for Atmospheric Sciences of the Nat. Academy of Sciences, NAS) was first step in establishing a National Weather Modification program
- 1966: Gordon J. F. MacDonald publishes military ideas on environmental engineering. MacDonald was Chair of the ICAS Select Panel on Weather and Climate Modification.
- 1960′s: In Wisconsin, US Navy Project Sanguine lays ELF antennae.
- 1968: Moscow scientists tell the West that Soviets pinpointed which pulsed magnetic field frequencies help mental and physiological functions and which do harm.
- 1968: Gordon JF MacDonald authors chapter in book: “Unless peace Comes – a scientific forecast of new weapons” MacDonald was Chair of the ICAS Select Panel on Weather and Climate Modification.
- 1969: Hail Suppression Data from Western North Dakota, 1969–1972 South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City.
- 1972: First reports on “ionospheric heater” experiments with high frequency radio waves, at Arecibo. 100-megawatt heater in Norway built later in decade; can change conductivity of auroral ionosphere.
- 1972: Potential Value of Satellite Cloud Pictures in Weather Mod. Projects – Report prepared for NASA by Institute of Atmospheric Sciences South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Rapid City.
- 1973: Documentation that launch of Skylab and associated rocket exhaust gases `’halved the total electron content of the ionosphere for three hours.
- 1973: Recommendations for study of Project Sanguine’s biological effects denied by Navy.
- 1974: United Nations General Assembly bans environmental warfare. ENMOD
- 1974: High-frequency experiments at Plattesville, Colorado; Arecibo, Puerto Rico; and, Armidale, New South Wales heat “bottom side of ionosphere”.
- 1974: Experiments airglow brightened by hitting oxygen atoms in ionosphere with accelerated electrons.
- 1975: Evaluation of Monte Carlo Tests of Effectiveness of Cloud Seeding on Growing Season Rainfall in North Dakota.
- 1975: Stanford professor Robert Helliwell reports that VLF from power lines is altering the ionosphere.
- 1975: U. S. Senator Gaylord Nelson forces Navy to release research showing that ELF transmissions can alter human blood chemistry.
- 1975: Pell Senate Subcommittee urges that weather and climate modification work be overseen by civilian agency answerable to U.S. Congress. No action taken.
- 1975: Soviets begin pulsing “Woodpecker” ELF waves, at key brainwave rhythms. Eugene, Oregon, one of locations where people were particularly affected.
- 1976: Drs. Susan Bawin and W. Ross Adey show nerve cells affected by ELF fields.
- 1977: Environmental Impacts of Precipitation Management – Inferences to Project Skywater
- 1979: Launch of NASA’s third High-Energy Astrophysical Observatory causes large-scale, artificially-induced depletion in the ionosphere. Plasma hole caused by “rapid chemical processes” between rocket exhaust and ozone layer.” …“ionosphere was significantly depleted over a horizontal distance of 300 km for some hours.”
- 1979: Annotated Bibliography of Predictor Variables for Weather Modification Applications – Funded by NSF Grant ATM 79-05007 pub., Illinois State Water Survey, Urbana.
- 1985: Bernard J. Eastlund applies for patent “Method and Apparatus for Altering a Region in the Earth’s Atmosphere, ionosphere and/or Magnetosphere,” (First of 3 Eastlund patents assigned to ARCO Power Technologies Inc.)
- 1986: US Navy Project Henhouse duplicates Delgado (Madrid) experiment — very low-level, very-low-frequency pulsed magnetic fields harm chick embryos. 20
- 1987: In the later part of the decade the U.S. begins network of Ground Wave Emergency Network (GWEN) towers, each to generate Very Low Frequency (VLF) waves for defense purposes .
- 1987-92: Other APTI scientists build on Eastlund patents for development of new weapon capabilities.
- 1994: Military contractor E-Systems buys APTI, holder of Eastlund patents and contract to build biggest ionospheric heater in world (HAARP).
- 1994: Congress freezes funding on HAARP until planners increase emphasis on earth-penetrating tomography uses, for nuclear counter proliferation efforts. (Oil and gas exploration)
- 1995-1997: Public complaints accumulate across the US regarding unusual cloud formations and sudden increase in observable persistent jet contrails that appear unnaturally under dry atmospheric conditions. These observations are accompanied by complaints of biological specimens and web formations that appear to fall from the sky. Many instances of qualified lab analysis reveal high concentration of aluminum, barium and other elements that are consistent with DoD electromagnetic experiments
- 1995: Raytheon buys E-Systems and old APTI patents. The technology is now hidden among thousands of patents within one of the largest defense contractor portfolios.
- 1995: Congress budgets $10 million for 1996 under “nuclear counterproliferation” efforts for HAARP project.
- 1995: Test of patent number 5,041,834 to generate an Artificial Ionospheric Mirror (AIM), or a plasma layer in the atmosphere. The AIM is used like the ionosphere to reflect RF energy over great distances.
- 1994-6: Testing of first-stage HAARP (euphemistically named High frequency Active Auroral Research Program) equipment continues, although funding was frozen.
- 1996: HAARP scientists test the earth-penetrating tomography applications by modulating the electroject at Extremely Low Frequencies (ELF)
- 1998: Projected date for fully-operating HAARP system.
- 2009: Operation HAMP – Department of Homeland Security operation to Modify and Steer Hurricanes with Geoengineering Aerosols
- 2012: Celebrating 50 years of Success. A Compilation of highlights from the Institute of Atmospheric Sciences at South Dakota School of Mines & Technology Rapid City.
____________________________________________________
The World is Waking Up to State Crimes of Climate Warming and Violent Weather by Combinations of Powerful Electromagnetic Energy Weapons and Aerosol Geoengineering
____________________________________________________
It was in
the mid- 1990′s when the US public a were suddenly confronted with
unexplained changes in the sky that included bazaar new cloud formations
and new types of jet contrails that persisted in the skies for hours
even while the relative humidity was very low at the altitudes where the
jets were flying. These observed changes were coincident with events
following the 1994 E-Systems purchase of APTI, also holder of plasma
physicist, Bernard Eastlund’s patents and contracts to build the world’s largest ionospheric heater (HAARP).
The history
of the 1966 National weather Modification Program and the coincidence of
events around the time of bazaar new cloud formations is sufficient
reason to pursue the relationship of persistent jet aerosols to the
ionospheric heater experiments at the HAARP facility and Gakona, AK,
Aricebo, PR and many more similar facilities brought online in recent
years.
The ongoing
depletion of earth’s protective OZONE layer is a known risk to
manipulation of the ionosphere with powerfully heated beams of
electromagnetic radiation. Pollution from the Shuttle missions, alone
has accounted for rapid ozone depletion according to NASA’s own
documents.
Further
damage results when chemical aerosols deployed over either polar region
traps heat in the troposphere resulting in a rise in surface
temperatures to endanger normal formation of seasonal ice with an
associated plunge in stratospheric temperatures into the range of -109
deg. F. with the formation of chemically contaminated ice crystals that
react with sunlight to further deplete the OZONE.
From 2009 to
2012 persistent jet chemical aerosols are clearly observed over the
North Polar regions on many satellite images and ground-based
photographs. It is no surprise that NASA now reports new OZONE depletion
in far northern latitudes where none was previously detected.
It’s no
secret that government agencies, the military and commercial interests
of the US and abroad have invested in a radical scalar system of weather
modification that is now revealed to have far too many unintended
negative consequences to sustain life on earth.
Continuation
of this vast and terra-deforming aerosol geoengineering operation will
only confirm that one agenda is to deplete the arctic ice – a concept
that has been embraced by influential men, Oil companies and nations for
nearly 100 years.
The
government, military, IPCC, UN and corporate stakeholders can no longer
pretend to be desperately concerned about global warming and climate
change while the world is waking up to realize these same entities are
participating in the deployment of electromagnetic weapons and aerosols
of massive climate destruction as a monstrous and Orwellian hoax on
humanity.
Related Links:
- 2012: Discovery Channel Airs Weather Control, Aerosols and Interview with Michael Murphy
- 2009: Operation HAMP – Department of Homeland Security operation to Modify and Steer Hurricanes with Geoengineering Aerosols
- 1968 – Unless Peace Comes – How to Wreck the Environment – Chapter by Gordon J.F. MacDonald
- 2011 – Here On Earth: A Natural History of the Planet – Flannery, 2011 – by Tim Flannery
- Discovery of Global Warming Roger Revelle – 1957 paper started the discussion even while warming the arctic was being considered.
- Coleman’s Corner : John Coleman – Meteorologist and original owner of the Weather Channel is an expert on the work of Oceanographer, Roger Revelle who – later in life – recanted his earlier conclusion that CO2 is a significant global warming gas..
- Stormy Weather – The Government’s Top-Secret Efforts To Control Mother Nature-12-22-2001 by Bob Fitrakis and Fritz Chess ColumbusAlive.com 12-22-2001
- Are Humans doomed to Destroy Themselves? Tim Fannery’s book: HERE ON EARTH A natural history of the planet
- Historical perspective on atmospheric engineering. A periodization, Régis Briday PhD Student at Centre Alexandre Koyré(PPT)
- Polar Eclipse; Village Voice article features May 1946 Mechanix Illustrated “using atomic bombs to warm the arctic”.
- Arctic oil rush: The new global petroleum race will shape Alaska’s future.
- HAARP.net Nick Begich Website – Angels Don’t Play this HAARP
- Global Research: Extensive Archives on Climate Change, Weather Modification and Chemtrails
- HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program)
- HAARP University( High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program).
- HAARP 101: The World’s Sexiest Energy Weapon
http://rezn8d.net/2012/01/04/haarp-the-worlds-sexiest-energy-weapon/ - HAARP 201: Timeline: An Animated History of Ionospheric Destruction
http://rezn8d.net/2012/01/20/haarp-timeline-an-animated-history-of-ionospheri… - HAARP 301: The Sonic Weapon of Vladimir Gavreau — Tesla, LRAD, and HAARP
http://rezn8d.net/2012/02/15/the-sonic-weapon-of-vladimir-gavreau-tesla-lrad-… - HAARP 401: Directed Energy Weapons 101: Infrasonic, Sonic, Microwave & Laser
http://rezn8d.net/2012/02/15/directed-energy-weapons-101-infrasonic-sonic-mic… - HAARP 501: Project Nimbus & The Fire of the Gods
http://rezn8d.net/2012/03/06/haarp-project-nimbus-and-the-fire-of-the-gods/ - HAARP 601: HAARP + DARPA = Team Thundercats
http://rezn8d.net/2012/03/21/darpa-haarp-team-thundercats/ - HAARP 701: Resonations from the Moon
http://rezn8d.net/2012/03/27/haarp-resonations-from-the-moon/ - HAARP 801: Russian President wields Zombie Apocalypse weapon!
http://rezn8d.net/2012/04/05/russian-president-wields-zombie-apocalypse-weapon/ - HAARP 901: “Tales from the Crypt” Deleted Internet Pages
http://rezn8d.com/haarp/haarpgate.html
___________________________________________________________
VIDEO TRANSCRIPT:
NikolaTesla, Inventor of the Death Ray, died in Jan, 1943 wherein the FBI took possession of his papers and documents.
NikolaTesla, Inventor of the Death Ray, died in Jan, 1943 wherein the FBI took possession of his papers and documents.
After WWII,
Operation “Overcast” (Later named opertion Paper Clip) was a US program
to employ NAZI regime scientists in US laboratories.
The National
Security Act, passed in 1947 Created the Central Intelligence Agency
and made possible the rise of the military industrial complex
to increase opportunities for scientific experiments to be conducted without public knowledge or Congressional oversight.
to increase opportunities for scientific experiments to be conducted without public knowledge or Congressional oversight.
In 1958, the
military announced they were experimenting on the ionosphere with
electronic beams for the purpose of manipulating the weather.
In 1962 Respected Meteolrologist Harry Wexler proposed geoengineering strategies to warm the planet.
In 1963 the
National Academy of Scientists proposed formation of a panel to create a
“National Weather and Climate Modification Program”.
In 1966
Plans to warm the arctic were abandoned without comment to be replaced
with warnings that CO2 was already causing the atmosphere to get warmer.
This video introduces the article. Global Warming Linked to Advanced Climate Change Technology.
The title
sounds provocative but NASA has concluded that man-made, persistent
contrails are exacerbating global warming and could contribute to
long-term changes in Earth’s climate.
The article
explores the forgotten history of America’s National Weather and Climate
Modification Program – Still in existance – and how it rapidly evolved
into a military/civilian weather warfare program of mass destruction.
The documentation and subsequent critique reveals a program that went into rapid mission creep when the military became involved. The critique was drafted in 1986 by a member of the Union of Atomic Scientists.
The documentation and subsequent critique reveals a program that went into rapid mission creep when the military became involved. The critique was drafted in 1986 by a member of the Union of Atomic Scientists.
The record
shows that industrialists and their scientists have been looking for
ways to warm the arctic for 100 years beginning in 1877 when Harvard
geologist Nathaniel Shaler proposed diverting warm Atlantic water into
the Arctic Sea.
Decades of
arctic warming proposals followed until 1962 when respected MIT
meteorologist, Harry Wexler proposed 3 schemes to increase the global
temperature of the Earth by 1.7°C,:
(1) Detonate 10 hydrogen bombs in the arctic ocean to send ice crystals into the polar atmosphere
(2) Destroy the ozone layer by using aircraft to spray chlorine or bromine into the stratosphere .
(3) Launch dust particles into equatorial orbit to diffuse light to heat to warm the polar regions.
(2) Destroy the ozone layer by using aircraft to spray chlorine or bromine into the stratosphere .
(3) Launch dust particles into equatorial orbit to diffuse light to heat to warm the polar regions.
These ideas
sound pretty frightening today, but in 1962 Wexler’s ideas were gaining
traction and nobody “important” was calling him a lunatic. But following
Wexler’s untimely death that same year the problem of how to warm the
planet completely reversed polarity.
Suddenly – and without explanation – it was now imperative to find ways to cool the planet and to keep the atmosphere from warming.
Suddenly – and without explanation – it was now imperative to find ways to cool the planet and to keep the atmosphere from warming.
The U-turn
in national direction came about when a paper was published by
oceanographer, Roger Revelle who claimed earth’s atmosphere was warming
due to a buidup of carbon dioxide from burning coal back in the
industrial age.
The new
narrtive became “official” for media consumption in 1966 when Gordon
MacDonald – Chairman of the new ICAS Select Panel on Weather and Climate
Modification stated: “Carbon dioxide placed in the atmosphere since the
start of the industrial revolution has produced an increase in the
average temperature of the lower atmosphere of a few tenths of a degree
Fahrenheit.”
Wexler’s
proposals to warm the planet were never mentioned again but remained
quietly popular with stakeholders in the oil and energy markets who had
always seen vast opportunities for new shipping lanes and drilling as
soon as the ice melted a bit.
In view of NASA’s position that man-made persistent contrails are exacerbating global warming – what are we to think?
If these
man-made clouds are normal water vapor we have a problem that
accelerates global warming. But If the problem can be fixed, and no
governrnment authority has yet thought it was important enough to take
immediate action we can reasonably assume that warming the climate with
persistent contrails is a tolerable or even desired outcome.
And if If
man-made clouds are revealed to be chemical aerosols deliberately
sprayed into the atmosphere we can reasonably assume that heating the
atmosphere is a hidden agenda inside a covert aerosol operation that
mimmicks the appearance of a geoengineering plan to cool the planet. In
reality, the chemical aerosol operations provide plausible deniablity to
spectators that our benevolent government is secretly spraying the
skies to test ways to mitigate global warming for the good of humanity.
This
plausible deniaility is taught to us through media coverage of
geoengineers lake David Keith who presents aerosol “cooling” strategies
in frequent public appearances that are – in turn – presented as news in
multiple media sources..
So, the
agenda to warm the planet is cleverly hidden in plain sight disguised as
an undisclosed but benevolent government program to test aerosol
spraying to cool the planet if we should ever decide it’s necessary.
Meanwhile, arctic ice continues to retreat despite decades of “testing”.
Aerosols are
not the sole requirement in advanced climate change technology. High
energy ionospheric heaters, Tesla Arrays, and exotic electromagnetic
devices are required to interact with chemical aerosols in ways that
normal water vapor contrails never could.
Chef Barry