MORE MISSING MONEY, THIS TIME $41,000,000,000 AT THE WORLD BANK
Well, the American (s)election is officially over, and we're now in whatever shenanigans "they" are going to pull to turn the whole thing into another hanging chad circus (remember that one?). And speaking of shenanigans and circuses, check out this story (shared by reader T.S.) about some more missing money - this time a mere $41,ooo,000,000 at the World Bank - which, as the article indicates, may have gone missing due to some sloppy "accounting practices":
World Bank 'Misplaces' $41 Billion in Climate Change Funds
But wait...there's more. Note what Oxfam says about the missing money:
The bank gets its funding from contributions made by rich nations. However, a recent decision to divert 45% of its development funds from poverty programs to climate change programs is meant more to assuage the guilt of rich nations than to help the poor climb out of poverty.
About $40 billion a year from the World Bank is now earmarked to fund climate change mitigation efforts. Naturally, with that much loose cash floating around, sticky fingers are busy "misplacing" the money, and isn't that a darn shame?
An investigation by Oxfam of the World Bank's finances shows that anywhere between $24 and $41 billion of "misplaced funds" has gone missing due to "poor record-keeping practices, says Oxfam.
And yes, these funds were likely stolen.
An Oxfam audit of the World Bank’s 2017-2023 climate finance portfolio
found that between $24 billion and $41 billion in climate finance went unaccounted for between the time projects were approved and when they closed.There is no clear public record showing where this money went or how it was used, which makes any assessment of its impacts impossible. It also remains unclear whether these funds were even spent on climate-related initiatives intended to help low- and middle-income countries protect people from the impacts of the climate crisis and invest in clean energy.
"No clear public record showing where this money went or how it was used" is bureaucratese for "it's completely missing... stolen...poof...gone."
And this, of course, casts a rather gloomy shadow on the whole climate change screech: how much money went to fund flooding....er.... flood research? Unknown. How much went to fund geoengineering projects? Unknown. How much went to fund Baal Gates' lunatic project of blotting out the sun? unknown.
In other words, the missing money is casting the long shadow of grift and embezzlement over the whole narrative, a narrative that, in turn, appears to be a convenient cover for world-class money laundering.
Why do I raise the specter of this money funding actual geoengineering and weather manipulation? Because as I have argued in many previous blogs, climate change is a convenient narrative behind which to hide such weather engineering black projects, and now the World Bank, and Oxfam, have done us the service of providing a bit of corroborative evidence. Forty-one billion dollars, even with today's Bai Den Jao inflation, will buy a lot of cloud seeding, and a lot of flooding. Will will provide a lot of payola and kickback to broadcasters not to broadcast storm warnings, and so on.
In other words, we may have just been inadvertently afforded one glimpse into the funding infrastructure behind such geoengineering projects, and conventinetly, it's in a bank that can keep massive amounts of data on where, when, and how to engineer certain types of storms for minimum risk and maximum profits to "investors." We're looking at the financial infrastructure of geoengineering.
See you on the flip side....
(if you enjoyed today's blog please share with your friends.)
No comments:
Post a Comment