Monday, October 21, 2024
5077-5081: High I.Q. Politician Totally Destroys Woke Immigration Policies from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
International Public Notice: All United Nations Treaties Are Fraudulent
By Anna Von Reitz
LEGAL MEMORANDUM
Is the United States in a Treaty Relationship
with the United Nations?
Questions:
- Is any participation and funding of the United Nations (and its subsidiary and/or associated organizations) legal?
- Did the 1945 signing of the United Nations (UN) Charter and the US Senate vote authorizing the President’s signature create Treaty obligations binding on the United States?
- Was the UN Charter ratified as a Treaty by the US Senate or is it merely a contract between the United States and an international association?
- Is the absence of the required deposit of the formal Instrument of Ratification evidence that the UN Charter was not lawfully ratified?
- Are the UN Charter and related UN documents (such as the WHO Constitution) binding on State governments under the Supremacy Clause of the US Constitution?
- Are the UN Charter and related UN documents binding in any way on the United States?
- What binding obligations does membership in the UN (and its subsidiary organizations) impose on the United States?
- Was the manner in which then President Harry S. Truman presented the Charter to the US Senate unconstitutional as conceived in deceit, maintained in deceit and thus ultra vires, beyond the power of the President and Senate?
- Are any signatories to the UN Charter bound, as if by a “Treaty”, to either the UN or its Member States?
Facts & Law:
[A] At the end of World War Two the victorious powers negotiated the establishment of a successor to the League of Nations, to be called the “United Nations.” The UN Conference in San Francisco, in the spring and early summer of 1945, following the defeat of Nazi Germany, adopted the Charter and it was opened for signatures. President Truman was present at the Conference when the US Secretary of State signed the Charter, June 26, 1945. [1]
[B] In Article 110 the Charter requires its ratification:
- The present Charter shall be ratified by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional processes.
- The ratifications shall be deposited with the Government of the United States of America, which shall notify all the signatory states of each deposit as well as the Secretary-General of the Organization when he has been appointed.
- The present Charter shall come into force upon the deposit of ratifications by the Republic of China, France, the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the United States of America, and by a majority of the other signatory states. A protocol of the ratifications deposited shall thereupon be drawn up by the Government of the United States of America which shall communicate copies thereof to all the signatory states. [2]
[C] Harry S. Truman, the President of the United States, and a former Senator, personally took the Charter to the US Senate asking for ‘advice and consent’ to join the United Nations.
[D] On July 28, 1945 the Senate held a Roll Call vote, as the Congressional Record shows [3]:
The Congressional Record states:
“Two-thirds of the Senators present concurring therein, the resolution of ratification is agreed to, and the treaty is ratified.”
[E] The US State Department, as official Depository, has published a document showing the ratifications of the original members. This excerpt shows the initial US signing of the Charter by the Secretary of State in June of 1945 and the date in August of 1945 when President Truman signed the Charter while he was in Europe at the Potsdam Conference [4].
[F] While the National Archives shows a photo of President Truman signing the actual Charter on August 8, 1945. There is no record of a formal “Instrument of Ratification” on file with the Depository, as required by the Charter itself. [5] [6]
[G] The US Constitution provides, Article VI:
“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby”
[H] The Vienna Convention on Treaties (VCLT) defines Treaties as contracts between sovereign states.
” Article 1 – Scope of the present Convention
The present Convention applies to treaties between States.
Article 3 – International agreements not within the scope of the present Convention
The fact that the present Convention does not apply to international agreements concluded between States and other subjects of international law…” [7]
[I] Congress initially adopted the UN Participation Act in 1945 [8] after President Truman signed the Charter. While the Act provides for an ambassador-rank US Representative appointed by the President with the advice and consent of the Senate it does not authorize US participation in the United Nations.
Discussion: The United States relationship with the UN is unconstitutional, conceived in deceit, maintained in deceit and is thus ultra vires.
Harry S. Truman assumed the office of President of the United States when President Roosevelt died on April 12, 1945. Previously he had been Vice-President of the United States and President of the Senate, of which he had been a member prior to becoming Vice-President.
In an unprecedented act, Truman personally presented the United Nations Charter to the US Senate and spoke to the body in favor of participating in the UN. He stated, among other points:
“I am appearing to ask for the ratification of the Charter… in accordance with the Constitution. … For this is not a static treaty…” [9] (Emphasis added)
Although the President pro tem of the Senate inaccurately characterized the Charter of the United Nations as a “treaty” the President of the United States specified it was not a “treaty.”
This inconsistency suggests that the Senate was misinformed regarding the nature of the document. This situation is further exposed by the US State Department’s official compendium of Treaties in Force [10] and its supplement [11] which do not list the UN Charter as a Treaty in force.
The Vienna Convention on Treaties is clear: international agreements, such as Charters, are not treaties.
Therefore, by the preponderance of relevant authorities, the Charter is not a treaty. Despite the incorrect use of the word “treaty” in the Congressional Record, UN decisions do not trigger the “Supreme Law of the Land” clause of the Constitution. The UN Charter was conceived, presented and maintained by deceit. Any action by the US Government in furtherance of participation is ultra vires and void as unconstitutional.
Thus, State (and local) governments are not bound to follow UN dictates, including those issued by such subsidiary UN bodies as the World Health Organization.
The Charter explicitly differentiates between ‘Treaties’ and ‘international agreements’, stipulating that any Treaty brought before the UN must be registered with the Secretariat. The facts further show that no signatory to the UN Charter is bound, as if by a “Treaty”, to either the UN or its Member States. Nations which conclude the same international agreement do not enter into a Treaty among themselves by so doing. Section 102 of the Charter, the only Article referencing Treaties, states:
- Every treaty and every international agreement entered into by any Member of the United Nations after the present Charter comes into force shall as soon as possible be registered with the Secretariat and published by it.
- No party to any such treaty or international agreement which has not been registered in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 1 of this Article may invoke that treaty or agreement before any organ of the United Nations. [12]
The deception continues even today, since the US State Department erroneously refers to the UN Charter as a “multilateral treaty”.
“The United States is depositary for over 200 multilateral treaties – including, for example, the Charter of the United Nations, The Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency, and the North Atlantic Treaty. In its depositary capacity, the United States keeps the original treaty texts and facilitates their signature, as appropriate. The depositary also receives instruments relating to the treaties, such as instruments of ratification, and maintains status lists of such actions.” [13]
Note that all of the United Nations ‘treaties’ listed on the various State Department compilations noted above appear to be operational agreements for various international agencies, not Treaties governing relations among States.
International conventions and agreements to form international associations, private clubs among nations, are not Treaties under Article VI of the US Constitution and as such are not binding on the Nation or its several States.
With the very recent Decision by the United States Supreme Court, Loper et al. vs Department of Commerce, overturning the traditional ‘deference’ shown by Courts to the interpretations of law by Federal Agencies, there is no special credence that we must give to the State Department’s interpretation of US treaty obligations. [14]
Continued participation in the UN and its subsidiary organizations, commitment of resources or public funding of same, on the basis of our alleged “treaty” obligations to them, is an unlawful act and must be immediately terminated.
Respectfully submitted,
Ralph Fucetola JD
Attorney at Law: 1971 – 2006
[1] http://www.sfmuseum.org/un/signing.html
[2] https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text
[3] https://www.senate.gov/about/resources/pdf/un-charter-roll-call-vote-1945.pdf
[4] https://2017-2021.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/298-UN-Charter.pdf
[5] https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/photograph-records/64-50
[6] https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1945v01/introduction
[7] VCLT: https://legal.un.org/ilc/texts/instruments/english/conventions/1_1_1969.pdf
[8] UN Participation Act of 1945: https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/COMPS-1090/pdf/COMPS-1090.pdf
[9] https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/library/public-papers/69/address-senate-urging-ratification-charter-united-nations
[10] https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/TIF-2020-Full-website-view.pdf
[11] https://www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/TIF-Supplement-Report-2023.pdf
[12] https://www.un.org/en/about-us/un-charter/full-text
[13] https://www.state.gov/depositary-information/
[14] https://www.scotusblog.com/2024/06/supreme-court-strikes-down-chevron-curtailing-power-of-federal-agencies/
Note: some agreements listed by the State Department as “multilateral treaties” are certainly not; for example, the Kosovo UN Security Council Resolution is on the list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Interim_Administration_Mission_in_Kosovo
International Public Notice: Reposting With Commentary
By Anna Von Reitz
Guilty as [Not] Charged. Q1: Who Owns the Damn Flag? Q2: What's the Difference Between "Globalist", "Robber Baron", "Oligarch", "Destructigarch" and "Tyrant"?
We are living in a tragic and deadly geopolitical theatrical show. Who wrote the script? Who commissioned it? Who hired (and pays) the actors? Why? Let's Talk About It.
|
| |||||||||||||||
Hint: RE: Q 1. If you answered “The Zionists” or “The Jews” or “The Kazarian Mafia”, you got the answer wrong. If that makes you unhappy, your really need to read on.
Bonus: RE: Q 2. Just 145 years and a couple of letters”.
Now let’s look at Q1: To find the answer, we have to look backward in history and, surprise, it isn’t to the Balfour Declaration or its antecedents and circumstances. That compass is far too narrow to explain the phenomenon we are seeing today, and the process by which we got here. No, we have to look to the age of the great emerging fortunes amassed by the robber barons of the 19th century.
What’s a robber baron? The Encyclopedia Britannica says, in an article written by one Stephen Schneider and “Fact-checked by The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica”
John Jacob Astor, engraving after a painting by Alonzo Chappel.
Library of Congress, Washington, D.C.
Key People:
“robber baron, pejorative term for one of the powerful 19th-century American industrialists and financiers who made fortunes by monopolizing huge industries through the formation of trusts, engaging in unethical business practices, exploiting workers, and paying little heed to their customers or competition. Alternatively, those who credit the explosive growth of American capitalism during this period to the indefatigable pursuit of success and material wealth are likely to celebrate these entrepreneurial tycoons as “captains of industry.” Among the sectors in which they compiled their great wealth were the oil, steel, liquor, cotton, textile, and tobacco industries, railroads, and banks.
It has been argued that these capitalist pioneers were the “antecedents” of the organized crime that emerged in the United States during the Prohibition era (1920–33). The robber barons transformed the wealth of the American frontier into vast financial empires, amassing their fortunes by monopolizing essential industries. In turn, these monopolies were built upon the liberal use of tactics that are today the hallmark of organized crime: intimidation, violence, corruption, conspiracies, and fraud.”¹
Please note the list of people identified as robber barons by Britannica: George M. Pullman, Andrew Carnegie, J.P. Morgan, John D. Rockefeller, Jay Gould. That list, of course, is not exhaustive, but is of extreme interest when you consider the 1911 political cartoon, published in the St. Louis Post Dispatch by one of the great political cartoonists of his era, Robert Minor:
Minor indicates “John D. Rockefeller, J. P. (Pontifex Maximus) Morgan, (Pontifex Maximus), John D. Ryan of National City Bank, and Morgan partner George W. Perkins. Immediately behind Karl Marx is Teddy Roosevelt, leader of the Progressive Party.²
The captains of industry of the US, England and the European Continent paid for the socialist revolutions around the world. JP Morgan, for example, financed both the Kerensky, who successfully overthrew the Tzar and established the Russian Revolution as the ruling force of the Russian Empire and Lenin’s Bolsheviks, who overthrew Kerensky and seized power for themselves. He was not alone, of course, Rockefeller and the others helped by giving very generously their financial, propaganda, material and political support to the Russian³, ⁴, ⁵, ⁶, ⁷, and Chinese⁸ revolutions.
In some ways, robber barons/captains of industry are just like the rest of us. When they go shopping
they spend money for exactly what they want. When “Wall Street”, the world’s great capitalists and bankers, its fiercely competitive and utterly ruthless economic mafia dons, collude to buy themselves an entirely different economic system, one that allegedly will destroy them and their power, we have to ask, “Why? Why would they do that? What are they getting when they buy one socialist revolution after another (and pay for counter revolutions if they don’t like the first one, as in Kerensky and the Bolsheviks)? They are capitalists, locked in fierce and deadly struggle with socialists, aren’t they?”
Well, no, they are not. Their propaganda, designed for us peasants (whom their beloved Karl Marx characterized as “sacks of potatoes”). Because they are buying precisely what they want: absolute and utter control of the raw materials of production, the means of production, the output of production and the sales of products which were made under their total control.
WE care about labels like “Capitalism” and “Democracy” and “Socialism” and “Communism”. They don’t.
WE care about national attributes and identifications like “American” and “Canadian” and “Chinese” and “North Korean” and “German” and “Israeli” and “Saudi” and “Russian”. They don’t.
WE care about the political designations we go to war for like “Nazism” and “Freedom” and “Imperial” and “Democratic”. They don’t (and happily fund both sides of every war because they are the only real winners of each and every war).
WE care about religious distinctions like “Christian” and “Muslim” and “Jewish” and “Hindu”. They don’t.
WE care about political ideologies and their territorial and social claims like “Racism” and “Antisemitism” and “Zionism” and “Sexism” and “Transphobia”. They don’t.
THEY really do care about depopulation and eugenics, though. And they have been shopping at the Depop Depot Department Store since Professor Sir Francis Galton first coined the seductive and scientific term, “Eugenics”, in 1883.⁹ Sir? Yup. The father of eugenics, depopulation “science”, who was, by the way, a cousin of Charles Darwin, was knighted for his contributions to humanity in 1909, 2 years before his death.¹⁰
Look where they shop. Look where the Open Foundation/George Soros shops. He buys hate at the global hate store. Look where the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation/Bill and Melinda Gates shop. They shop at the Destructocrat Emporium where genes and lives are on sale, and they are very, very cheap.
Look
where the Good Club shops. They shop at the “Let’s have a climate
change clam bake where the little people get to starve and we get to own
everything because we convinced them that eliminating food to eliminate
carbon (them) made some sort of sense when it is utterly stupid!!!!”
It is generally said by those on every side of every political, religious, philosophical, economic, social, racial or other divide, that we are on the brink of destruction such as we have never known before due to the nearly miraculous capacity of administrative, military, informational, medical, genetic and communications technologies. Each of them contains a powerful and potentially massively disruptive set of capacities. Linked together, any combination of them is almost unimaginably powerful.
If they were linked together by unaccountable plutocrats acting on their own hidden and deeply unhumanitarian agenda, they could be focused to become unimaginably tyrannical from the most minute level of existence to the most enlarged one of which we are capable even in imagination. They are linked together in exactly that way, but the ruthless, rich and relentlessly destructive, self-appointed and self-anointed heirs, both genetically and psychologically, of the utterly amoral and vicious robber barons of yore. They are identical and they have neither morality nor limits to their deceit and destructiveness.
They own the flag. The one that they throw up and over the wall. They disguise it as someone else’s flag, but this is the real one:
They use tricks. They make it look like a Saudi flag or an Israeli flag or a Palestinian flag or a Spanish flag or a North Vietnamese flag or a Japanese flag or a Chinese flag or a Russian flag or a Black Lives Matter flag or whatever is convenient. And they employ their talented and well-practiced propaganda mills to move us, convince us, shift us, mobilize us into whatever Malthusian Management position they want us in.
And damned if we don’t fall for it over and over and over and over and over. And damned if we don’t hate each other on command, and kill each other on command, and inject each other with bioweapons on command and congratulate ourselves for how well informed and smart we are to understand things so clearly and be ready to build back better or tear down totally or eat the bugs or move into a Smart City or whatever they tell us our lives depend on today.
Look, o one has read me into any secret programs or shared with me anything that is not widely available. I have no security ties or clearances and never had had even the opportunity to have any (which I would have roundly rejected, by the way). My late husband, Major General Albert N. Stubblebine III (US Army, Deceased), who held every security clearance of which he was aware, never so much as breathed a whisper of classified - or even potentially classified - information to me in our 26 magnificent years prior to his assassination.
So what I see I see with my own eyes, ears and capacity to decode complexity in my search for underlying causes. It is my firm and fixed conviction that unless and until you understand the root cause of the problem(s) you are dealing with, or impacted by, or being threatened/hurt/killed by, you cannot cure the problem. That means that instead of a holistic approach which resolves the problem you can only come up with an allopathic one that suppresses the symptom you are focusing on at the moment, but leaves the process unchecked, only to create more symptoms.
That is why I believe that the efforts to exit the WHO, for example, are wasted, despite how deadly WHO is. Whatever the WHO does, another organism of the parent beast, death machine that dispatches the WHO to do its evil deeds, the UN, can do just as completely if the WHO is wiped off the face of the earth (which is not a bad idea, it is just not effective enough).
For example, the damage and destruction of national and personal sovereignty ensured under the IHR (legally binding only if a nation’s membership in the UN is not fraudulent, which every country’s membership is¹¹) and the “Pandemic Preparedness and Prevention” idiocy is also assured under the UN Committe on Environment and Development¹², the UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs¹³, the UN Guidance on Municipal Financial Affairs¹⁴ and more, much, much, much more
all summed up under the wildly misnamed “Sustainable” [sic] “Development” [sic] Goals¹⁵
and every terrible thing they actually entail.
We know that disruption and destruction are being planned for us
¹⁶, as this 2024 report from the Government of Canada,
¹⁷ tells us.
But wait! Here is the same plan for our destruction again,
in the World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report, 2019, 14th Edition¹⁸
Oh, but wait! Here is an earlier iteration of the same chart
in the World Economic Forum’s Global Risks Report of 2010¹⁹
²⁰
It’s
all over the World Economic Forum (WEF). Wait! What? the WEF, a private
organization is telling governments how to think about the future and
what to do about it?
Given that the trail of culpability seems to
lead through, to, under and behind the World Economic Forum, which has
at least two formal contracts with the Unelected Nobodies (UN) to
implement global disruption and destruction (AKA Agenda 21/Agenda
2030/The Great Reset/the Fourth Industrial Revolution/Pact for the
Future/Digital Compact, etc.) perhaps we might find what Dear Leader
Schwab, his “You will own nothing and be happy”-ness himself, has to say
about these disruptions and their solutions (the $$ part is highlighted
in green, of course)
That leads us to the McGuire Rule: “Follow the money!”
Who funds the World Economic Forum? Good question:
Footnotes 1, and 2 in the above are referenced below as:
Footnote 1 ²¹, Footnote 2 ²²
In case you are planning on dropping in to Davos 2025 on January 20-24, for a look-see and a bit of hobnobbing with the 2000 or so people who will be at Davos for the WEF meeting this year, you’d better have a flourishing piggy bank:
²³
but there’s a bit more to budget for since “Figures vary, but overall costs can exceed £250,000 for the week; rental homes can cost around £15,000, plus high food, drink and event prices (a hot dog reportedly costs $43). Many attendees fly in on private jets and hire drivers for the week, too.”²⁴
So we have a fancy club of fancy (that means inordinately, astonishingly wealthy) robber barons who have decided to reform/transform society to their liking and have seized upon the global control system which earlier robber barons put in place to serve as the agency of supernational, or as Justin Trudeau put it, the first post-national state.
²⁵
Of course, if you succeed in destroying national autonomy via uncontrolled migration and supranational policies like the ones that have been inserted in legislation all around the world (see, for example, Canada’s C-293, US 116-22, New Zealand’s Health Plan, the EU’s Health Emergency Preparedness and Response Authority (HERA) and many, many more) every nation is a post-national state.
And the destructagarchs can bring out their flag and own it outright because you will either be dead by that time or will have been rendered totally powerless.
That is, after all, the goal. How powerful do you think the transhumanized, Bio digitally converged crypto cattle in their SMART prison cities are going to be?
So the robber barons 2.0 and beyond, now fully in charge of everything, will not need to hide anything because they can fearlessly and flagrantly do anything.
Or, we can recognize that they are the menace and get our nations out of the Death Machine they and their evil predatory psychopathic predecessors have built precisely and specifically for our destruction: the United Nations.
How? Go to PreventGenocide2030.org and,
if you live in the US, use your Freedom Mouse to take all 6 steps of
the 10 Million Patriot Challenge. They only take a few minutes, but they
are critically important.
If you live in Canada, visit StopC-293.ca and then take the steps of the 10 Million Patriot Challenge as well.
If you live elsewhere, do the same: the 10 Million Patriot Challenge gives voice to your discontent in a way that, roared loudly enough, can literally save humanity from the most powerful destructive force we have ever faced.
So, when we are asked to fight and destroy one another because some flag has been flung across our walls with destructive impact, the owner of the flag is always the same: it is always the destructigarchs, the tyrants, the predatory robber barons who have no national, religious, tribal or loyalty. Their flag serves only tyranny and dehumanization.
So could we please stop falling for the same trick over and over and over and over and over and over?
“Inquiries into Human Faculty and Its Development” 1883, Sir Francis Galton
By that time, the generous philanthropic revolutionary shoppers had instituted widespread culling of the feeble-minded, indigent, those inconvenient and religiously, politically, culturally or otherwise guilty of being too “other” for the princes of society to have in THEIR world.
Monday, October 21, 2024
International Public Notice: For the Love of God and Country
By Anna Von Reitz
Monday, October 21, 2024
Shifting Racial Identity -- Is Race a Choice?
By Anna Von Reitz
No comments:
Post a Comment