Sunday, June 23, 2024
4905: International Public Notice: Regulation Z as an Example of "Legalization" from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Many
people coming out of the miasma created by private for-profit
corporations operating "as" governments are completely disoriented.
For example, most of us expect police officers to protect us, and we'd be wrong.
That
is not the job of police officers. They are not here to protect the
General Public. This has been firmly admitted and established in
multiple court rulings.
Law
Enforcement Officers, LEOs, are private security personnel; they are
here to protect the corporations they work for from loss and liability,
and to enforce statutory requirements on the corporation's actual
personnel and actual dependents.
Sometimes
they have a problem identifying the corporation's personnel,
accidentally-on-purpose, and they wind up addressing the rest of us,
instead.
The
arrests they make of non-statutory, non-citizens pad their revenues,
which is pure cream and gravy for the corporations that hire them.
Last
time we looked, the courts were charging $25,000 per misdemeanor and
$1M per felony charge against the public trusts, regardless of the
outcome of the case. All they have to do is assign a docket number and
rubber stamp a decision.
You
can see why these police officers are keen to make arrests and bring
charges and why their bosses in the court system encourage this and love
them for it.
The LEOs themselves know no better and are not taught any better. Why?
Because the only way to make a moral man commit immoral acts is to mislead him into thinking that he is doing the right thing.
Most
LEOs don't realize that: (1) they are working in a private capacity and
(2) the corporations they work for only appear to have public
authorities and functions, because those same corporations are operating
under color of law as franchises of Federal Subcontractors.
Most
LEOs don't realize that (3) the State of State statutes and other codes
and regulations they enforce are not "Law" and over 90% of the time,
those statutes, codes, and regulations don't apply to members of the
General Public at all.
Just as the General Public is not protected by police officers, they shouldn't be addressed by police officers, but they are.
LEOs
also don't realize that (4) their incorporated employers have left them
without access to public bonding or insurance, so that they are 100%
commercially and personally liable for their actions on the job and may
be charged under 18 USC 241 and 18 USC 242.
On
top of everything else that is challenging about their employment, if
they, for example, violate Article IV of the Constitution of the United
States, and issue a bill of attainder against someone who actually is
owed the protections of the Constitution, they can not only lose their
job, they can lose their personal property and face jail time for it.
Of course, they don't find out about this until it actually happens and they are left like orphans on a street corner.
The
foreign corporations that use them to do the dirty work have no motive
to properly educate these men and women; quite the opposite. The more
daring these LEO's are in their attacks on the General Public, the more
money the court system drags in.
This
is known as "privateering" or "racketeering" and it involves extortion
of time or money or both, from people who don't owe either, usually
under conditions of fraud.
Racketeering
can occur in any jurisdiction, while privateering is the same basic
crime carried out in international jurisdiction with a license from a
government to "legalize" it.
Increasingly,
people are becoming aware of the abuse of licenses and are refusing to
obtain licenses to do things that they don't actually do --- like
driving motor vehicles.
A license is permission to do something that is otherwise illegal.
It
is not illegal nor is it unlawful for an American to get in his car and
drive down to the local grocery store to buy a pound of butter.
His
right to travel on the public roads by any means of conveyance is
inviolable, so long as he doesn't actually harm anyone else or harm
anyone else's property.
Broken
tail-lights, illegal U turns, and five miles over the speed limit
doesn't enter into it, until or unless such a non-citizen causes actual
damage; it's arguable that a "clear and present danger" may be grounds
for pre-emptive arrest --- obvious weaving all over the road, 100 mph in
a 20 mph zone, etc., ---
but not the paltry routine traffic stops that we've become heir to.
We
recently attended a court session where over a dozen people were
convicted of "speeding" one to five miles over the speed limit; even the
judge was offended, despite pocketing $350,000 plus fines in a single
afternoon of gavel-waving.
The
problem is that all these people are being convicted under the False
Presumption that they are voluntarily participating in interstate
commerce and that they are voluntarily "driving" a "registered motor
vehicle" -- when in fact they have been misinformed and coerced to
misidentify themselves as "drivers" and also coerced to register their
private motorcars as "commercial motor vehicles", too.
In
the 1950s a big push was made to register every private car in America,
whether or not it was engaged in any commercial activity at all.
This
was done so that the State of State corporate franchises could claim an
ownership interest in all these private cars and use them as collateral
for their spending. It had nothing to do with what the actual owners
used the car for, whether they were engaged in any commercial use of the
car or not.
Realizing
that the actual laws pertaining to drivers and driving and the use of
the public roads for private commercial gain were being illegally
imposed on people who by definition were not drivers and on cars that by
definition were not motor vehicles, the perpetrators of these new
registration requirements had to provide remedy.
Attached
to the Federal Highway Safety Act of 1956, the Federal Reserve Board of
Governors (the beneficiaries of all the purloined private car
collateral) imposed "Regulation Z", that provides for the identification
of private cars and issuance of private license plates, to identify
those cars that aren't actually involved in any commercial activity, but
whose owners were coerced to register them as commercial motor vehicles
anyway.
A
Regulation Z license plate posts notice to the LEOs that they are not
dealing with a commercial motor vehicle, nor can they presume that the
operator is functioning as a "driver" -- as in the operator of a motor
vehicle engaged in interstate commerce.
Different rules apply.
Over
the years demand for Regulation Z plates declined as ignorance of the
issues grew, and many states stopped producing them; in other states
more sensitive to the legalization issues, Regulation Z plates or tags
remained available, but people had to ask for them and pay a bit extra
for them.
No
effort was made to educate the LEOs nor the Public about these issues,
but some people read the Motor Vehicle Code and realized that their car
was improperly registered--- and that they, themselves, were responsible
for creating a falsified public record, indicating that their car was
being used for commercial purposes, when it wasn't.
For many people, this causes reasonable concerns about the legality of lying and creating such a false document.
Other
people did more research and discovered that "registration" gives away
an ownership interest, if not the entire ownership, of whatever is being
registered. So this same legislation demanded that Americans give up an
ownership interest in their private property to the State-of-State -- a
form of white collar racketeering.
Still
more research revealed that "drivers" are persons engaged in commercial
enterprise deriving private gain from the use of public roads -- like
taxi drivers and courier services. Not Dad going back and forth to his
job at Nathan's Meat Market.
Eventually
the trail led to the involuntary (and falsified) registration of
private cars in the 1950's, and to Regulation Z, the remedy for what
would otherwise be an inequitable and illegal attachment of private
property assets for public use and misrepresentation of a licensed
occupation.
Those
of us who have Driver Licenses and who aren't actually involved in
commerce, are, in effect, impersonating a licensed professional-- which
is a crime in itself, like impersonating a police officer.
Yet
here we have institutions "acting as" government entities, and police
officers hired by these private corporations, suborning us to obtain
Driver Licenses
While
we all have an interest in making sure that people know how to move
about safely on the public roads, licensing them as "Drivers" when they
are not remotely engaged in commercial activity, is a form of
self-incrimination fraud that they are being coerced to commit against
themselves.
By analogy, we wouldn't apply for a license to hunt deer if we had no intention nor desire to hunt deer.
Why
would we be forced to apply for a license to "drive a motor vehicle"
for purposes of private commercial gain, when we have no intention,
reason, or desire to participate in any such activity?
We
wouldn't, except that any car appearing without license plates is
immediately stopped and the operator is coerced, questioned like a
criminal, and arrested.
The issues that required the establishment of Regulation Z are just as potent today as
ever; without Regulation Z, the imposition of registration on private
cars is still illegal, and the States-of-States must provide private
plates or tags in compliance with Regulation Z in order to legalize
their automobile registration statutes.
In
several states, Missouri among them, private plates have not been
available for some years and bureaucrats have forgotten that they ever
existed -- much less the reason why.
As
a result, people in these states who resist the idea of creating false
documents concerning their use of their private automobiles, and more
false documents concerning their own activities, have been forced to
object to the courts.
The
courts in turn throw it back on the politicians instead of researching
the issues for themselves; these Conviction Mills read the statute and
fling the gavel, never questioning the basic legality of the statute
itself.
Meantime,
the people, who should never be arrested or even addressed about the
peaceable exercise of their most basic rights, are functionally denied
remedy that must be provided to legalize the imposition of forced
registration of private automobiles in the first place.
Similarly,
we would not apply for licenses as Medical Doctors if we had no desire
to be physicians, and if we falsified our application so as to obtain a
medical license under False Pretenses, we would expect to be arrested
for impersonating a licensed professional.
The
same exact rationale applies to applying for a Driver License with no
desire or expectation of participating in commerce. This leaves a
majority of Americans unwittingly impersonating a licensed professional
-- a Driver engaged in commercial intercourse of some kind.
There
is no known remedy for this improper demand that people falsely license
themselves as "Drivers" and incur the resulting Legal Presumptions, but
there certainly should be, for otherwise those making the demand are
engaged in suborning criminal activity -- literally coercing the
ignorant applicants to commit a crime against the public and against
themselves: impersonation of a licensed professional, when they are not
engaged in nor aware of the profession and cannot evaluate the
undisclosed licensing contract.
As
a result of all these improper demands and their improper
administration of remedy, the law enforcement community and the courts
and the State-of-State Legislatures are under increasing demand to
correct their operations, properly train their personnel, comply with
the Federally mandated remedies, and exonerate Americans who have
objected to the current circumstance.
This
includes but is not limited to those convicted of petty traffic
infractions, speeding that did not result in explicit endangerment,
non-registration of private cars and trucks in the absence of remedy,
and driver licensing.
The
demand that a member of the General Public obtain a Driver License when
they are not knowingly and voluntarily engaged in commercial activity
is itself suborning a crime: it requires fraud, self-incrimination, and
creation of falsified documents.
The demand that a member of the General Public completes a Registration of their private automobile
as
a motor vehicle engaged in commerce is similarly a crime resulting in
falsified documents and the coerced transfer of ownership interest in
private property. It also subjects the victim to foreign statutory laws
and municipal codes for no good reason.
In
order to legalize any of this activity, the remedies provided by
Regulation Z must be made readily available and private plates or tags
must be produced and made available by the State-of-State organizations
requiring the registration of private automobiles.
Making
the lives of the victims "difficult" via repeated illegal and unlawful
arrests for non-registration or non-licensure, in the face of failure to
provide remedy for these impositions, is criminal.
Failure
to provide remedy results in re-criminalization of the affected
statutes, and liability for the State-of-State and County organizations
responsible.
We
could wish that this common example was the only example of abuse of
licensing and abuse of registration and failure to comply with remedy
provisions, but it's not.
This
common and unremediated abuse is symptomatic of the criminal
misadministration that this country and its natural populace has
suffered.
Lack of awareness and education has meant that the abuses have continued unabated, until now.
The
State Assemblies of properly declared, provenanced, recorded, and
published Americans are preparing new Public Laws for enforcement,
requiring the application of the known remedies and providing for
alternatives, including State Credentials, that will serve as proper
identification of Americans living in each State of the Union going
forward.
The
foreign British Territorial State-of-State and corresponding Municipal
organizations are culpable for these offenses and omissions and
unremediated impositions upon Americans and American property assets in
every State of the Union.
Providing
Regulation Z exemptions and Z Registration plates or tags is not
discretionary; likewise, the State-of-State organizations cannot
continue to demand Driver Licensing without providing and advertising
Traveler IDs, instead, for those who are not engaged in commercial
activities.
Issued by:
Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
June 23rd 2024
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment