Thursday, December 28, 2023
4571-4572: American Public Announcement: What Applies to You? ---And Doesn't? from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
As
always, it is a matter of discerning which "law" applies to you -- or
doesn't apply to you. People have been contacting me, alarmed by new
regulations being imposed by the "Corporate Transparency Act" (CTA) as
of next Monday, January 1, 2023.
This Act, like all legislative Acts, pertains only to federal business entities, corporate officials, and corporate employees.
Are you a "federal" corporate business entity, corporate official, or corporate employee?
Let's look at the actual list of who is liable for these new business reporting requirements:
The
CTA impacts federal reporting entities, corporations, limited liability
companies, limited business partnerships, business trusts, and similar
entities that are created or registered by filing documentation with a
State of State Secretary of State or Indian Tribal Office. (Indian
Tribal Offices are also under the British-connected Federal Municipal
System.)
CTA
does not include unincorporated, unregistered, unlicensed, and exempted
businesses that have not sought public bankruptcy protection or similar
limited liability benefits, and therefore are not public entities.
It
does include non-profits and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) that
have filed paperwork with any State of State Secretary of State or
registered their organizations as franchise corporations with any State
of State Division of Banking and Commerce, etc.
Bottom
line, if you have been unwise enough to incorporate your business
enterprises and sought "benefits" for your business from the Public, and
then used layers of interlocking trusts and other mechanisms to hide
your business relationships, launder money, collude in illegal asset
protection schemes, and dodge taxes --- you are in a heap of trouble,
boy.
As of January 1,
2024, you have to report on your business relationships, ownership
interests, etc., to FinCen, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, of
the U.S. Department of Treasury (note, this is not the same as the U.S.
Department of the Treasury, LOL).
As
of this past week, you were in a heap of trouble, anyway, as your
corporations are basically dissolved if they were in any way attached to
the British Empire --and most of the corporations in America were,
because since the Civil War when the Corporation Craze started in
America, the State of State organizations have all been British
Territorial Government operations.
Read
that -- unknown to you, your post-Civil War Corporations created in
America have all been registered or otherwise documented and created by a
British Territorial Secretary of State's Office, not an American
Secretary of State's Office.
This
goes back to the great Substitution Fraud that occurred right after the
Civil War, when the British Territorial Government (which was one of
our three Federal Subcontractors) declared a "state of emergency" and
shoe-horned -- under force and color of law -- the people of each State
to create new "State of State Constitutions" providing a service
contract for British Territorial State of State organizations to come in
and substitute for the American State of State organizations that
existed prior to the Civil War.
Prior
to the Civil War, our State services were provided by American
purveyors operated as, for example, The State of Florida. After the
above described maneuver, the same services were provided by British
Territorial purveyors operated as, for example, the State of Florida.
The
only difference that a person on the street could observe would be a
change from "The" to "the", new signage, and some new personnel.
All
these organizations and all the organizations created by or registered
by these and similar British-connected corporations (this probably means
you, if you are an American corporation, limited liability company,
yada-yada formed in this country after 1860) have been dissolved and
their assets entered into receivership as of last week.
So
while reporting under the requirements of the CTA may have posed yet
another reporting expense ---and if you were colluding, evading, or
entangling in improper ways --- possible fines and other regulatory
unpleasantness, there are bigger fish to fry.
Don't
worry about CTA or even the U.S. Department of Treasury. Worry about
hauling your rumps and assets out of the flaming dogpile.
The
only way you can do this is by lawfully converting your corporate
business operations -- that is, voluntarily "nationalizing" your
corporations to stand under the Law of the Land and the auspices of your
American Government still standing on the land and soil of your
country.
Otherwise,
your companies are unincorporated chattel assets, unprotected and
liable for all the "public debts" run up against private assets for the
past three centuries.
This
is because, ever since Queen Anne, the Brits have been operating their
Monarchy as a shell game. The Throne of England has stood vacant for
three centuries, and that is a real problem, because in order to charter
or register corporations -- a government must hold its sovereignty on
the Land and Soil.
And
yes, the Poo rolls downhill. Because their Majesties haven't been
operating in the proper Office and capacity and under the correct form
of Law, they haven't had the power to create or register corporations
this entire time.
As
a result, all the corporations formed under the auspices of Great
Britain and the UK and most American Corporations, too, (because of the
Substitution Scheme described above) stand dissolved and their assets
are claimed by our unincorporated Federation of States, as the
Preferential Creditor still standing.
Under
such a circumstance, former British Corporations, like their unwitting
"American affiliates", may choose to lawfully convert their operations
as American Corporations standing on the land jurisdiction of The United
States of America.
Intent
to function lawfully from now on may be established by a vote of the
Board of Directors, Board of Governors, or other duly seated corporation
officers. So long as they honor this expressed intent they will be
given a reasonable amount of time to restructure and lawfully convert
their operations.
Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
December 28th 2023
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
International Public Notice: One Good Fact v A Lot of Bad Law
By Anna Von Reitz
Notice to Principals is Notice to Agents; Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals
We
paraphrase the title of this Notice from a
reader-researcher-correspondent who responded to our recent appeal for
research assistance:
"The
last actual monarch of England was Queen Anne, who reigned from 1702
until 1714. She was the last monarch of the House of Stuart and the last
English monarch to date who was not also monarch of Scotland."
However,
the continued practice of the Coronation seems to say otherwise; Kings
and Queens of England have continued to be crowned "as" Kings and Queens
of England --- haven't they?
Queen
Elizabeth II certainly seemed to be taking the Coronation Vows of the
Queen of England during her televised 1953 Coronation, but as Regina v
JAH (John Anthony Hill) proved, within three days she severed that
Social Contract, breaking it and leaving the English Throne vacant
throughout the rest of her long career.
She didn't sit on the Throne of England for seventy years; she sat on The Chair of the Estates, instead.
So,
knowing this we've been poking at the belly of the Beast and have
confirmed among other things that neither the present King Charles III
nor King Charles of Scotland ever took the Coronation Vows to be Kings
of the land and soil of their respective countries.
That
is, they never entered General Jurisdiction and somehow magically just
popped up to reign on the sea and in the air with no legs on dry land at
all.
People have assumed that it is possible to be both King of England and Scotland, but "no man can serve two masters".
Instead,
what appears to have happened, is an aberration of Nature and a gross
violation of the public's trust in both England and Scotland, as well as
Ireland and Wales later on.
The people
living in these countries have gone on believing in the existence of a
King of England sitting on the Throne of England, and as we have seen,
there has been considerable investment --- Elizabeth II's entire "for
show" Coronation, for example --- in continuing this charade for public
consumption, but.... sometime during the reign of Queen Anne, she became
a "Corporate Queen" operating in the jurisdiction of the sea and owing
her service to a Legal Fiction, not a living Kingdom populated by men
and women.
This
counts as one of the longest-running fraud schemes in history, and
stands as a stunning example of corporate guile employed against the
living people who have relied upon what they reasonably believed to be
their Christian King or Queen, to protect them and uphold their law.
King
Charles III and King Charles of Scotland are both "legless" having
either vacated or never occupied the actual thrones of England or
Scotland, either one --- and it appears that this has been the practice
of their Predecessors for the past 300 years.
They
kept up appearances without actually being Kings of England or Scotland
--- which means they have all been nothing more or less than glorified
CEOs, operating apart from the land and soil of their respective
countries.
It
also means that everything they have "signed into law" for the past 300
years is either void for fraud (most likely) or legislation that
applies only to public employees.
It
means that all the "wars" they have engaged in from the time of Queen
Anne forward have been Mercenary Conflicts only euphemistically called
"wars".
And
that means that all the "war reparations" they have collected since The
War of the Spanish Succession have been collected under False Pretenses
and conditions of illegal confiscation.
This
also explains their ability to amass vast fortunes for the conduct of
these wars, as they have been able to engage the backing of private
banks and industrialist cronies acting as war profiteers in wars for
profit, instead of relying on the public purse --- at least, that has
been the case during the "wars".
In
each case an umbrella corporation was formed to act as a sort of
clearinghouse for war-related purchases and disbursements. In the
Second World War, this umbrella corporation in America was the U.S.
Corp. Immediately after the "war" ended, this umbrella was folded up
and bankrupted as a result of its surplus investments, and the cost of
this was transferred to the unwitting American Public.
This
is just one example of how letting the supposed monarchs operate in
this manner has promoted corruption and harm to the public they are
supposed to serve, encouraged wars-for-profit, cronyism, elitism, unjust
enrichment, and has ultimately given rise to their effort to establish a
form of Corporate Feudalism, in which their corporations would
literally own living people like farmyard animals and dispose of them
accordingly.
It
should now be apparent to everyone reading this why a King must be held
accountable to the people of his country and must sit on the Throne of
his country and be responsible under the Law of the Land and Soil,
before he has the right to charter or register any form of business
entity.
This,
then, also explains how and why all the Municipal and Territorial
Corporations -- and their franchises -- created and administered by
"King" Charles III and "King" Charles of Scotland and all of their
Predecessors back to Queen Anne, have been foreclosed upon by their
Preferential Creditor, The United States of America --- our
unincorporated Federation of States.
None
of these corporations except those that can prove that they were formed
properly and lawfully prior to Queen Anne or under the auspices of
Queen Anne prior to her quiet abdication of the Throne of England, have
any right to exist.
The
authority that a country has to charter and register corporations
derives from the Land and Soil Jurisdiction, and without a Sovereign on
the Land and Soil, no such authority exists.
As
a result, all these later corporations from HSBC in Hong Kong to JB's
Fish 'N Chips, Inc., are undone; the venerable Bank of England, formed
in 1694 to fund the Government, most likely still holds water-- but
beginning sometime during Queen Anne's Administration, there is no valid
authority in place to create corporations.
Everything that has gone on since then has been unlawful by definition, and a merely legal existence is not sufficient.
Put
another way, "Great Britain" is a Legal Fiction, but the Kingdom of
England is a Lawful Person; it follows that the "King of Great Britain"
is a Legal Person, whereas the "King of England" is a Lawful Person.
Legal Persons do not have the power to self-generate.
Thus
all these corporations that have been formed for the last 300 years in
England and in the Union and the Commonwealth, and all their franchises
formed in other countries, including most of the members of the World
Economic Forum -- are void.
"Lost at sea."
They
now represent a vast pile of unincorporated chattel assets claimed by
the Preferential Creditor, our unincorporated Federation of States doing
business as The United States of America.
The
only option to unravel this Mess is for all these corporations to
undergo lawful conversion, that is, "nationalization" and come back
under the Law of the Land in their respective countries.
The
only way for England to proceed is through the authority and claims of
the Hereditary Lord High Steward, Ivan Talbot, and the only way for him
to form a lawful government is to call a meeting of the Heirs of the
Norman Settlement --- something that hasn't been done on a voluntary
basis since they signed The Magna Carta.
This
may seem extreme, but when you are dealing with corporate mischief
and malfeasance going back 300 years at the Highest Levels of Government
in the western world, extreme measures are called for.
Issued by: Anna Maria Riezinger, Fiduciary
The United States of America
In care of: Box 520994
Big Lake, Alaska 99652
December 28th 2023
----------------------------
To support this work look for the Donate button on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment