Miracle on Main Street: Brother Max/Is Dream Money Lawful Money?
BROTHER MAX
we
Acres the Atlantic, the German federal reserve—a
central bank of issue called the Reichsbank —performed an
experiment in artificial money that devastated the German
people, 1916-1923. Pearl S. Buck wrote a book about it with
Erma von Pustau called How It Happens (New York: The
John Day Company, 1947). Genocide by paper flood is
documented in this book with dramatic eye-witness vivid-
ness.
In the beginning days, as the Reichsbank started issuing
paper credit out of thin air, the German press excitedly
called inflation ‘the miracle of German industry!” No
wonder., Everybody had money and credit, just like in
America in the go-go 1960’s. But soon the dream turned
nightmarish. Recalling her brother’s remarks about his
normally thrifty wife, Frau von Pustau describes Germany
around 1919:
“Robert first looked puzzled, then he said to me, “You know,
Hilde is just how women ought to be. But it’s madness to save
nowadays.’ Saving is the very source of wealth and health of a
sound nation. We were on our way to becoming a crazy, a neuro-
tic, a mad nation.”
The press cooperated not with the struggling, suffering
47
48 THE MIRACLE ON MAIN STREET
people who looked to their newspapers for answers, but
with the Friends of Paper Money. No attempt was made to
publish or broadcast the one true cause of inflation, to lead
the people to the solution. Unfortunately for them, the
Germans had had no Roger Sherman, no Article I Section
10; they were completely at the mercy of the Reichsbank
and industry (itself indebted to the Reichsbank ) and, of
course, the government (the Reichsbank’s largest debtor).
Please note that the Director of the Reichsbank at this time
was none other than Max Warburg, the brother of Paul,
who created and served as a governor of America’s Federal
Reserve Board. Also note that during much of this period,
our boys and German boys were fighting the bloodiest war
in world history, up to then. Millions of people got killed.
The newspapers and radios published all kinds of tips
and hints on how to live with inflation, buying cheaper
cuts of meat, staying cold in winter, just generally reducing
one’s needs in the interests of “conservation” —that kind of
thing, with which you’re quite familiar.
“Inflation is a thing which has slipped out of control of
everyone,” the newspapers lamented; as times grew
worse, the media began blaming ‘foreigners,’ gold
speculators, and gold hoarders. Of course, hoarding gold
is just about the only defense anyone has against inflation.
Even in the last frantic days, the press was still terming
inflation “a catastrophe of nature.” Do you see any
similarities between the media then and now?
Frau von Pustau says:
By the end of the year my allowance and all the money I
earned were not worth one cup of coffee. You could go to the
baker in the morning and buy two rolls for 20 marks; but go there
in the afternoon, and the same two rolls were 25 marks. The baker
didn’t know how it happened. His customers didn’t know how it
happened. It had somehow to do with the dollar, somehow to do
with the stock exchange—and somehow, maybe, to do with the
Jews.
Confusion, mass ignorance, debates flaming from all
sides, complicated solutions proposed by experts: “All
BROTHER MAX 49
these technical questions made it difficult for anybody to
understand for a long time what was happening,” Frau
von Pustau says. And while no one was understanding,
the Friends of Paper Money were pocketing more and
more of the people’s property.
She recalls:
When Father came back from vacation, he said that the
workers had discovered the ‘trick of inflation,’ which was to figure
the value of money in gold. Time and again, the workers struck
for the ‘adjustment of their wages,’ paid daily in exact accordance
with the daily mark devaluation.
Those who quickly converted to gold were able to sur-
vive the inflation with their resources reasonably intact.
“Quickly converting to gold” is but one step below hav-
ing a redeemable currency. For those who remained igno-
rant of the “trick of inflation,’’ says Frau von Pustau, “‘life
was madness, nightmare, desperation, chaos.”
Finally, out of the chaos came the cure. But the cure
became a political game, a long, drawn out affair that
lasted nearly six months as the various factions in govern-
ment and business jockeyed for position to see who would
be given credit for bringing about the cure. Says Frau von
Pustau:
The government struggled hard to restore the gold standard.
But the Minister of Finance was the socialist Hilferding. Big busi-
ness was ready, now, to restore the gold standard; but the whole
clique, including the agriculture, peasants, and Junkers wanted to
be given credit for restoring sound and solid money. While this
struggle went on, chaos increased.
And prostitution and suicide and every kind of street
crime imaginable. Even unimaginable: it got so bad, accord-
ing to Frau von Pustau, that chunks of meat were butch-
ered from the flanks of horses standing at rest in front of
their wagons and were either sold or eaten on the spot.
At length, with a loaf of bread costing billions of marks,
the currency was made redeemable in gold coin and in-
stantly the stormy sea calmed. But enormous damage had
been done, both past and future. For the “honor” of restor-
50 THE MIRACLE ON MAIN STREET
ing a sound mark was given to Dr. Hjalmar Schacht, who
was skyrocketed by the media to national heroism, fame
and adulation because of his “accomplishment.” Because
he had “rescued Germany,” anyone Dr. Schacht as-
sociated with would be accorded great public esteem. It’s
history that Hjalmar Schacht chose to associate himself
with Adolf Hitler, becoming the Fuhrer’s chief economic
advisor.
In 1949, China was drowned in an inflation identical to
the German one, resulting in Mao Tse Tung’s repressive
dictatorship. In 1946, the Hungarian government's central
bank printed the 10-quintrillion Pengo note which, before
the Second World War, would have bought the whole
country; in April 1946, a 10-quintrillion Pengo couldn’t pur-
chase a dozen eggs. With the collapse of the Hungarian
economy, of course, came communist dictatorship. And so
on, globally.
A giant step toward an American 10-quintrillion dollar
note was taken with the passage last March of ‘The De-
pository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control
Act of 1980.” This Act empowers the Federal Reserve. to
declare almost anything to be money, and compels all banks
to join its system.
Truly, as Frédéric Bastiat wrote in the last century,
“Often the masses are plundered and do not know it.”
The same monetary system that was established on April 2,
1792, is in effect today.”
—Bruce A. Budlong,
Acting Director, Special
Financing Staff, Department of the
Treasury, Fiscal Service
“The terms ‘lawful money’ and ‘lawful money of the United
States’ shall be censtrued to mean gold or silver coin of the United
States.” ,
—12 UNITED STATES CODE 152
A Il coins and currencies of the United States (including
Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve
banks and national banking associations), regardless of when
coined or issued, shall be legal tender for all debts, public and
private, public charges, taxes, duties, and dues.”
—31 UNITED STATES CODE 392
52
8
IS DREAM MONEY
LAWFUL MONEY?
We
This may surprise you, but Congress has never de-
clared Federal Reserve notes to be a legal tender in pay-
ment of debts. Doubt me? Look at your currency:
‘“,.. LEGAL TENDER FOR ALL DEBTS PUBLIC AND PRIVATE.”
4 The word “FoR” is used rather than “IN PAYMENT OF.””
t Was this just accidental? No. It is well-settled in the courts
that lawmakers are presumed to have selected each word
that makes up a statute carefully and deliberately, lest the
statute be considered void for vagueness. We can be sure,
then, that when Congress chose NOT to use “IN PAYMENT
oF,” it did so for a good reason, that good reason being
the hard fact that no debt can be paid in full in the eyes of
American jurisprudence unless paid in gold or silver coined and
regulated in value by Congress, courtesy of Article I Sections
8 and 10. (See “The U.S. Monetary System,” p. 148.)
About all a Federal Reserve note can legally do is wipe
out one debt and replace it with itself, another debt, a note
that promises nothing. If anything’s been paid, the pay-
ment occurs only in the minds of the parties—in the
ideasphere — not the real world.
It’s important for you to mark well that Federal Reserve
notes are not your government's money. They bear likenesses
of our presidents, they bear the signatures of our Treasurer
and the Secretary of the Treasury, they bear beautiful en-
53
54 THE MIRACLE ON MAIN STREET
gravings of our most sacred political monuments, and
even—since the late 1950’s—the pious religious motto “In
God We Trust,” but they are not your government's money. So
when you revile American Dream money, you’re in no
way insulting your government. Federal Reserve paper is
not lawful money, not government money. It is the scrip of
a private corporation partially owned by your local banker.
Whether it’s a $100 bill or a $1 bill, a Federal Reserve note is
intrinsically worth about one cent. Its extrinsic worth is
whatever it will buy from day to day in the marketplace,
just like the 1916-1923 German mark.
Is this any kind of money for a stable country to have?
Between 1913 and 1963, the Federal Reserve promised
redeemability in lawful money on their notes. But in 1963,
they began issuing notes minus the redeemability promise.
This enabled your banker to issue you a note that said “In
God We Trust” in exchange for your silver dollar, without
his having to exchange that silver dollar back for the note.
An unfair deal, you might say, but who took steps to pre-
vent it?
Interestingly, the first 50,000,000 no-promise Federal Re-
serve notes were shipped out on November 26, 1963,
which happened to be the day of John F. Kennedy’s
funeral. A coin dealer friend of mine says, ““You know, they
couldn’t have picked a better day to catch the people off
guard.” 1
These days it looks like there’s not enough gold and
silver “to go around.” That’s because there’s so much
paper. Inflation always makes people think there’s a short-
age in precious metals. The reason is simple: Increased paper
increases prices.
It looks, too, as though we're “off the gold standard,” as
a banker told me in earnest not long ago. Both this and the
“not enough” assumptions are based on pure hearsay. How
rarely we bother to check things out! How easily we sur-
1. See Appendix, page 128 ff.
IS DREAM MONEY LAWFUL MONEY? 55
render our lives to gossip! Oh, that ideasphere! For
America to be “off the gold (or silver) standard’ the Coin-
age Act of April 2, 1792, which specifies in detail how our
money is to be made, would have to be rescinded or re-
pealed by Congress. Then, a constitutional amendment
permitting the states to make something other than gold
and silver coin a tender in payment of debts would have to
be passed and ratified by three-fourths of the states.
As of 1981, neither of these events has happened. God
help us if they ever should happen.
It is the Federal Reserve’s monetary system that is no
longer on the gold or silver standard. In the Federal Re-
serve’s own published statement:
Today, in the United States, there are only two kinds of money
in use in significant amounts —currency (paper money and coins in
the pockets and purses of the public) and demand deposits (check-
ing accounts in commercial banks). Since $1 in currency and $1 in
demand deposits are freely convertible into each other at the op-
tion of a bank’s customer, both are money to an equal degree.
What . . . makes these instruments acceptable at face value pay-
ment of all debts? Mainly, it is the confidence people have that they
will be able to exchange such money for real goods and services
whenever they choose to do so.!
So there you have it: paper and confidence are the
monies in which we conduct our daily commercial trans-
actions, with our friendly banker as our perpetual mid-
dleman. But have the instruments of the Federal Reserve
_ monetary system ever qualified to be the money in which
the transactions of government must be conducted? Let’s
investigate.
The government is limited to a special kind of money by
federal statute. For, you see, in order to live up to the
Constitution’s promise of establishing domestic tranquil-
lity and promoting the general welfare, the people in-
1. Modern Money Mechanics, Dorothy Nichols, published 1975 by the Federal Re-
serve Bank of Chicago. Available from Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of
Chicago, P.O. Box 834, Chicago, Illinois 60690.
56 THE MIRACLE ON MAIN STREET
structed their representatives to keep all official accounts
and proceedings in ‘‘the money of account of the United
States.” First legislated in the Coinage Act of 1792, this
requirement is found in current law at Section 371 of Title
31 of the United States Code, which you should memorize:
31 UNITED STATES CODE 371
The money of account of the United States shall be expressed in
dollars or units, dimes or tenths, cents or hundredths, and mills or
thousandths, a dime being the tenth part of a dollar, a cent the
hundredth part of a dollar, a mill the thousandth part of a dollar;
- and all accounts in the public offices and all proceedings in the
courts shall be kept and had in conformity to this regulation.
Thus, it is federal regulation that all accounts in the
public offices and all proceedings in the courts must be
conducted in whatever has been declared to be “the
money of account of the United States,” this money being
expressed —or measured —in “dollars.”
A dollar, therefore, is neither a coin nor a piece of
paper, but simply the name of the unit by which the
value of money is measured, just as ‘‘quart’’ is the name
of a unit by which liquid is measured. A dealer selling a
car for “1500 quarts” would surely be asked ‘Quarts of
what?”’ Where, then, is the frivolity in asking of a $15
parking ticket, “Fifteen dollars of what?’’?
When courts and public offices require you to pay in
dollars, the dollars must—by the above law—be dollars
(or units) of the money of account of the United States. Is
there any doubt in your mind as to what the money of
account of the United States is?
The Coinage Act of 1792 specifically declared gold and
silver to be ‘’as':money in the United States.” But in 1933,
Congress suspended our currency’s redemption in gold,
and in 1968 suspended the redemption of silver certifi-
cates in silver. (In both cases, the excuse was “temporary
emergency,” as it always is when governments work with
bankers to harvest the people’s property without due pro-
cess.) The cumulative effect of those acts of 1933 and 1968
IS DREAM MONEY LAWFUL MONEY? 57
was this:
Congress eliminated the money of account of the
United States from the banking system without declar-
ing a replacement, with the astonishing result that
neither our courts nor our public offices are complying
with 31 U.S.C. 371!
Federal Reserve notes and all those confidence-
building, important-looking instruments of Federal Re-
serve banking may be “money,” all right, but they’ve
never been declared to be the money of account of the
United States, as gold and silver have. They may even be
measured in dollars or units, but not in dollars or units of
the money of account of the United States.
Federal Reserve notes can be a tender for debts,
and they may even be “lawful” money, in the sense that
they’ve never been specifically declared unlawful, but they
are not the money of account of the United States that is
measured in dollars in which “all accounts in the public
offices and all the proceedings in the courts shall be kept
and had.” And if you doubt me, just ask any judge or
lawyer or attorney general to show you legislation that
disproves me.
In short, Federal Reserve notes are compelling images
charged with charm and enchantment, like movies and TV
and comic strips and stereo and colorful pages in magazin-
es. If you believe that they, or the bank demand deposits
for which they are redeemable, are the money the law
requires us to pay into our government, you’ re living ina
dream world.
1. This section was changed September 12, 1982, by Public Law 97-258 to read, “United
States money is expressed in dollars, dimes or tenths, cents or hundredths, and mills or
thousandths. A dime isa tenth of a dollar, a cent is a hundredth of a dollar, and a mill is
a thousandth of a dollar.” The change does not affect the meaning of 31 USC 371.
PL 97-258's purpose, according to its own preamble, is to “revise, codify, and enact
without substantive change, certain general permanent Jaws, related to money and
finance...” Thus, if ever a dispute should develop over the HISADING of a part of the
en the original statute must be reverted to.
'm being intentionally repetitive about this “money-of-account-of-the-United
Stites hat presenta dace business because there's So much misinformation
we must set right. The dollar is Nor the money of account, it is the Unrr by which the
money of account is measured. Please read and re-read this section until you have it
cold. ;
A ll the perplexities, confusion and distress in America arise
not from defects in their constitution or confederation, not from a
want of honor or virtue so much as from downright ignorance of
the nature of coin, credit, and circulation.”
—John Adams to Thomas
Jefferson, 1787
I have studied finance and economics and international trade
all my life, and now, after these recent events, I have come to the
conclusion that I know nothing whatever about any of them.’
—Paul Moritz Warburg, remarking
on the Crash of 1929, as quoted
in The Nation, February 3, 1932
WW. have awakened forces that nobody is at all familiar
with.”
—John Connally, Secretary of the
Treasury, quoted in The Wall
Street Journal, August 14, 1971
58
EE ee Ta eee een ee Ee ae RT Ltr wee er ee Le a eee
No comments:
Post a Comment