This
is another article in which I assume, for the purposes of argument
only, that virologists are actually discovering viruses, and vaccines
are launched to prevent viral diseases.
Why do I bother? Because most people belong to the virus religion. They have faith. They pray at the altar of the virus.
OK. What is the role of antibodies in vaccines?
We’re
told that the vaccine produces a beneficial antibody response. These
antibody scouts of the immune system rush to the scene and identify the
injected viruses or parts of viruses---thereby alerting the foot
soldiers of the immune system, which march forward and
destroy/neutralize the viral components.
Thus,
vaccination is a rehearsal for the real thing. It prepares the body for
the later moment when the virus naturally shows up. The body is ready
to defeat the actual disease.
In my previous article on that subject, I showed the rehearsal is a farce. It doesn’t prepare the immune system for anything.
The
so-called adjuvants in the vaccine, which are supposed to enhance and
magnify the immune response, simply stimulate a reaction against
themselves, the adjuvants.
Now, I’m going further.
Below,
I’m going to republish an excerpt from a devastating Christine Johnson
article which shows the failure of the HIV antibody test.
Johnson’s
article proves that antibodies, which are supposed to be specific to
HIV and only HIV, meaning they only swing into action when HIV appears,
are responding to all sorts of substances in the body, none of which has
anything to do with HIV.
This means the antibodies aren’t “specific.” They aren’t just marching to one tune. They’re marching to many different tunes.
In
the case of vaccination, antibodies can appear because: there are
intrusive non-viral substances in the vaccine; or there are intrusive
non-viral substances already in the body.
Defenders
of vaccination might respond, “Suppose antibodies are responding to six
different factors in the vaccine. One of those factors would be the
virus in the vaccine. So that’s good.”
BUT
if antibodies are really general and not specific, how do we know they
actually react to a virus in a vaccine and not something else in the
vaccine or the body?
We don’t know.
We’re looking at false science, science without a punch line.
Here
is an excerpt from the 1996 Christine Johnson article on the HIV blood
test -- with the corresponding reference number(s) to the scientific
literature (also listed out in this article):
Factors Known to Cause False-Positive HIV Antibody Test Results:
* Anti-carbohydrate antibodies (52, 19, 13)
* Naturally-occurring antibodies (5, 19)
*
Passive immunization: receipt of gamma globulin or immune globulin (as
prophylaxis against infection which contains antibodies)(18, 26, 60, 4,
22, 42, 43, 13)
* Leprosy (2, 25)
* Tuberculosis (25)
* Mycobacterium avium (25)
* Systemic lupus erythematosus (15, 23)
* Renal (kidney) failure (48, 23, 13)
* Hemodialysis/renal failure (56, 16, 41, 10, 49)
* Alpha interferon therapy in hemodialysis patients (54)
* Flu (36)
* Flu vaccination (30, 11, 3, 20, 13, 43)
* Herpes simplex I (27)
* Herpes simplex II (11)
* Upper respiratory tract infection (cold or flu)(11)
* Recent viral infection or exposure to viral vaccines (11)
* Pregnancy in multiparous women (58, 53, 13, 43, 36)
* Malaria (6, 12)
* High levels of circulating immune complexes (6, 33)
* Hypergammaglobulinemia (high levels of antibodies) (40, 33)
* False positives on other tests, including RPR (rapid plasma reagent) test for syphilis (17, 48, 33, 10, 49)
* Rheumatoid arthritis (36)
* Hepatitis B vaccination (28, 21, 40, 43)
* Tetanus vaccination (40)
* Organ transplantation (1, 36)
* Renal transplantation (35, 9, 48, 13, 56)
[...]
* Proteins on the filter paper (13)
* Epstein-Barr virus (37)
* Visceral leishmaniasis (45)
* Receptive anal sex (39, 64)
References:
1.
Agbalika F, Ferchal F, Garnier J-P, et al. 1992. False-positive
antigens related to emergence of a 25-30 kD protein detected in organ
recipients. AIDS. 6:959-962.
2.
Andrade V, Avelleira JC, Marques A, et al. 1991. Leprosy as a cause of
false-positive results in serological assays for the detection of
antibodies to HIV-1. Intl. J. Leprosy. 59:125.
3.
Arnold NL, Slade RA, Jones MM, et al. 1994. Donor follow up of
influenza vaccine-related multiple viral enzyme immunoassay reactivity.
Vox Sanguinis. 67:191.
4.
Ascher D, Roberts C. 1993. Determination of the etiology of
seroreversals in HIV testing by antibody fingerprinting. AIDS. 6:241.
5.
Barbacid M, Bolgnesi D, Aaronson S. 1980. Humans have antibodies
capable of recognizing oncoviral glycoproteins: Demonstration that these
antibodies are formed in response to cellular modification of
glycoproteins rather than as consequence of exposure to virus. Proc.
Natl. Acad. Sci. 77:1617-1621.
6.
Biggar R, Melbye M, Sarin P, et al. 1985. ELISA HTLV retrovirus
antibody reactivity associated with malaria and immune complexes in
healthy Africans. Lancet. ii:520-543.
[snip]
59.
Weber B, Moshtaghi-Borojeni M, Brunner M, et al. 1995. Evaluation of
the reliability of six current anti-HIV-1/HIV-2 enzyme immunoassays. J.
Vir. Meth. 55:97.
60.
Wood C, Williams A, McNamara J, et al. 1986. Antibody against the human
immunodeficiency virus in commercial intravenous gammaglobulin
preparations. Ann. Int. Med. 105:536.
61. Yale S, Degroen P, Tooson J, et al. 1994. Unusual aspects of acute Q fever-associated hepatitis. Mayo Clin. Proc. 69:769.
62.
Yoshida T, Matsui T, Kobayashi M, et al. 1987. Evaluation of passive
particle agglutination test for antibody to human immunodeficiency
virus. J. Clin. Micro. Aug:1433.
63.
Yu S, Fong C, Landry M, et al. 1989. A false positive HIV antibody
reaction due to transfusion-induced HLA-DR4 sensitization.
NEJM.320:1495.
64. National Institue of Justice, AIDS Bulletin. Oct. 1988.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
(Follow me on Substack, Twitter, and Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment