Below is a video of
the May 14, 2022, Buffalo, NY, shooting taken by a camera apparently
attached to the headgear worn by the alleged shooter. We can see his
view of the alleged shooting. But the video shows that the shooting is
fake. BitChute took
the video down from its video streaming website, stating: “This video
is blocked under the following Community Guideline: Abhorrent Violence.”
Of course, former Vice President Biden would never let a good tragedy
go to waste, especially when orchestrated by his friends at the CIA. He
has used the shooting to whip up racial hatred and call for new gun control measures.
Watch closely in the video at the man standing near the trunk as the
alleged shooter exits his car. The shooter allegedly shoots a lady, but
the person standing near the trunk falls over as though he is shot
also.
The problem is that he could not have been shot. The shooter was using
what appeared to be an AR15. That weapon shoots a .223 caliber bullet on
a very precise trajectory. It was impossible for the gun pointed at the
woman to shoot the man.
The script called for the gunman to shoot the lady and the man near
the car trunk. It appears that the man near the trunk followed the
script and fell to that ground as though being shot. The gunman realized
he forgot to shoot the man at the trunk and panned the mussel of his
gun back to him to shoot him. But the man had already fallen to the
ground as he was instructed according to the script. The gunman had to
improvise and shot the man as he was on the ground.
Since posting this blog a number of people have noted the
convincing fall by the woman in the blue dress. Her fall is not
convincing to those familiar with wound ballistics. Indeed, it is rather
suspicious and yet another reason to disbelieve the authenticity of the
shooting.
A person would only fall as that woman fell if she were shot in the
head. It is obvious that the woman was not shot in the head because of
the complete lack of blood. A head wound would cause an explosive amount
of blood to be extruded from the massive exit wound.
In a case where a gunshot strikes the heart causing it to stop
immediately, there is enough residual oxygen in the blood to allow a
person with a stopped heart to continue to function for 10 to 15 seconds
before incapacitation. See Urey Patrick & John Hall, In Defense of
Self and Others (2004). For instance in a case where a knife attacker is
charging at a victim “[t]he harsh reality in such circumstance is that
unless the shot happens to hit the attacker in the central nervous
system, the attack will succeed.” Id. at 109. The woman in the video was not shot in the head.
Assume that the person is not shot directly in
the heart but is shot and is bleeding profusely. Total incapacitation by
blood loss does not begin to occur until the shooting victim loses
approximately 20%-25% of her blood. Such blood loss in an average
healthy adult would take approximately 5 seconds assuming the largest
artery in the human body (thoracic artery) was severed. It is notable
that in the Buffalo shooting scenario there was no visible blood flowing
from the woman’s body. There is simply no way to explain her immediate
incapacitation.
A number of anecdotal cases were presented in
which the victims of the gunshots, including those shot through the
heart, continued to engage in strenuous physical activity before they
finally died. Patrick & Hall at 64 (citing Levy, V., et al.,
Survival Time in Gunshot and Stab Wound Victims, The American Journal of
Forensic Medicine and Pathology 1988; 9(3)). Washington v. Starke, 855
F.2d 346 (6th Cir. 1988) (after being shot in the back of the head by
an officer with a .38 caliber handgun, the subject ran for a distance of
298 feet, before collapsing and dying from the wound); Jones v.
Wittenberg University, 534 F.2d 1203 (6th Cir. 1976) (after being shot
in the chest by a security guard, the subject kept running for a
distance of 30 to 40 yards, before he collapsed and died); Amato v.
United States, 549 F. Supp. 863 (D.N.J. 1982), aff’d, 729 F.2d 1445 (3d
Cir. 1984) (A perimeter was set up in order to arrest the robbers as
they exited the bank. As the robbers ran from the bank one of the bank
robbers fired on the agents who were converging on them. The chain
reaction caused by that shot was described by the court as equivalent to
the splitting of an atom. Eleven agents fired 39 rounds which included
281 bullets and buckshot pellets. The bank robber who fired on the
agents was killed. However, it is notable that the other bank robber
survived the shooting, even though he suffered 65 bullet wounds); Goold
v. Saunders, 194 N.W. 227 (Iowa 1923) (plaintiff survives after being
shot with 125 bullets).
In the April 11, 1986, FBI Miami Shootout, bank
robbers William Matix and Michael Platt were each wounded with several
rounds, but were able to continue to shoot at FBI Agents for over 4
minutes killing two FBI Agents and wounding an additional five agents
before Matix and Platt were finally killed. Matix was shot 6 times and
Platt was shot 12 times during the shootout. Greg Solano, Knife verses
Gun, Police Shootings, Sheriff Greg Solano Blog, (September 06, 2006).
Dr. W. French Anderson analyzed the FBI Miami Shootout in detail. His
analysis revealed that the first wound suffered by Michael Platt to his
right upper arm and chest was unsurvivable and was the primary injury
responsible for Platt’s death. However, after receiving that fatal
wound, Platt continued to engage the FBI Agents in the gun battle and
suffered 5 more gunshot wounds in the minutes before he shot and killed
two FBI Agents and seriously wounded at least one other agent. At the
beginning of the gun battle, William Matix was shot in his arm and head
and fell unconscious. After several minutes, he regained consciousness
and rejoined the gun battle, firing his gun at the FBI Agents and local
police officers who arrived at the scene before he was finally shot and
killed by an FBI Agent. W. French Anderson, M.D., Forensic Analysis of
the April 11, 1986, FBI Firefight, Firearms Tactical Institute.
The woman’s fall in the video was certainly an
amazing piece of stunt work. which was obviously well-practiced in order
to sell the shooting. But keep in mind that her fall like that after
being shot in the torso sells the shooting to most people who are not
aware of the effect of bullets on the human body. Knowledgeable persons
know that a torso shot is NOT immediately incapacitating where the
person loses all function within a millisecond. Her fall impeaches the
authenticity of the shooting.
No comments:
Post a Comment