We begin here:
“To
obtain embryo cells [for research on vaccines and other pharma
products], embryos from spontaneous abortions cannot be used, nor can
those obtained by means of abortions performed via the vagina: in both
cases, the embryo will be contaminated by micro-organisms.”
“The
correct way consists in having recourse to Caesarian section or to the
removal of the uterus. Only in this way can bacteriological sterility be
guaranteed.”
“In
either case, then, to obtain embryo cells for culture a programmed
abortion must be adopted, choosing the age of the embryo and dissecting
it while still alive, in order to remove tissues to be placed in culture
media.”
“Given
these premises, we face the dilemma of whether the deliberate
systematic destruction of a human creature to obtain cell material can
be justified, when it is recognized that this is of great interest to
fundamental research and for the diagnosis of some human diseases. Are
research and diagnosis of such great value that they justify the
destruction of human beings?”
“The
Geneva Declaration affirms that the doctor has the duty to take the
greatest care to safeguard the life of a human being from its conception
and will not, even under threat, use his knowledge to infringe
humanitarian laws.” (1986-04-26; Herranz, Gonzalo; Il Sabato,
no.15…Professor Herranz was, at the time, president of the Committee of
Medical Ethics of Spanish Doctors and vice-president of the Permanent
Committee of Medical Ethics of the European Community.)”
What
exactly happened in 1972 or 1973, in the Netherlands, where an infant
girl was aborted, and her kidneys used to make a cell line that would be
used, going forward, in the testing of vaccines?
That cell line is called HEK 293, and it has been used to test COVID vaccines.
I
have already presented evidence for concluding the abortion involved
removing the living infant from her mother’s womb, and taking her
kidneys, which of course killed her.
This
evidence rests on the realization that, in order to extract viable and
useful kidney tissue, the baby had to have a functioning blood supply,
which meant she was alive.
But
the evidence ALSO comes from knowing many other abortions have been
carried out, in order to harvest tissue for medical research, by
murdering living babies.
I have found a very informative article (2/9/2021) at the Centre for Bio-Ethical Reform UK, by Christian Hacking, titled, “What the HEK?!”. Quoting from the article:
“HEK
293 is a human cell line created using a kidney from a dissected unborn
baby in the Netherlands between 1972 and 1973. It is the second most
common cell line and is used extensively in ‘pharmaceutical and
biomedical research’. It is also used in vaccine creation and cancer
research.”
“It
was used, along with other human cell lines, to develop a genetically
engineered spike protein (that the mRNA vaccine codes for) in the
original development stage of the vaccine. The ‘new technology’ Pfizer
vaccine and the Moderna Vaccine were tested on HEK 293 before they began
human trials. This testing is ongoing for all new batches. Finally the
‘old technology’ Oxford AstraZeneca vaccine grew a weakened viral strain
in HEK 293 cell culture…”
“The
kidney in question was dissected from a healthy Dutch baby girl of
unknown origin by the team at Leiden University in the Netherlands in
1972. Despite the inclusion of the term ‘embryonic’ in the title, the
baby in question was probably 12-13 weeks old when she was killed so as
to secure functioning kidney cells. The man in charge of the research
was named Alex Jan Van der Eb; he is still alive and still based in
Holland.”
“When
questioned on the matter by the FDA in 2001, Dr Van der Eb confirmed it
was an intentional abortion of a ‘fetus’ but gave hazy details of the
exact experiments.”
“’So
the kidney material, the fetal kidney material was as follows: the
kidney of the fetus was, with an unknown family history, obtained in
1972 probably. The precise date is not known anymore. The fetus, as far
as I can remember, was completely normal. Nothing was wrong. The reasons
for the abortion were unknown to me. I probably knew it at that time,
but it got lost, all this information’.”
Author
Hacking continues: “…extracting and growing living cells is incredibly
difficult. In order to give oneself the best chance of success you need
to ensure the child is healthy, fresh, intact and sterile. As one
embryologist and Emeritus Professor of Anatomy confirms:”
"’In
order to sustain 95% of the cells, the live tissue would need to be
preserved within 5 minutes of the abortion. Within an hour the cells
would continue to deteriorate, rendering the specimens useless’."
[That
statement was made by “Dr C Ward Kischer, embryologist and Emeritus
Professor of Anatomy; specialist in Human Embryology, University of
Arizona College of Medicine…”]
[My
comment: This suggests the abortion, in the Netherlands, in 1972, was
planned and technicians were standing by. I would say that, to ensure
the viability of the tissue, the infant had a functioning blood supply
and was alive when her kidneys were removed, killing her.]
Hacking:
“In order for the organs to be at ‘optimal viability’, the child needs
to be dissected and organs extracted within 5 minutes of delivery.
Anaesthetic also cannot be used so as to not change the cellular
activity of the organs the researcher wants to obtain.”
“Acclaimed
Doctor, Ian Donald, the pioneer of the ultrasound scanner, also claims
to have witnessed the WI-38 [another cell-line] dissections [1962],
conducted at the Karolinska Institute; he described them such:
"’Experiments
were being performed on near-term alive aborted babies who were not
even afforded the mercy of anesthetic as they writhed and cried in
agony, and when their usefulness had expired, they were executed and
discarded as garbage’."
“In his dense book ‘The Foetus As Transplant Donor the Scientific, Social, and Ethical Perspectives’,
immunologist Dr Peter McCullagh relays detailed descriptions of the
methods used on dozens of ‘fetal tissue donors’ from the 1970’s onward,
including the deaths of babies between 7 and 26 weeks gestation by
decapitations, exposure, dissection and drug testing. Gynaecologist and
ex-abortionist Dr Bernard Nathanson, relaying his own understanding of
abortion, and citing McCullagh’s book claims the Swedish experiments
took place thus:
“’...in
Sweden they have been puncturing the sac of a pregnant woman at let us
say 14 to 16 weeks, and then they put a clamp on the head of the baby,
pull the head down into the neck of the womb, drill a hole into the
baby’s head, and then put a suction machine into the brain and suck out
the brain cells….. Healthy human fetuses from 7 to 21 weeks from legal
abortions were used. This is in Sweden. The conception age was estimated
from crown rump length and so on. Fetal liver and kidney were rapidly
removed and weighed. Now at 21 weeks, what they were doing, or 18 weeks,
or 16 weeks, was what is called prostaglandin abortions. They would
inject a substance into the womb. The woman would then go into
mini-labor and pass this baby. 50% of the time, the baby would be born
alive, but that didn’t stop them. They would just simply open up the
abdomen of the baby with no anesthesia, and take out the liver and
kidneys, etc.’”
“A
research paper from the University of Toronto from June 1952 commenting
on the method of their experiments suggests that these techniques were
universal with researchers working in close proximity to the abortions.”
"’No
macerated [softened after death] specimens were used and in many of the
embryos the heart was still beating at the time of receipt in the virus
laboratory."
“According
to Gonzalo Herranz, former head of the Committee of Medical Ethics of
Spanish doctors, the best way to prevent ‘contamination by
microorganisms’ is to deliver the child by caesarean section or the
removal of the uterus.”
“A 1982 review of a history of tissue donation affirms this, and much of the above evidence:”
"’Fetal
tissue for transplantation must be “harvested” within a few minutes of
delivery. Ideally this is by hysterectomy, with the fetus delivered in
utero. Drugs which reduce fetal physiological activity need to be
avoided. The fetus is therefore in as alive and aware a state as
possible when being opened’."
From Hacking’s article, it’s quite clear how the standard procedure of infant-murder is carried out.
It’s
entirely reasonable to assume fetal cell line HEK 293---used for COVID
vaccine testing---was originally produced, in 1972, by the murder of an
infant. Refusal to take a COVID vaccine on the basis of conscience and
religion is more than justified.
Given the weight of the circumstantial case, I would say that for all people of faith, refusal is essential.
Lunatic
medical murderers and their allies will say anything to avoid blame and
the application of true justice to themselves. They will invent
“science” at the drop of a hat and couch it in humanitarian terms. They
will claim the ends justify the means. They will commit gross forgery to
pretend those ends are vital.
But we don’t have to stand by and passively believe them.
Billions of people of faith can stand against them.
~~~
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
(Follow me on Substack, Twitter, and Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment