82. Mr. Young's Head Was Pounded To Jelly: The Underground History of American Education by John Taylor Gatto from archve.org

 

82. Mr. Young's Head Was Pounded To Jelly: The Underground History of American Education by John Taylor Gatto from archve.org

 

Mr. Young's Head Was Pounded To Jelly  

 

     The most surprising thing about the start-up of mass public education in mid-nineteenth- century Massachusetts is how overwhelmingly parents of all classes soon complained about it. Reports of school committees around 1850 show the greatest single theme of discussion was conflict between the State and the general public on this matter.  Resistance was led by the old yeoman class — those families accustomed to taking care of themselves and providing meaning for their own lives. The little town of Barnstable on  Cape Cod is exemplary. Its school committee lamented, according to Katz's Irony of  Early School Reform, that "the great defect of our day is the absence of governing or  controlling power on the part of parents and the consequent insubordination of children.  Our schools are rendered inefficient by the apathy of parents." 

      Years ago I was in possession of an old newspaper account which related the use of  militia to march recalcitrant children to school there, but I've been unable to locate it  again. Nevertheless, even a cursory look for evidence of state violence in bending public  will to accept compulsion schooling will be rewarded: Bruce Curtis' book Building the  Education State 1836-1871 documents the intense aversion to schooling which arose  across North America, in Anglican Canada where leadership was uniform, as well as in  the United States where leadership was more divided. Many schools were burned to the  ground and teachers run out of town by angry mobs. When students were kept after  school, parents often broke into school to free them. 

      At Saltfleet Township in 1859 a teacher was locked in the schoolhouse by students who  "threw mud and mire into his face and over his clothes," according to school records —  while parents egged them on. At Brantford, Ontario, in 1 863 the teacher William Young  was assaulted (according to his replacement) to the point that "Mr. Young's head, face  and body was, if I understand rightly, pounded literally to jelly." Curtis argues that parent     resistance was motivated by a radical transformation in the intentions of schools — a  change from teaching basic literacy to molding social identity.  

     The first effective American compulsory schooling in the modern era was a reform school movement which Know-Nothing legislatures of the 1850s put into the hopper  along with their radical new adoption law. Objects of reformation were announced as  follows: Respect for authority; Self-control; Self-discipline. The properly reformed boy  "acquires a fixed character," one that can be planned for in advance by authority in  keeping with the efficiency needs of business and industry.

     Reform meant the total transformation of character, behavior modification, a complete makeover. By 1857, a few  years after stranger-adoption was kicked off as a new policy of the State, Boutwell could  consider foster parenting (the old designation for adoption) "one of the major strategies  for the reform of youth."' The first step in the strategy of reform was for the State to  become de facto parent of the child. That, according to another Massachusetts educator,  Emory Washburn, "presents the State in her true relation of a parent seeking out her  erring children." 

      The 1850s in Massachusetts marked the beginning of a new epoch in schooling.  Washburn triumphantly crowed that these years produced the first occasion in history  "whereby a state in the character of a common parent has undertaken the high and sacred  duty of rescuing and restoring her lost children. ..by the influence of the school." John  Philbrick, Boston school superintendent, said of his growing empire in 1863, "Here is  real home!" (emphasis added) All schooling, including the reform variety, was to be in  imitation of the best "family system of organization"; this squared with the prevalent  belief that delinquency was not caused by external conditions — thus letting industrialists  and slumlords off the hook — but by deficient homes.  

 

     Between 1840 and 1860, male schoolteachers were cleansed from the Massachusetts  system and replaced by women. A variety of methods was used, including the novel one  of paying women slightly more than men in order to bring shame into play in chasing men  out of the business. Again, the move was part of a well-conceived strategy: "Experience  teaches that these boys, many of whom never had a mother's affection... need the  softening and refining influence which woman alone can give, and we have, wherever  practicable, substituted female officers and teachers for those of the other sex."  

     A state report noted the frequency with which parents coming to retrieve their own children from reform school were met by news their children had been given away to  others, through the state's parens patriae power. "We have felt it to be our duty generally to decline giving them up to their parents and have placed as many of them as we could  with farmers and mechanics," reads a portion of Public Document 20 for the state of  Massachusetts, written in 1864. (emphasis added) To recreate the feelings of parents on hearing this news is beyond my power.   

 

1. The reader will recall such a strategy was considered for Hester Prynne's child, Pearl, in Hawthorne's   Scarlet Letter. That Hawthorne, writing at mid-century, chose this as a hinge for his characterization of the fallen woman Hester is surely no coincidence.