District of Columbia Act of 1871 Defacto
Undoubtedly, the Rothschild brothers financially backed the Federal-
ists, in a similar manner as they backed the Duke of Wellington, Cecil
Rhodes, Vladimir Lenin , Leon Trotsky, Adolf Hitler, and many other
fascists and megalomaniacs.
But they were not the first to do so. Agents of the Jesuit Order and
Jewish Kahal, such as Haym Solomon, had clearly been active in Fed-
eralist circles before the Rothschild dynasty were given the reins of
financial control.
In any case, the Rothschilds and their agents, the Schiffs and War-
burgs, were unquestionably instrumental in formulating the so-called
Jekyll Island Agreement, which was the basis for the creation of the
private Federal Reserve Bank. The Federal Reserve Act was passed on
December 22, 1913.
Interestingly, this is the time of the Winter Solstice, which is an im-
portant day in the Luciferian calendar.
In 1781, Congress established the Office of Finance to save the United
States from fiscal ruin. Salomon allied himself with Superintendent of
Finance William Morris and became one of the most effective brokers
of bills of exchange to meet federal government expenses. Solomon
also personally advanced funds to members of the Continental Con-
gress and other federal officers, charging interest and commissions
well below the market rates – Michael Feldberg (Haym Salomon: The
Rest of the Story)
James Madison confessed that “I have for some time...been a pen-
sioner on the favor of Haym Salomon, a Jew broker” – ibid
Solomon supposedly wrote the first draft of the United States Consti-
tution according to some historians.
Some claim that he designed the Great Seal of the United
States , which is why it has what some believe resembles a Jewish
Star above the eagle’s head design, and it is also on the back of every
American one dollar bill.
He believed the United States would become a world power – (Hyam
Solomon Bio, Indopedia.org)
The blunt reality is that the Rothschild banking dynasty in Europe was
the dominant force, both financially and politically, in the formation of
the Bank of the United States – G. Edward Griffin (The Creature from
Jekyll Island )
The Rothschilds were Jesuits who used their Jewish background as a
faรงade to cover their sinister activities.
The Jesuits, working through Rothschild and Biddle, sought to gain
control of the banking system of the United States –Bill Hughes (The
Secret Terrorists)
Over the years since N. M. Rothschild...had been, for a time, the offi-
cial European banker for the U.S. government and was a pledged
supporter of the Bank of the United States – Derek Wilson (Roth-
schild: The Wealth and Power of a Dynasty)
He was lord and master of the money-market of the world, and of
course virtually lord and master of everything else...
He literally held the revenues of Southern Italy in pawn, and mon-
archs and ministers of all countries courted his advice and were guided by his suggestions – Benjamin Disraeli (Prime Minis-
ter of England writing on Lord Rothschild)
Aware that the Rothschilds are an important Jewish family, I looked
them up inEncyclopedia Judaica and discovered that they bear the ti-
tle “Guardians of theVatican Treasury”...The appointment of Rothschild
gave the black papacy absolute financial power and secrecy. Who
would ever search a family of orthodox Jews for the key to the wealth
of the Roman Catholic Church? – F. Tupper Saussy (Rulers of Evil)
The Hofjuden (Court Jews)
Amschel Mayer Rothschild was the father of five sons who would
jointly form one of the most powerful banking families in history.
Amschel died in 1812, which means he may have conspired with the
Federalists who attempted to found the first US federal bank, in 1791.
By 1789, he was assisting the House of Hesse and British Crown, with
their attempts to undermine Napoleon.
Mayer Amschel Rothschild, took over the reigns from his father. He
was a Knight of Malta . Elite Masonic Jews had long worked as money
men and advisors to the Turks, Huns, and Church of Rome. Mayer
died in 1855, which means he was in a position to involve himself in
the conspiracy to open the second US Federal bank.
Nathan Mayer Rothschild was in charge of the London branch of his
family’s banking cartel. He was already working in the Stock Ex-
change from 1804. He established his London bank in 1811. He died
in 1836. Of course, long before Nathan’s time, Jewish financiers had
been active in England . For example, during the Civil War
(1642–1651), Menasseh Ben Israel, funded the tyrant Oliver Crom-
well
James Mayer Rothschild was advisor to two French kings. Highly dec-orated, he and his four brothers were bestowed the hereditary title of
Baron by Austria‘s Francis II (the Holy Roman Emperor). James was
also appointed consul-general of the Austrian Empire and, in 1823, he
was awarded the French Legion of Honor.
The predecessors of the Rothschilds were the Hahn family. The Roth-
schilds are related to the Bauers, Oppenheimers, Warburgs, and
Schiffs. These Khazarian families were able lieutenants of royalty, but
not the architects of control, as many misinformed authors believe.
They exercise enormous influence over the American government by
way of Masonic lodges and Federal orgs such as the Federal Reserve
Banks.
The facts show, beyond doubt, that traitorous Nationalists (or should
we say Internationalists), such as Hamilton, Morris, Solomon, Burr,
and Biddle, did not have the best interests of ordinary Americans at
heart. On the contrary, by way of their Constitution, and later by way
of their banks and credit houses, they sought to subjugate and im-
poverish the citizens of America . In his excellent books entitled The
Secret Terrorists and Enemy Unmasked, author Bill Hughes
details the strong arm methods used by Biddle to force wary President
Andrew Jackson into commissioning the founding of the Federal Bank:
Biddle responded to Jackson refusing to allow him to re-establish the
central bank by shrinking the nation’s money supply. He did this by
refusing to make loans. By so doing, he upended the economy and
money disappeared. Unemployment ran high. Companies went
bankrupt because they could not pay their loans...So confident was he
that he publicly boasted that he had caused the economic wars
in America.
Is there no danger to our liberty and independence in a bank that in
its nature has so little to bind it to our country? Is there not cause to
tremble for the purity of our elections in peace and for the independ-
ence of our country in war? Controlling our currency, receiving our public monies, and holding
themselves in dependence, it would be more formidable and danger-
ous than a naval and military power of the enemy – President Andrew
Jackson
Because Andrew Jackson persistently resisted the threats and devices
of the bankers, he was the victim of an attempted assassination. The
gunman was a certain Richard Lawrence. G. Edward Griffin wrote:
... Lawrence ...boasted to friends that he had been in touch with pow-
erful people in Europe who had promised to protect him from pun-
ishment should he be caught – (The Creature from Jekyll Island )
The Federal bankers caused the Depression of 1929, and saw to it
that thousands of American businesses were ruined. They funded
Adolf Hitler, and financed Lenin’s murderous Bolsheviks. Avaricious
financial organizations that plague the planet, such as the World Bank
and IMF (International Monetary Fund), are merely
tentacles of the Federal System of the Globalists.
Immense sums belonging to our national depositors have been given
to Germany on no collateral security whatsoever...Billions upon billions
of our money has been pumped into Germany by the Federal Reserve
Board and the Federal Reserve Banks – H. S. Kenan (The Federal Re-
serve Bank)
Sir Joseph Stamp was a director of the Bank of England from 1928 to
1941. He openly addressed the colossal power of the Bankers:
The modern banking system manufactures money out of nothing. The
process is perhaps the most astounding piece of sleight of hand that
was ever invented. Banking was conceived in iniquity and born in sin.
Bankers own the Earth. Take it away from them, but leave them the
power to create money, and with the flick of a pen they will create enough money to buy it back again...Take this great power away from
them and all great fortunes like mine will disappear, and they ought
to disappear, for then this would be a better and happier world to live
in. But if you want to continue to be slaves of the banks and pay the
cost of your own slavery, then let the bankers continue to create
money and control credit.
President Thomas Jefferson was not a Freemason, and was not the
least bit interested in amassing personal wealth. He had no love for
the Federal bank, and made his stance clear with these remarks:
I believe that banking institutions are the most dangerous to our lib-
erties than standing armies. Already they have raised up a moneyed
aristocracy that has set the government at defiance. The issuing
power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to
whom it properly belongs.
A private central bank issuing the public currency is a greater menace
to the liberties of the people than a standing army...We must not let
our rulers load us with perpetual debt.
I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties
than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks
to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by defla-
tion, the banks and corporations that will grow up around the banks
will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up
homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.
Jefferson ‘s reputation is certainly marred on several accounts, not
least by his appointment of British agent Albert Gallatin as Secretary
of the Treasury in 1801. In the same year, Gallatin was also appoint-
ed Vice President. Regrettably, a statue of the duplicitous Gene-
va-born Gallatin stands to this day outside the United States Treasury
building in Washington DC .
It is interesting and suggestive to note that Alexander Hamilton’s
banking system precisely paralleled that used by British bankers. He
favored what is known as the tontine capitalist system:
His tontine scheme, fashioned after the British tontine of 1789, in-
volved a system of rights of annual payments to survivors, the annui-
ties therefrom becoming the means of creating a permanent invest-
ment class – Frank Bourgin (The Great Challenge: The Myth of Lais-
sez-Faire in the Early Republic)
Political figures of intelligence and cunning knew the real reason for
the War of Independence . They knew it had to do with money and
usury, and with nationwide colonization, confiscation, and extortion.
They knew the conflict was fomented by British and European banks,
eager to establish control over America, as they had throughout the
world. This fact is admitted by British agent Benjamin Franklin, whose
comment takes us to the heart of the matter:
The inability of the Colonists to get power to issue their own money
permanently out of the hands of King George III and the international
bankers, was the prime reason for the revolutionary war.
The Colonists were not able to free themselves from the clutches of
the international bankers and royal overlords. The War of Independ-
ence was not a victory for the citizens of America . On the contrary, it
was yet one more victory for the aristocracy that has controlled
America from the beginning.
As with the real first bank, the government had been the only depos-
itor to put up any real money, with the remainder being raised from
loans the investors made to each other, using the magic of fractional
reserve banking. When time came for renewal of the charter, the
bankers were warning of bad times ahead if they didn’t get what they wanted. The charter was not renewed. Five
month later Britain had attacked America and started the war of 1812
– (Money as History)
Few people are aware today that the history of the United States ,
since the Revolution in 1776, has been, in large part, the story of an
epic struggle to get free, and stay free, of control by the European
international banks. This struggle was finally lost in 1913, when Pres-
ident Woodrow Wilson signed the into effect the Federal Reserve Act,
putting the International Banking Cartel in charge of creating America
‘s money – Paul Grignon (Money as Debt)
Thomas Jefferson mentioned the nefarious power of the bankers di-
rectly, saying desperately:
I wish it were possible to obtain a single amendment to our Constitu-
tion – taking from the federal government their power of borrowing.
Thomas Jefferson. Along with William Paterson, Thomas Paine, Patrick
Henry, and Samuel Adams, he put state’s rights before the demands
of insatiable Federalists.
After Alexander Hamilton’s gang had established the Federal Bank,
and the Judiciary with its unlimited power, Jefferson’s illusions con-
cerning America‘s fate was gone. In 1821, five years before he died,
he recorded his misgivings and foreboding:
It has long...been my opinion...that the germ of dissolution of our fed-
eral judiciary is in the constitution of the federal judiciary; an irre-
sponsible body working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a lit-
tle today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a
thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped from the
states, and the government of all be consolidated into one. To this I
am opposed, because when all government...shall be drawn to Wash-
ington as the center of all power, it will render powerless the checks
provided of one government on another, and will become as venal
and oppressive as the government from which we separated.
Our government is now taking so steady a course as to show by what
road it will pass to destruction, to wit, by consolidation first, and then
corruption, its necessary consequences.
The following year, Jefferson ‘s insight sharpened all the more. His
words reveal the accuracy of his foresight:
If ever this vast country is brought under a single government, it will
be one of the most extensive corruption... In fact, Jefferson had mis-
givings about the state of affairs in America many years before he
wrote these words. He had been living in France , as minister to
that country, between the years 1784 and 1789. Upon his return to
America , he was horrified to see how little effect the grand precepts
and provisos of the Declaration of Independence , which he had
chiefly formulated, had made. Alfred Jay Knock explains:
On arriving in New York and resuming his place in the social life of the
country, he was greatly depressed by the discovery that the principles
of the Declaration had gone wholly by the board. No one spoke of
natural rights and popular sovereignty, it would seem actually that
no one had ever heard of them. On the contrary, everyone was talk-
ing about the pressing need of a strong
central coercive authority, able to check the incursions which the
“democratic spirit” was likely to incite upon “the men of principle and
property”...Clearly, though the Declaration might have been the char-
ter of American independence, it was in no sense the charter of the
new American State – (Our Enemy, the State)
Patrick Henry, long time critic of the Constitution’s drafters, also
My great objection to this Government is, that it does not leave us the
means of defending our rights; or of waging war against ty-
rants...Have we the means of resisting disciplined armies, when our
only defense, the militia, is put into the hands of Congress? – (Speech
of 5 June 1788)
Did you ever read of any revolution in any nation, brought about by
the punishment of those in power, inflicted by those who had no
power at all?...Will your Mace-bearer be a match for a disciplined
regiment?...Will the oppressor ever let go of the oppressed? Was there
ever an instance? Can the annals of mankind exhibit one single ex-
ample, where rulers, overcharged with power, willingly let go of the
oppressed? – ibid
A standing army we shall have also, to execute the execrable com-
mands of tyranny- ibid
Alfred Jay Nock summarizes the travesty and the tragedy in these
words:
Nowhere in the history of the constitutional period do we find the
faintest suggestion of the Declaration’s doctrine of natural rights, and
we find its doctrine of popular sovereignty not only continuing in
abeyance, but constitutionally estopped from ever reappearing. No-
where do we find a trace of the Declaration’s theory of government,
on the contrary, we find it expressly repudiated. The new political
mechanism was a faithful replica of the old disestablished British
model, but so far improved and strengthened as to be incomparably
more close-working and efficient...presenting more attractive possibili-
ties of capture and control – (Our Enemy, the State)
Note the Masonic colors of Maher’s tie.
Nothing that governments do is new. Despots within government op-
erate according to plans that are repeated, in various ways, over
generations. Their control is aided and abetted by their
co-conspirators in the media. The politicians and media spin doctors
are instructed by overlords who control the private banks and “phil-
anthropic” foundations.
Public sentiment is everything. With public sentiment nothing can fail.
Without it nothing can succeed. He who molds opinion is greater than
he who enacts laws – Abraham Lincoln
In many cases, the politicians, media men, and bankers are them-
selves under the tutelage and direction of British and European aris-
tocracy who have made the “board,” so to speak, on which the great
geopolitical games are played.
The conspirators who organize the game are cautious. They do not
want their true allegiances or diabolical schemes to be publicly ex-
posed. Each group, and each conspirator, knows how vulnerable they
are. They know that knowledge of their true allegiances and agendas
must never leak out to the masses at large. Their
entire success depends upon human apathy and ignorance.
In “Red Dusk and the Morrow”...by Sir Paul Dukes, formerly Chief of
the British Secret Service in Russia , we read that a Lithuanian asked
a prominent Bolshevik how the regime was maintained. The answer
was: “Our power is based on three things: first, on Jewish brains;
secondly, on Lettish and Chinese bayonets; and thirdly, on the crass
stupidity of the Russian people – Denis Fahey (The Rulers of Russia )
The elitist conspirators also know that should civil unrest occur, the masses can be forced back into line by threats to their material and
emotional security. The strategy is tried and true, and usually works
wonders. As the author Ernest Hemmingway explained:
The first panacea for a mismanaged nation is inflation of the curren-
cy; the second is war. Both bring a temporary prosperity and both
bring a permanent ruin. But both are the refuge of political and eco-
nomic opportunists.
The Trinity of Slavery. The basic diagram shows how the Atonist roy-
als have maintained world control for millennia. By way of theology
and politics is the human heart and mind enslaved. Through secret
societies, such as Masonry, the royal hierarchy of control is perpetu-
ated and monitored. As French poet Charles Peguy wrote: “Tyranny is
always better organized that freedom.” Because of the confessions
and evidence provided by intelligent and informed
whistle-blowers from within religion, politics, royalty, and masonry,
we know a great deal about how the engines of world control operate.
However, there are also pitfalls when insiders with myopic insight,
and inflexible allegiances and prejudices, attempt to instruct the
masses as to the intricacies of world control. When it comes to ex-
posing the dirty little secrets, and the dirty big secrets, of those oc-
cupying the highest levels of the Atonist power-pyramid,
objectivity is essential. Photographs of their hideous visages, taken
from a rickety platform constructed by their agents, will be “blurred”
and inadequate, to say the least.
The philosopher Ayn Rand frequently warned her readers of the evils
of big government. With great lucidity, she wrote:
Instead of being a protector of man’s rights, the government is be-
coming their most dangerous violator; instead of guarding freedom
the government is establishing slavery; instead of protecting men
from the initiators of physical force, the government is initiating physical force and coercion in any manner and issue it pleases; in-
stead of serving as the instrument of objectivity in
human relationships, the government is creating a deadly subterra-
nean reign of uncertainty and fear...instead of protecting men from
injury by whim, the government is arrogating to itself the power of
unlimited whim – so that we are fast approaching the stage of the ul-
timate inversion: the stage where the government is free to do any-
thing it pleases, while the citizens may act only by permission; which
is the stage of the darkest periods of human history, the
stage of rule by brute force.
No comments:
Post a Comment