December 18th, 2010 Posted in STJ MEMBERS
Misinformation and its Effect on the
Credibility of 9/11 Truth
Frank Legge (BSc, PhD) flegge@iinet.net.au
15 February 2010
There has been heated debate about what hit the Pentagon.
At first glance it appears that the 757 could not have hit the Pentagon because
there appeared to be too little debris and too little damage at the impact
site.
It is very attractive to find evidence to support these claims because, if
substantiated, it would prove once and for all that the official story about
the Pentagon attack is a pack of lies, and many people have tried very hard to
do so.
Careful examination of the evidence, however, shows that it cannot be
conclusively proved that no 757 hit the Pentagon.
This is of little importance in the overall 9/11 analysis because there is
ample physical evidence that explosives were used at the World Trade Centre in
controlled demolitions. The demolition evidence is sufficient to prove that the
official story is false and that the NIST report and the 9/11 Commission report
are simply parts of a cleverly and expensively constructed cover-up. NIST
could not have failed to address explosives out of ignorance as they were well
versed in old and new explosive technologies.
From this we learn that officials are willing to deceive the public about this pivotal event and that skepticism will therefore be appropriate for all related pronouncements.
Read the full paper here:
What Hit the Pentagon? Misinformation and its Effect on the Credibility of 9/11 Truth
Dr. Frank Legge
Posted by Baldwin Templeton at 1:19 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
No comments:
Post a Comment