As
I’ve been telling readers for many months, even if you assume
SARS-CoV-2 is real, the test is useful, and the case and death numbers
are meaningful, there are vast and crippling internal contradictions
within the official portrait of COVID-19.
Currently, I’m focusing on the PCR test and its fatal flaws.
The
test is a MAJOR weak point in the enemy’s attack on humanity. If the
test falls, the case and death numbers are shown to be wildly false, and
the whole pandemic narrative collapses.
I urge readers to spread this information far and wide.
On August 29, 2020, the New York Times published a long article headlined, “Your coronavirus test is positive. Maybe it shouldn’t be.”
Its
main message? “The standard [COVID PCR] tests are diagnosing huge
numbers of people who may be carrying relatively insignificant amounts
of the virus…Most of these people are not likely to be contagious…”
“In
three sets of testing data…compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New
York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried
barely any virus, a review by The Times found.”
“On
Thursday, the United States recorded 45,604 new coronavirus cases,
according to a database maintained by The Times. If the rates of
contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide,
then perhaps only 4,500 of those people may actually need to isolate and
submit to contact tracing.”
TAKEAWAY
FROM THE Times: Up to 90% of ALL people who have been labeled “COVID
cases” are not COVID cases. This fact would downgrade the pandemic to
“just another flu season.” And there would be no reason for lockdowns.
Of course, the Times goes on to say the solution to this problem is MORE TESTING. Only a moron would accept that notion.
The
enduring message of their article still stands: the PCR test apparatus
is a fraud, through and through. It enables the recording of
monumentally false case numbers, which are used to declare unnecessary
lockdowns and wall-to-wall economic destruction.
Make the truth known.
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
No comments:
Post a Comment