During
this series of articles, in which I’ve been exposing the COVID PCR test
as a fraud and a hoax and a con, I’ve assumed, for purposes of
discussion, that the virus---SARS-CoV-2---is real and has been isolated.
I’ve made that assumption in order to show that, within the official world of COVID, the PCR is a sham.
However, as my readers know, for months I’ve been making the case that no one has proved SARS-CoV-2 exists.
Therefore,
the PCR test is built to detect a fragment of a virus whose very
existence has failed to meet a rational standard of evidence.
This raises the absurdity of the PCR test to a whole new level.
Researchers
assume the piece of RNA the test is looking for is part of
SARS-CoV-2. But without having the actual isolated virus in hand, there
is no way to know this RNA fragment is any more relevant than a speck of
dust on the moon.
Recently,
Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and Sally Fallon Morell published a
statement concerning the existence of SARS-CoV-2. I am printing it here
in full. It should be read and understood by every thinking person:
Statement On Virus Isolation (SOVI)
"Isolation:
The action of isolating; the fact or condition of being isolated or
standing alone; separation from other things or persons; solitariness."
-- Oxford English Dictionary
The
controversy over whether the SARS-CoV-2 virus has ever been isolated or
purified continues. However, using the above definition, common sense,
the laws of logic and the dictates of science, any unbiased person must
come to the conclusion that the SARS-CoV-2 virus has never been isolated
or purified. As a result, no confirmation of the virus’ existence can
be found. The logical, common sense, and scientific consequences of this
fact are:
*
the structure and composition of something not shown to exist can’t be
known, including the presence, structure, and function of any
hypothetical spike or other proteins;
* the genetic sequence of something that has never been found can’t be known;
* “variants” of something that hasn’t been shown to exist can’t be known;
* it’s impossible to demonstrate that SARS-CoV-2 causes a disease called Covid-19.
In
as concise terms as possible, here’s the proper way to isolate,
characterize and demonstrate a new virus. First, one takes samples
(blood, sputum, secretions) from many people (e.g. 500) with symptoms
which are unique and specific enough to characterize an illness. Without
mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain
genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters and ultracentrifuges
i.e. purifies the specimen. This common virology technique, done for
decades to isolate bacteriophages and so-called giant viruses in every
virology lab, then allows the virologist to demonstrate with electron
microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles. These
particles are the isolated and purified virus.
These
identical particles are then checked for uniformity by physical and/or
microscopic techniques. Once the purity is determined, the particles may
be further characterized. This would include examining the structure,
morphology, and chemical composition of the particles. Next, their
genetic makeup is characterized by extracting the genetic material
directly from the purified particles and using genetic-sequencing
techniques, such as Sanger sequencing, that have also been around for
decades. Then one does an analysis to confirm that these uniform
particles are exogenous (outside) in origin as a virus is conceptualized
to be, and not the normal breakdown products of dead and dying tissues.
(As of May 2020, we know that virologists have no way to determine
whether the particles they’re seeing are viruses or just normal
break-down products of dead and dying tissues.)
If
we have come this far then we have fully isolated, characterized, and
genetically sequenced an exogenous virus particle. However, we still
have to show it is causally related to a disease. This is carried out by
exposing a group of healthy subjects (animals are usually used) to this
isolated, purified virus in the manner in which the disease is thought
to be transmitted. If the animals get sick with the same disease, as
confirmed by clinical and autopsy findings, one has now shown that the
virus actually causes a disease. This demonstrates infectivity and
transmission of an infectious agent.
None
of these steps has even been attempted with the SARS-CoV-2 virus, nor
have all these steps been successfully performed for any so-called
pathogenic virus. Our research indicates that a single study showing
these steps does not exist in the medical literature.
Instead,
since 1954, virologists have taken unpurified samples from a relatively
few people, often less than ten, with a similar disease. They then
minimally process this sample and inoculate this unpurified sample onto
tissue culture containing usually four to six other types of material —
all of which contain identical genetic material as to what is called a
“virus.” The tissue culture is starved and poisoned and naturally
disintegrates into many types of particles, some of which contain
genetic material. Against all common sense, logic, use of the English
language and scientific integrity, this process is called “virus
isolation.” This brew containing fragments of genetic material from many
sources is then subjected to genetic analysis, which then creates in a
computer-simulation process the alleged sequence of the alleged virus, a
so called in silico genome. At no time is an actual virus confirmed by
electron microscopy. At no time is a genome extracted and sequenced from
an actual virus. This is scientific fraud.
The
observation that the unpurified specimen — inoculated onto tissue
culture along with toxic antibiotics, bovine fetal tissue, amniotic
fluid and other tissues — destroys the kidney tissue onto which it is
inoculated is given as evidence of the virus’ existence and
pathogenicity. This is scientific fraud.
From
now on, when anyone gives you a paper that suggests the SARS-CoV-2
virus has been isolated, please check the methods sections. If the
researchers used Vero cells or any other culture method, you know that
their process was not isolation. You will hear the following excuses for
why actual isolation isn’t done:
1. There were not enough virus particles found in samples from patients to analyze.
2. Viruses are intracellular parasites; they can’t be found outside the cell in this manner.
If
No. 1 is correct, and we can’t find the virus in the sputum of sick
people, then on what evidence do we think the virus is dangerous or even
lethal? If No. 2 is correct, then how is the virus spread from person
to person? We are told it emerges from the cell to infect others. Then
why isn’t it possible to find it?
Finally,
questioning these virology techniques and conclusions is not some
distraction or divisive issue. Shining the light on this truth is
essential to stop this terrible fraud that humanity is confronting. For,
as we now know, if the virus has never been isolated, sequenced or
shown to cause illness, if the virus is imaginary, then why are we
wearing masks, social distancing and putting the whole world into
prison?
Finally,
if pathogenic viruses don’t exist, then what is going into those
injectable devices erroneously called “vaccines,” and what is their
purpose? This scientific question is the most urgent and relevant one of
our time.
We are correct. The SARS-CoV2 virus does not exist.
Sally Fallon Morell, MA
Dr. Thomas Cowan, MD
Dr. Andrew Kaufman, MD
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.)
(Follow me on Gab at @jonrappoport)
No comments:
Post a Comment