We begin with excerpts from an important article at Children’s Health Defense, “Microchips, Nanotechnology and Implanted Biosensors: The New Normal?” by Pam Long.
Buckle up.
“U.S.
military personnel will be the first subjects in nanotechnology trials
in the pursuit of optimizing health and early detection of disease
outbreaks. Profusa has research contracts for bio-integrated sensors
with the U.S. Department of Defense and Defense Advanced Research
Projects Agency (DARPA), pending U.S. Food and Drug Administration
approval in early 2021.”
“Profusa’s
promotional video shows how the bio-integrated sensor enables a soldier
to be tracked by remote computers using GPS in addition to monitoring
real-time biomarkers, such as oxygen levels and heart rate. While this
biotechnology is portrayed as potentially lifesaving to a soldier on the
battlefield, the implications of GPS tracking individuals is a
terrifying step towards a surveillance state in the general population.
Furthermore, tracking people in stages of sickness can only result in
medical tyranny in the hands of any government. The Profusa influenza
study requires patients to wear the wearable version of the reader 24
hours a day, with continuous biomarker information collection into a
database, and aims to detect four stages of infection: healthy,
infected, asymptomatic and recovery stage. These unreliable detection
stages could become the criteria for different levels of individual
participation in society as experienced in the unsustainable COVID-19
state-level lockdowns for the masses.”
“This
Profusa nanotechnology has three components: an inserted [implanted]
sensor called hydrogel, a light-emitting fluorescent sensor reader on
the surface of the skin and an electronic software component that
transmits to an online database…and there is no information on how the
technology could be removed, if at all. ‘Tiny biosensors that become one
with the body’ could imply a lifetime commitment.”
So…implanted
nano-bio sensors. Could this be taken a step further? Instead of
placing the sensors just under the surface of the skin, could they be
injected with a vaccine?
Are researchers interested in marrying nanotechnology and vaccines?
Here is a quote from Frontiers in Immunology, 24 January, 2019, “Nanoparticle-Based Vaccines Against Respiratory Viruses”:
A new generation of vaccines based on nanoparticles has shown great
potential to address most of the limitations of conventional and subunit
vaccines. This is due to recent advances in chemical and biological
engineering, which allow the design of nanoparticles with a precise
control over the size, shape, functionality and surface properties,
leading to enhanced antigen presentation and strong immunogenicity. This
short review provides an overview of the advantages associated with the
use of nanoparticles as vaccine delivery platforms to immunize against
respiratory viruses…” [such as the purported COVID-19 virus?]
Here is another quote, also from Frontiers in Immunology, October 4, 2018, “Nanoparticle Vaccines Against Infectious Diseases”:
In the last several years, the use of nanoparticle-based vaccines has
received a great attention to improve vaccine efficacy, immunization
strategies, and targeted delivery to achieve desired immune responses at
the cellular level…Nanocarriers composed of lipids, proteins, metals or
polymers have already been used…This review article focuses on the
applications of nanocarrier-based vaccine formulations and the
strategies used for the functionalization of nanoparticles to accomplish
efficient delivery of vaccines in order to induce desired host immunity
against infectious diseases.”
There can be no doubt that nanotechnology is, indeed, very much involved in cutting-edge vaccine research.
Here are astonishing quotes from the journal Nano Today, from a 2019 paper titled: “Nanowire probes could drive high-resolution brain-machine interfaces.” Its authors are Chinese and American:
“…advances
can enable investigations of dynamics in the brain [through
nano-sensor-implants] and drive the development of new brain-machine
interfaces with unprecedented resolution and precision.”
“…output
electrical signals of brain activity or input electrical stimuli to
modulate brain activity in concert with external machines, including
computer processors and prosthetics, for human enhancement…”
Aside
from research into prosthetics and, perhaps, the reversal of certain
paralyses, this avenue of investigation also suggests “modulation” of
the brain remotely connected to machines, for the purpose of control.
Modulation…such as control of basic thought-impulses, sensations, emotions?
ONE: Nano-sensors, implanted in the body and brain, would issue real time data-reports on body/brain functioning to ops centers.
TWO:
And from those ops centers, data---including instructions---would be
sent back to the nano-sensors, which would impose those instructions on
the brain and body.
If
this seems impossible, consider nanotech research aimed at improving
the use of prosthetics. In that field, imposing instructions on the
body/brain appears to be the whole point.
The
question is: how far along the road of development is this
technology? I can only say we are seeing the public published face of
nanotech. What lies behind it, in secret research, is a matter for
estimation and speculation.
I
offer one speculation: the “promotion” of the social agenda of
collectivist thought, through nanotech. Utilizing the Internet of
Things, an attempt would be made to hook up and “harmonize” many, many
brains with one another. Same basic feelings, same impulses---shared.
Who
would be interested in such a program? Think Chinese government, DARPA
(the technology arm of the Pentagon), and numerous other international
actors. Think Rockefeller medical researchers. Think technocracy and
Brave New World.
But
wait. Suppose untold numbers of nanoparticles are ALREADY in
traditional vaccines? And suppose we have no idea how they got there? Or
whether they are “only” dangerous contaminants that could affect human
health in many damaging ways…or are some of them ALSO nanosensors that
can receive and transmit information? Do these contaminating
nanoparticles represent an earlier stage of research in implantation of
vaccine-nanos into humans?
A
2017 study of 44 types of 15 traditional vaccines, manufactured by
leading global companies, has uncovered a very troubling and previously
unreported fact:
The vaccines are heavily contaminated with a variety of nanoparticles.
Many of the particles are metals.
We’re talking about traditional vaccines, such as HPV, flu, Swine Flu, Hepatitis B, MMR, DPT, tetanus, etc.
To
begin to understand some of the destructive effects of contaminating
nanoparticles in vaccines, here is the groundbreaking 2017 study:
International Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination
Volume 4 Issue 1
January 23 2017
New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines:
Micro- and Nanocontamination
Antonietta M Gatti and Stefano Montanari
“The
analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain
non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not
declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case.
This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be
adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this
contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted
components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used
to produce vaccines…”
Are the study authors leaving the door open to the possibility that the contamination is intentional?
“The
quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual
chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are
neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are
biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either
immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from
administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and
not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as
such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different
from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that
toxicity…they induce an inflammatory reaction.”
“After
being injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can
stay around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas…But they
can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to
guess what will be their final destination…As happens with all foreign
bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction
that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded.
Furthermore, the protein-corona effect…due to a nano-bio-interaction…can
produce organic/inorganic composite particles capable of stimulating
the immune system in an undesirable way…It is impossible not to add that
particles the size often observed in vaccines can enter cell nuclei and
interact with the DNA…”
“In
some cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys, they can
corrode and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the
tissues…”
“Given
the contaminations we observed in all samples of human-use vaccines,
adverse effects after the injection of those vaccines are possible and
credible and have the character of randomness, since they depend on
where the contaminants are carried by the blood circulation. It is only
obvious that similar quantities of these foreign bodies can have a more
serious impact on very small organisms like those of children. Their
presence in the muscles…could heavily impair the muscle functionality…”
“We
come across particles with chemical compositions, similar to those
found in the vaccines we analyzed, when we study cases of environmental
contamination caused by different pollution sources. In most
circumstances, the combinations detected are very odd as they have no
technical use, cannot be found in any material handbook and look like
the result of the random formation occurring, for example, when waste is
burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they should not be present
in any injectable medicament, let alone in vaccines, more in particular
those meant for infants.”
This 2017 study opens up a whole new field: the investigation of nanoparticles in vaccines where none were expected.
Such particles are not medicine in any sense of the word.
Many
legal and scientific “experts” assert the State has a right to mandate
vaccines and force them on the population. But these contaminating
nanoparticles are not vaccines or medicines. Only a lunatic would defend
the right of the State to inject them.
Here
is another section from the 2017 study. Trade names of vaccines, and
compositions of the nanoparticle contaminants are indicated.
“…further
presence of micro-, sub-micro- and nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies
(ranging from 100nm to about ten microns) was identified in all cases
[all 44 vaccines], whose presence was not declared in the leaflets
delivered in the package of the product…”
“…single
particles, cluster of micro- and nanoparticles (<100nm) and
aggregates…debris of Aluminum, Silicon, Magnesium and Titanium; of Iron,
Chromium, Silicon and Calcium particles…arranged in a cluster, and
Aluminum-Copper debris…in an aggregate.”
“…the
particles are surrounded and embedded in a biological substrate. In all
the samples analyzed, we identified particles containing: Lead (Typhym,
Cervarix, Agrippal S1, Meningitec, Gardasil) or stainless steel
(Mencevax, Infarix Hexa, Cervarix. Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1,
Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec, Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and
MMRvaxPro).”
“…particles of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten, Calcium chloride).”
“…singular debris found in Repevax (Silicon, Gold, Silver) and Gardasil (Zirconium).”
“Some
metallic particles made of Tungsten or stainless steel were also
identified. Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium, Strontium and
Aluminum (Vivotif, Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron (Priorix,
Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium (Meningetec); Gold or
Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron,
Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth (Gardasil) or Cerium (Agrippal S1)
were also found. The only Tungsten appears in 8/44 vaccines, while
Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in 25/44. The
investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological
substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria. As
soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a
nano-bio-interaction…occurs and a ‘protein corona’ is formed…The
nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not
biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized
as self by the body.”
“…examples
of these nano-bio-interactions. Aggregates can be seen (stable
composite entities) containing particles of Lead in Meningitec… of
stainless steel (Iron, Chromium and Nickel…) and of Copper, Zinc and
Lead in Cervarix…Similar aggregates, though in different situations
(patients suffering from leukemia or cryoglobulinemia), have already
been described in literature.”
I’m
sure you’ve read official assurances that vaccine-manufacturing
problems are “rare.” You can file those pronouncements along with other
medical lies.
“I’d like the heavy metal sandwich on rye, please. And instead of serving it on a plate, can you inject it?”
---It’s
obvious from what I’ve written so far in this article that research and
development of nanoparticles as vaccine components is far along. And
while much of what is already in the vaccines may be nano-contamination,
there has also been a very strong push to refine the research---INSERT
NANO SENSORS IN THE BODY AND BRAIN THAT WOULD RECEIVE AND TRANSMIT
INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS.
Just
to give you an idea of how important nanoparticles-in-vaccines is to
the pharmaceutical establishment, here is what happened to the two
Italian researchers who uncovered the presence of nanos in traditional
vaccines, the authors of the study I quoted from above:
James Grundvig, at GreenMedInfo.com and the World Mercury Project, reported (3/17/16):
“Last
week, the Italian police raided the home and science laboratory of Drs.
Antonietta Gatti and Stefano Montanari. The police snatched all of the
digital assets owned by the husband and wife team of nanopathologists,
grabbing laptops, computers, and flash-drives---and with it, years of
work and research.”
“Because
Gatti and Montanari had taken their research of nanodust and
nanoparticles…to what unseen contamination might reside in vaccines in
2016, they came under the microscope of the United States, European, and
Italian authorities. They had touched the third rail of medicine. They
had crossed the no-go zone with the purported crime being scientific
research and discovery. By finding nano-contamination in random
vaccines, Gatti and Montanari revealed, for the first time, what no one
knew: Vaccines had more than aluminum salts adjuvants, Polysorbate-80,
and other inorganic chemicals in them, they also harbored stainless
steel, tungsten, copper, and other metals and rare elements that don’t
belong in shots given to fetuses, pregnant women, newborns, babies and
toddlers developing their lungs, immune and nervous systems.”
“When
the scientists published their findings in January 2017, New
Quality‐Control Investigations on Vaccines: Micro‐ and
Nanocontamination, the logical next step for the World Health
Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) should have
been to open an investigation into their claims, hire independent
scientists to run their own lab tests to confirm or refute the findings.
If confirmed, then the healthcare agencies would enact new policies on
safety of the vaccine supply chain, and enforce strict quality control
and quality assurance programs.”
“But
none of that happened. A year went by. It was cheaper for the
authorities to attack the Italian scientists than upset the vaccine
gravy train that supports the politicians.”
Now,
it appears we are on the cusp of an approval for one vaccine, the COVID
shot, to be certified for injection into every person in the world.
What better opportunity for implanting nanotech particles in humans?
Here is just one example:
New England Journal of Medicine, September 2, 2020; “Phase 1–2 Trial of a SARS-CoV-2 Recombinant Spike Protein Nanoparticle Vaccine.”
“rSARS-CoV-2,
developed by Novavax and manufactured at Emergent Biosolutions, is a
recombinant nanoparticle vaccine constructed from the full-length (i.e.,
including the transmembrane domain), wild-type SARS-CoV-2 spike
glycoprotein…”
“We
initiated a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 1–2 trial to evaluate
the safety and immunogenicity of the rSARS-CoV-2 vaccine (in 5-μg and
25-μg doses, with or without Matrix-M1 adjuvant, and with observers
unaware of trial-group assignments) in 131 healthy adults. In phase 1,
vaccination comprised two intramuscular injections, 21 days apart…”
It’s happening. It’s in progress.
What
is on the horizon? Through the use of implanted nanosenors that can
receive instructions, the enactment of an agenda of collectivist
thought. An attempt would be made to hook up and “harmonize” many, many
brains with one another. Same basic feelings, same impulses---shared…
Who
would be interested in such a program? Think Chinese government, DARPA
(the technology arm of the Pentagon), and numerous other international
actors. Think Rockefeller medical researchers. Think technocracy and
Brave New World.
No comments:
Post a Comment