Recently, I’ve written a series of articles revealing that the existence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus is unproven.
I’ve
quoted key CDC and study documents that confess “the virus is
unavailable.” Which is like an ice company saying they have no access to
water.
I’ve
published quotes from Dr. Tom Cowan’s major article exposing how CDC
journal authors “assemble” the idea of a virus from cobbled sequences
they ASSUME are parts of SARS-CoV-2. (Below, I reprint my article on Dr.
Cowan’s shocking findings.)
Now, I want to make overall comments on the con, the game, the hustle.
The
public, and most medical professionals, are awed by the whole concept
of genetic sequencing. They accept the process as a holy of holies. If
researchers in their lab claim they’ve “sequenced the virus,” the virus
must exist. How else could its genetic structure have been discovered?
Of course, the virus doesn’t have to exist at all. We are talking about an illusion. Stage magic.
And if we could force him to explain his trick, the magician would say:
“Notice,
I begin with a fragment of RNA I assume is part of a larger new
virus. My assumption isn’t proven. I simply make the claim.”
“Then
I lay out the genetic structure of that little piece of RNA, and I
discover I need a great more genetic information to fill out the
sequence of the whole virus.”
“That’s
not really a discovery. I already knew I’d need much more. The question
is: where am I going to get that added information?”
“The
answer is: from data bases. These bases contain miles of sequences that
have already been established---rightly or wrongly. Sequences of other
viruses.”
“Which
sequences do I choose? I make guesses. I make assumptions. Actually, I
choose according to a story line that has already been laid down. In
this case, a story about a member of the coronavirus family. That’s
right. I always knew what I was going to look for. In fact, that initial
piece of RNA I began with? I could have selected all sorts of other
pieces of RNA, but I chose that one because it seemed to be from the
coronavirus family.”
“Does
this whole business sound like a Lego or tinker-toy operation? Well, it
is. I never have a physical specimen of the virus. I never isolate the
purported virus from all the material that surrounds it. I just assume
or pretend the virus is in there.”
“Anyway,
I now select all sorts of genetic sequences from the huge database. And
I hook the sequences together, AS IF they were already connected and
real and waiting for me to find them. They weren’t, but I pretend they
were.”
“That
pretense is the key. It’s like selling a sucker a map leading to a lost
silver mine. There was never a map. The con artist cobbled it together
from pieces of other old maps of a territory in the mountains of
Colorado. The map looks real. It looks whole. But it was never whole.”
“THE
GENETIC SEQUENCE OF THE VIRUS is that map. It’s made to look like a one
long code that was there all along. But it wasn’t. It isn’t.”
“Every
good magic trick works this way. The magician makes the audience
believe he is performing one smooth operation. But he isn’t. He’s taking
all sorts of detours. He’s reaching into his sleeve and pulling out a
card. He’s palming that card so no one sees it. He’s slipping the card
into the deck in his other hand. And all the while, he’s talking
confidently and making other gestures to distract the audience.”
“The
whole purpose of the trick is to inspire awe. In the lab, the same
principle applies. The researchers SEEM to find one long genetic
sequence of the whole virus. Astonishing.”
“But that’s not what happened. Not by a long shot.”
“And
notice one other very important thing. In the lab, we are actually
piecing and cobbling together the pattern---the code---of a virus. We
don’t have to deal with actual genes. What we do is all on the level of
IDEATIONAL construction. We’re hooking up DATA. So that’s another level
of the trick. We’re not stringing together pieces of material. We’re
stringing together pieces of data from genetic databases. This would be
like standing on stage in front of an audience and doing a very clever
card trick without having a deck of cards in the first place. Now THAT’S
a trick for the ages.”
With all this I mind, read my previous article on Dr. Tom Cowan’s shocking discoveries:
Dr. Tom Cowan explores the COVID virus invented out of sheer nonsense
---Cowan
analyzes yet another key document posted by the CDC, in their journal,
Emerging Infectious Diseases: “Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome
Coronavirus 2 from Patient with Coronavirus Disease, United States”---
by Jon Rappoport
The
hits keep coming. The CDC used an arbitrary computer “tinker-toy”
process to invent a description of the virus. The virus that no one has
proven exists. This is the basic conclusion of Dr. Tom Cowan.
The
CDC article was discovered by Sally Fallon Morrell. Her co-author, Dr.
Cowan, fleshes out the fraud. Cowan’s article is titled, “Only Poisoned
Monkey Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’.”
Dr.
Cowan: “[The CDC journal article] was published in June 2020 [original
publication, March 2020]. The purpose of the article was for a group of
about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the
isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new
SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists
for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important
paper reveals some shocking findings.”
“First,
in the section titled ‘Whole Genome Sequencing,’ we find that rather
than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to
end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR
probes. This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately
30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact
virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer
program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.”
In
other words, the sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was done by
assumption and arbitrary inference. If this is science, a penguin is a
spaceship.
Cowan:
“To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific
fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have
found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a
tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a
computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim
this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never
actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic
makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves
and horn.”
“The
researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2
by ‘consensus,’ sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs
will come up with different versions of the imaginary ‘unicorn,’ so they
come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary
unicorn.”
As
I’ve been stating, the “discovery” of the “new virus” was actually the
foisting of a PRE-DETERMINED STORY ABOUT A VIRUS. Nothing real or
believable about it.
But once the official pattern is laid down, others follow it dutifully.
Dr.
Cowan uncovers more insanity in the CDC journal article. Using the
ASSUMED new virus, in an UN-ISOLATED STATE, the researchers try to prove
it is harmful by injecting it on to several different types of cells in
the lab:
Cowan:
“The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so
shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I
was reading. Let me quote the passage intact:”
“’Therefore,
we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in
several common primate and human cell lines, including human
adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human
embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81
cells [monkey cells]. … Each cell line was inoculated at high
multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was
observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero [monkey] cells, which
grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In
contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and
A549 cells [human cells] were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection’.”
“What
does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking
statement of all from the virology community? When virologists attempt
to prove infection, they have three possible ‘hosts’ or models on which
they can test…”
“The
third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the
method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain
the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many
times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue,
unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.”
“The
shocking thing about the above [CDC journal] quote is that using their
own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 —
even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the
three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means
they proved, on their terms, that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not
infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells,
and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and
amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.”
“My
friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the
CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the
SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible
conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in
their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured
only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.”
So first…use a process of genetic sequencing that involves concocting, out of an arbitrary computer program…
The existence and structure of the “new virus”...
And
then, taking a soup that the researchers claim contains the virus, in
an un-isolated state, inject the soup into several types of cells in the
lab...
And discover the prime target---human cells---are not infected by the imaginary virus.
And after this good day’s work, walk away and pretend nothing odd or self-incriminating happened.
And oh yes, lock down the planet based on this “science.”
Naturally, we MUST take a toxic vaccine that prevents non-infection by the non-virus.
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.) 
No comments:
Post a Comment