The
hits keep coming. The CDC used an arbitrary computer “tinker-toy”
process to invent a description of the virus. The virus that no one has
proven exists. This is the basic conclusion of Dr. Tom Cowan.
The
CDC article was discovered by Sally Fallon Morrell. Her co-author, Dr.
Cowan, fleshes out the fraud. Cowan’s article is titled, “Only Poisoned
Monkey Cells ‘Grew’ the ‘Virus’.”
Dr.
Cowan: “[The CDC journal article] was published in June 2020 [original
publication, March 2020]. The purpose of the article was for a group of
about 20 virologists to describe the state of the science of the
isolation, purification and biological characteristics of the new
SARS-CoV-2 virus, and to share this information with other scientists
for their own research. A thorough and careful reading of this important
paper reveals some shocking findings.”
“First,
in the section titled ‘Whole Genome Sequencing,’ we find that rather
than having isolated the virus and sequencing the genome from end to
end, they found 37 base pairs from unpurified samples using PCR
probes. This means they actually looked at 37 out of the approximately
30,000 of the base pairs that are claimed to be the genome of the intact
virus. They then took these 37 segments and put them into a computer
program, which filled in the rest of the base pairs.”
In
other words, the sequencing of the SARS-CoV-2 virus was done by
assumption and arbitrary inference. If this is science, a penguin is a
spaceship.
Cowan:
“To me, this computer-generation step constitutes scientific
fraud. Here is an equivalency: A group of researchers claim to have
found a unicorn because they found a piece of a hoof, a hair from a
tail, and a snippet of a horn. They then add that information into a
computer and program it to re-create the unicorn, and they then claim
this computer re-creation is the real unicorn. Of course, they had never
actually seen a unicorn so could not possibly have examined its genetic
makeup to compare their samples with the actual unicorn’s hair, hooves
and horn.”
“The
researchers claim they decided which is the real genome of SARS-CoV-2
by ‘consensus,’ sort of like a vote. Again, different computer programs
will come up with different versions of the imaginary ‘unicorn,’ so they
come together as a group and decide which is the real imaginary
unicorn.”
As
I’ve been stating, the “discovery” of the “new virus” was actually the
foisting of a PRE-DETERMINED STORY ABOUT A VIRUS. Nothing real or
believable about it.
But once the official pattern is laid down, others follow it dutifully.
Dr.
Cowan uncovers more insanity in the CDC journal article. Using the
ASSUMED new virus, in an UN-ISOLATED STATE, the researchers try to prove
it is harmful by injecting it on to several different types of cells in
the lab:
Cowan:
“The real blockbuster finding in this study comes later, a finding so
shocking that I had to read it many times before I could believe what I
was reading. Let me quote the passage intact:”
“’Therefore,
we examined the capacity of SARS-CoV-2 to infect and replicate in
several common primate and human cell lines, including human
adenocarcinoma cells (A549), human liver cells (HUH 7.0), and human
embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293T). In addition to Vero E6 and Vero CCL81
cells [monkey cells]. … Each cell line was inoculated at high
multiplicity of infection and examined 24h post-infection. No CPE was
observed in any of the cell lines except in Vero [monkey] cells, which
grew to greater than 10 to the 7th power at 24 h post-infection. In
contrast, HUH 7.0 and 293T showed only modest viral replication, and
A549 cells [human cells] were incompatible with SARS CoV-2 infection’.”
“What
does this language actually mean, and why is it the most shocking
statement of all from the virology community? When virologists attempt
to prove infection, they have three possible ‘hosts’ or models on which
they can test...”
“The
third method virologists use to prove infection and pathogenicity — the
method they most rely on — is inoculation of solutions they say contain
the virus onto a variety of tissue cultures. As I have pointed out many
times, such inoculation has never been shown to kill (lyse) the tissue,
unless the tissue is first starved and poisoned.”
“The
shocking thing about the above [CDC journal] quote is that using their
own methods, the virologists found that solutions containing SARS-CoV-2 —
even in high amounts — were NOT, I repeat NOT, infective to any of the
three human tissue cultures they tested. In plain English, this means
they proved, on their terms, that this ‘new coronavirus’ is not
infectious to human beings. It is ONLY infective to monkey kidney cells,
and only then when you add two potent drugs (gentamicin and
amphotericin), known to be toxic to kidneys, to the mix.”
“My
friends, read this again and again. These virologists, published by the
CDC, performed a clear proof, on their terms, showing that the
SARS-CoV- 2 virus is harmless to human beings. That is the only possible
conclusion, but, unfortunately, this result is not even mentioned in
their conclusion. They simply say they can provide virus stocks cultured
only on monkey Vero cells, thanks for coming.”
So first...use a process of genetic sequencing that involves concocting, out of an arbitrary computer program...
The existence and structure of the “new virus”...
And
then, taking a soup that the researchers claim contains the virus, in
an un-isolated state, inject the soup into several types of cells in the
lab...
And discover the prime target---human cells---are not infected by the imaginary virus.
And after this good day’s work, walk away and pretend nothing odd or self-incriminating happened.
And oh yes, lock down the planet based on this “science.”
Naturally, we MUST take a toxic vaccine that prevents non-infection by the non-virus.
(The link to this article posted on my blog is here -- with sources.) 
No comments:
Post a Comment