The Physicians For Informed Consent Ask If The MMR Vaccine Is More Dangerous Than The Measles
What Happened: The
Physicians for Informed Consent (PIC) are a group of doctors and
scientists from around the world who have come together to support
informed consent when it comes to mandatory vaccine measures. Their
information is based on science. Their mission is to deliver data on
infectious diseases and vaccines, and to unite doctors, scientists,
healthcare professionals, attorneys, and families who support voluntary
vaccinations. Their vision is that
doctors and the public are able to evaluate the data on infectious
diseases and vaccines objectively and voluntarily engage in
informed
decision-making about vaccination.
You can check out their directors, advisors, and founding members here.
The organization itself is much bigger than the founding members, and
includes a coalition of organizations, doctors and scientists.
On their website, they’ve put out some excellent downloadable PDF’s
with regards to the MMR vaccine. One of them deals with “what parents
need to know about the measles vaccine” and another one presents the
information that has them questioning if the MMR vaccine is safer than
the measles. They point out that the chances of dying from measles and
make many comparisons to the vaccine.
According to a MedAlerts search of the FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database,
as of 2/5/19, the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles,
mumps, and rubella vaccines alone was: 93,929 adverse events, 1,810
disabilities, 6,902 hospitalizations, and 463 deaths. The National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Act has paid out approximately $4 billion to
compensate families of vaccine-injured children. As astronomical as the
monetary awards are, they’re even more alarming considering HHS claims that only an estimated 1% of vaccine injuries are even reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS).
Contracting measles is not dangerous in
the developed world, and natural measles provide immunity and also has a
number of health benefits, like the reduced risk for cancer. That is
sourced within their PDF, as well as other potential treatments.
advertisement - learn more
I can go on and on, but for the sake of a short read I am pointing you, the reader, towards the PDF’s.
The PDF’s are well-sourced and laid out
in an easy to read and understand type of manner, and quite detailed.
Their arguments are quite compelling, and it would be interesting to
present this information to a physician on the opposite end of the
spectrum in order to hear or read their rebuttal. So feel free to take a
look at them if interested!
Why This Is Important: When
it comes to both our individual and collective health, all of us simply
want what’s best. Nobody can really deny that, especially for our
children. The issue is, many people have been made to believe that
vaccines are for the greater good of everybody. We are made to believe
that children, for example, who are not vaccinated are actually a danger
to the vaccinated children.
The Physicians for Informed Consent are
well aware of this argument, and they present a lot of information on
why that’s not true. At the end of the day, in order to produce “herd
immunity” from vaccines, the vaccines must be 100 percent effective for
everybody, all of the time. We already know that that’s not the case and
that a large majority are susceptible to vaccine injury. The National
Childhood Vaccine Injury act alone is enough to argue against mandatory
vaccination and the idea that the unvaccinated are a risk to the
vaccinated. In fact, vaccines have been known to spread diseases. This
has happened with polio as well as the measles.
For example, during the measles outbreak
in California in 2015, a large number of suspected cases occurred in
recent vaccinees. Of the 194 measles virus sequences obtained in the
United States in 2015, 73 were identified as vaccine sequences. The
media (Pharma-owned) generated high public anxiety. This fear-mongering
led to the demonization of unvaccinated children, who were perceived as
the spreaders of this disease. Rebecca J. McNall, a co-author of the
published report, is a CDC official in the Division of Viral Diseases
who had the data proving that the measles outbreak was in part caused by
the vaccine. It is evidence of the vaccine’s failure to provide
immunity. (source)
There are actually decades of examples when it comes to the measles.
The Takeaway
Vaccinations are quite a controversial
topic, and vaccine hesitancy continues to increase among not only the
global citizenry, but among doctors and physicians as well, which was
also expressed at the recent World Health Organization vaccine summit.
You can read more about that here.
In today’s day and age, it’s important
to ask ourselves if measures taken under the guise of goodwill are
really necessary and good for us. Take terrorism, for example, the idea
that those who fund the problem, arm the problem, and in some cases create the problem then propose the solution of foreign infiltration, again, under the guise of goodwill.
So what were the real intentions, to stop the terrorists or to take
over the country for natural resources and economic power and control?Are people capitalizing off of the coronavirus? Not just for profit but for control, like Edward Snowden mentioned?
It’s also important to note that pharmaceutical companies hold tremendous lobbying power, even more so than big oil. (source)
Ask yourself, should we not have the right to decide for ourselves what goes into our body? Especially when there is a tremendous amount of flawed logic with the idea of mass vaccinations? Should we not have access to appropriate double blind placebo controlled safety studies? How come there are none for vaccines?
Why are there massive ridicule campaigns against organizations, professionals and people who create awareness about vaccine safety? Is vaccine safety not in the best interests of everybody? Should we not be analyzing and questioning instead of simply believing?
We must ask ourselves if we want to
continue to give our consciousness and perceptions about certain
medications over to these global and federal health authorities or, is
it time to start asking more questions and pointing out facts that don’t
really resonate? Why is discussion being discouraged, censored and even
punished?
Why is Julian Assange in Jail? Why do we jail those who expose crimes and identify with those who commit them?
At the end of the day, vaccines are not a
one size fits all product, and that’s quite clear. There are risks
associated with vaccines, and evidence suggests that they are nowhere
near as rare as they’re made out to be.
If we can come together as billions and
shut down for the coronavirus, imagine what we could do if we come
together to oppose measures that we as a citizenry, and as an entire
collective, do not desire.
Start Your Free 7 Day Trial To CETV!
Due to the pressure of mass censorship, we now have our own censorship-free, and ad-free on demand streaming network!You can stream conscious media 24/7 and enjoy mind-expanding interviews, original shows, and documentaries and guided programs.
Click here to start a FREE 7-Day Trial and watch 100's of hours of conscious media that you won't see anywhere else.
No comments:
Post a Comment