This
is one of those investigations in which you ask yourself, IS THE
PHENOMENON, AS DESCRIBED, REAL? That's where I started. At this point,
I've written well over 150 articles about COVID-19.
And of course, the phenomenon is not real.
Most people wouldn't be able to grasp that. They're stuck at the gate, saying, PEOPLE ARE DYING, IT MUST BE THE VIRUS.
Well,
people are always dying. It's very easy to repackage their deaths
under a new label. And those that are dying for new reasons...you can
track down those reasons, too. In a few places, it's pollution, in
another place it could well be a previous vaccine campaign, and so on.
In New York, a lot of people are dying premature deaths because they're
put on breathing ventilators and heavily sedated.
As I laid out
in several key articles, proper procedures of viral discovery were never
carried out in China or anywhere else. There is no convincing proof
researchers ever found a new virus.
Therefore, every piece of
so-called information coming from "new virus" has no foundation
whatsoever. For example, the diagnostic tests. Tests for what? And
then, the case numbers would be meaningless as well.
But again,
these facts are hard for people to swallow. They want to believe. They
believe they must believe. It's a theocracy.
In the set-up,
there are two positions you can take. You can stand outside the whole
illusion and expose it; or you can enter the illusion and then show
internal contradictions and lies and false pictures, within the fraud.
For
instance, the case numbers. I've explained ways the CDC and other
agencies are fiddling them, inflating them. I've also stood outside the
whole case number game and pointed out it's without meaning, because,
again, the existence of a new virus hasn't been proven. The tests, all
of them, are supposed to be evidence of the presence of the virus.
You can be OUTSIDE or INSIDE. Or both.
Let's
say someone publishes a photo of 510th Street in New York during rush
hour. You can simply say there is no 510th Street in New York. Or you
can look at the details of the photo. You can say, "You see that man
wearing a fleecy winter coat and a long scarf? Now look behind him.
There are three girls wearing bikinis waiting for a bus. Doesn't that
seem odd?"
You can also make a circumstantial case. That's a
third aspect of an investigation. "Look, this man accused of check
forgery has been convicted three times in other states for the same
crime. He worked for his uncle, who went to prison for forgery in
France. Right now, he lives above a store where a check forger is
turning out fake checks."
I've done that with the virus---showing
that, back through history, the so-called discovery of a new virus, and
its promotion, have been used to obscure, and stand in for, other forms
of killing. Industrial pollution, forced starvation, purposeful
contamination of water supplies, treatment with highly toxic medical
drugs and vaccines. The story about a virus protects the killers.
As
you can see, I'm explaining all this in a very straightforward way.
Now. But in 1987, when the issue was AIDS and HIV, and I was writing a
book on the subject, I waded through a mass of confusion for months.
The confusion was caused by me being inside the picture and not knowing
there was an outside. When I finally realized what was going on, a
large number of seemingly disparate pieces of information clicked into
place. I saw the landscape. I saw what was in it, and I could stand
away from it and look at it as a whole.
As a fourth
consideration, you could examine the history of the teachings that train
and predispose people to believe in a phenomenon that is not real. In
this case, teachings about germs. Teachings that indicate germs are as
dangerous as nitroglycerin. Teachings that claim disease comes directly
from germs---ignoring, for example, the fact that people have intrinsic
immune defenses. Mind control through germ theory is a long story that
I'm just briefly mentioning. But it's very useful to see how
indoctrination works in the background; when the next big epidemic is
announced, most people immediately fall in line. They're confirming
what they've been taught to believe. It's another church.
There was the church of HIV, the church of West Nile, the church of SARS, Swine Flu, Zika, Bird Flu, and so on.
Speaking
of teachings---one of the most important predispositions that people
cling to like life rafts is: one effect, one cause. The effect would be
COVID-19, and the cause would be the coronavirus. But the effect is
not One Thing. As I stated above, people are actually dying as a result
of different conditions...which have different causes. Grasping this
produces a very beneficial explosion that scatters much mind control.
Another
predisposition is the illogical notion that the effect proves the
cause. "Well, look at the all the lockdowns (effect); therefore, the
cause, the justification must be the dangerous virus." Nonsense.
Aristotle exposed that fallacy a long time ago.
"But...but I don't care. People are dying, it must be the virus. I believe."
Yes, people believe. When has that not been the case?
And
when they believe, they ask a few typical questions. "But what about
the people dying in Italy?" They are the BUT WHAT ABOUT people. They
always have another WHAT ABOUT. Or they'll say, "There was a boy who
suddenly died in Montana, how do you explain that?" The HOW DO YOU
EXPLAIN people.
I explain what I can, based on evidence I've put
together. I don't know what happened to the boy in Montana or the girl
in India or the mother in Mongolia. But I do know there is no
particular reason to assume the virus was the cause of death.
True
believers tend to put things together this way: the news reports an
unusual death; it's impossible to understand what happened from the
account; unusual effect must equal an unusual cause; the COVID virus
would be unusual; therefore, the virus caused the unusual death.
Preposterous, but there it is. You can take a sledgehammer to that
pillar of dull thought, and you won't knock it down in a hundred years.
Then
we come to the question of conspiracy. This can also be called: who
benefits? People mistakenly assume that a conspiracy is like a bank
robbery. A small number of people walk into a bank and take the money.
They benefit. But in a conspiracy, there are compartmentalized
beneficiaries, and they aren't all plotting together. Most
beneficiaries see an opportunity and they take it.
Drug companies
make money on the vaccine and the drugs used to treat COVID-19
patients. State governments receive federal money to "fight the
virus." Researchers win promotions. Public health agencies obtain more
funding, and more power. Financiers buy up devalued properties at
bargain prices. At the top of the ladder, key plotters contrive
selling the story of a new killer virus, because they intend to use it
to lock down the planet. Why? Because they want to torpedo economies
and move in on the wreckage and build a new economic, social, and
political world order. It doesn't take thousands or millions of
people---all in the know---to foist a conspiracy. Far from it.
An
investigation of a story makes the story fall apart. You see it in a
different light. You no longer believe the central narrative. You keep
asking deeper questions about basic assertions contained in the story,
and your answers produce more collapses of the cement that holds the
story together.
Finally, for now, there is the matter of
individual choice and responsibility. Individuals can believe or not
believe. There is always that option. People are not doomed to accept
an oppressive narrative imposed on them. If that were the case, there
would be no point to human thought or action. We would forever be
victims. This is not the case. It never was. Some people are
dedicated to the notion that there is no way out of the dungeon of
external control. Their dedication to this proposition has great
tonnage. For them. They purposely ignore the fact that, down through
history, there has been an enormous struggle to establish individual
freedom, and this war has been astonishingly successful---relative to
older despotisms and tyrannies. In fact, their choice, now, to walk
around spraying doom of whatever brand they want to sell is evidence of
that freedom. I'm not impressed by doom. I'm impressed by freedom. We
are in yet another fight for it now. I'm impressed by individuals who
use their freedom to make their best vision into fact in the world. My
investigations are aimed at exposing the power players who plot and
fight against freedom. |
No comments:
Post a Comment