The reference here is a stunning May 23 article by John Pospichal, "Questions for lockdown apologists," posted at medium[dot]com.
Pospichal
examined overall mortality numbers for Austria, Belgium, Denmark,
England and Wales, France, Italy, Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, Sweden,
Switzerland, Ecuador, and New York City.
Supported by charts,
here are excerpts from his article: "We now have mortality data for the
first few months of 2020 for many countries, and, as you might expect,
there were steep increases associated with the beginning of the COVID-19
pandemic in each one."
"Surprisingly, however, these increases
did not begin before the lockdowns were imposed, but after. Moreover, in
almost every case, they began immediately after. Often, mortality
numbers were on a downward trend before suddenly reversing course after
lockdowns were decreed."
"This is an astonishing finding..."
"You
will notice that only after each country (or city) was locked down did
the increases begin. Moreover, they began immediately, and in nearly
every case, precipitously."
"All this leads us to the following
questions, which we pose to all those who continue to defend the use of
lockdowns as an effective means to prevent excess deaths."
"Q:
Why was there no significant increase in overall mortality, in any
country we have good data for, before the start of lockdowns?"
"Q: Why does a precise and exact correlation exist between the start of lockdowns and significant rises in overall mortality?"
"Q:
How is it that governments in every country imposed lockdowns at
precisely the same time relative to the future precipitous rise in their
populations' overall mortality rate?"
"Q: How is it, moreover,
that this moment in time [i.e., the imposition of lockdowns] happened to
fall immediately before that precipitous rise?"
"Q: If health
authorities vastly underestimated the prevalence of the virus at the
beginning of the pandemic, why did the virus nevertheless wait until
lockdowns were imposed to suddenly start killing at levels which
exceeded normal deaths?"
---To that last question, I would
respond: No virus would wait. We're not talking about a virus at all.
We're talking about the sudden effects of the lockdowns.
And
those sudden death-effects would come crashing down, first, and
immediately, on the most vulnerable people in these countries:
The elderly, who were already ill for years.
THE LOCKDOWNS FORCED THE PREMATURE DEATHS OF OLD PEOPLE.
PEOPLE
WHO HAD BEEN SUFFERING FROM MULTIPLE HEALTH CONDITIONS FOR YEARS, WHO
HAD BEEN TREATED WITH TOXIC MEDICAL DRUGS, WHOSE IMMUNE SYSTEMS WERE
ALREADY SEVERELY COMPROMISED...
AND WHO ARE SUDDENLY TERRIFIED BY
TWO MORE FACTORS---THE POSSIBILITY OF A COVID-19 DIAGNOSIS, AND
ISOLATION FROM FRIENDS AND FAMILY. THESE TWO FACTORS PUSH THEM OVER THE
EDGE AND THEY DIE.
Especially in nursing homes; but also in hospitals, and in their homes.
This is the true face of "COVID."
This
is how the case numbers and the death numbers are being propped up all
over the world, to yield the impression of a virus on the loose.
Without those huge numbers, the whole vicious charade of a pandemic would be exposed and rejected at once.
The lockdowns are a method of killing.
The
governors and mayors and presidents and prime ministers who imposed the
lockdowns---and behind them, the planners of "COVID"--- have been
killing old people.
blog[dot]nomorefakenews[dot]com/2020/07/01/murder-by-lockdown-details-from-a-dozen-countries/ |
No comments:
Post a Comment