Thursday, July 16, 2020
2599-2600: Why You Can't Be Your Own Mother from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
I titled this article to get your
attention. It is obvious, to most of us anyway, that we can't function
as our own Mother, though it seems that I must now belabor that point.
There are simply some things that we
can't do for ourselves, and there are other things, like peeing, that
nobody else can do for us. This is built into the web of our physical
existence and is not subject to change.
So. Having squared that away, I
will next observe that Federal Employees and Dependents cannot create
the Federal Republic, for the same reason that we cannot act as our own
Mothers.
Federal Employees and Dependents by
definition lack the legal and lawful standing to re-create the "missing
part" of our Federal Government, known as the Federal Republic.
Re-creating the Federal Republic is a multi-step process requiring participation by multiple other entities.
First, the American States and People have to assemble and bring their States of the Union into Session to conduct business.
That hasn't been done since the
Civil War and has proven to be quite a Goat Roping Contest, thanks to
misguided efforts by our Employees to incapacitate us and identify us as
employees just like them--- and therefore, just as helpless to do the
necessary work of Reconstruction.
So that has had to be overcome, with
the People forced to formally declare their political status and to
"re-populate" their States on paper -- States that they never left in
fact.
All right, consider that part done.
The American People have responded,
have declared themselves to be Americans acting in the capacity of
American State Citizens, our fifty States have been re-populated
accordingly, and the State Assemblies have been called into Session.
That's steps one, two, and three
---- (1) Declaration; (2) Acceptance of State Citizenship; (3) Setting
up State Assemblies and calling into Session.
Next, the State Assemblies must take
care of housekeeping business and formally enroll all the Western
States that have been left in limbo pending their final acceptance as
States of the Union.
Next, each State must create its own
new "State of State" organization. For example, New Hampshire has to
create (or as it is, re-create) The State of New Hampshire, to do
business for New Hampshire, as part of the re-instated Confederation of
States.
This requires re-writing the
original Constitution of each American State of State that existed prior
to the Civil War, and in the case of the new western State members,
writing a first-ever American State-level Constitution, because all
these States have ever known is a British Territorial version acting as a
place-holder.
Finally, with all the members of the
Confederation of States reconstructed, it is their responsibility to
re-launch the Federal Republic owed to Americans under the provisions of
The Constitution for the united States of America.
We are a little better than half-way home, somewhere between second and third base.
There are those who think that they
can hurry this process along by using Federal Citizens to fill the ranks
of fake "assemblies" --- and pull another fast one on the American
People.
RuSA and the so-called "National Assembly" groups think that they can do this, but they don't understand the actual law.
If they did, they'd already know
that their efforts are doomed and that they lack the standing required
to complete the legitimate reconstruction process.
Federal citizens of either stripe,
Territorial or Municipal, cannot restore the Federal Republic for the
same reason that you can't function as your own Mother.
So, as it behooves everyone in this
country to get it straight and get it done, join and support your actual
State Assembly and take the steps necessary to properly declare your
political status, either as an American State National or as an American
State Citizen.
Having thus reclaimed your own
lawful standing as an American and being enabled to act in the proper
capacity, you can "re-constitute" --- that is, reconstruct, your
American State of State organization, reclaim the assets of the Federal
State Trusts, and restore the Federal Republic.
Not until.
So, Mr. President--- if you want our
assistance in this otherwise impossible to accomplish feat, you have
it. It behooves you, your Administration, the members of the military,
and the members of the Federal Civil Service to get the lead out and
help us do what has to be done.
Because we are the only ones that can act as your Mother.
----------------------------
See this article and over 2500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Florida Department of Health saboteurs are RIGGING coronavirus test results, wildly inflating infection numbers to hobble reopening efforts
A stunning investigation by Orlando Fox News affiliate Fox 35 finds
that the Florida Department of Health is reporting suspiciously high
“positive” rates from dozens of COVID-19 testing labs in Florida, often
in contradiction to the real numbers that those labs reported to the
state. This appears to indicate a massive, coordinated conspiracy by
State of Florida workers in the Florida Department of Health who are attempting to sabotage the reopening efforts by wildly exaggerating the number of infections for political purposes.
Read the entire article here:
https://www.newstarget.com/2020-07-14-florida-department-of-health-rigging-coronavirus-test-results-sabotage.html
Read the entire article here:
https://www.newstarget.com/2020-07-14-florida-department-of-health-rigging-coronavirus-test-results-sabotage.html
The IRS Supreme Court Cases
By Anna Von Reitz
Today, I have received a most
extraordinary document: the history of the IRS in Supreme Court Cases,
assembled as a list, from one of my readers. It's a brilliant summation
done in an extraordinarily succinct way.
The documented history of the IRS in
this country goes back to the Civil War, when they were hired as
privateers to interrupt and blockade Confederate shipping. They
operated as the original pirates of the Caribbean did, offshore, on
island bases, from the Outer Banks of North Carolina, eastward to the
Bahamas, Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Cuba, around Florida and the
Caribbean proper.
They were pirates for hire then, and they are pirates for hire now.
Their history in Europe has been
documented back to the early 1100's, when they were first organized as
armed enforcement for the Dominican Order, which was running the
Inquisition at the time. The Church of Rome had decreed a Special
Offering known as Peter's Pence, to be collected once a year on April
15, as a percentage of income for the prior year, supposedly to defray
the cost of the Crusades in the Holy Land.
Does that sound familiar?
This particular organization, the
Internal Revenue Service, has been engaged in bilking the public to pay
for mercenary and holy wars (yet another oxymoron) for a very long
time. And yes, the entire apparatus of the Roman Pontiff, the City of
Rome, the Romanus Pontifex, the Vatican, the various constructs of the
Holy Roman Empire, and the Holy See are very much to blame for all of
this ---- for conceiving this system of oppression in the name of God,
for implementing it, for protecting it, for practicing it --- and
continuing it into the modern era.
Why do I particularly blame the
Church--- especially when the Pope's Municipal Government ostensibly
fought for the Confederacy? Because his tax collectors fought for the
North, and his Overseer of the Commonwealth, the British King, was
following the Pope's instructions to employ the Internal Revenue Service
against the South.
"Internal" to what, we should ask? Apparently, the Holy See, which runs the Municipal United States theocracy.
One is reminded of the advice of 2
Corinthians 11: 1-15, and the words of St. Paul about those who come "in
the name of" Jesus (or should we properly translate his name as
Joshua?) but preach a "different Jesus" and a different Gospel, too. A
deceptive substitution, not unlike what Eve faced in the Garden:
"But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtlety, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ."
The Internal Revenue Service
employed by the Territorial Government spells its name out in full,
while the IRS employed by the Municipal Government uses abbreviated
alphabet soup code: IRS.
They both work for the same Master and play both ends against the middle.
Subtle, indeed. A deceit known to
the players, designed to keep the victims confused throughout, set up so
that if the IRS doesn't get you, the Internal Revenue Service will, and
neither one of them have the least little bit of authority to address
you at all.
They are just running a racketeering
scheme on your shores under color of law, and claiming that you owe
them for this service.
And you are doing what? Sitting in
your living room, in your Laz-E-Boy recliner thinking --- "Rubbish! That
can't be so!" --- but it is the truth, nonetheless, and the longer you
sit there not believing it (and therefore doing nothing about it) the
worse it gets.
The privateers operating the
offshore blockade against the Confederacy simply came ashore after the
Civil War ended and went to work for BOTH sides of the non-existent
conflict. I say, "non-existent" because both sides were ultimately
employed by the same man, Pope Pius IX.
All that blood, all that waste, all
master-minded and created by one of our own dear Federal Subcontractors,
playing a little two-fisted game with himself at the expense of his
Allies and Employers and Parishioners, too.
And they were getting ready to do it again.
But I digress.
Here is the meat of the story, and I
cannot take credit for assembling it in this fashion though I have
often enough discussed individual cases--- a compilation of all the
United States Supreme Court Cases that have overturned and exposed the
venal nature of "the Internal Revenue Service"--- first presented by the
Freedom Law School at its historic "Hearing on Taxation" held in
Washington, DC over a decade ago:
1. Brushaber v. Union Pacific R.Co., 240 U. S, 1.11 (1916)
2. Maxwell v. Dow, 176 U.S. 581,20 S.Ct. 448 (1900)
3. Texas v. White, 7 Wall. 700; U.S. v. Cathcart, 25 F.Case No. 14,756
4. Stanton v. Baltic Minning Company 240 U.S. 103, 112 (1919)
5. Bowers v Kerbaugh-Empire 271 U.S. 170, 174,174 (1926); In re Charge to Grand Jury, 30 F. Case No. 18,273 (65 C.J. Section 2) -- not known to be overturned. NOTICE OF DISHONOR: 06/15/2017 Page 6 of 9.
6. Peck v Lowe 247 U.S.165, 173 (1918)
7. Doyle v Mitchell Bros. 247 U. S. 179,183 (1918)
8. Eisner v Macomber 252 U. S. 179, 183 (1918)
9. Evans v Gore 253 U.S. 245(1920)
10. Flint v Stone Tracy Co. 220 U.S. 107, 144,151-152, 165,55 S L.ed. 107419 Sup CCL Rep 342, Ann Cas. 1912B 1312(1911)
11. Merchants Loan And Trust Co. v. Smietanka, 255 U.S. 509519 (1921)
12. Helvering v Edison Brothers' Stone, 8th Cir. 133 F2d 575 (1943)
13. Southern Pacific v Lowe 247 U.S. 330, 335 (1918): Art 1, Sec. 8, Cl17 And Art.IV, Sec. 3 CL 2: Art. 1 Sec. 8 Cl. 17: Art. IV Sec. 3 Cl. 15 USC 1681h: 28 U.S.C. 1333 or 1337: False Claims Act, see 31 U.S.C. 3729(a)(7)
14. UNITED STATES v MERKSKY 361 U.S. 431, 438(1960)
15. CALIFORNIA BANKERS ASSN. v SCHULZ 419 U.S.21, 26 (1974)
16. FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE CORP v. Merrill, 332 U.S. 380,384 (1947)
17. Utah Power & Light Co v. United States, 391
18. United States v. Stewart, 108 re Floyd Acceptance, 7: Wall 666; Article 1 Sec.2: Art. 1 Sec.9
19. Knowlton v Moore, 178 U.S. 41, 47(1900); 19 CFR 351, 102
20. Butcher's Union Co. v Cresent City Co. 111 U.S. 746, 756 (1884)
21. TRUAX v CORRIGAN 257 U.S. 312,348 (1921)
22. Sims v Abrens 167 Ark. 557271 S.W. 720, 773 (1925)
23. Myer v STATE OF NEBRASKA 262 U.S. 390, 399 (1923)
24. Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall 36
25. Butchers' Union Co. v Crescent City Co. 4 Sup Ct. 652
26. Vick Wo v Hopkins 6 Sup Ct. 1064
27. Minnesota v Barer 10 Sup Ct 862
28. Allegeyer v Lousiana 17 Sup Ct. 427
29. Lochner v New York 25 Sup Ct. 539, 3 Ann Cas 1133
30. Twining v New Jersey 29 Sup Ct. 14
31. Chicago B&O R.R. v. McGuire 31 Sup Ct. 259
32. Truax v Raich 36 Sup Ct. 7, L.R.A.1916D, 545 Ann. Cas. 1917B 283.
33. Adams v Tanner 37 Sup Ct. 662 L.R.A.1917F, 1163, Ann. Cas. 1917D 973
34. New York Life Ins. Co v Dodge 38 Sup Ct. 337, Ann Cas. 1918E,593
35. Traux v Corrigan 42 Sup Ct. 124
36. Adkins v Children's Hospital 43 Sup Ct. 394,67 L. Ed (April 9, 1923)
37. Wyeth v Cambridge Board Of Health 200 Mass 474,86 N. E. 925, 128 Am St. Rep. 43923 L. R. A. (N.S.) 147
38. MURDOCK v COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA 319 U.S. 105, 113; 63 Sup Ct. 875; 87 L Ed 1298 (1943)
39. Tyler et al Administrators v. United States, 281 US 497, 502 (1930)
40. Pollock v Farmers' Loan And Trust Co. 157 U.S. 429, 442, 555, 556, 573, 582, 595 (1895)
41. STRATTON'S INDEPENDENCE, LTD. V HOWBERT231 U.S. 399, 417 (1913)
42. Main v Grand Trunk R. Co. 35 L.ed 994, 3 Inters. Com.Rep. 807, 12 Sup Ct. Rep. , As interpreted in Galveston, H&S A.R. Co. v. Texas, 52 S.L. ed. 1031, 1037, 28 Sup Ct. Rep. 638:
At this time, Defense presented one
of the arguments provided by Long's Research Foundation studies. They
read to the jury the Mission Statement of the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE,
which states that the income tax relies upon “VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE” and a
quote from the head of the Alcohol Tobacco Tax Division of the IRS,
WHICH, IN ESSENCE, SHOWED THAT THE INCOME TAX IS 100% VOLUNTARY, AS
OPPOSED TO THE ALCOHOL TAX, WHICH IS 100% ENFORCED. NOTICE OF DISHONOR:
06/15/2017 Page 7 of 9.
43. U. S. v WHITRIDGE 231 U. S. 231 U. s. 144, 147(1913)
44. Taft v BOWERS 278 U.S. 470,481 (1929)
45. COPPAGE v STATE OF KANSAS 236 U.S.l, 23-24(1915)
46. U. S. v. Constantine 296 U.S. 287(1935?) IRS Ruled Unconstitutional As Prohibition Had Been Repealed.
In 1965 The United States Supreme Court traced the IRS back to the Civil
War (as we did, also) and found no legislative Act Of Congress lawfully establishing the IRS as a Federal agency, department or anything else.
War (as we did, also) and found no legislative Act Of Congress lawfully establishing the IRS as a Federal agency, department or anything else.
For still more juicy tidbits, go to Paul Andrew Mitchell (Federal Witness)
website http://supremelaw.org and read over the 31 Questions.
website http://supremelaw.org and read over the 31 Questions.
Please note that no IRS publications
carry an Office of Management and Budget form number, meaning that they
are admittedly not a U.S. Government entity.
And finally, the coup de grace:
U.S. v. Lloyde R. Long, FEDERAL DISTRICT COURT, ALABAMA, Case 1-93-91,
and the famous Shreveport, Louisiana victory in the Tommy Cryer case, in
which he successfully maintained that no power to tax a man's time on
Earth exists.
The IRS and the Internal Revenue
Service are both operating as foreign privateers on our shores, carrying
out an illegal "war" that actually ended more than 150 years ago, still
pillaging and plundering the American People, who were the dupes and
victims throughout.
So, still sitting in your Laz-E-Boy thinking that I am blowing smoke up your butt for fun?
"Your" members of Congress are
allowing this to go on, year after year, decade after decade, and you
are content to let them "represent" you? If that's true, and you
knowingly allow this, and let your employees condone this, then you are a
willing accomplice to their crimes against other Americans.
Your inaction makes you a war criminal and a traitor.
Finally, we get to the really
interesting part. How, my Reader wanted to know, is it possible that
all these Supreme Court cases and all this evidence exists, and nothing
has been done?
As neither the IRS nor the Internal
Revenue Service are part of the government (see above) the government
has no authority to put these organizations out of business or demand
change in their operations unless they are clearly operating in a
criminal fashion.
After nearly fifty Supreme Court
cases, the "government" still isn't convinced that anything untoward has
been going on. The House Oversight Subcommittee is responsible, and has
done nothing.
As I told my reader, it has proven
extraordinarily difficult to get Congress--Municipal or Territorial-- to
slap the hands of its own bill collectors.
Second, all these decisions are in
the nature of "negative law" --- proving what isn't true, striking down
particular cases and instances, but not establishing "positive law" that
could be used to enforce against the activities of the Internal Revenue
Service and the IRS, both.
This is one of the limiting aspects
of the Supreme Court's authority, which is strictly in the negative ---
an ability to strike down, but no ability to create law.
Meantime, guess who is sitting there
like a Fat Toad in a Fly Factory, not creating any new law to rein in
the activities of the IRS and Internal Revenue Service? All the
slime-sucking politicians.
That's right, the members of
"Congress" --- both Territorial and Municipal, the same people wearing
both hats, glutting themselves either way.
Every time I see Nancy Pelosi
talking about the "poor" while she cheats them out of the fruits of
their own labors, I experience involuntary retching; every time I see
Mitch McConnell's supercilious face talking about farmers and hometowns,
I want to hurl my breakfast.
If you are sickened, too, it's time to dust off your Employer ID and take action.
It's your Public Duty to put an end
to this travesty. I will say it again ---take aim and umbrage against
these evils, or you are an accomplice to it. Cowards are on The List
for destruction in Revelation 21.
After all, folks, that's what
motivated me. I knew that if I didn't get off my duff and take action
to stop the crime, I'd be an accomplice to it. And so will you, if you
just sit there, curled up in a fetal position in your recliner,
muttering, "She can't be right." --- in the face of dozens of Supreme
Court rulings.
Go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly. net Get started now.
----------------------------
See this article and over 2500 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment