110.
Frederick W. Taylor: The Underground History of American Education by John
Taylor Gatto from archive.org
Chapter Nine The Cult of Scientific Management
On the night of June 9, 1834, a group of
prominent men "chiefly engaged in commerce" gathered privately in a Boston drawing room
to discuss a scheme of universal schooling.
Secretary of this meeting was William Ellery Channing, Horace Mann 's
own minister as well as an international
figure and the leading Unitarian of his day. The location of the meeting house is not entered in the minutes
nor are the names of the assembly 's participants apart from Channing. Even though
the literacy rate in Massachusetts was 98
percent, and in
neighboring Connecticut, 99.8 percent, the assembled businessmen agreed the present system of schooling allowed too much to depend upon chance. It encouraged more entrepreneurial exuberance than the social system could bear. — The minutes of this meeting are Appleton Papers collection, Massachusetts Historical Society
neighboring Connecticut, 99.8 percent, the assembled businessmen agreed the present system of schooling allowed too much to depend upon chance. It encouraged more entrepreneurial exuberance than the social system could bear. — The minutes of this meeting are Appleton Papers collection, Massachusetts Historical Society
110. Frederick W.
Taylor
The
first man on record to perceive how much additional production could be
extracted from close regulation of labor
was Frederick Winslow Taylor, son of a wealthy
Philadelphia lawyer. "What I demand of the worker," Taylor
said, "is not to produce any longer
by his own initiative, but to execute punctiliously the orders given down to
their minutest details."
The Taylors, a prominent Quaker family
from Germantown, Pennsylvania, had taken
Freddy to Europe for three years from 1869 to 1872, where he was
attending an aristocratic German academy
when von Moltke's Prussian blitzkrieg culminated in the French disaster at Sedan and a German Empire
was finally proclaimed, ending a thousand
years of disunion. Prussian schooling was the widely credited forge
which made those miracles possible. The
jubilation which spread through Germany underlined a presumably fatal difference between political
systems which disciplined with ruthless
efficiency, like Prussia's socialist paradise, and those devoted to
whimsy and luxury, like France's. The
lesson wasn't lost on little Fred.
Near the conclusion of his Principles of
Scientific Management '(1911), published thirty- nine years later, Taylor summarized the new
managerial discipline as follows:
1 .
A regimen of science, not rule of thumb.
2. An emphasis on harmony, not the discord
of competition.
3. An insistence on cooperation, not
individualism.
4. A fixation on maximum output.
5. The development of each man to his
greatest productivity.
Taylor's biographers, Wrege and Greenwood,
wrote:
He left us a great legacy. Frederick
Taylor advanced a total system of management, one which he built from pieces taken from
numerous others whom he rarely would credit....
His genius lies in being a missionary.
After Taylor's death in 1915, the
Frederick W. Taylor Cooperators were formed to
project his Scientific Management movement into the future. Frank Copley
called Taylor "a man whose heart
was aflame with missionary zeal." Much about this Quaker-turned- Unitarian, who married into an
Arbella-descended Puritan family before finally becoming an Episcopalian, bears decisively on the
shape schooling took in this country. Wrege and
Greenwood describe him as: "often arrogant, somewhat caustic, and
inflexible in how his system should be
implemented.... Taylor was cerebral; like a machine he was polished and he was also intellectual. ...Taylor's
brilliant reasoning was marred when he attempted to articulate it, for his delivery was often
demeaning, even derogatory at times."
Frank Gilbreth's 2 Motion Study says:
It is the never ceasing marvel concerning
this man that age cannot wither nor custom
stale his work. After many a weary day's study the investigator awakes
from a dream of greatness to find he has
only worked out a new proof for a problem Taylor has already solved. Time study, the instruction card,
functional foremanship, the differential rate
piece method of compensation, and numerous other scientifically derived
methods of decreasing costs and
increasing output and wages — these are by no means his only contributions to standardizing the
trades.
To fully grasp the effect of Taylor's
industrial evangelism on American national
schooling, you need to listen to him play teacher in his own words to
Schmidt at Bethlehem Steel in the
1890s:
Now
Schmidt, you are a first-class pig-iron handler and know your business well.
You have been handling at a rate of
twelve and a half tons per day. I have given considerable study to handling pig-iron, and feel you
could handle forty-seven tons of pig-iron per day if you really tried instead of twelve and a half
tons. Skeptical but willing, Schmidt
started to work, and all day long, and at regular intervals, was told by the men who stood over him with a
watch, "now pick up a pig and walk.
Now sit down and rest. Now walk — rest," etc. He worked when he was
told to work, and rested when he was
told to rest, and at half past five in the afternoon had his forty-seven tons loaded on the car.
The incident described above is,
incidentally, a fabrication. There was no Schmidt except in Taylor's mind, just as there was no close
observation of Prussian schools by Mann.
Below, he testifies before Congress in 1912:
There is a right way of forcing the shovel
into materials and many wrong ways. Now, the
way to shovel refractory stuff is to press the forearm hard against the
upper part of the right leg just below
the thigh, like this, take the end of the shovel in your right hand and when you push the shovel into the pile,
instead of using the muscular effort of the arms, which is tiresome, throw the weight of your
body on the shovel like this; that pushes your
shovel in the pile with hardly any exertion and without tiring the arms
in the least.
Harlow Person called Taylor's approach to
the simplest tasks of working life "a
meaningful and fundamental break with the past." Scientific
management, or Taylorism, had four
characteristics designed to make the worker "an interchangeable part of
an interchangeable machine making
interchangeable parts."
Since each quickly found its analogue in
scientific schooling, let me show them to you: 3 1) A mechanically controlled work pace; 2)
The repetition of simple motions; 3) Tools
and technique selected for the worker; 4) Only superficial attention is
asked from the worker, just enough to keep
up with the moving line. The connection of all to school procedure is apparent.
"In the past," Taylor wrote,
"Man has been first. In the future the system must be first." It was not sufficient to have physical movements
standardized; the standardized worker
"must be happy in his work," too, therefore his thought
processes also must be standardized. 4
Scientific management was applied wholesale in American industry in the decade after 1910. It spread quickly to
schools.
In the preface to the classic study on the
effects of scientific management on schooling in America, Education and the Cult of
Efficiency, 5 Raymond Callahan explains that when he set out to write, his intent was to explore
the origin and development of business values
in educational administration, an occurrence he tracks to about 1900.
Callahan wanted to know why school
administrators had adopted business practices and management parameters of assessment when "Education
is not a business. The school is not a factory."
Could the inappropriate procedure be explained
simply by a familiar process in which
ideas and values flow from high-status groups to those of lesser
distinction? As Callahan put it,
"It does not take profound knowledge of American education to know
that educators are, and have been, a
relatively low-status, low-power group." But the degree of intellectual domination shocked him:
What was unexpected was the extent, not only
of the power of business-industrial groups,
but of the strength of the business ideology... and the extreme weakness
and vulnerability of school
administrators. I had expected more professional autonomy and I was completely unprepared for the extent and
degree of capitulation by administrators to
whatever demands were made upon them. I was surprised and then dismayed
to learn how many decisions they made or
were forced to make, not on educational grounds, but as a means of appeasing their critics in
order to maintain their positions in the school, [emphasis added]
- The actual term "scientific management" was created by famous lawyer Louis Brandeis in 1910 for the Interstate Commerce Commission rate hearings. Brandeis understood thoroughly how a clever phrase could control public imagination.
- Gilbreth, the man who made the term "industrial engineering" familiar to the public, was a devotee ofTaylorism. His daughter wrote a best seller about the Gilbreth home, Cheaper By The Dozen, in which her father's penchant for refining work processes is recalled. Behind his back, Taylor ran Gilbreth down as a "fakir."
- List adapted from Melvin Kranzberg and Joseph Gies, By the Sweat of Thy Brow.
- Taylor was no garden-variety fanatic. He won the national doubles tennis title in 1881 with a racket of his own design, and pioneered slip-on shoes (to save time, of course). Being happy in your work was the demand of Bellamy and other leading socialist thinkers, otherwise you would have to be "adjusted" (hence the expression "well- adjusted"). Taylor concurred. 5
5.Callahan
, s analysis why schoolmen are always vulnerable is somewhat innocent and ivory
tower, and his recommendation for reform — to
effectively protect their revenue stream from criticism on the part of
the public — is simply tragic; but his gathering of data is matchless and
his judgment throughout in small matters
and large is consistently illuminating.
The
Adoption Of Business Organization By Schools
No comments:
Post a Comment