"The
Lung," Second Edition, 2014: "Nanoparticles [are] comparable in size to
subcellular structures...enabling their ready incorporation into
biological systems."
A 2017 study of 44 types of 15 traditional
vaccines, manufactured by leading global companies, has uncovered a very
troubling and previously unreported fact:
The vaccines are heavily contaminated with a variety of nanoparticles.
Many of the particles are metals.
We're talking about traditional vaccines, such as HPV, flu, Swine Flu, Hepatitis B, MMR, DPT, tetanus, etc.
To
begin to understand some of the destructive effects of contaminating
nanoparticles in vaccines, here is the groundbreaking 2017 study:
International Journal of Vaccines & Vaccination
Volume 4 Issue 1
January 23 2017
New Quality-Control Investigations on Vaccines:
Micro- and Nanocontamination
Antonietta M Gatti and Stefano Montanari
"The
analyses carried out show that in all samples checked vaccines contain
non biocompatible and bio-persistent foreign bodies which are not
declared by the Producers, against which the body reacts in any case.
This new investigation represents a new quality control that can be
adopted to assess the safety of a vaccine. Our hypothesis is that this
contamination is unintentional, since it is probably due to polluted
components or procedures of industrial processes (e.g. filtrations) used
to produce vaccines..."
Are the study authors leaving the door open to the possibility that the contamination is intentional?
"The
quantity of foreign bodies detected and, in some cases, their unusual
chemical compositions baffled us. The inorganic particles identified are
neither biocompatible nor biodegradable, that means that they are
biopersistent and can induce effects that can become evident either
immediately close to injection time or after a certain time from
administration. It is important to remember that particles (crystals and
not molecules) are bodies foreign to the organism and they behave as
such. More in particular, their toxicity is in some respects different
from that of the chemical elements composing them, adding to that
toxicity...they induce an inflammatory reaction."
"After being
injected, those microparticles, nanoparticles and aggregates can stay
around the injection site forming swellings and granulomas...But they
can also be carried by the blood circulation, escaping any attempt to
guess what will be their final destination...As happens with all foreign
bodies, particularly that small, they induce an inflammatory reaction
that is chronic because most of those particles cannot be degraded.
Furthermore, the protein-corona effect...due to a
nano-bio-interaction...can produce organic/inorganic composite particles
capable of stimulating the immune system in an undesirable way...It is
impossible not to add that particles the size often observed in vaccines
can enter cell nuclei and interact with the DNA..."
"In some
cases, e.g. as occurs with Iron and some Iron alloys, they can corrode
and the corrosion products exert a toxicity affecting the tissues..."
"Given
the contaminations we observed in all samples of human-use vaccines,
adverse effects after the injection of those vaccines are possible and
credible and have the character of randomness, since they depend on
where the contaminants are carried by the blood circulation. It is only
obvious that similar quantities of these foreign bodies can have a more
serious impact on very small organisms like those of children. Their
presence in the muscles...could heavily impair the muscle
functionality..."
"We come across particles with chemical
compositions, similar to those found in the vaccines we analyzed, when
we study cases of environmental contamination caused by different
pollution sources. In most circumstances, the combinations detected are
very odd as they have no technical use, cannot be found in any material
handbook and look like the result of the random formation occurring, for
example, when waste is burnt. In any case, whatever their origin, they
should not be present in any injectable medicament, let alone in
vaccines, more in particular those meant for infants."
This 2017 study opens up a whole new field: the investigation of nanoparticles in vaccines where none were expected.
Such particles are not medicine in any sense of the word.
Many
legal and scientific "experts" assert the State has a right to mandate
vaccines and force them on the population. But these contaminating
nanoparticles are not vaccines or medicines. Only a lunatic would
defend the right of the State to inject them.
Here is another
section from the 2017 study. Trade names of vaccines, and compositions
of the nanoparticle contaminants are indicated. Take a deep breath and
buckle up:
"...further presence of micro-, sub-micro- and
nanosized, inorganic, foreign bodies (ranging from 100nm to about ten
microns) was identified in all cases [all 44 vaccines], whose presence
was not declared in the leaflets delivered in the package of the
product..."
"...single particles, cluster of micro- and
nanoparticles (less than 100nm) and aggregates...debris of Aluminum,
Silicon, Magnesium and Titanium; of Iron, Chromium, Silicon and Calcium
particles...arranged in a cluster, and Aluminum-Copper debris...in an
aggregate."
"...the particles are surrounded and embedded in a
biological substrate. In all the samples analyzed, we identified
particles containing: Lead (Typhym, Cervarix, Agrippal S1, Meningitec,
Gardasil) or stainless steel (Mencevax, Infarix Hexa, Cervarix.
Anatetall, Focetria, Agrippal S1, Menveo, Prevenar 13, Meningitec,
Vaxigrip, Stamaril Pasteur, Repevax and MMRvaxPro)."
"...particles of Tungsten identified in drops of Prevenar and Infarix (Aluminum, Tungsten, Calcium chloride)."
"...singular debris found in Repevax (Silicon, Gold, Silver) and Gardasil (Zirconium)."
"Some
metallic particles made of Tungsten or stainless steel were also
identified. Other particles containing Zirconium, Hafnium, Strontium and
Aluminum (Vivotif, Meningetec); Tungsten, Nickel, Iron (Priorix,
Meningetec); Antimony (Menjugate kit); Chromium (Meningetec); Gold or
Gold, Zinc (Infarix Hexa, Repevax), or Platinum, Silver, Bismuth, Iron,
Chromium (MMRvaxPro) or Lead,Bismuth (Gardasil) or Cerium (Agrippal S1)
were also found. The only Tungsten appears in 8/44 vaccines, while
Chromium (alone or in alloy with Iron and Nickel) in 25/44. The
investigations revealed that some particles are embedded in a biological
substrate, probably proteins, endo-toxins and residues of bacteria. As
soon as a particle comes in contact with proteic fluids, a
nano-bio-interaction...occurs and a 'protein corona' is formed...The
nano-bio-interaction generates a bigger-sized compound that is not
biodegradable and can induce adverse effects, since it is not recognized
as self by the body."
"...examples of these
nano-bio-interactions. Aggregates can be seen (stable composite
entities) containing particles of Lead in Meningitec... of stainless
steel (Iron, Chromium and Nickel...) and of Copper, Zinc and Lead in
Cervarix...Similar aggregates, though in different situations (patients
suffering from leukemia or cryoglobulinemia), have already been
described in literature."
I'm sure you've read official
assurances that vaccine-manufacturing problems are "rare." You can file
those pronouncements along with other medical lies.
"I'd like the heavy metal sandwich on rye, please. And instead of serving it on a plate, can you inject it?"
Several vital questions demanding answers spring from the findings of this 2017 study:
Are some of these nanoparticles intentionally placed in vaccines?
Does
the standard manufacturing process for traditional vaccines INEVITABLY
lead to dangerous and destructive nano-contamination?
New
nano-technology is already being employed to create several
vaccines---supposedly "improving effectiveness." In fact, the coming
COVID-19 vaccine may be a nano-type. Does this manufacturing process
carry with it the unavoidable effect of unleashing a hurricane of
nanoparticle contaminants?
How many cases of childhood brain damage and autism can be laid at the door of nanoparticle contamination?
And
finally, where are these contaminated vaccines manufactured? The above
study did not attempt to discover this. It was outside the scope of
the research. It's common knowledge that, for example, in the case of
the US, vaccines or their components, are, in many instances, not
produced domestically. Where does this put control of safety? In, say,
China, where there have been numerous pharmaceutical scandals connected
to contamination of products?
The vaccine establishment
does not show the slightest interest in answering any of these
questions. They are busy pretending the questions don't exist.
Trusting these people would be suicidal. |
No comments:
Post a Comment