The reference here is an analysis of mortality data by Mark Blaxill and Amy Becker, "Lessons from the Lockdown," posted at Children's Health Defense on June 18:
"But
the pandemic experience has brought on a surprising effect on this
expected death rate among children. Starting in early March, expected
deaths began a sharp decline, from an expected level of around 700
deaths per week to well under 500 by mid-April and throughout May."
"As
untimely deaths spiked among the elderly in Manhattan nursing homes and
in similar settings all over the country, something mysterious was
saving the lives of children. As springtime in America came along with
massive disruptions in family life amid near universal lockdowns,
roughly 30% fewer children died."
"Virtually the entire change
came from infants. Somehow, the changing pattern of American life during
the lockdowns has been saving the lives of hundreds of infants, over
200 per week."
"One very clear change that has received publicity
is that public health officials are bemoaning the sharp decline in
infant vaccinations as parents are not taking their infants into
pediatric offices for their regular well-baby checks. In the May 15
issue of the CDC Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), a group
of authors from the CDC and Kaiser Permanente reported a sharp decline
in provider orders for vaccines as well as a decline in pediatric
vaccine doses administered. These declines began in early March, around
the time infant deaths began declining."
Mustn't report that on the nightly news. A leak of truth might turn into a river.
The very thought that vaccines are harmful enough to cause death, and withholding them would align with the Hippocratic Oath?
"Say
Bob, here's an interesting item we could run on the broadcast tonight.
Deaths of infants are down during the pandemic, and so are
vaccinations."
"I see. So you want to end up announcing Frisbee
contests during picnics in the park? And I'll be producing free YouTube
videos featuring cats doing somersaults? You're drinking again,
right?"
For those who can't bring themselves to even stick a toe
in the waters of the evidence against vaccines, because their cult of
science forbids it on pain of death...and who, likewise, salute all
public health directives concerning the "pandemic," like good little
boys and girls, here is a backgrounder I call...
To the "educated" potato heads: science is not a political hierarchy
Remember the science bloggers living in mommy's basement? Now we have the new COVID version.
"Who's
a Communist?" "I'm a Communist." "Who's a Communist?" "I'm a
Communist." It's fun. It's a new toy to play with. Capitalism is
out. Old-fashioned.
"Mao killed 60 million of his own people." "Who's Mao?"
So
far, I've written about 150 articles on the preposterous COVID fakery.
In this piece, I'm going to discuss political hierarchy.
Which
is how Tony Fauci got to where he is. It has nothing to do with
knowledge or skill in handling purported "outbreaks." And if it weren't
Fauci, it would be someone else. Another person on television standing
next to the president. Because that is the structure, the pecking
order. There are slots to fill. And there must be a central
mouthpiece.
"Wanted. Spokesperson to represent The Word."
Whose word?
Do
you really believe that, at the beginning of this whole COVID
operation...Fauci is sinking himself deep in collaborative meetings with
scientists to come up with a plan? There is back and forth? Opinions
are challenged? Data are examined? Objections are made? Fauci listens
to a representative from Sweden, where the government is taking a
different path? He listens to a pro like Dr. Scott Atlas? Economic
advisors are in the room, making calculations on the devastating effects
of a three-month national lockdown? Fact-checkers, not bullshitters,
look into the past track record of that abject failure, Neil Ferguson,
who is predicting on his worn-out computer that two million people in
America will die---which is the whole rationale for ordering lockdowns?
Someone who is actually intelligent and honest, who works for a US
intelligence agency, steps in and questions the event that kicked off
all the false hysteria---the Chinese Regime, an overt enemy of the US,
locking down 50 million people overnight for no medical reason and
sending a fake signal to the WHO and CDC that this is the new model for
control? Do you think any of this happens in a room?
Do you
think your college education and what you think you know has the
slightest connection to this situation, because you took a biology
course and a chemistry course and can find your way around a computer?
Do
you have any idea how much counter-information which contradicts your
gnome-hero, Fauci, has been piling up in the past three months, and how
much of it has been coming from people with all sorts of credentials you
would otherwise admire? Do you? Do you know how much of this
information has been suppressed by the press? No, you don't. You're a
potato head.
The discovery of a new virus has been challenged.
The PCR and antibody tests have been discredited as a legitimate avenue
of diagnosis; along with widespread eyeball diagnosis, and coding
patients as COVID who really have other unrelated conditions, and
counting non-COVID deaths as COVID, this means all the case numbers are
meaningless. The overwhelming number of people dying of the "pandemic"
are the elderly, who have years of serious health problems, who have
been treated with many toxic drugs, who are then terrified by receiving a
false COVID diagnosis, who are isolated from family and friends, and
die. Many old people in these straits are put on ventilators, heavily
sedated, and die from the treatment.
But none of this information
that challenges the official picture is shoved in the face of public
health officials, with a government demand that they respond openly, and
in detail. Why? Because the political hierarchy is geared to close
out dissent. This has nothing to do with science.
Science
involves questions and rebuttals and counter-opinion, and studies that
test other options and views. Science is about confirming or denying
official positions through analysis and experiment. It isn't about who
has wormed his way to the top of the food chain. It isn't about who is
secretly backing the Mouthpiece. Aka Bill Gates.
Some potato
heads look at things this way: whatever Trump is saying is a lie. The
person who opposes Trump must be right. That person appears to be
Fauci. Therefore, Fauci is stating SCIENCE. End of story.
Very
few, if any potato heads are aware of the following statement, from a
woman who has scrutinized more medical studies than at least 99.9
percent of the doctors on the planet:
"It is simply no longer
possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or
to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical
guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached
slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New
England Journal of Medicine." -Marcia Angell, MD ("Drug Companies and
Doctors: A story of Corruption." NY Review of Books, Jan. 15, 2009.)
Very
few, if any potato heads are aware of the review published in the
Journal of the American Medical Association on July 26, 2000, by the
revered public health expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Public
Health, Dr. Barbara Starfield. Starfield concluded that, every year in
the US, the medical system kills 225,000 people. (Review: "Is US Health
Really the Best in the World?"
Those are two examples of what we
could call counter-science. They take the mainstream to task. They
deliver blows to official positions. THIS is what "Fauci-science"
should have been subjected to, from the get-go. And this is what
"vaccine science"---the holy of holies---should be subjected to.
Very
few, if any, potato heads are aware of the case-number game, through
which a locale which is coming out of lockdown and opening up the
economy is punished. It's simple. Expand worthless testing. New case
numbers will automatically rise. The News will report these scary
numbers. Of course, when new case numbers are expanded, the death rate
automatically goes down. So the News omits that fact.
Potato
heads tend to admire censorship, never having learned how deep the Bill
of Rights actually goes. Truth should win out over dissent, as far as
the potato heads are concerned. Whose truth? Theirs, naturally.
Those
potato heads who claim to favor socialism (aka Communism) have no idea
that the US government is following the lockdown model of a Chinese
regime that secured its grip on power, under Mao, by killing 40-65
million of its own people.
Rule: a political hierarchy depends on the support of potato heads.
The
federal agencies that stand behind the US "coronavirus task force" ARE a
chunk of the political hierarchy. Their basic agenda is CONTROL.
Potato
heads don't worry about control. They think they're above it all and
compliant. An odd mix, but it works for them. "How can I be at fault
if I go along with the directives?" Hundred of millions of Chinese
people ran that question through their minds until it was too late.
"Who's a potato head?" "I'm a potato head." "Who's a potato head?" "I'm a potato head."
What
the major media are giving us these days is wartime messaging; it
always comes in the form of an appeal for unity. But in this case, the
war is being fought by the government against the domestic population.
So we're being asked to work together against ourselves. Anyone who recognizes this is labeled an outlier.
By the potato heads.
The political hierarchy which they adore, which they call science, has them in the crosshairs, along with everyone else.
This
is the hierarchy which we must dismantle and take down and expose. The
leaders, along with their freeloader bureaucracies, are a putrid mix of
unknowing and evil fascists.
In America, the National Institutes
of Health and the CDC could disappear tomorrow and nothing untoward
would happen. In fact, automatically, improvements would occur.
Subconsciously, the population of the country would breathe a sigh of
relief.
"Finally. Good news. No potatoes today."
For
many potato heads, the presence of Dr. Fauci making pronouncements to
the nation is a no-brainer, in every possible sense of that term. It's
as if there is a lab where official items are produced: ideas,
statements, positions, and even people. Fauci was one of those items. A
lab made him, he was and is official, and that's the end of that.
But it isn't, it's just the beginning.
The Official is being taken apart. |
No comments:
Post a Comment