2496-2498: Reply About NLA and Confusion of Law from Lincoln County Watch
By Anna Von Reitz
Some people have identified me as an
"enemy" of the National Liberty Alliance (NLA) and that's not what goes
on between them and me, at least not from my side of the issues.
I want to make it very clear that
from a constitutional standpoint, and from within a construct of
American Common Law, NLA is most often absolutely right about everything
they publish.
However --- and this is a big
"however"---- when we address something like THE STATE OF MICHIGAN
SUPERIOR COURT, we are facing foreign commercial corporation tribunals,
not erring
American courts.
American courts.
And that difference of discernment is what separates me from the NLA.
Commercial tribunals naturally
function under the global law of commerce, not American Common Law. So
it makes no sense to send them Writs of Mandamus or Coram Nobis or enter
pleas related to constitutional guarantees.
These foreign courts are operating
in foreign jurisdictions and under foreign law and the subjects and
PERSONS they address are foreign, too.
In a way, NLA makes the same mistake as the Colorado Nine.
They assume that all these courts
are American courts functioning in error, when in fact these are not
American Common Law Courts and never have been, even though they are
staffed by Americans.
Perhaps that is what is so confusing.
If you stop and think a moment you will realize that not everything goes on in the realm of the land and soil.
Some people actually do make their
livelihoods on the sea, and they have to have courts that deal with
those special issues and administer the international Law of the Sea.
Some people operate as commercial corporations and need to have COURTS
to sort out their differences.
The problem isn't that their courts are malfunctioning.
The problem is that the American
Common Law Courts, that are supposed to be addressing the needs of the
people of this country, are rare as hen's teeth.
So, slowly, over time, due to our
own inaction and ignorance, our courts have shut down and in their
absence, the quasi-military "district" courts have been pressed into
service to ensure public safety. Or so they say.
They can't trespass onto our soil,
so they have to presume instead that we are undeclared "persons" --
unknowns -- and play a little Pretend Game. Instead of addressing us,
they address Foreign Situs Trusts named after us (Territorial Courts) or
they address various kinds of CORPORATIONS named after us (Municipal
COURTS).
Via these devices called "Special
Purpose Vehicles" they traffic us into their foreign jurisdiction and
subject "what appears to be us"--- our names construed to be the names
of trusts and estates and public transmitting utilities, etc.,--- to
their foreign forms of law --- but in fact, so far as they are
concerned, the living man or woman is never in their court at all.
We don't exist. We are not "recognizable" by their courts.
And this accounts for the odd
phenomenon that judges appear not to hear what you say in their courts.
They don't. When push comes to shove, they can't. Because if they do,
they have to admit that they are engaged in fraudulent proceedings
against a man or woman who is being impersonated as a thing and who is
suffering the crime of barratry at their hands.
The way out of this is to remove
yourself and your names from their presumptions by declaring your proper
political status, recording this declaration, and running your own
American Common Law Courts.
Then the NLA's Writs will have meaning and traction and enforcement again.
Not until.
In my discussions with former judges
and former Bar Attorneys there always comes a point where they bow
their heads and admit that they always knew that what they were doing
was wrong, but they didn't see a way out of it.
There had to be some kind of law and order, even if it was--paradoxically-- imposed by fraud.
They try to excuse themselves by making reference to "the Law of Necessity".
Once things deteriorated to this
point, they were placed in a Double Bind. They couldn't very well
explain that they were participating in crime in order to preserve some
kind of law and order, could they?
So a deep and unnatural silence descended and we were left to figure things out for ourselves --- and we have done so.
We are declaring and recording our
political status, forming our State Assemblies, forming our jury pools
and electing our court officials (known as Justices) and yes, our Common
Law Sheriffs. American Common Law Courts are opening up again and
being serviced by Counselors of Law.
Ironically, once the members of NLA
figure out what has been wrong all along, once they realize that we were
always our own answer, and that our State Assembly Courts are their own
long-lost missing American Common Law Courts---- the ones that they
should be addressing all their elegant writs to --- you will hear the
stampede from all corners of the country as they rush to come home and
identify themselves as the men and women who are owed every jot of the
Constitutional Guarantees.
Can this be accomplished
peacefully? Yes. In fact, Ex Parte Milligan, 71 US 2, (1866) put the
answer in place when the problem all began. When our civilian courts
open to serve the American People, the military and commercial courts
must stand down.
So, full speed ahead and straight on to morning. Drop what you are doing and go to: www.TheAmericanStatesAssembly.
And yes, NLA members are as welcome
to participate in this as everyone else. Maybe more so, as their
expertise as constitutional jurists and researchers is needed and
welcome in our courts.
----------------------------
See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Reply About Colorado Nine
By Anna Von Reitz
I have sent numerous letters and cards to the Colorado Nine, but I haven't had a reply back in over two years, similar to what happened with Chief LaVern Fasthorse. I was able to correspond for a while, and in Fasthorse's case, talk on the phone, and all of a sudden --- nothing.
These men are political prisoners every bit as much as any other political prisoners have ever been.
But they are still making some wrong
assumptions--- they now know, apparently, something I tried to tell
them five years ago --- that the public offices are vacant.
God willing and more Americans continue to step up, those "vacated" offices will fill up and our country can get back on track.
Part of what is so bitter for me
about the whole Colorado Nine Debacle, is that it could have been
avoided and those good men could be filling those vacated public
offices, instead of sitting in a foreign jail.
Stephen-John Nalty would make a fine constitutional Justice of the Peace.
However, they still don't appear to
realize that the "courts" they are addressing are private tribunals run
by foreign, for-profit corporations that are essentially no different
from any other commercial corporation ---- just in the business of
providing "governmental services".
The State of Colorado, Inc. is
running a private in-house corporate tribunal and telling its employees
and their dependents when to stand up and when to sit down.
If you aren't an employee or dependent of the State of Colorado, why would you stay five minutes in their court?
You wouldn’t.
Why would you attack a foreign corporation’s in-house tribunal, either, and try to tell it what to do or how to do it?
You wouldn’t. You’d have no reason to.
Yet, that’s what the Colorado Nine did.
They “transgressed” and threatened
the Municipal COURT of the STATE OF COLORADO under the false assumption
that it had something to do with them.
Sad to say, they created their own
problem, because they couldn’t or wouldn’t accept the fact that that
COURT had nothing to do with them at all, and what they needed to do was
to work on restoring their own court system, instead.
Self-governance is such a radical concept.
You have to declare and record your
own political status. You have to assemble your State Assembly, form
your Juror Pools, hold your Elections, fill your public offices, and so
on and on.
It’s a lot of hard work. And it even costs some money.
Most Americans starting out to reclaim their heritage don’t have a foggy notion what that heritage is.
They don’t know the structure of their own government.
They don’t know the difference between a U.S. Citizen and a US citizen and a State Citizen.
They have no idea that their government was never fully restored after the Civil War.
They have been kept in the dark, used and abused by their own employees, for well over a century.
And only now are we coming out of the fog.
Did the Municipal COURT grossly over-react?
Yes.
Did these men commit any actual crime under the Law of the Land?
No.
So what are they doing in a foreign jail?
Wasting time.
Unfortunately, until they realize what they did wrong— nobody else can apologize for them.
The rational thing would be for them
to write to the State of Colorado Congressional Delegation and ask them
to intercede— explain that they are Coloradans who got confused and
misaddressed the Municipal COURT by mistake.
Pure and simple.
They didn’t actually cause any harm.
And since the members of Congress
run the Municipal Government, they are the ones who can tell the
Municipal COURT to pardon or parole the Colorado Nine.
Who knows? If the publicity for
them is good (carrot) and the political backlash is awful (stick) they
might be persuaded to ask the Governor to commute those cruel and
unusual punishments.
But that is about the only possible
answer left because they asked for and received a jury trial and
accepted — knowingly or unknowingly — that those foreign Persons merely
residing in the State of Colorado, were their peers, even if in fact
they were not and never could be.
At that point, the Court’s hands are
tied. There is no viable appeal process from a jury trial except the
presentation of new exculpatory evidence justifying a new trial or a
pardon or commutation of sentence.
I started working on a pardon for
all those involved and worked on it off and on as I could for three
months, only to find out that Nalty and Doucette were still busy filing
Motions and continuing to address the COURT as if it were their court
and as if they ever had recognizable Constitutional guarantees in that
COURT, etc., etc.
That is, they continued to ignore
everything I told them, continued to assume they could access
Constitutional guarantees while nodding their heads and agreeing that
they are US citizens.
How many times do I have to say this?
U.S. Citizens and “citizens of the
United States” have no Constitutional guarantees. All they have are
“Equal Civil Rights” and even those are suspended right now because of
the Plandemic.
The only people who can enforce the Constitutions are the People — the American State Citizens.
And in order to be a State Citizen you have to declare and record your political status and join your State Assembly.
If the Colorado Nine had been
listening to me, they would have declared and recorded their political
status and formed the Colorado Assembly and been running their own
courts by now.
If they had listened to me they
wouldn’t have ever addressed the STATE OF COLORADO, and having made that
tragic mistake, they would contact the Colorado Congressional
Delegation and explain what happened and ask for their sentence to be
commuted.
If anyone can get my answer to Nalty, please do.
But success is predicated on these
men realizing that they addressed the wrong court in the wrong
jurisdiction and their apologizing for that mistake. Until they fully
realize that yes, they did something wrong, their only chance of walking
free is foreclosed.
While they continue to rant and
blame and accuse and make constitutional claims, it shows that they
still don’t understand why what they did was wrong. They are continuing
to make the same mistake that got them arrested in the first place.
----------------------------
See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
Daylight in the Swamps, Sorcha Faal.....
By Anna Von Reitz
The court case Jacobson v. Massachusetts has nothing to do with "American Citizens" ---- only U.S. Citizens.
Can't you tell the difference
between "America" --- The United States and The United States of America
--- and "the" US and "the" United States of America?
Completely different beasties. I
just named four completely different entities. Two of them are
instrumentalities of the sovereign States and are as American as apple
pie. The other two are names used by two foreign governments doing
business "under our names" and they aren't "American" at all.
Can you figure out this con game or are you part of it?
You keep mischaracterizing
everything "the US" does as something "the Americans" are doing. Please
leave us out of it? It's not us.
So far as we are concerned FDR was
no hero. In fact, we call him the "King Rat". And far from saving our
country from anything, both he and his Cousin Teddy, set us up for the
Great Depression and everything that has gone on here afterward.
Hear that, Sorcha? The Roosevelts
stink, stank, stunk. They were and are far lower than skunks, or even
snakes in the bottom of a deep wagon rut.
We know what went on. We know who
did it. We know where, when, and why --- and that knowledge is not
likely to depart from us.
Speaking for myself and every other
truly enlightened American, when this is over with, I am going to go
looking for Franklin Delano Roosevelt's grave, and if at all possible, I
intend to spray all over it.
Nobody in their right mind is going to trust anything the British Crown Corp is selling and that includes vaccines.
----------------------------
See this article and over 2400 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com
To support this work look for the PayPal buttons on this website.
How do we use your donations? Find out here.
No comments:
Post a Comment