The US National Toxicology Program (NTP)
Review of Fluoride Neurotoxicity: Presumed Hazard to Humans
The
National Toxicology Program is an inter-agency program headquartered
at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS). The
NTP provides toxicological evaluations on substances of public health
concern.
On October 22, the
DRAFT NTP Monograph on the Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects, was released and stated:
“NTP
concludes that fluoride is presumed to be a cognitive
neurodevelopmental hazard to
humans. This conclusion is based on a
consistent pattern of findings in human studies across
several different populations showing that higher fluoride exposure is
associated with decreased IQ or other cognitive impairments in
children…”
On November
6, the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) held a public meeting to share
the findings of the NTP report, and to start their review of the
report. Chris Neurath, FAN’s Science Director, and
Bill Hirzy PhD (FAN Board Member) attended this meeting. Read
Chris’ review here.
FAN nominated
fluoride for review by NTP back in 2015 and NTP accepted. They
systematically reviewed all the available evidence of fluoride
neurotoxicity up through August 2019. This cut-off date
means the three most recent high-quality studies were not included
(Green 2019: Riddell 2019: Till 2020
(published ahead of print in Nov 2019).
The report
identified 149 published human neurotoxicity studies, and 339 animal
experiment studies deemed relevant. Their consistency in finding
neurotoxic harm, especially lowered IQ in the human studies,
was striking. The NTP review recognized 18 of the human neurobehavioral
studies in children as being relatively high quality. Every one of the
18 found statistically significant neurobehavioral harm. Not a single
study rated high quality failed to find a
neurotoxic effect from fluoride.
This finding
undermines fluoridation defenders frequently citing the Broadbent 2015
study, which found no effect, to claim there is no clear evidence of
fluoride neurotoxicity. The NTP rated Broadbent
2015 as relatively low quality and high risk of bias so gave it little
weight compared to the numerous higher quality studies.
The review
noted, “Many of the studies (n = 49) included in the entire human body
of evidence were initially published in a foreign language (mainly
Chinese) and translated
by the Fluoride Action Network.” These translations were expensive,
but necessary. FAN was able to do this because of the donations from
those who put their trust in us over many years.
The NTP
review does have a serious problem, however, in what appears to be a
last-ditch effort to buy time for fluoridation. Without any reasonable
justification, the NTP review claims the evidence
for neurotoxicity at exposure levels similar to those in the USA from
fluoridated water is “inconsistent”. The review therefore suggests that
no conclusion can be made about whether fluoride is causing any
neurotoxic harm at levels experienced by people with
fluoridated water. Even before consideration of the three most recent
studies done in Canada and the USA, which are clearly at levels relevant
to fluoridation, this argument “holds no water”. Of the 18 high
quality studies in children, 9 were at exposure
levels equivalent to those experienced by at least some people in the
USA with fluoridated water. Every single one of these 9 studies found a
statistically significant lowering of IQ, increase of ADHD, or other
adverse effect. The Green 2019 study was one
of the 9, and it indisputably found lowered IQ from artificially
fluoridated water at the same levels as in the USA.
The unfounded
NTP claim that the evidence is “inconsistent” at levels of fluoride
exposure in the USA is further debunked by a comprehensive independent
review of fluoride neurotoxicity published just
yesterday [Grandjean
2019]. Dr. Philippe Grandjean is one of the world’s leading
experts in developmental neurotoxicity. Using methods sanctioned by the
National Academies of Sciences and EPA, he estimated the level of
fluoride that would cause a harmful loss of IQ based
on the recent highest quality studies. The levels were well below 0.7
mg/L fluoride in drinking water or its equivalent in urine fluoride,
even before any safety factors were applied. Grandjean’s conclusion is
clear: “… there is little doubt that developmental
neurotoxicity is a serious risk associated with elevated fluoride
exposure … due to community water fluoridation….”
In his full
conclusions, he further explains the strength of the evidence and
suggests the neurotoxic harms from existing studies may be, if anything,
underestimates of the harm.
Previous
assessment of neurotoxicity risks associated with elevated fluoride
intake relied on cross-sectional and ecological epidemiology studies and
findings from experimental
studies of elevated exposures. The evidence base has greatly expanded
in recent years, with 14 cross-sectional studies since 2012, and now
also three prospective studies of high quality and documentation of
individual exposure levels.
Thus, there is little doubt that developmental neurotoxicity is a serious risk associated with elevated fluoride exposure, whether
due to community water fluoridation, natural fluoride
release from soil minerals, or tea consumption, especially when the
exposure occurs during early development. Even the most informative
epidemiological studies involve some uncertainties,
but imprecision of the exposure assessment most likely results in an
underestimation of the risk.
[Grandjean
2019]
The NTP
review of fluoride neurotoxicity comes from the most authoritative US
government source. It found extensive, consistent, and clear evidence
that fluoride harms the developing brains of children.
However, in its discussion of the relevance to artificial water
fluoridation it strays from objective analysis. Grandjean’s careful
review corrects this problem.
FAN will be
bringing Grandjean’s review and our own comments to the NAS committee
that is peer-reviewing the NTP report. We believe an honest and
responsible assessment of the scientific evidence would
conclude that artificial water fluoridation is currently causing loss
of IQ and other neurotoxic harm in the USA and wherever fluoridation is
practiced.
Thank you,
Chris NeurathResearch Director
No comments:
Post a Comment