Part One: TESTIMONYby His ExcellencyCarlo Maria Viganò Titular Archbishop ofUlpiana Apostolic Nuncio

1TESTIMONYby His ExcellencyCarlo Maria Viganò Titular Archbishop ofUlpiana Apostolic Nuncio In this tragic momentfor the Church in various parts of the world —the United States, Chile, Honduras, Australia, etc. —bishops have a very grave responsibility. I am thinking in particular of the United States of America, where I was sent as Apostolic Nuncio by Pope Benedict XVI on October
19, 2011, the memorial feast of the FirstNorth American Martyrs. The Bishops of the United States are called, and I with them, to follow the example of these first martyrs who brought the Gospel to the lands of America, to be credible witnesses of the immeasurable love of Christ, the Way, the Truth and the Life. Bishops and priests, abusing their authority, have committed horrendous crimes to the detriment of their faithful, minors, innocent victims, and young men eager to offer their lives to the Church, or by their silence have not prevented that such crimes continue tobe perpetrated.To restore the beauty of holiness to the face of the Bride of Christ,which is terribly disfigured by so many abominable crimes, and if we truly want to free the Church from the fetid swamp into which she has fallen, we must have the courage totear down the culture of secrecy and publicly confess the truths we have kept hidden. We must teardown the conspiracy of silence with which bishops and priests have protected themselves at the expense oftheir faithful, a conspiracy of silence that in the eyes of the world risks making the Church look like a sect, a conspiracy of silence not so dissimilar from the one that prevails in the mafia. “Whatever you havesaid in the dark ... shall be proclaimed from the housetops” (Lk. 12:3). I had always believed and hoped that the hierarchy of the Church could find within itself the spiritual resources and strength to tellthe whole truth, to amend and to renew itself. That is why, even though I had repeatedly been asked to do so, I always avoided making statements to the media, even when it would have been my right to do so, in order to defend myself against the calumnies published about me, even by high-ranking prelates of the Roman Curia. But now that the corruption has reached the very top of the Church’s hierarchy,my conscience dictates that I reveal those truths regarding the heart-breaking case of the Archbishop Emeritus of Washington, D.C., Theodore McCarrick, which I came to know in the course of the duties entrusted to me by St. John Paul II, as Delegate for Pontifical Representations,from 1998 to 2009, and by Pope Benedict XVI, as Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America,from October 19, 2011 untilend of May 2016. As Delegate for Pontifical Representations in the Secretariat of State, myresponsibilities were not limited to the Apostolic Nunciatures, but also included the staff of the Roman Curia (hires, promotions, informationalprocesses on candidates to the episcopate, etc.) and the examination of delicate cases, including those regarding cardinals and bishops, that were entrusted to the Delegate by the Cardinal Secretary of State or by the Substitute of the Secretariat of State.To dispel suspicions insinuated in several recent articles, I will immediately say that the Apostolic Nuncios in the United States, Gabriel Montalvo and Pietro Sambi, both prematurelydeceased, did not fail to inform the Holy See immediately,as soon as they learned of Archbishop McCarrick’s gravely immoral behavior with seminarians and priests. Indeed, according to what Nuncio Pietro Sambi wrote, Father Boniface Ramsey, O.P.’s letter, dated November 22, 2000, was written at the request of the late Nuncio Montalvo.In the letter, FatherRamsey, who had been a professor at the diocesan seminary in Newark from the end of the ’80s until 1996, affirms that there was a recurring rumor in the seminary that the
2Archbishop “shared hisbed with seminarians,” inviting five at a time to spend the weekend with him at his beach house. And he added that he knew a certain number of seminarians, some of whom were later ordained priests for the Archdiocese of Newark, who had been invited to this beach houseand had shared a bed with the Archbishop. The office that I held at the time was not informed of any measure taken by the Holy See after those chargeswere brought by Nuncio Montalvo at the end of 2000, when CardinalAngelo Sodanowas Secretary of State. Likewise, Nuncio Sambi transmitted to the Cardinal Secretary of State,Tarcisio Bertone, an Indictment Memorandum against McCarrick by the priest Gregory Littleton of the diocese of Charlotte, who was reduced to the lay state fora violation of minors, together with two documents from the same Littleton, in which he recounted his tragic story of sexual abuse by the then-Archbishop of Newark and several other priests and seminarians. The Nuncio added that Littleton had already forwarded his Memorandum to about twenty people, including civil and ecclesiastical judicial authorities, police and lawyers, in June 2006, and that it was therefore very likely that the news would soon be made public. He therefore called for a prompt intervention by the Holy See. In writing upa memo1on these documents that were entrusted to me, as Delegate for Pontifical Representations, on December 6, 2006, I wrote tomy superiors, Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone and the Substitute Leonardo Sandri, that the facts attributed to McCarrick by Littleton were of such gravity and vileness as to provoke bewilderment, a sense of disgust, deep sorrow and bitterness in the reader, and that they constituted the crimes of seducing, requesting depravedacts of seminarians and priests, repeatedly and simultaneously with several people, derision of a young seminarian who tried to resist the Archbishop’s seductions in the presence of two other priests, absolution of the accomplicesin these depraved acts, sacrilegious celebration of the Eucharist with the same priests after committing such acts. In my memo, which I delivered on that same December 6, 2006 to my direct superior, the Substitute Leonardo Sandri, I proposed the following considerations and course of action to my superiors: •Given that it seemed a new scandal of particular gravity, as it regarded a cardinal, was going to be addedto the many scandals for the Church in the United States,•and that, since this matter had to do with a cardinal, and according to can. 1405 § 1, No. 2 ̊, “ipsius Romani Pontificis dumtaxat ius est iudicandi”; •I proposed that an exemplarymeasure be taken againstthe Cardinal that could have amedicinal function, to prevent future abuses against innocent victims and alleviate the very serious scandal for the faithful, who despite everything continued to love and believe in the Church. I added that it would be salutary if, for once, ecclesiastical authority would intervene before the civil authorities and, if possible, before the scandal had broken out in the press. This could have restored some dignity to a Church so sorely tried and humiliated by so many abominable acts on the part of some pastors. If this were done, thecivil authority would no longer have to judge a cardinal, but a pastor with whom the Church had already taken appropriate measures to prevent the cardinal from abusing his authority and continuing to destroy innocent victims. 1All the memos, letters and other documentation mentioned here are available at the Secretariat of State of the Holy Seeor at the Apostolic Nunciature in Washington, D.C.