Ex-Chiropractor Fined $100,000 For Posting “Anti-Vaccine” Information on Social Media
By
Arjun Walia
Arjun Walia
In Brief
- The Facts:A former chiropractor has been fined $100,000 for posting information about vaccines to her social media pages.
- Reflect On:How can someone be fined for questioning vaccine safety when a plethora of science already does so? Why does the mainstream use terms like "anti-vax" instead of addressing the actual points made by vaccine safety advocated? Why do they use ridicule?
“Anti-vaccine”
is a term used by the medical establishment and mainstream media to
point a finger at and ridicule those who question the safety of
vaccines. Any information that’s shared on social media today that
simply questions the safety of vaccines and even uses credible sources,
like peer-reviewed research and testimony from scientists and doctors,
is almost instantaneously censored. This is disturbing, as it doesn’t
allow for the free exploration of information that makes a big impact on
public health.
The truth is, if vaccines were
completely safe, then the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA)
would not have already paid approximately $4 billion to families of
vaccine injured children. And, that $4 billion statistic comes from a
database that records an estimated 1 percent of vaccine injured
children, because only 1 percent of vaccine injuries are archived and
reported. (source)
There are countless examples that
clearly justify the questioning of vaccine safety, as this is legitimate
and scientific. One of the best examples I like to use to make this
point clear is aluminum.
A study published in 2011 makes the issue quite clear:
Aluminum is an experimentally demonstrated neurotoxin and the most commonly used vaccine adjuvant. Despite almost 90 years of widespread use of aluminum adjuvants, medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor. There is also a concerning scarcity of data on toxicology and pharmacokinetics of these compounds. In spite of this, the notion that aluminum in vaccines is safe appears to be widely accepted. Experimental research, however, clearly shows that aluminum adjuvants have a potential to induce serious immunological disorders in humans. (source)
The key takeaway here is “medical science’s understanding about their mechanisms of action is still remarkably poor.”
advertisement - learn more
After this study, more research came out
to help us better understand what happens when aluminum is injected
into the body. It has been found that injected aluminum does not exit
the body; in fact, it stays in the body and travels to various
organs like the brain, where it remains long-term. This isn’t surprising
since it’s the adjuvant, it’s designed to stay there or else the
vaccine doesn’t work.
As the groundbreaking study in 2015 emphasized:
Evidence that aluminum-coated particles phagocytozed in the injected muscle and its draining lymph notes can disseminate within phagocytes throughout the body and slowly accumulate in the brain further suggests that alum safety should be evaluated in the long term.
Furthermore, in 2018, a paper published
in the Journal of Inorganic Biochemistry found that almost 100 percent
of the intramuscularly injected aluminum in mice as vaccine adjuvants
was absorbed into the systemic circulation and traveled to different
sites in the body such as the brain, the joints, and the spleen, where
it accumulated and was retained for years post-vaccination. (source)
The point is, when you inject aluminum,
it doesn’t exit the body, it stays there. Multiple scientists, like Dr.
Chris Exley, a Professor in Bioinorganic Chemistry and the world’s
leading expert in aluminum toxicology, want to study this. He was
recently denied by scientific authorities the funding to study aluminum
in vaccines. His GoFundMe campaign was also taken down. You can read
more about that story in detail here.
So censorship is happening on all
fronts. Again, this is just one of many examples. Another one would be
the fact that The National Order of Biologists made a €10,000 donation
to a group that questions the safety of vaccines. The Infanrix Hexa
vaccine was the first one tested, and results showed no trace of
antigens and a high level of contamination.
There are dozens upon dozens of examples.
Former Chiropractor Fined $100k
The latest example comes from a former
Halifax-based chiropractor, who has been ordered to pay her regulator
$100,000 as part of a settlement agreement on charges of professional
misconduct related to her sharing “anti-vaccination” views online.
An article written about the case from
CBC News ridicules her, stating that she has no expertise in the subject
and may be causing harm by posting about it. The truth is, doctors
don’t have expertise in this subject either, all they understand is how
vaccines work, and unless they self-educate, they seem to be
clueless about vaccine safety.
CBC news explains:
In a decision released publicly Thursday, a hearing committee of the Nova Scotia College of Chiropractors took into consideration Dena Churchill’s “dire financial circumstances” and gave her 10 years to pay the money. But it also said if she has not paid at least $30,000 by Jan. 2, 2022, the full amount becomes due immediately.
“Dr. Churchill’s conduct brought the profession of chiropractic into disrepute,” the hearing committee writes in its decision.
“Dr. Churchill has shown no remorse. There is genuine concern that she is ungovernable.”
The college launched an investigation a year ago after its registrar filed a complaint regarding Churchill’s extensive posts on social media about topics outside her scope of practice, most notably posts about vaccines that made disproved claims.
The guideline from the national chiropractic association, which is observed by the Nova Scotia college, is for chiropractors not to discuss vaccines in any capacity.
In my opinion, this is a ridiculous
guideline. Anybody should be able to openly and freely discuss vaccines
and share information as well as their opinion. Today, we now have a
‘ministry of truth’ that is silencing information, as well as what seems
to be a global campaign in favour of forced vaccination of the entire
population. Thankfully, we’re not quite there yet.
It’s unfortunate that she received this fine, but her posts are like millions of others who are sharing the same information.
In the post above, she is simply
advocating that it’s wrong to forcefully vaccinate people, especially
when there are no safety studies. She is correct, despite the fact that
the mainstream claims that vaccines go through rigorous safety testing,
there is no evidence of this. Let’s not forget that there are no double
blind placebo safety studies that exist for vaccines.
Furthermore, the bioaccumulation of
vaccine ingredients, like aluminum mentioned above, has not been studied
by our federal health regulatory agencies, despite the call for it by
a number of scientists.
If we look at the measles vaccine, for
example, let’s not forget that hundreds of children have died from the
measles vaccine. According to a MedAlerts search
of the FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database as
of 2/5/19, the cumulative raw count of adverse events from measles,
mumps, and rubella vaccines alone was: 93,929 adverse events, 1,810
disabilities, 6,902 hospitalizations, and 463 deaths. What is even more
disturbing about these numbers is that VAERS is a voluntary and passive
reporting system that has been found to only capture 1% of adverse events.
This all comes after the fact that the
odds of dying from measles is extremely low compared to the
risks associated with the vaccine, and there is evidence that vaccinated
individuals are actually spreading the disease. Again, I am just using
this example as one of many to show why forced vaccinations should not
be an option, and that freedom of choice should always exist.
You can read more about measles and the vaccine in this detailed article:
The Takeaway
Health professionals who are concerned
about vaccine safety are prevented from talking about the concerns and
issues they feel exist with vaccines. What type of world might this lead
to? The day we stop questioning and muzzle those who do question this
issue is the day we have strayed very far from science and into
scientific dogma.
In the age of mass censorship of
information and perception manipulation, we must continue to share
information and opinions freely and openly. We must not allow forced
measures with weak justification, like the vaccination of all
individuals. This would take away our freedom of choice and our right to
decide for ourselves.
We can prevent this by continually
sharing information and speaking up. The truth is out there. Think for
yourself instead of allowing ‘big brother’ to do it for you.
You Can Help Stop The 5G Infrastructure
We've launched a funding campaign to fuel our efforts on this matter as we are confident we can make a difference and have a strong plan to get it done.
Check out our plan and join our campaign here.
No comments:
Post a Comment