Wall St. and the Rise of Hitler by
Antony C. Sutton from reformation.org
CHAPTER FIVE
I.T.T. Works Both Sides of the War
Thus while I.T.T. Focke-Wolfe planes were bombing Allied ships, and I. T. T. lines were passing information to German submarines, I.T.T. direction .finders were saving other ships from torpedoes. (Anthony Sampson, The Sovereign State of I.T.T., New York: Stein & Day,
The multi-national giant International Telephone and Telegraph (I.T.T.)1 was founded in 1920 by Virgin Islands-born entrepreneur Sosthenes Behn. During his lifetime Behn was the epitome of the politicized businessman, earning his profits and building the I.T.T. empire through political maneuverings rather than in the competitive market place. In 1923, through political adroitness, Behn acquired the Spanish telephone monopoly, Compania Telefonica de Espana. In 1924 I.T.T., now backed by the J.P. Morgan firm, bought what later became the International Standard Electric group of manufacturing plants around the world.
The
parent board of I.T.T. reflected the J.P. Morgan interests, with Morgan
partners Arthur M. Anderson and Russell Leffingwell. The Establishment law firm
of Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed was represented by the two junior
partners, Gardiner & Reed.
DIRECTORS
OF I.T.T. IN 1933:
|
|
Directors
|
Affiliation
with other
Wall Street firms: |
Arthur
M. ANDERSON
|
Partner,
J.P. MORGAN and New York Trust Company
|
Hernand
BEHN
|
Bank
of America
|
Sosthenes
BEHN
|
NATIONAL
CITY BANK
|
F.
Wilder BELLAMY
|
Partner
in Dominick & Dominicik
|
John
W. CUTLER
|
GRACE
NATIONAL BANK, Lee Higginson
|
George
H. GARDINER
|
Partner
in Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed
|
Allen
G. HOYT
|
NATIONAL
CITY BANK
|
Russell
C. LEFFINGWELL
|
Partner
J.P. MORGAN and CARNEGIE CORP.
|
Bradley
W. PALMER
|
Chairman,
Executive Committee, UNITED FRUIT
|
Lansing
P. REED
|
Partner
in Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed
|
The
National City Bank (NCB) in the Morgan group was represented by two directors,
Sosthenes Behn and Allen G. Hoyt. In brief, I.T.T. was a Morgan-controlled
company; and we have previously noted the interest of Morgan-controlled
companies in war and revolution abroad and political maneuvering in the United
States.2
In
1930 Behn acquired the German holding company of Standard Elekrizitäts A.G.,
controlled by I.T.T. (62.0 percent of the voting stock), A.E.G. (81.1 percent
of the voting stock) and Felton & Guilleaume (six percent of the voting
stock). In this deal Standard acquired two German manufacturing plants and a
majority stock interest in Telefonfabrik Berliner A.G.I.T.T. also obtained the
Standard subsidiaries in Germany, Ferdinand Schuchardt Berliner Fernsprech-und
Telegraphenwerk A,G., as well as Mix & Genest in Berlin, and Suddeutsche
Apparate Fabrik G,m.b.H. in Nuremberg.
It
is interesting to note in passing that while Sosthenes Behn's I.T.T. controlled
telephone companies and manufacturing plants in Germany, the cable traffic
between the U.S. and Germany was under the control of Deutsch-Atlantische
Telegraphengesellschaft (the German Atlantic Cable Company). This firm,
together with the Commercial Cable Company and Western Union Telegraph Company,
had a monopoly in transatlantic U.S.-German cable communications. W.A. Harriman
& Company took over a block of 625,000 shares in Deutsch-Atlantische in
1925, and the firm's board of directors included an unusual array of
characters, many of whom we have met elsewhere. It included, for example, H. F.
Albert, the German espionage agent in the United States in World War I;
Franklin D. Roosevelt's former business associate yon Berenberg-Gossler; and
Dr. Cuno, a former German chancellor of the 1923 inflationary era. I.T.T. in
the United States was represented on the board by yon Guilleaume and Max
Warburg of the Warburg banking family
There
is no record that I.T.T. made direct payments to Hitler before the Nazi grab
for power in 1933. On the other hand, numerous payments were made to Heinrich
Himmler in the late 1930s and in World War II itself through I.T.T. German
subsidiaries. The first meeting between Hitler and I.T.T. officials — so far as
we know — was reported in August 1933,3
when Sosthenes Behn and I.T.T. German representative Henry Manne met with
Hitler in Berchesgaden. Subsequently, Behn made contact with the Keppler circle
(see Chapter Nine) and, through Keppler's influence, Nazi Baron Kurt von
Schröder became the guardian of I.T.T. interests in Germany. Schröder acted as
the conduit for I.T.T. money funneled to Heinrich Himmler's S.S. organization
in 1944, while World War II was in
progress, and the United states was at war with Germany.4
Through
Kurt Schröder, Behn and his I.T.T. gained access to the profitable German
armaments industry and bought substantial interest in German armaments firms,
including Focke-Wolfe aircraft. These armaments operations made handsome
profits, which could have been repatriated to the United States parent company.
But they were reinvested in German rearmament. This reinvestment of profits in
German armament firms suggests that Wall Street claims it was innocent of
wrongdoing in German rearmament — and indeed did not even know of Hitler's
intentions — are fraudulent. Specifically, I.T.T. purchase of a substantial
interest in Focke-Wolfe meant, as Anthony Sampson has pointed out, that I.T.T.
was producing German planes used to kill Americans and their allies — and it
made excellent profits out of the enterprise.
In
Kurt von Schröder, I.T.T. had access to the very heart of the Nazi power elite.
Who was Schröder? Baron Kurt von Schröder was born in Hamburg in 1889 into an
old, established German banking family. An earlier member of the Schröder
family moved to London, changed his name to Schroder (without the dierisis) and
organized the banking firm of J. Henry Schroder in London and J. Henry Schroder
Banking Corporation in New York. Kurt von Schröder also became a partner in the
private Cologne Bankhaus, J. H. Stein & Company, founded in the late
eighteenth century. Both Schröder and Stein had been promoters, in company with
French financiers, of the 1919 German separatist movement which attempted to
split the rich Rhineland away from Germany and its troubles. In this escapade
prominent Rhineland industrialists met at J. H. Stein's house on January 7,
1919 and a few months later organized a meeting, with Stein as chairman, to
develop public support for the separatist movement. The 1919 action failed. The
group tried again in 1923 and spearheaded another movement to break the
Rhineland away from Germany to come under the protection of France. This
attempt also failed. Kurt von Schroder then linked up with Hitler and the early
Nazis, and as in the 1919 and 1923 Rhineland separatist movements, Schröder
represented and worked for German industrialists and armaments manufacturers.
In
exchange for financial and industrial support arranged by von Schroder, he
later gained political prestige. Immediately after the Nazis gained power in
1933 Schroder became the German representative at the Bank for International
Settlements, which Quigley calls the apex of the international control system,
as well as head of the private bankers group advising the German Reichsbank.
Heinrich Himmler appointed Sehroder an S.S. Senior Group Leader, and in turn
Himmler became a prominent member of Keppler's Circle. (See Chapter Nine.)
In
1938 the Schroder Bank in London became the German financial agent in Great
Britain, represented at financial meetings by its Managing Director (and a
director of the Bank of England), F.C. Tiarks. By World War II Baron Schrader
had in this manner acquired an impressive list of political and banking
connections reflecting a widespread influence; it was even reported to the U.S.
Kilgore Committee that Schrader was influential enough in 1940 to bring Pierre
Laval to power in France. As listed by the Kilgore Committee, Sehroder's
political acquisitions in the early 1940s were as follows:
SS
Senior Group Leader. Iron Cross of First and Second Class.
|
|
Trade
Group for Wholesale and Foreign Trade – Manager.
|
Swedish
Consul General.
|
|
Akademie
fur Deutsches Recht (Academy of Germany Law) – Member
|
International
Chamber of Commerce – Member of administrative committee.
|
|
City
of Cologne – Councilor.
|
Council
of Reich Post Office – Member of advisory board.
|
|
University
of Cologne – Member of board of trustees.
|
German
Industrial and Commerce Assembly – Presiding member.
|
|
Kaiser
Wilhelm Foundation – Senator.
|
Reich
Board of Economic Affairs Member.
|
|
Advisory
Council of German-Albanians.
|
Deutsche
Reichsbahn – President of administrative board.
|
|
Goods
Clearing Bureau – Member.
|
|
|
Working
Committee of Reich Group for Industry and Commerce – Deputy chairman.5
|
Schröder's
banking connections were equally impressive and his business connections (not
listed here) would take up two pages:
Bank
for International Settlement – Member of the directorate.
|
|
Deutsche
Verkehrs-Kredit-Bank, A.G., Berlin (Controlled by Deutsche Reichsbank) –
Chairman of board of directors.
|
J.H.
Stein & Co, Cologne – Partner (Banque Worms was French correspondent).
|
|
Deutsche
Ueberseeische Bank (Controlled by Deutsche Bank, Berlin) – Director.6
|
Deutsche
Reichsbank, Berlin. Adviser to board of directors.
|
|
|
Wirtschaftsgruppe
Private Bankegewerbe – Leader.
|
|
|
This
was the Schröder who, after 1933, represented Sosthenes Behn of I.T.T. and
I.T.T. interests in Nazi Germany. Precisely because Schröder had these
excellent political connections with Hitler and the Nazi State, Behn appointed
Schröder to the boards of all the I.T.T. German companies: Standard
Electrizitatswerke A.G. in Berlin, C. Lorenz A.G. of Berlin, and Mix &
Genest A.G. (in which Standard had a 94-percent participation).
In
the mid-1930s another link was forged between Wall Street and Schröder, this
time through the Rockefellers. In 1936 the underwriting and general securities
business handled by J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation in New York was
merged into a new investment banking firm — Schroder, Rockefeller &
Company, Inc. at 48 Wall Street. Carlton P. Fuller of Schroder Banking
Corporation became president and Avery Rockefeller, son of Percy Rockefeller
(brother of John D. Rockefeller) became vice president and director of the new
firm. Previously, Avery Rockefeller had been associated behind the scenes with
J. Henry Schroder Banking Corporation; the new firm brought him out into the
open.7
I.T.T.
had yet another conduit to Nazi Germany, through German attorney Dr. Gerhard
Westrick. Westrick was one of a select group of Germans who had conducted
espionage in the United States during World War I. The group included not only
Kurt von Schröder and Westrick but also Franz von Papen — whom we shall meet in
company with James Paul Warburg of the Bank of Manhattan in Chapter Ten — and
Dr. Heinrich Albert. Albert, supposedly German commercial attache in the U.S.
in World War I, was actually in charge of financing yon Papen's espionage
program. After World War I Westrick and Albert formed the law firm of Albert
& Westrick which specialized in, and profited heavily from, the Wall Street
reparations loans. The Albert & Westrick firm handled the German end of the
J Henry Schroder Banking loans, while the John Foster Dulles firm of Sullivan
and Cromwell in New York handled the U.S. end of the Schroder loans.
Just
prior to World War II the Albert-Papen-Westrick espionage operation in the United
States began to repeat itself, only this time around the American authorities
were more alert. Westrick came to the U.S. in 1940, supposedly as a commercial
attache but in fact as Ribbentrop's personal representative. A stream of
visitors to the influential Westrick in-eluded prominent directors of U.S.
petroleum and industrial firms, and this brought Westrick to the attention of
the FBI.
Westrick
at this time became a director of all I.T.T. operations in Germany, in order to
protect I.T.T. interests during the expected U.S. involvement in the European
war.8 Among his other enterprises Westrick
attempted to persuade Henry Ford to cut off supplies to Britain, and the
favored treatment given by the Nazis to Ford interests in France suggests that
Westrick was partially successful in neutralizing U.S. aid to Britain.
Although
Westrick's most important wartime business connection in the United States was
with International Telephone and Telegraph, he also represented other U.S.
firms, including Underwood Elliott Fisher, owner of the German company Mercedes
Buromaschinen A.G.; Eastman Kodak, which had a Kodak subsidiary in Germany; and
the International Milk Corporation, with a Hamburg subsidiary. Among Westrick's
deals (and the one which received the most publicity) was a contract for Texaco
to supply oil to the German Navy, which he arranged with Torkild Rieber,
chairman of the board of Texaco Company.
In
1940 Rieber discussed an oil deal with Hermann Goering, and Westrick in the
United States worked for Texas Oil Company. His automobile was bought with
Texaco funds, and Westrick's driver's license application gave Texaco as his
business address. These activities were publicized on August 12, 1940. Rieber
subsequently resigned from Texaco and Westrick returned to Germany. Two years
later Rieber was chairman of South Carolina Shipbuilding and Dry Docks,
supervising construction of more than $10 million of U.S. Navy ships, and a
director of the Guggenheim family's Barber Asphalt Corporation and Seaboard Oil
Company of Ohio.9
In
1939 I.T.T. in the United States controlled Standard Elektrizitats in Germany,
and in turn Standard Elektrizitats controlled 94 percent of Mix & Genest.
On the board of Standard Elektrizitats was Baron Kurt von Schroder, a Nazi
banker at the core of Nazism, and Emil Heinrich Meyer, brother-in-law of
Secretary of State Keppler (founder of the Keppler Circle) and a director of
German General Electric. Schroder and Meyer were also directors of Mix &
Genest and the other I.T.T. subsidiary, C. Lorenz Company; both of these I.T.T.
subsidiaries were monetary contributors to Himmler's Circle of Friends — i.e., the Nazi S.S. slush fund. As late
as 1944, Mix & Genest contributed 5,000 RM to Himmler and Lorenz
contributed 20,000 RM. In short, during World War II International Telephone
and Telegraph was making cash payments to S.S. leader Heinrich Himmler.10
These payments enabled I.T.T. to protect its investment in Focke-Wolfe, an
aircraft manufacturing firm producing fighter aircraft used against the United
States.
The
interrogation of Kurt von Schröder on November 19, 1945 points up the
deliberate nature of the close and profitable relationship between Colonel
Sosthenes Behn of I.T.T., Westrick, Schröder, and the Nazi war machine during
World War II, and that this was a deliberate and knowledgeable relationship:
Q.
You have [told] us in your earlier testimony, a number of companies in Germany
in which the International Telephone and Telegraph Company or the Standard
Electric Company had a participation. Did either International Telephone and
Telegraph Company or the Standard Electric Company have a participation in any
other company in Germany?
A.
Yes. The Lorenz Company, shortly before the war, took a participation of about
25 percent in Focke-Wolfe A.G. in Bremen. Focke-Wolfe was making airplanes for
the German Air Ministry. I believe that later as Focke-Wolfe expanded and took
in more capital that the interest of Lorenz Company dropped a little below this
25 percent.
Q.
So this participation in Focke-Wolfe by Lorenz Company began after Lorenz
Company was nearly 100-percent owned and controlled by Colonel Behn through the
International Telephone and Telegraph Company?
A.
Yes.
Q.
Did Colonel Behen [sic] approve of
this investment by the Lorenz Company in Focke-Wolfe?
A.
I am confident that Colonel Behn approved before his representatives who were
in close touch with him formally approved the transaction.
Q.
What year was it that the Lorenz Company made the investment which gave it this
25 percent participation in Foeke-Wolfe?
A.
I remember it was shortly before the outbreak of war, that is, shortly before
the invasion of Poland. [Ed: 1939]
Q
Would Westrick know all about the details of the participation of Lorenz
Company in Foeke-Wolfe, A.G. of Bremen?
A.
Yes. Better than I would.
Q.
What was the size of the investment that Lorenz Company made in the Focke-Wolfe
A.G., of Bremen, which gave them the initial 25 percent participation?
A.
250,000 thousand RM initially, and this was substantially increased, but I
don't recall the extent of the additional investments that Lorenz Company made
to this Focke-Wolfe A.G. of Bremen.
Q.
From 1055, until the outbreak of the European War, was Colonel Behn in a
position to transfer the profits from investments of his companies in Germany
to his companies in the United States?
A.
Yes. While it would have required that his companies take a little less than
the full dividends because of the difficulty of securing foreign exchange, the
great bulk of the profits could have been transferred to the company of Colonel
Behn in the United States. However, Colonel Behn did not elect to do this and
at no time did he ask me if I could accomplish this for him. Instead, he
appeared to be perfectly content to have all the profits of the companies in
Germany, which he and his interests controlled, reinvesting these profits in
new buildings and machinery and any other enterprises engaged in producing
armaments.
Another
one of these enterprises, Huth and Company, G.m.b.H., of Berlin, which made
radio and radar parts, many of which were used in equipment going to the German
Armed Forces. The Lorenz Company as I recall it [had] a 50-percent
participation in Huth and Company. The Lorenz Company also had a small
subsidiary which acted as a sales agency for the Lorenz Company to private
customers.
Q.
You were a member of the board of Lorenz Company's board of director, from
about 1935 up to the present time. During this time, Lorenz Company and some of
the other companies, such as Foeke-Wolfe with which it had large participation,
were engaged in the manufacture of equipment for armaments and war production.
Did you know or did you hear of any protest made by Colonel Behn or his
representatives against these companies engaged in these activities preparing
Germany for war?
A.
No.
Q.
Are you positive that there was no other occasion in which you were asked by
either Westrick, Mann [sic], Colonel Behn or any other person connected with
the International Telephone and Telegraphic Company interests in Germany, to
intervene on behalf of the company with the German authorities.
A.
Yes. I don't remember any request for my intervention in any matter of
importance to the Lorenz Company or any other International Telephone and
Telegraph interests in Germany.
I have read the record of this interrogation
and I swear that the answers I have given to the question of Messrs. Adams and
Pajus are true to the best of knowledge and belief. s. /Kurt von Schröder
It was this story of I.T.T.-Nazi
cooperation during World War II and I.T.T. association with Nazi Kurt von
Schröder that I.T.T. wanted to conceal — and almost was successful in
concealing. James Stewart Martin recounts how during the planning meetings of
the Finance Division of the Control Commission he was assigned to work with
Captain Norbert A. Bogdan, who out of uniform was vice president of the J.
Henry Schroder Banking Corporation of New York. Martin relates that
"Captain Bogdan had argued vigorously against investigation of the Stein
Bank on the grounds that it was 'small potatoes.'"11
Shortly after blocking this maneuver, two permanent members of Bogdan's staff
applied for permission to investigate the Stein Bank — although Cologne had not
yet fallen to U.S. forces. Martin recalls that "The Intelligence Division
blocked that one," and so some information on the Stein-Schröder
Bank-I.T.T. operation survived.
Footnotes:
1For an excellent review of I.T.T.'s
worldwide activities, see Anthony Sampson, The Sovereign State of I.T.T., (New
York: Stein & Day, 1973).
2See also Sutton, Wall Street and the
Bolshevik Revolution, op. cit.
3New York Times, August 4, 1933.
4See also Chapter Nine for documentary
proof of these I.T.T. payments to the S.S.
5Elimination of German Resources, p.
871.
6Ibid.
7New York Times, July 20, 1936.
8Anthony Sampson reports a meeting
between I.T.T. vice president Kenneth Stockton and Westrick in which the
preservation of I.T.T. properties was planned. See Anthony Sampson, op. cit.,
p. 39.
9There is no substance to reports that
Rieber received $20,000 from the Nazis. These reports were investigated by the
F.B.I. with no proof forthcoming. See United States Senate, Subcommittee to
Investigate the Administration of the. Internal Security Act, Committee on the
Judiciary, Morgenthau Diary (Germany), Volume I, 90th Congress, 1st Session,
November 20, 1967, (Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1967), pp.
316-8. On Rieber see also Appendix to the Congressional Record, August 20,
1942, p, A 1501-2, Remarks of Hon. John M. Coffee.
10See pp. 128-130 for further details.
11James Stewart Martin, op. cit., p. 52.
No comments:
Post a Comment