FBI Sued for Failure to Report Known 9/11 Evidence to Congress
In Brief
- The Facts:The Lawyers’
Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth,
and 9/11
victim family members have announced a joint federal lawsuit against U.S. Department of Justice for not acknowledging evidence about what happened on 9/11. - Reflect On:Why has the US government continuously ignored credible evidence? Why do they constantly deem it a 'conspiracy theory' and use character assassination and ridicule tactics instead of just countering the evidence?
Nearly
20 years after 9/11, the tragic event has served as a catalyst for the
mass awakening of millions of people to facts about our government, or
‘the powers that be,’ that they previously were unaware of. Furthermore,
every year after that event has brought even more awareness and new
information to the forefront, serving as a mass awakening tool. It has
helped so many people understand that not everything presented to us by
our government is accurate. When it comes to 9/11, many believe it was
an event created by the powers that be in order to justify the invasion
of Iraq by the western military alliance, otherwise known as ‘false
flag’ terrorism. This narrative has been supported by many academics
trying to bring awareness to the truth of the event as well as multiple
political figures from around the world, including those within the
United States.
advertisement - learn more
The evidence that something fishy
happened on 9/11 is very strong, and this is why the majority of
American citizens alone don’t believe the official explanation provided
by their government, which is evident if you look at the latest
polls. Over the past few years, this subject has been under
investigation by thousands of architects, engineers and physicists.
Researchers have even been publishing papers in peer reviewed academic
journals emphasizing that what we really saw, apart from planes hitting
the towers, was a simultaneous controlled demolition. For example, a
paper titled “15 Years Later, On The Physics Of High-Rise Building Collapses” in the European Scientific Journal concluded:
The evidence points overwhelmingly to the conclusion that all three buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition. Given the far-reaching implications, it is morally imperative that this hypothesis be the subject of a truly scientific and impartial investigation by responsible authorities.
This is just one of many examples
suggesting it was a controlled demolition, but the key takeaway there is
the “far-reaching implications.” Full disclosure on what happened that
day, if a controlled demolition was involved, would be very impactful.
Just think about what that means… Furthermore, it’s quite clear that the
majority of people around the world have already accepted this
conclusion. What does that say about our government and the entire
western military alliance? What does that show us about what these
people are capable of? What else have they done? What else are they
going to do? What is the extent of their deception and for what purpose?
In more recent news, The Lawyers’
Committee for 9/11 Inquiry, Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth,
and 9/11 victim family members Robert McIlvaine and Barbara
Krukowski-Rastelli announced a joint federal lawsuit filed in the U.S.
District Court for the District of Columbia against the U.S. Department
of Justice and the FBI. The lawsuit is for their failure to perform a
congressionally mandated assessment of any evidence known to the FBI
that was not considered by the 9/11 Commission related to any factors
that contributed in any manner to the terrorist attacks of September 11,
2001.
Initiatives like this are important,
because as mentioned earlier, there is more than enough evidence showing
that something fishy happened, and that a controlled demolition was
involved. Donald Trump has even made some comments on 9/11, suggesting
that bombs were involved in taking down the World Trade towers.
advertisement - learn more
This current lawsuit is being brought
under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 702, 706, and the
federal mandamus statute, 28 U.S.C. 1361.
The complaint cites
the failure of the FBI and its 9/11 Review Commission to assess key
9/11-related evidence that the FBI can be shown to have had, or been
aware of, regarding:
- the use of pre-placed explosives to destroy World Trade Center Buildings, 1, 2, and 7;
- the arrest and investigation of the “High Fivers” observed photographing and celebrating the attacks on the World Trade Center on 9/11;
- terrorist financing related to the reported Saudi support for the 9/11 hijackers;
- recovered plane parts, including serial numbers from all three crash locations;
- video from cameras mounted inside and outside the Pentagon; and
- cell phone communications from passengers aboard airplanes.
This is evidence relevant to the 9/11 Review Commission’s and the FBI’s compliance with the mandate from Congress, which should have been assessed by the FBI and the 9/11 Review Commission and reported to Congress. The complaint also cites the destruction by the FBI of evidence related to the “High Fivers.” Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth has joined in bringing the counts that involve the evidence of the World Trade Center’s explosive demolition and evidence related to the “High Fivers,” while the other plaintiffs are party to all counts. (source)
A news conference was held after the filing near the U.S. District Courthouse in Washington, D.C. Prior to this, the non-profit Lawyers Committee for 9/11 Inquiry
filed a petition with the U.S. Attorney in the Southern District of New
York, Manhattan, requesting that he present to a grand jury the
extensive evidence of federal crimes relating to the destruction of
three World Trade Center high rises on 9/11. The petition cited
conclusive evidence, providing proof of explosives and incendiaries
employed at ground zero to bring down the twin towers as well as the WTC
building #7.
Every time I write an article on this
subject, I love sharing the following quote by Edward Bernays, the
founding father of public relations:
The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. (source)Mark Twain is another great figure who shared this point of view, stating that:
The statesmen will invent cheap lies, putting the blame upon the nation that is attacked, and every man will be glad of those conscience-soothing falsities, and will diligently study them, and refuse to examine any refutations of them; and thus he will by and by convince himself the war is just, and will thank God for the better sleep he enjoys after this process of grotesque self-deception. (source)
These quotes sum up what I believe 9/11
was all about. George Orwell once said that “in a time of universal
deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.” Since
he offered those words decades ago, we have seen deceit become a
pervasive and global problem, where the general public really has no
clue what is happening around the world. The truth is, we live in a
world of secrecy, and many prominent figures throughout history have
been trying to tell us this for years. Even President Theodore Roosevelt
warned us of the secret government, revealing that “behind the
ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government, owing
no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people.” (source)
Are these the perpetrators behind 9/11? Has there really been a propaganda
campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an intensified
entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive TV watchers to
accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism?
Something to think about.
The Takeaway
How long has this type of ‘false flag terrorism’ been going on? Today, it seems that every time a ‘deceptive’ event is pulled off, it simply serves as a tool to wake up even more people. Transparency is here, and more than enough information is available for those who are curious and willing to actually take a look. As time goes on, the collective population is learning to think for themselves instead of simply believing what is told and presented to us. Despite the fact that speaking out against such things can bring character assassination and ridicule and is often casted off as fake news, it’s important to follow our hearts and really look into things that no longer resonate with us. The truth is available, and it will continue to come to light as we move through 2019 and beyond.Help Support Collective Evolution
The demand for Collective Evolution's content is bigger than ever, except ad agencies and social media keep cutting our revenues. This is making it hard for us to continue.In order to stay truly independent, we need your help. We are not going to put up paywalls on this website, as we want to get our info out far and wide. For as little as $3 a month, you can help keep CE alive!
SUPPORT CE HERE!
No comments:
Post a Comment