Sandy Hook Puzzles
Global Research, March 04, 2016
Perhaps the most unusual feature of the Sandy Hook story is the large
number of photographs that have been released in order to document the story.
It is as if there is no event without the proof supplied by the photographs.
This is unusual. When, for example, the FBI murdered
approximately 100 men,
women and children in the Branch Davidian compound in Waco, Texas, the reality
of the victims did not have to be established with a large number of photos
establishing that the victims were real people with real families. When workers
“go postal” and shoot their coworkers, photos are not used to prove that those
killed were real people with real families. When an airplane crashes, the event
does not have to be verified with news coverage of grieving relatives.
Yet photos are a defining
characteristic of Sandy Hook. It is almost like the photos are the event.
The importance of Sandy Hook
photos is of concern when so many experts demonstrate that so many of the
photos are photoshopped. Among the Sandy Hook photos are photos that are
collages of separate photos that have been put together. Others have people
inserted into photos. There are a large number of YouTube videos in which
people knowledgeable about the techniques of photo alteration demonstrate
problems with the photographs.
In response to links I provided to
Jim Fetzer’s walk through of several events that have so many anomalies as to
raise suspicions, I received emails from people who have the skills to analyze
whether a photo is real or a construction.
Some of the explanations are too
technical for an inexperienced person to follow, but the photos below are so
problematic that expert explanations seem unnecessary.
This is a photo used to establish
that the little girl on the right, a Sandy Hook victim, is a member of the
Robbie Parker family. Notice that the two children on Robbie Parker’s lap do
not appear to have legs. Possibly the white material under the torso of the
little girl with her fingers in her mouth can be construed as her legs, but it
looks like material draped across Parker’s thigh. I see no sign of legs for the
child in the red jumper, and the purpose of the red material draped across
Parker’s other thigh escapes me. It is as if the photo was lifted from a waist
up photo of the two children and placed on Robbie Parker’s lap. Notice that
Robbie Parkers hands seem to be inserted into his sleeves. Experts tell me that
an enlarged version of the photo reveals a straight line between Robbie Parker
and the Sandy Hook child victim and that this is a sign that the victim was
photoshopped into the photograph.
If this is indeed Robbie Parker’s
family, why would the family picture have to be a collage of photographs? Why
use a fake photograph to establish the identity of a real family?
This is a photo used to establish
the reality of one of the teachers allegedly killed in the Sandy Hook shooting.
According to experts, there are many problems with this photo. Without going
into any of them, notice that the shadow of the woman on the left falls to the
southwest, but the shadow of the woman on the right falls to the southeast.
This suggests the photo is a construction made from photos when the sun was in
different positions in the sky. The shadows associated with the woman in yellow
do not seem to relate to her, and the shadow in front of the standing man seems
unrelated to him.
This photo is one of those used to
establish the reality of Adam Lanza. It comes from a joint photo of Adam Lanza standing
with his father. Experts tell me that this is a photoshopped photo. The left
side of his upper body has been cut out to create the impression that he is
leaning against the background, leaving his left hand disembodied. Notice his
jeans. His left leg is far outside his left side body line and the jeans have
to cut in sharply to connect with his waist line.
This photo is one used to indicate
Sandy Hook school evacuation. There are several versions of this same photo
with the same woman leading the children but with a different child at the head
of the line. Other photos taken from further back show casually dressed adults
who appear to be parents watching a drill exercise. The kids seem to be
scowling or frowning from the bright sun, but the larger girl in blue appears
to be upset. Notice that she is out of line, that the girl in white and pink
behind her has her right hand on the girl in blue’s shoulder (experts say that
the hand is “painted on”) and that there is a person wearing black pants between
the two girls. How can this be? Experts say that the girl in the blue top was
photoshopped into the photograph, perhaps to add the missing look of alarm.
Here is a close-up in which you
can clearly see the kid who is in between the two girls.
To sum up. There are two
questions. Was Sandy Hook a drill that was turned into a public hoax by the use
of doctored photos in the interest of an agenda? If not, why are so many of the
released photos used to establish the reality of the event photoshopped?
Why not instead produce the death
certificates of the murdered children if not photos? Why not prove with utility
bills, school bus routes, and other evidence that the school was in operation
and not closed due to numerous problems that the school is claimed to have had?
Those unable to entertain
suspicion of government always insist that someone would talk and expose the
conspiracy. This insistence is extremely naive. Jobs and careers are at stake
and by now everyone has learned the fate of whistleblowers. There are safer
ways to talk. Just as the Soviet press developed ways for readers to read
between the lines, perhaps the carelessly faked Sandy Hook photographs are an
example of those drawn into a government conspiracy “talking” by doing a bad
job of producing faked photographs in order to alert us to a hoax.
What is disturbing to me is that I
do not know if Sandy Hook is a real event or a hoax. In place of evidence such
as bodies, body bags, death certificates, we have what appear to be faked
photographs. Why?
Possibly there are other
explanations for the anomalies in the photographs. Regardless, Sandy Hook
cannot be decided on the basis of photographs alone. The problem I have with
the official story is that such a massive event would leave massive evidence,
and we have been shown very little evidence. Why can’t we be allowed to see the
evidence?
Moreover, the Connecticut
government refused to release evidence that would confirm that the shootings
did take place. As far as I can tell from an Internet search, the children’s
death certificates have never been released to the public. How can this be a
privacy issue when the names and photographs of the murdered children are
released? State authorities had to be ordered by a judge to release even the
911 calls to the police about the event. Here is a New York Times report.
The best way to avoid conspiracy
theories is to do real investigations and to release real evidence. After all
the serious lies we have been told, governments cannot expect us to simply be
satisfied with their word for it.
If you look at the recent
shootings and terror events, one cannot avoid the impression that scripted
stories are instantly set in stone in the media prior to any investigation. The
explanation comes first and takes the place of investigation.
Perhaps the evidence exists and we
are not shown it because the government is training us to accept that truth is
what the government says, so evidence is not necessary to support the story. In
other words, government might be eliminating the belief that truth exists
independently of government’s statements and can be in conflict with them.
Orwell’s 1984 is more prescient than farfetched, so we cannot dismiss this
possibility.
Dr. Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Economic Policy and
associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He was columnist for Business
Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and Creators Syndicate. He has had many
university appointments. His internet columns have attracted a worldwide
following. Roberts’ latest books are The
Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the West, How America Was Lost,
and The
Neoconservative Threat to World Order.
The original source of this article is Institute for Political Economy
Copyright © Dr. Paul Craig
Roberts, Institute for Political Economy, 2016
No comments:
Post a Comment